Prosodic and segmental effects on EPG contact patterns of word-initial German clusters

Journal of Phonetics

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 388-403

  Bombien, Lasse ^a   Mooshammer, Christine ^b   Hoole, Philip ^a   Kühnert, Barbara ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b HASKINS LABORATORIES   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITÉ SORBONNE NOUVELLE PARIS 3   (France)

^d CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955095670     PISSN: 00954470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Beckman M., Edwards J., Fletcher J. Prosodic structure and tempo in a sonority model of articulatory analysis. Papers in laboratory phonology II: Gesture, segment, prosody 1992, 68-86. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. G.J. Docherty, D.R. Ladd (Eds.).
2. Bergmann, P. (2008). Assimilation within complex words in German. Poster presented at the workshop consonant clusters and structural complexity, Munich.
3. Blevins J., Garrett A. The evolution of metathesis. Phonetically based phonology 2004, 117-156. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. B. Hayes, R. Kirchner, D. Steriade (Eds.).
4. Bombien, L., Cassidy, S., Harrington, J., John, T., & Palethorpe, S. (2006). Recent developments in the EMU Speech Database System. In Proceedings 11th SST conference (pp. 313-316), Auckland.
5. Bombien, L., Mooshammer, C., Hoole, P., Kühnert, B., & Schneeberg, J. (2006). An EPG study of initial /kl/ clusters in varying prosodic conditions in German. In Proceedings of the 7th ISSP (pp. 457-460), Ubatuba, Brazil.
6. Bombien, L., Mooshammer, C., Hoole, P., Rathcke, T., & Kühnert, B. (2007). Articulatory strengthening in initial German /kl/ clusters under prosodic variation. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference of phonetic sciences (pp. 457-460), Saarbrüken.
7. Browman C., Goldstein L. Some notes on syllable structure in articulatory phonology. Phonetica 1988, 45:140-155.
8. Browman C., Goldstein L. Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica 1992, 49:155-180.
9. Browman C., Goldstein L. Competing constraints on intergestural coordination and selforganization of phonological structure. Les Cahiers de l'ICP 2000, 5:25-34.
10. Byrd D. C-centers revisited. Phonetica 1995, 52:285-306.
11. Byrd, D., & Choi, S. (2010). At the juncture of prosody, phonology, and phonetics-the interaction of phrasal and syllable structure in shaping the timing of consonant gestures. In C. Fougeron, B. Kühnert, M. d'Imperio, & N. Vallé (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology 10: Variation, detail and representation. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, in press.
12. Byrd D., Flemming E., Mueller C.A., Tan C.C. Using regions and indices in EPG data reduction. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1995, 38:821-827.
13. Byrd D., Kaun A., Narayanan S., Saltzman E. Phrasal signatures in articulation. Papers in laboratory phonology 5: Acquisition and the lexicon 2000, 70-87. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. M. Broe, J. Pierrehumbert (Eds.).
14. Byrd D., Krivokapić J., Lee S. How far, how long: On the temporal scope of prosodic boundary effects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2006, 120:1589-1599.
15. Byrd D., Saltzman E. The elastic phrase: Modeling the dynamics of boundary-adjacent lengthening. Journal of Phonetics 2003, 31:149-180.
16. Byrd D., Tan C.C. Saying consonant clusters quickly. Journal of Phonetics 1996, 24:263-282.
17. Byrd D., Tobin S., Bresch E., Narayanan S. Timing effects of syllable structure and stress on nasals: A real-time MRI examination. Journal of Phonetics 2009, 37:97-110.
18. Chitoran, I., Goldstein, L., & Byrd, D. (2002). Gestural overlap and recoverability: Articulatory evidence from Georgian. In Laboratory Phonology (Vol. 7, pp. 419-448). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
19. Cho, T., & Keating, P. (2007). Effects of initial position versus prominence in English. UCLA working papers in phonetics, 106, 1-33.
20. Cho T., McQueen J.M. Prosodic influences on consonant production in Dutch: Effects of prosodic boundaries, phrasal accent and lexical stress. Journal of Phonetics 2005, 33:121-157.
21. Cho T., McQueen J.M., Cox E.A. Prosodically driven phonetic detail in speech processing: The case of domain-initial strengthening in English. Journal of Phonetics 2007, 35:210-243.
22. Davidson L. Addressing phonological questions with ultrasound. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 2005, 19:619-633.
23. Davidson L., Roon K. Durational correlates for differentiating consonant sequences in Russian. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 2008, 38:137-165.
