Prosodic Boundary Strengthening in the Phonetics-Prosody Interface

Language and Linguistics Compass

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 120-141

  Cho, Taehong ^a  

^a Hanyang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84962885894     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1749818X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/lnc3.12178     Document Type: Article

References (113)

1. Barnes, J. A. 2002. Positional neutralization: a phonologization approach to typological patterns. University of California, Berkeley, CA: Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation.
2. Beckman, M. E. 1996. The parsing of prosody. Language and Cognitive Processes 11. 17-67.
3. Beckman, J. N. 1998. Positional faithfulness. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA: Ph.D. dissertation.
4. Beckman, M. E., and G. M. Ayers . 1994. Guidelines for ToBI labelling. Online MS and accompanying files. [Online]. Retrieved on 28 June 2015 from: Available at: http://www.ling.ohio-state.edu/~tobi/ame_tobi/.
5. Beckman, M. E., J. Hirschberg, and S. Shattuck-Hufnagel . 2005. The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework. Prosodic typology: the phonology of intonation and phrasing, ed. by S.-A. Jun, 9-54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Beckman, M. E., and J. Pierrehumbert . 1986. Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook 3. 255-309.
7. Berkovits, R. 1993. Utterance-final lengthening and the duration of final-stop closures. Journal of Phonetics 21. 479-89.
8. Berkovits, R. 1994. Durational effects in final lengthening, gapping, and contrastive stress. Language and Speech 37. 237-50.
9. Bombien, L., C. Mooshammer, and P. Hoole . 2013. Articulatory coordination in word-initial clusters of German. Journal of Phonetics 41. 546-61.
10. Bombien, L., C. Mooshammer, and P. Hoole, and B. Kühnert . 2010. Prosodic and segmental effects on EPG contact patterns of word-initial German clusters. Journal of Phonetics 38. 388-403.
11. Browman, C.P., and L. Goldstein . 1986. Towards an articulatory phonology. Phonology Yearbook 3. 219-52.
12. Browman, C.P., and L. Goldstein . 1992. Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica 49. 155-80.
13. Byrd, D. 2000. Articulatory vowel lengthening and coordination at phrasal junctures. Phonetica 57. 3-16.
14. Byrd, D. 2006. Relating prosody and dynamic events: Commentary on the papers by Cho, Navas and Smiljanić. Papers in Laboratory Phonology 8, ed. by L. Goldstein, D. Whalen and C. Best, 549-61. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
15. Byrd, D., and S. Choi . 2010. At the juncture of prosody, phonology, and phonetics-the interaction of phrasal and syllable structure in shaping the timing of consonant gestures. Laboratory Phonology 10, ed. by C. Fougeron, B. Kühnert, M. D'Imperio, and N. Vallée, 31-59. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
16. Byrd, D., A. Kaun, S. Narayanan, and E. Saltzman . 2000. Phrasal signatures in articulation. Papers in laboratory phonolgy V: acquisition and the lexicon, ed. by M. Broe and J. Pierrehumbert, 70-88. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. Byrd, D., J. Krivokapić, and S. Lee . 2006. How far, how long: on the temporal scope of prosodic boundary effects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120. 1589-99.
18. Byrd, D., and E. Saltzman . 1998. Intragestural dynamics of multiple prosodic boundaries. Journal of Phoentics 26. 173-99.
19. Byrd, D., and E. Saltzman . 2003. The elastic phrase: modeling the dynamics of boundary-adjacent lengthening. Journal of Phonetics 31. 149-80.
20. Cambier-Langeveld, T. 2000. Temporal marking of accent and boundaries. University of Amsterdam (LOT series 32): Ph.D. dissertation.
21. Cho, T. 2004. Prosodically-conditioned strengthening and vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in English. Journal of Phonetics 32. 141-76.
22. Cho, T. 2005. Prosodic strengthening and featural enhancement: evidence from acoustic and articulatory realizations of /a, i/ in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 117(6). 3867-78.
23. Cho, T. 2006. Manifestation of prosodic structure in articulation: evidence from lip kinematics in English. Laboratory phonology 8: varieties of phonological competence, ed. by L. M. Goldstein, D. H. Whalen, and C. T. Best, 519-48. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
24. Cho, T. 2008. Prosodic strengthening in transboundary V-to-V lingual movement in American English. Phonetica 65. 45-61.
25. Cho, T. 2011. Laboratory phonology. The continuum companion to phonology, ed. by N. C. Kula, B. Botma, and K. Nasukawa, 343-68. London: Continuum.
26. Cho, T. 2015. Language effects on timing at the segmental and suprasegmental levels. The handbook of speech production, ed. by M. Redford, 505-29. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
27. Cho, T., and S.-A. Jun . 2000. Domain-initial strengthening as featural enhancement: aerodynamic evidence from Korean. In Chicago Linguistics Society 36. 31-44.
