The effects of lexical neighbors on stop consonant articulation

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 134, Issue 2, 2013, Pages

  Goldrick, Matthew ^a   Vaughn, Charlotte ^a   Murphy, Amanda ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LANGUAGE PROCESSING; TARGET WORDS; VOICING CONTRASTS;

ACOUSTICS; PHYSICS;

LINGUISTICS;

ACOUSTICS; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPREHENSION; HUMAN; PHONETICS; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SPEECH; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STATISTICAL MODEL; VOICE;

ACOUSTICS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPREHENSION; CUES; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; PHONETICS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; VOICE QUALITY;

EID: 84882320216     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.4812821     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Allopenna, P., Magnuson, J., and Tanenhaus, M. (1998). " Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models.," J. Mem. Lang. 38, 419-429. 10.1006/jmla.1997.2558
2. Baese-Berk, M., and Goldrick, M. (2009). " Mechanisms of interaction in speech production.," Lang. Cognit. Processes 24, 527-554. 10.1080/01690960802299378
3. Chen, M. (1970). " Vowel length variation as a function of the voicing of the consonant environment.," Phonetica 22, 129-159. 10.1159/000259312
4. Gahl, S., Yao, Y., and Johnson, K. (2012). " Why reduce? Phonological neighborhood density and phonetic reduction in spontaneous speech.," J. Mem. Lang. 66, 789-806. 10.1016/j.jml.2011.11.006
5. Kessinger, R. H., and Blumstein, S. E. (1997). " Effects of speaking rate on voice-onset time in Thai, French, and English.," J. Phonetics 25, 143-168. 10.1006/jpho.1996.0039
6. Lisker, L., and Abramson, A. S. (1964). " A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements.," Word 20, 384-422.
7. Munson, B., and Solomon, N. P. (2004). " The effect of phonological neighborhood density on vowel articulation.," J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 47, 1048-1058. 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/078)
8. Peramunage, D., Blumstein, S. E., Myers, E., Goldrick, M., and Baese-Berk, M. (2011). " Phonological neighborhood effects in spoken word production: An fMRI study.," J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23, 593-603. 10.1162/jocn.2010.21489
9. Peterson, G. E., and Lehiste, I. (1960). " Duration of syllable nuclei in English.," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 32, 693-703. 10.1121/1.1908183
10. Pierrehumbert, J. (2002). " Word-specific phonetics.," in Laboratory Phonology VII, edited by, C. Gussenhoven, and, N. Warner, (Mouton, Berlin), pp. 101-140.
11. Scarborough, R. A. (2010). " Lexical and contextual predictability: Confluent effects on the production of vowels.," in Laboratory Phonology, edited by, C. Fougeron, B. Kuhnert, M. D'Imperio, and, N. Vallee, (De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin), pp. 557-586.
12. Sevald, C. A., and Dell, G. S. (1994). " The sequential cuing effect in speech production.," Cognition 53, 91-127. 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90067-1
13. Vitevitch, M. S., Ambrüster, J., and Chu, S. (2004). " Sublexical and lexical representations in speech production: Effects of phonotactic probability and onset density.," J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 30, 514-529.
14. Wright, R. (2004). " Factors of lexical competition in vowel articulation.," in Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI, edited by, J. Local, R. Ogden, and, R. Temple, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), pp. 26-50.