24. Fontdevila J., Pallarès M.D., Recasens D. The contact index method of EPG data reductions. Journal of Phonetics 1994, 22:141-154.
25. Fougeron, C. (1998). Variations articulatoires en début de constituants prosodiques de différents niveaux en français. Thèse de doctorat Université Paris III.
26. Fougeron C. Articulatory properties of initial segments in several prosodic constituents in French. Journal of Phonetics 2001, 29:109-135.
27. Fougeron C., Keating P. Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1997, 101:3728-3740.
28. Fougeron, C., Meynadier, Y., Demolin, D. (2000). 62 vs 96 electrodes: A comparative analysis of Reading and Kay Elemetrics EPG pseudo-palates. In Proceeding of the 5th seminar on speech production: Models and data (pp. 309-312), Kloster Seeon, Bavaria.
29. Gafos A. A grammar of gestural coordination. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2002, 20:169-337.
30. Gafos, A., Hoole, P., Roon, K., & Zeroual, C. (2010). Variation in timing and phonological grammar in Moroccan Arabic clusters. In C. Fougeron, B. Kühnert, M. d'Imperio, N. Vallé (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology 10: Variation, detail and representation. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, in press.
31. Geumann, A., Kroos, C., & Hoole, P. (1999). Are there compensatory effects in natural speech? In Proceedings of the 14th ICPHS (pp. 399-402), San Francisco.
32. Gibbon F., Hardcastle W., Nicolaidis K. Temporal and spatial aspects of lingual coarticulation in /kl/ sequences: A cross-linguistic investigation. Language and Speech 1993, 36:261-277.
33. Hall, N. (2003). Gestures and segments: Vowel intrusion as overlap. Ph.D. thesis, University of Haifa.
34. Hardcastle W., Roach P. An instrumental investigation of coarticulation in stop consonant sequences. Current issues in the phonetic sciences, current issues in linguistic theory (Vol. 9) 1979, 531-540. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. H. Hollien, P. Hollien (Eds.).
35. Harrington J., Fletcher J., Roberts C. Coarticulation and the accented/unaccented distinction: Evidence from jaw movement data. Journal of Phonetics 1995, 23:305-322.
36. Hoole P., Mooshammer C. Articulatory analysis of the German vowel system. Silbenschnitt und Tonakzente 2002, 129-152. Niemeyer, Tübingen. P. Auer, P. Gilles, H. Spiekermann (Eds.).
37. Jongman A. Duration of frication noise required for identification of English fricatives. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1989, 85:1718-1725.
38. Keating P. Phonetic encoding of prosodic structure. Speech Production: Models, Phonetic Processes and Techniques 2006, 167-186. Psychology Press, New York. J. Harrington, M. Tabain (Eds.).
39. Keating, P., Cho, T., Fougeron, C., & Hsu, C. (2003). Domain-initial articulatory strengthening in four languages. In Laboratory phonology (Vol. 6, pp. 143-161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Kochetov, A., Pouplier, M., & Son, M. (2007). Cross-language differences in overlap and assimilation patterns in Korean and Russian. In J. Trouvain, & W. Barry (Eds.), Phonetics and Phonology Vol. 5: Nasals, nasalization, and the velum (pp. 1361-1364), Saarbrücken, Germany.
41. Kollia H.B., Gracco V.L., Harris K.S. Articulatory organization of mandibular labial and velar movements during speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1995, 98:1313-1324.
42. Krakow R.A. Nonsegmental influences on velum movement patterns: Syllables, sentences, stress, and speaking rate. Phonetics and Phonology Vol. 5: Nasals, nasalization, and the velum 1993, 87-116. Academic Press, Inc, San Diego.
43. Kühnert B., Hoole P. Speaker-specific kinematic properties of alveolar reductions in English and German. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 2004, 18:559-575.
44. Kühnert, B., Hoole, P., & Mooshammer, C. (2006). Gestural overlap and c-center in selected French consonant clusters. In H. Yehia, D. Demolin, & R. Laboissière (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th international seminar on speech production (pp. 40-48). Belo Horizonte: UFMG.
45. Kuzla C., Cho T., Ernestus M. Prosodic strengthening of German fricatives in duration and assimilatory devoicing. Journal of Phonetics 2007, 35:301-320.
46. Maddieson I. Investigating Ewe articulations with electromagnetic articulography. Forschungsberichte-Institut für Phonetik und Sprachliche Kommunikation der Universität München 1993, 31:181-214.
