Prosodic boundary strength: An articulatory and perceptual study

Journal of Phonetics

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 430-442

  Krivokapić, Jelena ^a   Byrd, Dani ^b  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859971796     PISSN: 00954470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2012.02.011     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Beckman, M. E., & Ayers Elam, G. A. (1997). Guidelines for ToBI labelling. Version 3.0, unpublished ms. Available online at: http://www.ling.ohio-state.edu/~tobi/ame_tobi/labelling_guide_v3.pdf.
2. Beckman M.E., Hirschberg J., Shattuck-Hufnagel S. The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework. Prosodic typology. The phonology of intonation and phrasing 2005, 9-54. Oxford University Press. S.-A. Jun (Ed.).
3. Beckman M.E., Pierrehumbert J.B. Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook 1986, 3:255-309.
4. Byrd D. Articulatory vowel lengthening and coordination at phrasal junctures. Phonetica 2000, 57:3-16.
5. Byrd D. Relating prosody and dynamic events: Commentary on the papers by Cho, Navas, and Smiljanić. Laboratory phonology 8: Varieties of phonological competence 2006, 549-561. Mouton de Gruyter. L. Goldstein, D.H. Whalen, C. Best. (Eds.).
6. Byrd D., Kaun A., Narayanan S., Saltzman E. Phrasal signatures in articulation. Papers in laboratory phonology 5. Acquisition and the lexicon 2000, 70-87. Cambridge University Press. M.B. Broe, J.B. Pierrehumbert. (Eds.).
7. Byrd D., Krivokapić J., Lee S. How far, how long: On the temporal scope of phrase boundary effects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2006, 120:1589-1599.
8. Byrd D., Saltzman E. Intragestural dynamics of multiple phrasal boundaries. Journal of Phonetics 1998, 26:173-199.
9. Byrd D., Saltzman E. The elastic phrase: Modeling the dynamics of boundary-adjacent lengthening. Journal of Phonetics 2003, 31:149-180.
10. Campione E., Veronis J. A large-scale multilingual study of silent pause duration. Proceedings of speech prosody 2002, 11-13 April 2002 2002, 199-202. Laboratoire Parole et Langage, Aix-en-Provence. B. Bel, I. Marlien (Eds.).
11. Campos-Astorkiza R. Italian Raddoppiamento: Prosodic effects on length. 148th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, San Diego, CA, November 2004. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2004, 116(4):2645.
12. Carlson K., Clifton C., Frazier L. Prosodic boundaries in adjunct attachment. Journal of Memory and Language 2001, 45:58-81.
13. Cho T. Manifestation of prosodic structure in articulation: Evidence from lip kinematics in English. Laboratory phonology 8: Varieties of phonological competence 2006, 519-548. Mouton de Gruyter. L. Goldstein, D.H. Whalen, C. Best. (Eds.).
14. Cho T., McQueen J., Cox E. Prosodically driven phonetic detail in speech processing: The case of domain-initial strengthening in English. Journal of Phonetics 2007, 35:210-243.
15. Christophe A., Peperkamp S., Pallier C., Block E., Mehler.J. Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access: I. Adult data. Journal of Memory and Language 2004, 51:523-547.
16. Cole J., Goldstein L., Katsika A., Mo Y., Nava E., Tiede M. Perceived prosody: Phonetic bases of prominence and boundaries. Acoustical Society of America, Miami, FL, November 2008. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2008, 124(44):2496.
17. Cole J., Mo Y., Baek S. The role of syntactic structure in guiding prosody perception with ordinary listeners and everyday speech. Language and Cognitive Processes 2010, 25(7):1141-1177.
18. Cutler A., Dahan D., Donselaar W. Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Language and Speech 1997, 40:141-201.
19. Dowty D.R. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 1991, 67:547-619.
20. Dresher E.B. The prosodic basis of the Tiberian Hebrew system of accents. Language 1994, 70:1-52.
21. Edwards J., Beckman M.E., Fletcher J. The articulatory kinematics of final lengthening. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1991, 89:369-382.
22. Ferreira F. Effects of length and syntactic complexity on initiation times for prepared utterances. Journal of Memory and Language 1991, 30:210-233.
23. Ferreira F. Creation of prosody during sentence production. Psychological Review 1993, 100:233-253.
24. Fougeron C., Keating P. Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1997, 101:3728-3740.
25. Frazier L., Carlson K., Clifton.C. Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10:244-249.
26. Frota S. Prosody and focus in European Portuguese. Phonological Phrasing and Intonation 2000, Garland Publishing.
27. Fuchs S., Perrier P., Geng C., Mooshammer C. What role does the palate play in speech motor control? Insights from tongue kinematics for German alveolar obstruents. Speech production: Models, phonetic processes and techniques 2006, 149-164. Psychology Press, New York. J. Harrington, M. Tabain. (Eds.).
28. Gaitenby, J. H. (1965). The elastic word. Haskins report SR-2, 3.1-3.12.
29. Granqvist, S. (1996). Enhancements to the Visual Analogue Scale, VAS, for listening tests. TMH-QPSR, 4/1996, 61-62. Department of Speech, Music and Hearing, Royal Institute of Technology.
30. Gussenhoven C., Rietveld.A.C.M. Intonation contours, prosodic structure, and preboundary lengthening. Journal of Phonetics 1992, 20:283-303.
31. Hansson, P. (2003). Prosodic phrasing in spontaneous Swedish. Doctoral Dissertation. Travaux de l'institut de linguistique de Lund 43. Lund: Department of Linguistics and Phonetics, Lund University.
32. Hayes B. The prosodic hierarchy in meter. Rhythm and meter 1989, 201-260. Academic Press. P. Kiparsky, G. Youmans (Eds.).