28. Cho, T., S.-A. Jun, and P. Ladefoged . 2002. Acoustic and aerodynamic correlates of Korean stops and fricatives. Journal of Phonetics 30. 193-228.
29. Cho, T., and P. Keating . 2001. Articulatory and acoustic studies of domain-initial strengthening in Korean. Journal of Phonetics 29. 155-90.
30. Cho, T., and P. Keating . 2009. Effects of initial position versus prominence in English. Journal of Phonetics 37. 466-85.
31. Cho, T., J. Kim, and S. Kim . 2013. Preboundary lengthening and preaccentual shortening across syllables in a trisyllabic word in English. Journal of the Acousical Society of America 133(5). EL384-90.
32. Cho, T., D. Kim, and S. Kim . 2015. Prosodic strengthening on consonantal nasality and its asymmetric coarticulatory influence on vowel nasalization in CVN# and #NVC in English. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress on Phonetic Sciences 2015.
33. Cho, T., and P. Ladefoged . 1999. Variation and universals in VOT: evidence from 18 languages. Journal of Phonetics 27. 207-29.
34. Cho, T., Y. Lee, and S. Kim . 2011. Communicatively-driven versus prosodically-driven hyper-articulation in Korean. Journal of Phonetics 39. 344-61.
35. Cho, T., Y. Lee, and S. Kim . 2014. Prosodic strengthening on the /s/-stop cluster and the phonetic implementation of an allophonic rule in English. Journal of Phonetics 46. 128-46.
36. Cho, T., and J. McQueen . 2005. Prosodic influences on consonant production in Dutch: effects of prosodic boundaries, phrasal accent and lexical stress. Journal of Phonetics 33. 121-57.
37. Cho, T., and J. McQueen, and E. Cox . 2007. Prosodically driven phonetic detail in speech processing: the case of domain-initial strengthening in English. Journal of Phonetics 35. 210-43.
38. Cho, T., M. Son, and S. Kim . In press. Articulatory reflexes of the three-way contrast in labial stops and kinematic evidence for domain-initial strengthening in Korean. Journal of the International Phonetic Association. doi: 10.1017/S0025100315000481
39. Cole, J., H. Kim, H. Choi, and M. Hasegawa-Johnson . 2007. Prosodic effects on acoustic cues to stop voicing and place of articulation: evidence from Radio News Speech. Journal of Phonetics 35. 180-209.
40. Cooper, A. M 1991. Glottal gestures and aspiration in English. PhD dissertation, Yale University.
41. Cutler, A. 2012. Native listening: language experience and the recognition of spoken words, 1-576. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
42. de Jong K. 1995. The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97. 491-504.
43. Delattre, P. 1940. La force d'articulation consonantique en français. The French Review 14. 220-32.
44. D'Imperio, M. 2011. Prosodic hierarchy and articulatory control: evaluating the pi-gesture hypothesis in Italian EMA data. Handout from a talk presented at the Speech Production Workshop, Venice International University, Oct. 2011.
45. Edwards, J. E., M. E. Beckman, and J. Fletcher . 1991. The articulatory kinematics of final lengthening. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 89. 369-82.
46. Fletcher, J. 2010. The prosody of speech: timing and rhythm. The handbook of phonetic sciences, second edition, ed. by W. J. Hardcastle, J. Laver, and F. E. Gibbon, 523-602. Oxford: Blackwell.
47. Fougeron, C. 1999. Prosodically conditioned articulatory variations: a review. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 97. 1-74.
48. Fougeron, C. 2001. Articulatory properties of initial segments in several prosodic constituents in French. Journal of Phonetics 29. 109-35.
49. Fougeron, C., and P. A. Keating . 1997. Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106. 3728-40.
50. Fowler, C. A. 1988. Periodic dwindling of acoustic and articulatory variables in speech production. Paw Review 3. 10-3.
51. Goldstein, L., D. Byrd, and E. Saltzman . 2006. The role of vocal tract gestural action units in understanding the evolution of phonology. Action to Language via the Mirror Neuron System, ed. by M. Arbib, 215-49. New York: Cambridge University Press.
52. Gow, D. W., J. Melvold, and S. Manuel . 1996. How word onsets drive lexical access and segmentation: evidence from acoustics, phonology and processing. Proceedings of ICSLP (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, USA.
53. Gussenhoven, G., and A. C. M. Rietveld . 1992. Intonation contours, prosodic structure and preboundary lengthening. Journal of Phonetics 20. 283-303.
54. Hawkins, S. 1992. An introduction to task dynamics. Papers in laboratory phonology II: gesture, segment, prosody, ed. by G. Docherty and B. Ladd, 9-25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. Hayashi, W., C.-S. Hsu, and P. A. Keating . 1999. Domain-initial strengthening in Taiwanese: a follow-up study. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 97. 152-6.