47. Marin, S., & Pouplier, M. (in press). Temporal organization of complex onsets and codas in American English: Testing the predictions of a gestural coupling model. Motor Control.
48. Mattingly I.G. Phonetic representation and speech synthesis by rule. The cognitive representation of speech 1981, 415-420. North-Holland, Amsterdam. T. Myers, J. Laver, J. Anderson (Eds.).
49. Max L., Onghena P. Some issues in the statistical analysis of completely randomized and repeated measures for speech language and hearing research. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 1999, 42:261-270.
50. Meynadier, Y., Pitermann, M., & Marchal, A. (1998). Effects of contrastive focal accent on linguopalatal coarticulation in the French [kskll] clusters. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on spoken language processing (Vol. 5, pp. 1871-1874).
51. Mooshammer C., Fuchs S. Stress distinction in German: Simulating kinematic parameters of tongue tip gestures. Journal of Phonetics 2002, 30:337-355.
52. Öhman S.E. Numerical model of coarticulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1967, 41:310-320.
53. Pierrehumbert J., Talkin D. Lenition of /h/ and glottal stop. Papers in laboratory phonology II: Gesture, segment, prosody 1992, 90-127. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. G.J. Docherty, D.R. Ladd (Eds.).
54. R Development Core Team (2006). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna.
55. Recasens D. Lingual coarticulation. Coarticulation: Theory, Data and Techniques 1999, 80-104. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. W.J. Hardcastle, N. Hewett (Eds.).
56. Recasens D. The effect of syllable position on consonant reduction (evidence from Catalan consonant clusters). Journal of Phonetics 2004, 32:435-453.
57. Recasens D. Patterns of CVC coarticulatory direction according to the DAC model. Segmental and prosodic issues in Romance phonology of current issues in linguistic theory 2007, vol. 282:25-40. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia.
58. Recasens D., Fontdevila J., Pallarès M.D. Velarization degree and coarticulatory resistance for /i/ in Catalan and German. Journal of Phonetics 1995, 23:37-52.
59. Recasens D., Pallarès M. A study of /r/ and /rr/ in the light of the 'DAC' coarticulation model. Journal of Phonetics 1999, 27:143-170.
60. Recasens D., Pallarès M. Coarticulation, blending and assimilation in Catalan consonant clusters. Journal of Phonetics 2001, 29:273-301.
61. Recasens D., Pallarès M.D., Fontdevila J. A model of lingual coarticulation based on articulatory constraints. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1997, 102:544-561.
62. Saltzman, E., Goldstein, L., Holt, K., Kluzik, J., & Nam, H. (2007). Gait wheels and foot cycles: A parallel between the dynamics of locomotion and speech. Poster presented at 11th international conference on cognitive and neural systems.
63. Saltzman, E., Nam, H., Krivokapić, J., & Goldstein, L. (2008). A task-dynamic toolkit for modeling the effects of prosodic structure on articulation. In Proceedings of the fourth conference on speech prosody (pp. 175-184), Campinas.
64. Schiel, F., 1999. Automatic phonetic transcription of non-prompted speech. In Proceedings of the 14 ICPhS (pp. 607-610), San Francisco.
65. Selkirk E.O. On major class features and syllable theory. Language sound and structure 1984, 107-136. MIT Press, Cambridge. M. Aronoff, R. Oehrle (Eds.).
66. Shadle C.H., Scully C. An articulatory-acoustic-aerodynamic analysis of [s] in VCV sequences. Journal of Phonetics 1995, 23:53-66.
67. Sievers E. Grundzüge der Phonetik 1901, Breitkopf und Härtel, Leibzig.
68. Sproat R., Fujimura O. Allophonic variation in English /l/ and its implication for phonetic implementations. Journal of Phonetics 1993, 21:291-311.
69. Turk A.E., Shattuck-Hufnagel S. Multiple targets of phrase-final lengthening in American English words. Journal of Phonetics 2007, 35:445-472.
70. Turk A.E., White L. Structural influences on accentual lengthening in English. Journal of Phonetics 1999, 27:171-206.
71. Vitevitch M., Armbruster J., Chu S. Sub-lexical and lexical representations in speech production: Effects of phonotactic probability and onsetdensity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 2004, 30:514-529.
72. Wright R. A review of perceptual cues and cue robustness. Phonetically based phonology 2004, 34-57. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. B. Hayes, R. Kirchner, D. Steriade (Eds.).
73. Zsiga E.C. Phonetic alignment constraints: Consonant overlap and palatalization in English and Russian. Journal of Phonetics 2000, 28:69-102.