The parsing of prosody

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 11, Issue 1-2, 1996, Pages 17-68

  Beckman, Mary E ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21344470549     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/016909696387213     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Arisaka, H. (1941). Akusento no kata no honsitu ni tuite. Gengo kenkyuu, 7, 83-92.
2. Ayers, G.M. (1995). Nuclear accent types and prominence: Some psycholinguistic experiments. In Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Vol. 3, pp. 660-663, Stockholm, August.
3. Ayers, G.M. (1996). Nuclear accent types and prominence. Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
4. Beckman, M.E. (1994). When is a syllable not a syllable? Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics, 44, 50-69.
5. Beckman, M.E., & Ayers, G.M. (1994). Guidelines for ToBI labeling guide, ver. 2.0. Manuscript, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. (Tutorial and accompanying example utterances are available by contacting tobi@ling.ohio-state.edu.)
6. Beckman, M.E., & Edwards, J. (1990). Lengthenings and shortenings and the nature of prosodic constituency. In J. Kingston & M.E. Beckman (Eds), Between the grammar and physics of speech: Papers in laboratory phonology I, pp. 152-178. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Beckman, M.E., & Edwards, J. (1994). Articulatory evidence for differentiating stress categories. In P.A. Keating (Ed.), Phonological structure and phonetic form: Papers in laboratory phonology III, pp. 7-33. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Beckman, M.E., & Hirschberg, J. (1994). The ToBI annotation conventions. Manuscript, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. (Provided with the Guidelines for ToBI labeling guide, or available separately by contacting tobi@ling.ohio-state.edu.)
9. Beckman, M.E., & Pierrehumbert, J.B. (1986). Intonational structure in English and Japanese. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 255-310.
10. Bolinger, D. (1961). Contrastive accent and contrastive stress. Language, 37, 83-96.
11. Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). Sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
12. Cruttenden, A. (1994). Rises in English. In J. Windsor-Lewis (Ed.), Studies in general and English linguistics: Essays in honour of Professor J.D. O'Connor, pp. 155-173. London: Routledge.
13. de Jong, K. (1995). The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: Linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 491-504.
14. Fear, B.D., Cutler, A., & Butterfield, S. (1995). The strong/weak syllable distinction in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 1893-1904.
15. Goldsmith, J. (1990). Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
16. Gussenhoven, C. (1983). On the grammar and semantics of sentence accents. Dordrecht: Foris.
17. Hammond, M. (1986). The obligatory-branching parameter in metrical theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 4, 185-288.
18. Hattori, S. (1960). Gengogaku no hoohoo. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
19. Hermes, D.J., & van Gestel, J.C. (1991). The frequency scale of speech intonation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 97-102.
20. Hirschberg, J., & Ward, G. (1995). The interpretation of the high-rise question contour in English. Journal of Pragmatics, 24, 407-412.
21. Jackendoff, R. (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Jun, S. (1992). The domain of nasalization and the prosodic structure in Korean. In H.-M. Sohn (Ed.), Korean linguistics, Vol. 7, pp. 11-29. Seoul: Hanshin.
23. Kubozono, H. (1993). The organization of Japanese prosody. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.
24. Ladd, D.R. (1980). The structure of intonational meaning. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
25. Ladd, D.R. (1986). Intonational phrasing: The case for recursive prosodic structure. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 307-370.
26. Liberman, M.Y., & Pierrehumbert, J.B. (1984). Intonational invariance under changes in pitch range and length. In M. Aranoff & R.T. Oehrle (Eds), Language sound structure: Studies in phonology presented to Morris Halle, pp. 157-233. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Liberman, M., & Prince, A. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 249-336.
28. Maekawa, K. (1994a). Linguistics study of intonation and its current problems. In Proceedings of the Fall Meeting of the Acoustical Society of Japan, pp. 291-294. Tokyo: The Acoustical Society of Japan.
29. Maekawa, K. (1994b). Is there "dephrasing" of the accentual phrase in Japanese? Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics, 44, 146-165.