56. Hsu, C.-S. and Jun, S.-A. (1998). Prosodic strengthening in Taiwanese: syntagmatic or paradigmatic? UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 96. 69-89.
57. Jun, S.-A. 1993. The phonetics and phonology of Korean prosody. Ohio State University: Ph.D. dissertation.
58. Jun, S.-A. 1995. Asymmetrical prosodic effects on the laryngeal gesture in Korean. Papers in laboratory phonology IV: phonology and phonetic evidence, ed. by B. Connell and A. Arvaniti, 235-53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Jun, S.-A. 1998. The accentual phrase in the Korean prosodic hierarchy. Phonology 15(2). 189-226.
60. Jun, S.-A. 2003. Prosodic phrasing and attachment preferences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32. 219-49.
61. Jun, S.-A. 2014. Prosodic typology: by prominence type, word prosody, and macro-rhythm. Prosodic typology II: the phonology of intonation and phrasing, ed. by S.-A. Jun, 520-39. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
62. Jun, S.-A., M. Beckman, and H.-J. Lee . 1998. Fiberscopic evidence for the influence on vowel devoicing of the glottal configurations for Korean obstruents. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 96. 43-68.
63. Kang, Y. 2014. Voice onset time merger and development of tonal contrast in Seoul Korean stops: a corpus study. Journal of Phonetics 45. 76-90.
64. Kang, K. and S. Guion . 2008. Clear speech production of Korean stops: changing phonetic targets and enhancement strategies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 124. 3090-917.
65. Keating, P. A. 1984. Phonetic and phonological representation of stop consonant voicing. Language 60. 286-319.
66. Keating, P. A. 1990. The window model of coarticulation: articulatory evidence. Papers in laboratory phonology I: between the grammar and the physics of speech, ed. by J. Kingston and M. Beckman, 451-70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67. Keating, P. A. 2006. Phonetic encoding of prosodic structure. Speech production: models, phonetic processes, and techniques, ed. by J. Harrington and M. Tabain, 167-86. New York and Hove: Psychology Press.
68. Keating, P. A., T. Cho, C. Fougeron, and C.-S. Hsu . 2003. Domain-initial strengthening in four languages. Papers in laboratory phonology 6: phonetic interpretations, ed. by J. Local, R. Ogden, and R. Temple, 145-63. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
69. Keating, P. A., and S. Shattuck-Hufnagel . 2002. A prosodic view of word form encoding for speech production. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 101. 112-56.
70. Kim, S., and T. Cho . 2012. Prosodic strengthening in the articulation of English /æ/. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology 18(2). 321-37. The Phonology-Morphology Circle of Korea.
71. Kim, S., and T. Cho, and J. McQueen . 2012. Phonetic richness can outweigh prosodically-driven phonological knowledge when learning words in an artifical langauge. Journal of Phonetics 40(3). 443-52.
72. th Conference on Laboratory Phonology 2014. Tokyo, Japan.
73. Kingston, J., and R. L. Diehl . 1994. Phonetic knowledge. Langauge 70. 419-54.
74. Klatt, D. H. 1975. Vowel lengthening is syntactically determined in connected discourse. Journal of Phonetics 3. 129-40.
75. Krakow, R. A., F. Bell-Berti, and Q. E. Wang . 1995. Supralaryngeal declination: evidence from the velum. Producing Speech: Contemporary Issues: For Katherine Safford Harris, ed. by F. Bell-Berti and J. J. Raphael, 333-54. Melville, Long Island, New York: AIP Publishing.
76. Krivokapić, J., and D. Byrd . 2012. Prosodic boundary strength: an articulatory and perceptual study. Journal of Phonetics 40. 430-42.
77. Kuzla, C., T. Cho, and M. Ernestus . 2007. Prosodic strengthening of German fricatives in duration and assimilatory devoicing. Journal of Phonetics 35(3). 301-20.
78. Ladd, D. R. 2008. Intonational phonology, second edition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
79. Ladefoged, P. 1967. Three areas of experimental phonetics. London: Oxford University Press.
80. Ladefoged, P. 2001. Vowels and consonants. Oxford: Blackwell.
81. Ladefoged, P., and T. Cho . 2001. Linking linguistic contrasts to reality: the case of VOT. Travaux du cercle linguistique de copenhague, vol. XXXI (To Honour Eli Fischer-Forgensen), ed. N. Gronnum and J. Rischel, 212-23. C.A. Reitzel, Copenhagen.
82. Ladefoged, P., and G. Loeb . 2002. Preliminary studies on respiratory activity in speech. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 101. 50-60.
83. Lindblom, B. 1968. Temporal organization of syllable production. Speech Transmission Laboratory Quarterly Progress Status Report 2-3. 1-5.
