Communicatively driven versus prosodically driven hyper-articulation in Korean

Journal of Phonetics

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 344-361

  Cho, Taehong ^a   Lee, Yoonjeong ^a   Kim, Sahyang ^b  

^a Hanyang University   (South Korea)

^b Hong Ik University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960606917     PISSN: 00954470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.02.005     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Barnes, J. A. (2002). Positional Neutralization: A phonologization approach to typological patterns. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
2. Beckman M.E., Edwards J. Articulatory evidence for differentiating stress categories. Laboratory phonology, Vol. III: Phonological structure and phonetic form 1994, 7-33. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. P.A. Keating (Ed.).
3. Beckman, M. E., Edwards, J., & Fletcher, J. (1992). Prosodic structure and tempo in a sonority model of articulatory dynamics. Laboratory phonology Vol. II: Gesture, segment, prosody, pp. 68-86.
4. Bradlow A.R. A comparative acoustic study of English and Spanish vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1995, 97(3):1916-1924.
5. Bradlow A.R. A perceptual comparison of the /i/-/e/ and /u/-/o/ contrasts in English and Spanish: Universal and language-specific aspects. Phonetica 1996, 53:55-85.
6. Bradlow A.R. Confluent talker- and listener-related forces in clear speech production. Laboratory phonology 2002, 7:241-273. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin/New York.
7. Bradlow A.R., Bent T. The clear speech effect for non-native listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2002, 112:272-284.
8. Bradlow A.R., Kraus N., Hayes E. Speaking clearly for children with learning disabilities: Sentence perception in noise. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 2003, 46(1):80-97.
9. Browman C.P., Goldstein L. Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech. Laboratory phonology Vol. I: between the grammar and the physics of speech 1990, 341-376. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. J. Kingston, M.E. Beckman (Eds.).
10. Browman C.P., Goldstein L. Articulatory phonology: an overview. Phonetica 1992, 49:155-180.
11. Byrd D. Articulatory vowel lengthening and coordination at phrasal junctures. Phonetica 2000, 57(1):3-16.
12. Byrd D. Relating prosody and dynamic events: Commentary on the papers by Cho, Navas, and Smiljanić. Laboratory phonology 8: Varieties of phonological competence 2006, 549-561. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin/NY. L. Goldstein, D. Whalen, C. Best (Eds.).
13. Byrd D., Kaun A., Narayanan S., Saltzman E. Phrasal signatures in articulation. Laboratory phonology 2000, Vol. V:70-87. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
14. Byrd D., Krivokapić J., Lee S. How far, how long: On the temporal scope of prosodic boundary effects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2006, 120(3):1589-1599.
15. Byrd D., Saltzman E. The elastic phrase: Modeling the dynamics of boundary-adjacent lengthening. Journal of Phonetics 2003, 31(2):149-180.
16. Cho, T. (1996). Vowel correlates to consonant phonation: An acoustic-perceptual study of Korean obstruents. MA Thesis. University of Texas at Arlington.
17. Cho T. Prosodically conditioned strengthening and vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in English. Journal of Phonetics 2004, 32(2):141-176.
18. Cho T. Prosodic strengthening and featural enhancement: Evidence from acoustic and articulatory realizations of /a,i/ in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2005, 33:121-157.
19. Cho T. Manifestation of prosodic structure in articulatory variation: Evidence from lip kinematics in English. Papers in laboratory phonology, 2006, Vol. 8:519-548. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
20. Cho T. Prosodic strengthening in transboundary V-to-V lingual movement in American English. Phonetica 2008, 65:45-61.
21. Cho, T. (in press). The phonetics-prosody interface in laboratory phonology. In: N. C. Kula, B. Botma, & K. Nasukawa (Eds.), The continuum companion to phonology. London/New York: Continuum.
22. Cho T., Jun S.-A. Domain-initial strengthening as featural enhancement: Aerodynamic evidence from Korean. Chicago Linguistics Society 2000, 36:31-44. (Also appeared in UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 99, 57-70.).
23. Cho T., Keating P.A. Articulatory and acoustic studies on domain-initial strengthening in Korean. Journal of Phonetics 2001, 29(2):155-190.
24. Cho T., Keating P.A. Effects of initial position versus prominence in English. Journal of Phonetics 2009, 37:466-485.
25. Cho T., McQueen J. Prosodic influences on consonant production in Dutch: Effects of prosodic boundaries, phrasal accent and lexical stress. Journal of Phonetics 2005, 33:121-157.
26. Cho T., McQueen J., Cox E. Prosodically driven phonetic detail in speech processing: The case of domain-initial strengthening in English. Journal of Phonetics 2007, 35:210-243.
