Articulatory evidence for feedback and competition in speech production

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 44-66

  McMillan, Corey T ^a   Corley, Martin ^a   Lickley, Robin J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN MARGARET UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPETITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROPALATOGRAPHY; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONEME; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH ARTICULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TONGUE; WORD LIST RECALL;

EID: 58149277167     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: 14640732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690960801998236     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Baars, B. J. and Motley, M. T. (1976) Spoonerisms as sequencer conflicts: Evidence from artificially elicited errors. American Journal of Psychology, 89, pp. 467-484.
2. Baars, B. J., Motley, M. T. and MacKay, D. G. (1975) Output editing for lexical status in artificially elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 14, pp. 382-391.
3. Boucher, V. J. (1994) Alphabet-related biases in psycholinguistic inquiries: Considerations for direct theories of speech production and perception. Journal of Phonetics, 22, pp. 1-18.
4. Byrd, D., Flemming, E., Mueller, C. A. and Tan, C. C. (1995) Using regions and indices in EPG data reduction. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, pp. 821-827.
5. del Viso, S., Igoa, J. M. and Garcia-Albea, J. E. (1991) On the autonomy of phonological encoding: Evidence from slips of the tongue in Spanish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, pp. 161-185.
6. Dell, G. S. (1986) A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, pp. 283-321.
7. Dell, G. S. and Reich, P. A. (1981) Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, pp. 611-629.
8. Edwards, J., Gibbon, F. and Fourakis, M. (1997) On discrete changes in the acquisition of the alveolar/velar stop consonant contrast. Language and Speech, 40, pp. 203-210.
9. Frisch, S. A. and Wright, R. (2002) The phonetics of phonological speech errors: An acoustic analysis of slips of the tongue. Journal of Phonetics, 30, pp. 139-162.
10. Fromkin, V. A. (1971) The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language, 47, pp. 27-52.
11. Garrett, M. F. (1976) Syntactic processes in sentence production. New approaches to language mechanisms, pp. 231-256. North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam
12. Gibbon, F. (2006) Bibliography of electropalatographic (EPG) studies in English (1957-2006), Edinburgh, UK
13. Goldrick, M. (2006) Limited interaction in speech production: Chronometric, speech error, and neuropsychological evidence. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, pp. 817-855.
14. Goldrick, M. and Blumstein, S. E. (2006) Cascading activation from phonological planning to articulatory processes: Evidence from tongue twisters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, pp. 649-683.
15. Goldstein, L., Pouplier, M., Chen, L., Saltzman, E. and Byrd, D. (2007) Dynamic action units slip in speech production errors. Cognition, 103, pp. 386-412.
16. Hardcastle, W. J., Gibbon, F. and Nicolaidis, K. (1991) EPG data reduction methods and their implications for studies of lingual coarticulation. Journal of Phonetics, 19, pp. 251-266.
17. Hartsuiker, R. J., Corley, M. and Martensen, H. (2005) The lexical bias effect is modulated by context, but the standard monitoring account doesn't fly: Related beply to Baars et al. (1975). Journal of Memory and Language, 52, pp. 58-70.
18. Humphreys, K. R. Lexical bias in speech errors
19. Laver, J. D. M. (1980) Monitoring systems in the neurolinguistic control of speech production. Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand, Academic Press, New York
20. Levelt, W. J. M. (1983) Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14, pp. 41-104.
21. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
22. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A. and Meyer, A. S. (1999) A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, pp. 1-75.
23. Liberman, A. M. (1997) Speech: A special code, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
24. Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P. and Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967) Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74, pp. 431-460.
25. Lombard, E. (1911) Le signe de l'elevation de la voix. Annales des Maladies de L'oreille et du Larynx, 37, pp. 101-119.
26. Motley, M. T., Camden, C. T. and Baars, B. J. (1982) Covert formulation and editing of anomalies in speech production: Evidence from experimentally elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, pp. 578-594.
27. Mowrey, R. A. and MacKay, I. R. (1990) Phonological primitives: Electromyographic speech error evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, pp. 1299-1312.
28. Nooteboom, S. G. (2005) Listening to one-self: Monitoring in speech production. Phonological encoding and monitoring in normal and pathological speech, pp. 167-186. Psychology Press, Hove, UK
29. Nooteboom, S. G. and Quene, H. (2008) Self-monitoring and feedback: A new attempt to find the main cause of lexical bias in phonological speech errors. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, pp. 837-861.
30. Peterson, R. R. and Savoy, P. (1998) Lexical selection and phonological encoding during language production: Evidence for cascaded processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 24, pp. 539-557.
31. Pisoni, D. B. and Tash, J. (1974) Reaction times to comparisons with and across phonetic categories. Perception and Psychophysics, 15, pp. 285-290.
32. Pouplier, M. Units of phonological coding: Empirical evidence
33. Pouplier, M. (2007) Tongue kinematics during utterances elicited with the SLIP technique. Language and Speech, 50, pp. 311-341.
34. Pouplier, M. and Hardcastle, W. (2005) A re-evaluation of the nature of speech errors in normal and disordered speakers. Phonetica, 62, pp. 227-243.
35. Rapp, B. and Goldrick, M. (2000) Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107, pp. 460-499.
36. Roelofs, A. (2004) Error biases in spoken word planning and monitoring by aphasic and nonaphasic speakers: Comment on Rapp and Goldrick (2000). Psychological Review, 111, pp. 561-572.
37. Samuel, A. (1996) Phoneme restoration. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, pp. 647-654.
38. Schneider, W., Eschman, A. and Zuccolotto, A. E prime 1.0.
39. Scobbie, J. M., Wood, S. E. and Wrench, A. A. (2004) Advances in EPG for treatment and research: An illustrative case study. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 18, pp. 373-389.
40. Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. and Klatt, D. H. (1979) The limited use of distinctive features and markedness in speech production: Evidence from speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, pp. 41-55.
41. Spivey, M., Richardson, D. C. and Dale, R. The Oxford handbook of human action, Oxford University Press, New York
42. Studebaker, G. A. (1985) A 'rationalized' arcsine transform. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, pp. 455-462.
43. Wrench, A. Articulate assistant user guide, version 1.3a.