Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational English

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 92-111

  Bell, Alan ^a   Brenier, Jason M ^b   Gregory, Michelle ^c   Girand, Cynthia ^d   Jurafsky, Dan ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b Cataphora Inc   (United States)

^c PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^d Silver Creek Systems   (United States)

^e STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Content words; Function words; Models of speech production; Predictability; Word duration; Word frequency

Indexed keywords

EID: 56549108198     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Alario F.-X., and Caramazza A. The production of determiners: Evidence from French. Cognition 82 (2002) 179-223
2. Aylett, M. P. (1999). Stochastic suprasegmentals: Relationships between redundancy, prosodic structure and syllabic duration. In Proceedings of the 1999 international conference on spoken language processing (pp. 289-292).
3. Aylett M., and Turk A. The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: A functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech 47 (2004) 31-56
4. Aylett M., and Turk A. Language redundancy predicts syllable duration and the spectral characteristics of vocalic syllable nuclei. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119 (2006) 3048-3058
5. Balota D.A., Boland J.E., and Shields L.W. Priming in pronunciation: Beyond pattern recognition and onset latency. Journal of Memory and Language 28 (1989) 14-36
6. Bard, E. G. & Aylett, M. P. (1999). The disassociation of deaccenting, givenness, and syntactic role in spontaneous speech. In Proceedings of the 1999 international conference on spoken language processing (pp. 1753-1756).
7. Bard E.G., Anderson A.H., Sotillo C., Aylett M., Doherty-Sneddon G., and Newlands A. Controlling the intelligibility of referring expressions in dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language 42 (2000) 1-22
8. Bell A., Jurafsky D., Fosler-Lussier E., Girand C., Gregory M., and Gildea D. Effects of disfluencies, predictability, and utterance position on word form variation in English conversation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 113 (2003) 1001-1024
9. Bock K. Closed-class immanence in sentence production. Cognition 31 (1989) 163-186
10. Bock K., and Levelt W.J.M. Language production: Grammatical encoding. In: Gernsbacher M.A. (Ed). Handbook of psycholinguistics (1994), Academic Press, New York 945-984
11. Brill F. Transformation-based error-driven learning and natural language processing: A case study in part-of-speech tagging. Computational Linguistics 21 (1995) 543-566
12. Browman C., and Goldstein L. Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech. In: Kingston J., and Beckman M.E. (Eds). Papers in laboratory phonology. I: Between the grammar and physics of speech (1990), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 341-376
13. Bush N. Frequency effects and word-boundary palatalization in English. In: Bybee J., and Hopper P. (Eds). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (2001), Benjamin, Amsterdam 255-280
14. Bybee J.L. The phonology of the lexicon: Evidence from lexical diffusion. In: Barlow M., and Kemmer S. (Eds). Usage-based models of language (2000), CSLI, Stanford, CA 65-85
15. Bybee J., and Hopper P. Introduction to frequency and emergence of linguistic structure. In: Bybee J., and Hopper P. (Eds). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (2001), Benjamin, Amsterdam 1-24
16. Bybee J., and McClelland J.L. Alternatives to the combinatorial paradigm of linguistic theory based on domain general principles of human cognition. The Linguistic Review 22 (2005) 381-410
17. Bybee J., and Scheibman J. The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: The reduction of don't in English. Linguistics 37 (1999) 575-596
18. Caramazza A., and Berndt R.S. A multicomponent deficit view of agrammatic Broca's aphasia. In: Kean M.-L. (Ed). Agrammatism (1985), Academic Press, Orlando 27-63
19. Cutler A., and Carter D. The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Computer Speech and Language 2 (1987) 133-142
20. Damian M.F. Articulatory duration in single-word speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 29 (2003) 416-431
21. Dell G.S. Effects of frequency and vocabulary type on phonological speech errors. Language and Cognitive Processes 5 (1990) 313-349
22. Dell G.S., and O'Seaghdha P.G. Stages of lexical access in language production. Cognition 42 (1992) 287-314
23. Eberhard K.M., Cutting J.C., and Bock K. Making syntax of sense: Number agreement in sentence production. Psychological Review 112 (2005) 531-559
24. Ferreira V.S., and Dell G.S. Effect of ambiguity and lexical availability on syntactic and lexical production. Cognitive Psychology 40 (2000) 296-340
25. Fidelholz J. Word frequency and vowel reduction in English. Chicago Linguistic Society 11 (1975) 200-213