27. Cho, T., Yoon, Y., & Kim, S. (in preparation). A kinematic study of prosodic boundary effects on the vowel /i/ articulation in Korean.
28. Christophe A., Peperkamp S., Pallier C., Block E., Mehler J. Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access: I. Adult data. Journal of Memory and Language 2004, 51:523-547.
29. Cutler A., Butterfield S. Rhythmic cues to speech segmentation: Evidence from juncture misperception. Journal of Memory and Language 1992, 31:218-236.
30. de Jong K.J. The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: Linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1995, 97(1):491-504.
31. de Jong K.J. Stress, lexical focus, and segmental focus in English: Patterns of variation in vowel duration. Journal of Phonetics 2004, 32:493-516.
32. de Jong K.J., Zawaydeh B.A. Comparing stress, lexical focus, and segmental focus: Patterns of variation in Arabic vowel duration. Journal of Phonetics 2002, 30:53-75.
33. Edwards J., Beckman M.E., Fletcher J. The articulatory kinematics of final lengthening. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1991, 89(1):369-382.
34. Flemming E. Auditory representations in phonology 1995, University of California, Los Angeles.
35. Flemming.E. Scalar and categorical phenomena in a unified model of phonetics and phonology. Phonology 2001, 18(1):7-44.
36. Fougeron C. Articulatory properties of initial segments in several prosodic constituents in French. Journal of Phonetics 2001, 29:109-135.
37. Fougeron C., Keating P.A. Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1997, 101(6):3728-3740.
38. Fowler C.A. Acoustic and kinematic correlates of contrastive stress accent in spoken English. Producing speech: Contemporary issues: For Katherine Safford Harris 1995, 355-373. AIP Publishing, Melville, Long Island, New York. F. Bell-Berti, J.J. Raphael (Eds.).
39. Gelfer C.E. A simultaneous physiological and acoustic study of fundamental frequency declination 1987, City University of New York.
40. Gelfer C.E., Harris K.S., Baer T. Controlled variables in sentence intonation. Laryngeal function in phonation and respiration 1987, 422-435. College-Hill, Boston. T. Baer, C. Sasaki, K. Harris (Eds.).
41. Gow D.W., Melvold J., Manuel S. How word onsets drive lexical access and segmentation: Evidence from acoustics, phonology and processing. Proceedings of ICSLP 96 (CD-ROM) 1996, University of Delaware & Alfred I. duPont Institute, Philadelphia. H.T. Bunnell, W. Idsardi (Eds.).
42. 't Hart J., Collier R., Cohen A. A perceptual study of intonation: An experimental-phonetic approach to speech melody 1990, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
43. Helfer K.S. Auditory and auditory-visual recognition of clear and conversational speech by older adults. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 1998, 9(3):234.
44. Jakobson R., Fant G., Halle M. Preliminaries to speech analysis: The distinctive features and their correlates 1965, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
45. Jun, S.-A. (1993). The phonetics and phonology of Korean prosody. Ph.D. Dissertation. Ohio State University.
46. Jun S.-A. Asymmetrical prosodic effects on the laryngeal gesture in Korean. Phonology and phonetic evidence: Laboratory phonology 1995, Vol. IV:235-253. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
47. Jun, S.-A. (2000). K-ToBI (Korean ToBI) Labelling Conventions (Version 3.1). http://www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/jun/ktobi/K-tobi.html.
48. Kang, K.-H. (2010). Clear speech production and perception of Korean stops and the sound change in Korean stops. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Oregon.
49. Kang K.-H., Guion S.G. Clear speech production of Korean stops: Changing phonetic targets and enhancement strategies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2008, 124(6):3909-3917.
50. Keating P.A. Phonetic encoding of prosodic structure. Speech Production: Models, Phonetic Processes, and Techniques 2006, 167-186. Psychology Press, New York and Hove. J. Harrington, M. Tabain (Eds.).
51. Keating P.A., Cho T., Fougeron C., Hsu C. Domain-initial strengthening in four languages. Laboratory phonology, Vol. IV: Phonetic interpretation 2003, 145-163. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. J. Local, R. Ogden, R. Temple (Eds.).
52. Keating P.A., Shattuck-Hufnagel S. A prosodic view of word form encoding for speech production. UCLA working papers in phonetics 2002, 101:112-156.
53. Kim S. Domain-initial strengthening of Korean fricatives. Harvard studies in Korean linguistics 2003, Vol. IX:164-173.
54. Kim S., Cho T. The use of phrase-level prosodic information in lexical segmentation: Evidence from word-spotting experiments in Korean. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2009, 125(5):3373-3386.
55. Klatt D. Vowel lengthening is syntactically determined in connected discourse. Journal of Phonetics 1975, 3:129-140.
