The influence of word retrieval and planning on phonetic variation: Implications for exemplar models

Linguistics Vanguard

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 215-225

  Fink, Angela ^a   Goldrick, Matthew ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Accent; Exemplars; Gradient representations; Neighborhood density; Reduction; Speech errors; Speech production

Indexed keywords

EID: 84964531665     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2199174X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/lingvan-2015-1003     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Antoniou, M., C. T. Best, M. D. Tyler, & C. Kroos 2011. Inter-language interference in VOT production by L2-dominant bilinguals: Asymmetries in phonetic code-switching. Journal of Phonetics 39 (4). 558-570.
2. Baese-Berk, M., & M. Goldrick 2009. Mechanisms of interaction in speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes 24 (4). 527-554.
3. Baddeley, A. D. & G. J. Hitch 1974. Working memory. In G. H. Bower (ed.) The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47-89). New York: Academic Press.
4. Balukas, C., & C. Koops (in press). Spanish-English bilingual voice onset time in spontaneous code-switching. International Journal of Bilingualism. doi:10.1177/1367006913516035.
5. Bell, A., J. M. Brenier, M. Gregory, C. Girand, & D. Jurafsky 2009. Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational English. Journal of Memory and Language 60 (1). 92-111.
6. Bobb, S. C., & Z. Wodniecka 2013. Language switching in picture naming: What asymmetric switch costs (do not) tell us about inhibition in bilingual speech planning. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 25 (5). 568-585.
7. Browman, C. P., & L. Goldstein. 1992. Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica 49(3-4). 155-180.
8. Chomsky, N., & M. Halle 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
9. Clopper, C. G., & J. B. Pierrehumbert 2008. Effects of semantic predictability and regional dialect on vowel space reduction. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 124(3). 1682-1688.
10. Damian, M. F. 2003. Articulatory duration in single-word speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 29(3). 416-431.
11. Ernestus, M. 2014. Acoustic reduction and the roles of abstractions and exemplars in speech processing. Lingua 142. 27-41.
12. Flege, J. E. 1991. Age of learning affects the authenticity of voice-onset time (VOT) in stop consonants produced in a second language. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 89(1). 395-411.
13. Fowler, C. A., & J. Housum 1987. Talkers' signaling of "new" and "old" words in speech and listeners' perception and use of the distinction. Journal of Memory and Language 26(5). 489-504.
14. Frisch, S. A., & R. Wright 2002. The phonetics of phonological speech errors: An acoustic analysis of slips of the tongue. Journal of Phonetics 30 (2). 139-162.
15. Gahl, S. 2008. Time and thyme are not homophones: The effect of lemma frequency on word durations in spontaneous speech. Language 84 (3). 474-496.
16. Gahl, S., Y. Yao, & K. Johnson 2012. Why reduce? Phonological neighborhood density and phonetic reduction in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language 66 (4). 789-806.
17. Garrett, M. F. 1975. The analysis of sentence production. In G. Bower (ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 9, 133- 175). New York: Academic Press.
18. Goldinger, S. D. 1998. Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review 105 (2). 251.
19. Goldrick, M., & S. E. Blumstein 2006. Cascading activation from phonological planning to articulatory processes: Evidence from tongue twisters. Language and Cognitive Processes 21 (6). 649-683.
20. Goldrick, M., H. R. Baker, A. Murphy, & M. Baese-Berk. 2011. Interaction and representational integration: Evidence from speech errors. Cognition 121(1). 58-72.
21. Goldrick, M., & K. Chu 2014. Gradient co-Activation and speech error articulation: comment on Pouplier and Goldstein (2010). Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience 29(4). 452-458.
22. Goldrick, M., E. Runnqvist, & A. Costa 2014. Language Switching Makes Pronunciation Less Nativelike. Psychological Science 25 (4). 1031-1036.
23. Goldrick, M., C. Vaughn, & A. Murphy 2013. The effects of lexical neighbors on stop consonant articulation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134(2). EL172-EL177.
24. Goldstein, L., D. Byrd, & E. Saltzman 2006. The role of vocal tract gestural action units in understanding the evolution of phonology. In: M. Arbib (ed.), From Action to Language: The Mirror Neuron System 215-249.
25. Goldstein, L., M. Pouplier, L. Chen, E. Saltzman, & D. Byrd 2007. Dynamic action units slip in speech production errors. Cognition 103(3). 386-412.
26. Gollan, T. H., & V. S. Ferreira 2009. Should I stay or should I switch? A cost-benefit analysis of voluntary language switching in young and aging bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 35 (3). 640.
