Gradient co-activation and speech error articulation: Comment on pouplier and goldstein (2010)

Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 452-458

  Goldrick, Matthew ^a   Chu, Karen ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Articulatory processing; Interactivity; Phonological encoding; Speech errors

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LINGUISTICS; PHONETICS; SIMULATION; SPEECH; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH RATE; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

EID: 84907738025     PISSN: 23273798     EISSN: 23273801     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2013.807347     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Aarts, E. H. L., & Korst, J. (1989). Simulated annealing and Boltzmann machines: A stochastic approach to combinatorial optimization and neural computing. Chichester: Wiley.
2. Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1992). Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica, 49(3-4), 155-180. doi:10.1159/000261913
3. Frisch, S. A., & Wright, R. (2002). The phonetics of phonological speech errors: An acoustic analysis of slips of the tongue. Journal of Phonetics, 30(2), 139-162. doi:10.1006/jpho.2002.0176
4. Goldrick, M., Baker, H. R., Murphy, A., & Baese-Berk, M. (2011). Interaction and representational integration: Evidence from speech errors. Cognition, 121(1), 58-72. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.006
5. Goldrick, M., & Blumstein, S. E. (2006). Cascading activation from phonological planning to articulatory processes: Evidence from tongue twisters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(6), 649-683. doi:10.1080/01690960500181332
6. Goldrick, M., & Rapp, B. (2007). Lexical and post-lexical phonological representations in spoken production. Cognition, 102(2), 219-260. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.010
7. Goldstein, L., & Browman, C. (1986). Representation of voicing contrasts using articulatory gestures. Journal of Phonetics, 14, 339-342.
8. Goldstein, L., Pouplier, M., Chen, L., Saltzman, E., & Byrd, D. (2007). Dynamic action units slip in speech production errors. Cognition, 103(3), 386-412. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.010
9. Lane, H., Denny, M., Guenther, F. H., Matthies, M. L., Menard, L., Perkell, J. S., Zandipour, M. (2005). Effects of bite blocks and hearing status on vowel production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118(3), 1636-1646. doi:10.1121/1.2001527
10. McMillan, C. T., & Corley, M. (2010). Cascading influences on the production of speech: Evidence from articulation. Cognition, 117(3), 243-260. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.019
11. McMillan, C. T., Corley, M., & Lickley, R. J. (2009). Articulatory evidence for feedback and competition in speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(1), 44-66. doi:10.1080/01690960801998236
12. Nam, H., Goldstein, L., Saltzman, E., & Byrd, D. (2004). TADA: An enhanced, portable Task Dynamics model in MATLAB. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115, 2430.
13. Pouplier, M. (2007). Tongue kinematics during utterances elicited with the SLIP technique. Language and Speech, 50(3), 311-341. doi:10.1177/00238309070500030201
14. Pouplier, M. (2008). The role of a coda consonant as error trigger in repetition tasks. Journal of Phonetics, 36(1), 114-140. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2007.01.002
15. Pouplier, M., & Goldstein, L. (2010). Intention in articulation: Articulatory timing in alternating consonant sequences and its implications for models of speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(5), 616-649. doi:10.1080/01690960903395380
16. Saltzman, E. L., & Munhall, K. G. (1989). A dynamical approach to gestural patterning in speech production. Ecological Psychology, 1(4), 333-382. doi:10.1207/s15326969eco0104-2
17. Smolensky, P. (2006). Formalizing the principles I: Representation and processing in the mind/brain. In P. Smolensky & G. Legendre (Eds.), The harmonic mind: From neural computation to Optimality-Theoretic grammar. Vol. 1: Cognitive architecture (pp. 147-205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Smolensky, P., Goldrick, M., & Mathis, D. (in press). Optimization and quantization in Gradient Symbol Systems: A framework for integrating the continuous and the discrete in cognition. Cognitive Science.