26. Forster K., and Chambers S. Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12 (1973) 627-635
27. Fosler-Lussier E., and Morgan N. Effects of speaking rate and word predictability on conversational pronunciations. Speech Communication 29 (1999) 137-158
28. Fougeron C., and Keating P.A. Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101 (1997) 3728-3740
29. Fowler C. Differential shortening of repeated content words produced in various communicative contexts. Language and Speech 31 (1988) 307-319
30. Fowler C.A., and Housum J. Talkers' signaling of "new" and "old" words in speech and listeners' perception and use of the distinction. Journal of Memory and Language 26 (1987) 489-504
31. Fox Tree J.E., and Clark H.H. Pronouncing "the" as "thee" to signal problems in speaking. Cognition 62 (1997) 151-167
32. Frank, A. F. & Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Speaking rationally: Uniform information density as an optimal strategy for language production. In Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 933-938).
33. Gahl, S., Garnsey, S. M., Fisher, C., & Matzen, L. (2006). "That sounds unlikely": Syntactic probabilities affect pronunciation. In Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1334-1339).
34. Gahl S., and Garnsey S.M. Knowledge of grammar, knowledge of usage: Syntactic probabilities affect pronunciation variation. Language 80 (2004) 748-775
35. Garrett M.F. The analysis of sentence production. In: Bower G.H. (Ed). The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory Vol. 9 (1975), Academic Press, London 133-177
36. Garrett M.F. Levels of processing in sentence production. In: Bower G.H. (Ed). Language production Vol. 1 (1980), Academic Press, London 177-220
37. Godfrey, J., Holliman, E., & McDaniel, J. (1992). SWITCHBOARD: Telephone speech corpus for research and development. In Proceedings of the IEEE ICASSP-92 (pp. 517-520). San Francisco: IEEE.
38. Goodglass H., and Menn L. Is agrammatism a unitary phenomenon?. In: Kean M.-L. (Ed). Agrammatism (1985), Academic Press, Orlando 1-26
39. Gordon B., and Caramazza A. Lexical decisions for open and closed class words: Failure to replicate differential frequency sensitivity. Brain and Language 15 (1982) 143-160
40. Gordon J.K., and Dell G.S. Learning to divide the labor: An account of deficits in light and heavy verb production. Cognitive Science 27 (2003) 1-40
41. Greenberg, S., Ellis, D., & Hollenback, J. (1996). Insights into spoken language gleaned from phonetic transcription of the Switchboard corpus. In Proceedings of the 1996 international conference on spoken language processing (pp. 24-27).
42. Gregory M.L., Raymond W.D., Bell A., Fosler-Lussier E., and Jurafsky D. The effects of collocational strength and contextual predictability in lexical production. Chicago Linguistic Society 35 (1999) 151-166
43. Griffin Z.M., and Bock K. Constraint, word frequency, and the relationship between lexical processing levels in spoken word production. Journal of Memory and Language 38 (1998) 313-338
44. Hawkins S., and Warren P. Implications for lexical access of phonetic influences on the intelligibility of conversational speech. Journal of Phonetics 22 (1994) 493-511
45. Herron D.T., and Bates E.A. Sentential and acoustic factors in the recognition of open- and closed-class words. Journal of Memory and Language 37 (1997) 217-239
46. Hocking R.R. Methods and applications of linear models: Regression and the analysis of variance. 2nd ed. (2003), Wiley, New York
47. Hooper J.B. Word frequency in lexical diffusion and the source of morphophonological change. In: Christie W. (Ed). Current progress in historical linguistics (1976), North Holland, Amsterdam 96-105
48. Jespersen, O. (1924/1965). The philosophy of grammar. New York: W.W. Norton.
49. Johnson, K. (2004). Massive reduction in conversational American English. In K. Yoneyama & K. Maekawa (Eds.), Proceedings of the first session of the 10th international symposium on spontaneous speech: Data and analysis (pp. 29-54). Tokyo: The National International Institute for Japanese Language.
50. Jurafsky D., Bell A., Gregory M., and Raymond W.D. Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production. In: Bybee J., and Hopper P. (Eds). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (2001), Benjamin, Amsterdam 229-254
51. Kello C.T., and Plaut D.C. Strategic control in word reading: Evidence from speeded responding in the tempo-naming task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26 (2000) 719-750
52. Krug M. String frequency: A cognitive motivating factor in coalescence, language processing, and linguistic change. Journal of English Linguistics 26 (1998) 286-320
53. Lapointe S.G., and Dell G.S. A synthesis of some recent work in sentence production. In: Carlson G.N., and Tanenhaus M.K. (Eds). Linguistic structure in language processing (1989), Kluwer, Dordrecht 107-156