56. Krakow R.A., Bell-Berti F., Wang Q.E. Supralaryngeal declination: Evidence from the velum. Producing speech: Contemporary issues (a Festschrift for Kathering Safford Harris) 1994, 333-354. AIP Press, Woodbury, New York. F. Bell-Berti, L.J. Raphael (Eds.).
57. Krivokapić J. Prosodic planning: Effects of phrasal length and complexity on pause duration. Journal of Phonetics 2007, 35:162-179.
58. Kuzla C., Cho T., Ernestus M. Prosodic strengthening of German fricatives in duration and assimilatory devoicing. Journal of Phonetics 2007, 35:301-320.
59. Ladd D.R. Declination: A review and some hypotheses. Phonology Yearbook 1984, 1:53-74.
60. Lehiste I. Suprasegmentals 1970, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
61. Liljencrants J., Lindblom B. Numerical simulations of vowel quality systems: The role of perceptual contrast. Language 1972, 48:839-862.
62. Lindblom B. Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1963, 35:1773-1781.
63. Lindblom B. Phonetic universals in vowel systems. Experimental phonology 1986, 13-44.
64. Lindblom B. Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. Speech Production and Speech Modeling 1990, 55:403-439.
65. Onaka, A. (2003). Domain-initial strengthening in Japanese: An acoustic and articulatory study. In: Proceedings of the 15th international congress of phonetic sciences. (pp. 2091-2094). Barcelona, Spain.
66. Onaka, A., Watson, C., Palethorpe, S., & Harrington, J. (2003). An acoustic analysis of domain-initial strengthening effect in Japanese. In S. Palethorpe & M. Tabain (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th international seminar on speech production. (pp. 201-206). Sydney, Australia.
67. Picheny M.A., Durlach N.I., Braida L.D. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1986, 29(4):434-446.
68. Pierrehumbert J., Talkin D. Lenition of /h/ and glottal stop. Laboratory phonology, Vol. II: Gesture, segment, prosody 1992, 90-117. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. G. Docherty, D.R. Ladd (Eds.).
69. Pitt M.A., Samuel A.G. Attentional allocation during speech perception: How fine is the focus?. Journal of Memory and Language 1990, 29:611-632.
70. Saltzman E. Dynamics and coordinate systems in skilled sensorimotor activity. Mind as motion: Dynamic, behavior, and cognition 1995, 149-173. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. R. Port, T. van Gelder (Eds.).
71. Saltzman E., Munhall K.G. A dynamical approach to gestural patterning in speech production. Ecological Psychology 1989, 1(4):333-382.
72. Schum D.J. Intelligibility of clear and conversational speech of young and elderly talkers. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 1996, 7(3):212.
73. Shattuck-Hufnagel S., Turk A. A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 1996, 25:193-247.
74. Sheskin D.J. Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures 2000, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton. 2nd ed.
75. Shin, J., & Cha, J.-E. (2003). The sound system of the Korean language (In Korean). Hankookmoonhwasa, Seoul. isbn:89-5726-014-593710.
76. Silbert N.H., de Jong K.J. Focus, prosodic context, and phonological feature specification: Patterns of variation in fricative production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2008, 123:2769-2779.
77. Smiljanic R. Early vs. late focus: Pitch-peak alignment in two dialects of Serbian and Croatian. Papers in laboratory phonology, 2006, Vol. 8:495-518. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
78. Smiljanicó R., Bradlow A.R. Production and perception of clear speech in Croatian and English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2005, 118(3):1677-1688.
79. Smiljanić R., Bradlow A.R. Stability of temporal contrasts across speaking styles in English and Croatian. Journal of Phonetics 2008, 36(1):91-113.
80. Smiljanić R., Bradlow A.R. Temporal organization of English clear and plain speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2008, 124(5):3171-3182.
81. Smiljanić R., Bradlow A.R. Speaking and hearing clearly: Talker and listener factors in speaking style changes. Linguistics and Language Compass 2009, 3(1):236-264.
82. Uchanski R.M. Clear speech. The handbook of speech perception 2005, 207-235. Blackwell, Malden/Oxford. D.B. Pisoni, R. Remez (Eds.).
83. Van Heuven V.J. What is the smallest prosodic domain?. Phonological structure and phonetic form: Papers in laboratory phonology 1994, Vol. III:76-97. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
84. Warner N., Otake T., Arai T. Intonational structure as a word boundary cue in Japanese. Language and Speech 2010, 53:107-131.
85. Wightman C.W., Shattuck-Hufnagel S., Ostendorf M., Price P.J. Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1992, 91:1707-1717.
86. Xu Y., Wang M. Organizing syllables into groups-Evidence from F0 and duration patterns in Mandarin. Journal of Phonetics 2009, 37:502-520.
87. Xu Y., Xu C.X. Phonetic realization of focus in English declarative intonation. Journal of Phonetics 2005, 33:159-197.
88. Yang B. A comparative study of American English and Korean vowels produced by male and female speakers. Journal of Phonetics 1996, 24:245-261.