30. McCawley, J.D. (1968). The phonological component of a grammar of Japanese. The Hague: Mouton.
31. Mixdorff, H., & Fujisaki, H. (1994). Analysis of voice fundamental frequency contours of German utterances using a quantitative model. In Proceedings of the 1994 International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, pp. 2231-2234, Yokohama, September.
32. Muranaka, T., & Hara, N. (1994). Features of prominent particles in Japanese discourse: Frequency, function, and acoustic features. In Proceedings of the 1994 International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, pp. 395-398, Yokohama, September.
33. Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
34. Pierrehumbert, J. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
35. Pierrehumbert, J. (1993). Alignment and prosodic heads. In Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, Vol. 10, pp. 268-286, Columbus, OH, August.
36. Pierrehumbert, J.B., & Beckman, M.E. (1988). Japanese tone structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Pierrehumbert, J., & Hirschberg, J. (1990). The meaning of intonation contours in the interpretation of discourse. In P.R. Cohen, J. Morgan, & M.E. Pollack (Eds), Intentions in communication , pp. 271-311. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Pitrelli, J., Beckman, M.E., & Hirschberg, J. (1994). Evaluation of prosodic transcription labeling reliability in the ToBI framework. In Proceedings of the 1994 International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, pp. 123-126, Yokohama, September.
39. Poser, W.J. (1984). The phonetics and phonology of tone and intonation in Japanese. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
40. Prince, A.S. (1983). Relating to the grid. Linguistic Inquiry, 14, 19-100.
41. Rooth, M. (1992). A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics, 1, 75-116.
42. Ross, K. (1995). Modeling of intonation for speech synthesis. Doctoral dissertation, Boston University, Boston, MA.
43. Sagisaka, Y., & Sato, H. (1983). Secondary accent analysis in Japanese stem-affix concatenations. Transactions of the Committee on Speech Research, No. S83-05, The Acoustical Society of Japan, Tokyo.
44. Selkirk, E.O. (1984). Phonology and syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Selkirk, E.O. (1986). On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 371-401.
46. Selkirk, E.O., & Tateishi, K. (1988). Constraints on minor phrase formation in Japanese. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, pp. 316-336. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistics Society.
47. Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., Ostendorf, M., & Ross, K. (1994). Stress shift and early pitch accent placement in lexical items in American English. Journal of Phonetics, 22, 357-388.
48. Steedman, M. (1987). Combinatory grammars and parasitic gaps. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 5, 403-439.
49. Steedman, M. (1991a). Structure and intonation. Language, 67, 260-296.
50. Steedman, M. (1991b). Surface structure, intonation, and "focus". Paper presented at the ESPRIT Workshop on Language and Speech, Brussels, November.
51. Steedman, M. (1996). On prosody and bootstrapping. In J. Morgan & K. Demuth (Eds), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition, pp. 331-342. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
52. Terken, J. (1995). Modeling variation of accentual prominence: Do we need free variability within the phrase? Evidence from spontaneous speech. Paper presented at the ATR 1995 International Workshop on Computational Modeling of Prosody for Spontaneous Speech Processing, Kyoto, April.
53. Trim, J.L.M. (1959). 'meidZer | @n 'main@ | "toungru:ps | in "iÎgliS Û. Le maître phonétique, 112, 26-29.
54. Trubetzkoy, N.S. (1958). Grundzüge der Phonologie. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.
55. Vanderslice, R., & Ladefoged, P. (1972). Binary suprasegmental features and transformational word-accentuation rules. Language, 48, 819-838.
56. Venditti, J.J. (1994). Japanese ToBI labeling guidelines. Manuscript, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. (On-line notes available from venditti@ling.ohio-state.edu.)
57. Vroomen, J., Collier, R., & Mozziconacci, S. (1993). Duration and intonation in emotional speech. In EUROSPEECH'93, pp. 577-580, Berlin, September.
58. Ward, G., & Hirschberg, J. (1985). Implicating uncertainty: The pragmatics of fall-rise intonation. Language, 61, 747-776.
59. Wightman, C.W., & Ostendorf, M. (1994). Automatic labeling of prosodic patterns. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 2, 469-481.
60. Woodbury, A. (1993). Against intonational phrases in Central Alaskan Yupik Eskimo. Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the Linguistics Society of America, Los Angeles, CA, January.