54. Lehiste I. Suprasegmentals (1970), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
55. Leslau W. Frequency as determinant of linguistic change in the Ethiopian languages. Word 25 (1969) 180-189
56. Levelt W.J.M. Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes, and representations. Cognition 42 (1992) 1-22
57. Levelt W.J.M. Phonological encoding in speech production: Comments on Jurafsky et al., Schiller et al., and van Heuven & Haan. In: Gussenhoven C., and Warner N. (Eds). Laboratory phonology 7 (2002), Mouton, Berlin/New York 87-99
58. Levelt W.J.M., Roelofs A., and Meyer A.S. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Science 22 (1999) 1-75
59. Levy R., and Jaeger T.F. Speakers optimize information density through syntactic reduction. In: Schölkopf B., Platt J., and Hoffman T. (Eds). Advances in neural information processing systems (2007), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 849-856
60. Lieberman P. Some effects of the semantic and grammatical context on the production and perception of speech. Language and Speech 6 (1963) 172-175
61. Lindblom B. Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In: Hardcastle W., and Marchal A. (Eds). Speech production and speech modeling (1990), Kluwer, Dordrecht 403-439
62. Liu H., Bates E., Powell T., and Wulfeck B. Single-word shadowing and the study of lexical access. Applied Psycholinguistics 18 (1997) 157-180
63. MacWhinney B. Emergentist approaches to language. In: Bybee J., and Hopper P. (Eds). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (2001), Benjamin, Amsterdam 449-470
64. Manning C., and Schütze H. Collocations. Foundations of statistical natural language processing (1999), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
65. Morton J. Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review 76 (1969) 165-178
66. Munson B. Lexical access, lexical representation, and vowel production. In: Cole J.S., and Hualde J.I. (Eds). Laboratory phonology 9 (2007), Mouton, Berlin/New York 201-228
67. Oldfield R.C., and Wingfield A. Response latencies in naming objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 17 (1965) 273-281
68. O'Shaughnessy D. Automatic recognition of hesitations in spontaneous speech. ICASSP-92. Vol. 1 (1992), IEEE, New York 593-596
69. Ostendorf, M., Shafran, I., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., Byrne, B., & Carmichael, L. (2001). A prosodically labeled database of spontaneous speech. In Proceedings of the ISCA workshop on prosody in speech recognition and understanding (pp. 119-121).
70. Pierrehumbert J.B. Word-specific phonetics. In: Gussenhoven C., and Warner N. (Eds). Laboratory phonology 7 (2002), Mouton, Berlin/New York 101-139
71. Pluymaekers M., Ernestus M., and Baayen R.H. Articulatory planning is continuous and sensitive to informational redundancy. Phonetica 62 (2005) 146-159
72. Pluymaekers M., Ernestus M., and Baayen R.H. Lexical frequency and acoustic reduction in spoken Dutch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118 (2005) 2561-2569
73. Rhodes, R. A. (1992). Flapping in American English. In Proceedings of the seventh international phonology meeting (pp. 217-232). Turin: Rosenberg and Sellier.
74. Rhodes R.A. English reduced vowels and the nature of natural processes. In: Hurch B., and Rhodes R.A. (Eds). Natural phonology: The state of the art (1996), Mouton, The Hague 239-259
75. Schuchardt, H. (1885). Über die Lautgesetze: Gegen die Jungrammatiker. Berlin: Robert Oppenheim (Excerpted with English translation. In Vennemann, T. & Wilbur, T. H. (Eds.). (1972). Schuchardt, the Neogrammarians, and the transformational theory of phonological change (pp. 1-72). Frankfurt: Athenaum Verlag).
76. Segalowitz S.J., and Lane K.C. Lexical access of function versus content words. Brain and Language 75 (2000) 376-389
77. Shattuck-Hufnagel S. The role of word structure in segmental serial ordering. Cognition 42 (1992) 213-259
78. Shriberg, E. (1995). Acoustic properties of disfluent repetitions. In Proceedings of the international congress of phonetic sciences (ICPhS-95) (Vol. 4, pp. 384-387). Stockholm: Stockholm University.
79. Stemberger J.P. An interactive activation model of language production. In: Ellis A. (Ed). Progress in the psychology of language (1985), Erlbaum, London 143-186
80. Taylor P. Analysis and synthesis of intonation using the Tilt model. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107 (2000) 1697-1714
81. Van Son, R. J. J. H., Koopmans-van Beinum, F. J., & Pols, L. C. W. (1998). Efficiency as an organizing principle of natural speech. In Proceedings of the 1998 international conference on spoken language processing (pp. 2395-2398).
82. Wheeldon L., and Lahiri A. Prosodic units in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language 37 (1997) 356-381
83. Zipf G.K. Relative frequency as a determinant of phonetic change. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 15 (1929) 1-95