27. Green, D. W. 1998. Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1(2). 67-81.
28. Grossberg, S. 2003. Resonant neural dynamics of speech perception. Journal of Phonetics 31. 423-445.
29. Kahn, J. M., & J. E. Arnold 2012. A processing-centered look at the contribution of givenness to durational reduction. Journal of Memory and Language 67 (3). 311-325.
30. Kahn, J. M., & J. E. Arnold 2013. Articulatory and lexical repetition effects on durational reduction: speaker experience vs. common ground. Language and Cognitive Processes. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2013.848989.
31. Kello, C. T. 2004. Control over the time course of cognition in the tempo-naming task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 30 (5). 942.
32. Kello, C. T., D. C. Plaut, & B. MacWhinney 2000. The task dependence of staged versus cascaded processing: An empirical and computational study of Stroop interference in speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129 (3). 340.
33. Kirchner, R., R. K. Moore, & T. Y. Chen 2010. Computing phonological generalization over real speech exemplars. Journal of Phonetics 38(4). 540-547.
34. Kirov, C., & A. Gafos 2007. Dynamic phonetic detail in lexical representations. In Proceedings of the 16th international congress of phonetic sciences, 637-640.
35. Lam, T. Q., & D. G. Watson 2014. Repetition reduction: Lexical repetition in the absence of referent repetition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 40 (3). 829.
36. MacLeod, C. M. 1991. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin 109(2). 163.
37. McClelland, J. L., & J. L. Elman 1986. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology 18. 1-86.
38. McMillan, C. T., M. Corley, & R. J. Lickley 2009. Articulatory evidence for feedback and competition in speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes 24(1). 44-66.
39. Meuter, R. F., & A. Allport 1999. Bilingual language switching in naming: Asymmetrical costs of language selection. Journal of Memory and Language 40(1). 25-40.
40. Monsell, S. 2003. Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(3). 134-140.
41. Munson, B., & N. P. Solomon 2004. The effect of phonological neighborhood density on vowel articulation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 47(5). 1048.
42. Norman, D. A., & T. Shallice 1986. Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 4, pp. 1-18). New York: Plenum.
43. Olson, D. J. 2013. Bilingual language switching and selection at the phonetic level: Asymmetrical transfer in VOT production. Journal of Phonetics 41(6). 407-420.
44. Pierrehumbert, J. 2002. Word-specific phonetics. Laboratory Phonology 7. 101-139.
45. Pierrehumbert, J. B. 2006. The next toolkit. Journal of Phonetics 34 (4). 516-530.
46. Pisoni, D. B. & S. V. Levi, 2007. Representations and representational specificity in speech perception and spoken word recognition. In: Gaskell, G. (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 3-18. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47. Rumelhart, D. E., G. E. Hinton, & J. L. McClelland 1986. A general framework for parallel distributed processing. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland, & the PDP Research Group (eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol. 1: Foundations, 110-146. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. Sadat, J., C. D. Martin, F. X. Alario, & A. Costa 2012. Characterizing the bilingual disadvantage in noun phrase production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 41(3). 159-179.
49. Scarborough, R. 2004. Coarticulation and the structure of the lexicon (Doctoral dissertation, University of California Los Angeles).
50. Scarborough, R. 2010. Lexical and contextual predictability: Confluent effects on the production of vowels. In C. Fougeron, B. Kuhnert, M. D'Imperio and N. Vallee (eds.), Laboratory Phonology 10, 557-586. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
51. Scarborough, R., & G. Zellou 2013. Clarity in communication: "Clear" speech authenticity and lexical neighborhood density effects in speech production and perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134(5). 3793-3807.
52. Smolensky, P., M. Goldrick, & D. Mathis 2014. Optimization and quantization in gradient symbol systems: A framework for integrating the continuous and the discrete in cognition. Cognitive Science 38. 1102-1138.
53. Tilsen, S. 2011. Metrical regularity facilitates speech planning and production. Laboratory Phonology 2 (1). 185-218.
54. Tilsen, S. 2013. A Dynamical Model of Hierarchical Selection and Coordination in Speech Planning. PloS One 8 (4). e62800.
55. Walsh, M., B. Möbius, T. Wade, & H. Schütze. 2010. Multilevel exemplar theory. Cognitive Science 34 (4). 537-582.
56. Wedel, A. B. 2007. Feedback and regularity in the lexicon. Phonology 24(1). 147-185.
57. Wright, R. 2004. Factors of lexical competition in vowel articulation. In J. J. Local, R. Ogden, & R. Temple (eds.), Laboratory Phonology 6, 75-87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.