84. Lindblom, B. 1990. Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H & H theory. Speech production and speech modeling, ed. by W. J. Hardcastle and A. Marchal, 403-40. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
85. Mücke, D., and M. Grice . 2014. The effect of focus marking on supralaryngeal articulation - Is it mediated by accentuation? Journal of Phonetics 44. 47-61.
86. Mücke, D., and M. Grice, and T. Cho . 2014. More than a magic moment - paving the way for dynamics of articulation and prosodic structure. Journal of Phonetics 44. 1-7.
87. Nakai, S., S. Kunnari, A. Turk, K. Suomi, and R. Ylitalo . 2008. Utterance-final lengthening and quantity in Northern Finnish. Journal of Phonetics 37. 39-45.
88. Nam, H., L. Goldstein, and E. Saltzman . 2009. Self-organization of syllable structure: a coupled oscillator model. Approaches to phonological complexity, ed. by F. Pellegrino, E. Marisco, and I. Chitoran, 299-328. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
89. Nespor, M., and I. Vogel . 1986. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
90. Onaka, A. 2003. Domain-initial strengthening in Japanese: an acoustic and articulatory study. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 2091-4. Barcelona, Spain: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
91. th international seminar on speech production, ed. by S. Palethorpe and M. Tabain, 201-6. Sydney, Australia: Macquarie University.
92. Pierrehumbert, J. 1980. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. MIT Ph.D. dissertation.
93. Pierrehumbert, J., and M. Beckman . 1988. Japanese tone structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
94. Pierrehumbert, J., and D. Talkin . 1992. Lenition of /h/ and glottal stop. Papers in laboratory phonology II: gesture, segment, prosody, ed. by G. Docherty and D. R. Ladd, 90-117. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
95. Saltzman, E. and K. G. Munhall . 1989. A dynamical approach to gestural patterning in speech production. Ecological Psychology 1. 333-82.
96. Saltzman, E., H. Nam, J. Krivokapic, and L. Goldstein . 2008. A task-dynamic toolkit for modeling the effects of prosodic structure on articulation. Proceedings of the speech prosody 2008 conference, ed. by P. A. Barbosa, S. Madureira, and C. Reis . Campinas, Brazil: Capes.
97. Schafer, A., and S.-A. Jun . 2002. Effects of accentual phrasing on adjective interpretation in Korean. East Asian language processing, ed. by M. Nakayama, 223-55. Stanford: CSLI.
98. Schertz, J., T. Cho, A. Lotto, and N. Warner . 2015. Individual differences in phonetic cue use in production and perception of a non-native sound contrast. Journal of Phonetics 52. 183-204.
99. Selkirk, E. 1984. Phonology and syntax: the relation between sound and structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.
100. Selkirk, E. 1995. Sentence prosody: intonation, stress, and phrasing. The handbook of phonological theory, ed. by J. A. Goldsmith, 550-69. Oxford: Blackwell.
101. Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., and A. E. Turk . 1996. A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 25(2). 193-247.
102. Shepherd, M. A. 2008. The scope and effects of preboundary prosodic lengthening in Japanese. USC Working Papers in Linguistics 4. 1-14.
103. Shin, S., S. Kim, and T. Cho . 2015. What is special about prosodic strengthening in Korean: evidence in lingual movement in V#V and V#CV. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress on Phonetic Sciences 2015.
104. Silva, D. J. 2006. Acoustic evidence for the emergence of tonal contrast in contemporary Korean. Phonology 23. 287-308.
105. Steriade, D. 1999. Phonetics in phonology: the case of laryngeal neutralization. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 2. Papers in phonology 3, ed. by M. Mordon, 25-146. Los Angeles: UCLA.
106. Straka, G. 1963. La divison de sons du language en voyelles et consonnes peut-elle être justifiée? Travaux de Ling. et de Littérature, U. de Strasbourg 1. 17-99.
107. Tabain, M. 2003. Effects of prosodic boundary on /aC/ sequences: articulatory results. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 113. 2834-49.
108. Tabain, M., and P. Perrier . 2005. Articulation and acoustics of /i/ in preboundary position in French. Journal of Phoentics 33. 77-100.
109. Turk, A. E., and S. Shattuck-Hufnagel . 2007. Multiple targets of phrase-final lengthening in American English words. Journal of Phonetics 35. 445-72.
110. Turk, A. E., and L. White . 1999. Structural influences on accentual lengthening in English. Journal of Phonetics 27. 171-206.
111. Vayra, M., and C. Fowler . 1992. Declination of supralaryngeal gestures in spoken Italian. Phonetica 49. 48-60.
112. White, L. S., and A. Turk . 2010. English words on the Procrustean bed: polysyllabic shortening reconsidered. Journal of Phonetics 38. 459-71.
113. Wightman, C. W., S. Shattuck-Hufnagel, M. Ostendorf, and P. J. Price . 1992. Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91. 1707-17.