Preboundary lengthening and preaccentual shortening across syllables in a trisyllabic word in English

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 133, Issue 5, 2013, Pages

  Cho, Taehong ^a   Kim, Jiseung ^a   Kim, Sahyang ^b  

^a Hanyang University   (South Korea)

^b Hong Ik University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMERICAN ENGLISH; BOUNDARY STRENGTHS; CONTEXT-WORD; PROSODIC BOUNDARY; STRESS PATTERNS;

ACOUSTICS; PHYSICS;

LINGUISTICS;

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHONETICS; SOUND DETECTION; SPEECH; SPEECH ANALYSIS; TIME; VOICE; YOUNG ADULT;

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHONETICS; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; TIME FACTORS; VOICE QUALITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84877612087     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.4800179     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bolinger, D. (1965). Forms of English: Accent, Morpheme, Order (Harvard University, Cambridge, MA), pp. 1-334.
2. Byrd, D., Krivokapić, J., and Lee, S. (2006). How far, how long: On the temporal scope of prosodic boundary effects., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 1589-1599. 10.1121/1.2217135
3. Byrd, D., and Riggs, D. (2008). Locality interactions with prominence in determining the scope of phrasal lengthening., J. Int. Phonetic Assoc. 38, 187-202.
4. Byrd, D., and Saltzman, E. (2003). The elastic phrase: Modeling the dynamics of boundary-adjacent lengthening., J. Phonetics 31, 149-180. 10.1016/S0095-4470(02)00085-2
5. Cambier-Langeveld, T. (1997). The domain of final lengthening in the production of Dutch., in Linguistics in the Netherlands, edited by, H. de Hoop, and, J. Coerts, (John Benjamins, Amsterdam), pp. 13-24.
6. Cambier-Langeveld, T. (2000). Temporal marking of accent and boundaries., Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam (LOT series 32). It is also available at http://dare.uva.nl/document/84163 (Last viewed March 31, 2013).
7. Cho, T. (2011). Laboratory phonology., in The Continuum Companion to Phonology, edited by, N. C. Kula, B. Botma, and, K. Nasukawa, (Continuum, London/New York), pp. 343-368.
8. Dasher, R., and Bolinger, D. (1982). On pre-accentual lengthening., J. Int. Phonetic Assoc. 12, 58-71. 10.1017/S0025100300002462
9. Erickson, D., and Lehiste, I. (1995). Contrastive emphasis in elicited dialogue: Durational compensation., in Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden, edited by, K. Elenius, and, P. Branderud, Vol. 4, pp. 352-355.
10. Fletcher, J. (2010). The prosody of speech: Timing and rhythm., in The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences, 2nd ed., edited by, W. J. Hardcastle, J. Laver, and, F. E. Gibbon, (Blackwell, Oxford), pp. 523-602.
11. Fougeron, C., and Jun, S.-A. (1998). Rate effects on French intonation: Prosodic organization and phonetic realization., J. Phonetics 26, 45-69. 10.1006/jpho.1997.0062
12. Jensen, C. (2004). Stress and accent: Prominence relations in Southern Standard British English., Ph.D. dissertation, University of Copenhagen, pp. 1-192.
13. Jones, D. (1956). An Outline of English Phonetics (Dutton, New York), pp. 1-362.
14. Keating, P. A., and Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2002). A prosodic view of word form encoding for speech production., UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 101, pp. 112-156. It is also available at http://escholarship.org/uc/item/1qf5f44k#page- 114 (Last viewed March 31, 2013).
15. Kohler, K. J. (1983). Prosodic boundary signals in German., Phonetica 40, 89-134. 10.1159/000261685
16. Liberman, M. (1975). The intonational system of English., Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, pp. 1-319.
17. Silverman, K. (1990). The separation of prosodics: Comments on Kohlers paper., in Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and the Physics of Speech, edited by, J. Kingston, and, M. E. Beckman, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), pp. 139-151.
18. Turk, A. E., and Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2007). Multiple targets of phrase-final lengthening in American English words., J. Phonetics 35, 445-472. 10.1016/j.wocn.2006.12.001
19. Turk, A. E., and White, L. (1999). Structural influences on accentual lengthening in English., J. Phonetics 27, 171-206. 10.1006/jpho.1999.0093
20. White, L. S. (2002). English speech timing: A domain and locus approach., Ph.D. dissertation, University of Edinburgh, pp. 1-336.