33. Itô J., Mester A. Weak layering and word binarity. Linguistics Research Center-92-09 1992, University of California, Santa Cruz.
34. Itô J., Mester A. The extended prosodic word. Phonological domains: Universals and derivations 2010, 135-194. Mouton de Gruyter. B. Kabak, J. Grijzenhout (Eds.).
35. Jun S.-A. Prosodic phrasing and attachment preferences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2003, 32:219-249.
36. Keating P., Shattuck-Hufnagel S. A prosodic view of word form encoding for speech production. UCLA working papers in phonetics 2002, 101:112-156.
37. Kjelgaard M.M., Speer S.R. Prosodic facilitation and inference in the resolution of temporal syntactic closure ambiguity. Journal of Memory and Language 1999, 40:153-194.
38. Kim M., Nam.H. Pitch accommodation in synchronous speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2009, 125(4):2575.
39. Klatt D. Vowel lengthening is syntactically determined in connected discourse. Journal of Phonetics 1975, 3:129-140.
40. Krivokapić J. Prosodic planning: Effects of phrasal length and complexity on pause duration. Journal of Phonetics 2007, 35:162-179.
41. Krivokapić, J. (2007b). The planning, production, and perception of prosodic structure. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
42. Krivokapić J., Ananthakrishnan S. Gradiency and categoricity in prosodic boundary production and perception. Acoustical Society of America, New Orleans, LA, November 2007. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2007, 122(5):3020.
43. Krivokapić.J. Prosodic interaction between speakers of American and British English. Acoustical Society of America, Baltimore, MD, April 2010. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2010, 127(3):1851.
44. Kubozono H. Modeling syntactic effects on downstep in Japanese. Papers in laboratory phonology II: Gesture, segment, prosody 1992, 287-368. Cambridge University Press. G. Docherty, R. Ladd (Eds.).
45. Ladd D.R. Intonational phrasing: The case of recursive prosodic structure. Phonology Yearbook 1986, 3:311-340.
46. Ladd D.R. Declination "reset" and the hierarchical organization of utterances. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1988, 84:530-544.
47. Ladd D.R. Intonational phonology. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 1996, Cambridge University Press.
48. McCarthy J., Prince A. Generalized alignment. Yearbook of Morphology 1993, 1993:79-153.
49. McQueen J.M., Cho.T. The use of domain-initial strengthening in segmentation of continuous English speech. Proceedings of the 15th international congress of phonetic sciences 2003, 2993-2996. Causal Productions, Adelaide. M.J. Solé, D. Recasens, J. Romero (Eds.).
50. Mooshammer C., Hoole P., Geumann A. Jaw and order. Language and Speech 2006, 50:145-176.
51. Nespor M., Vogel I. Prosodic phonology 1986, Foris Publications.
52. Oller K.D. The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1973, 54:1235-1247.
53. Pelekanou T., Arvaniti A. Postlexical rules and gestural overlap in a Greek spoken corpus. Recherches en linguistique grecque 2002, Vol. I. L' Harmattan, Paris, pp. 71-74.
54. Pierrehumbert, J. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT Press. Distributed 1988, Indiana University Linguistics Club.
55. De Pijper J.R., Sanderman A.A. On the perceptual strength of prosodic boundaries and its relation to suprasegmental cues. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1994, 96:2037-2047.
56. Price P.J., Ostendorf M., Shattuck-Hufnagel S., Fong C. The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1991, 90:2956-2970.
57. Rietveld T., Chen.A. How to obtain and process perceptual judgements of intonational meaning. Methods in empirical prosody research 2006, 283-319. Mouton De Gruyter, Berlin/New York. S. Sudhoff, D. Lenertová, R. Meyer, S. Pappert, P. Augurzky, I. Mleinek, N. Richter, J. Schliesser (Eds.).
58. Salverda A.P., Dahan D., McQueen J.M. The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension. Cognition 2003, 90:51-89.
59. Sanderman A.A., Collier R. Prosodic phrasing at the sentence level. Producing speech: contemporary issues. For Katherine Safford Harris 1995, 321-332. American Institute of Physics, New York. F. Bell-Berti, L.J. Raphael. (Eds.).
60. Schafer, A. J. (1997). Prosodic parsing: the role of prosody in sentence comprehension. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts.
61. Schreuder M., Gilbers D., Quené H. Recursion in phonology. Lingua 2009, 119:1243-1252.
62. Selkirk E. On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook 1986, 3:371-405.
63. Selkirk E. The prosodic structure of function words. Papers in optimality theory 1995, 439-470. GLSA Publications. J. Beckman, L. Walsh Dickey, S. Urbanczyk. (Eds.).
64. Selkirk E. On clause and intonational phrase in Japanese: The syntactic grounding of prosodic constituent structure. Gengo Kenkyu 2009, 136:35-73.
65. Shattuck-Hufnagel S., Turk A. A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 1996, 25:193-247.
66. Smith, C. L. (2007). Prosodic accommodation by French speakers to a non-native interlocutor. In: Proceedings of the 16th international congress of phonetic sciences, 1081-1084.
67. Swerts M. Prosodic features at discourse boundaries of different strength. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1997, 101:514-521.
68. Swets B., Desmet T., Hambrick D.Z., Ferreira F. The role of working memory in syntactic ambiguity resolution: A psychometric approach. Journal of Experiment Psychology: General 2007, 64-81.
69. Tabain M. Effects of prosodic boundary on/aC/ sequences: Articulatory results. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2003, 113:2834-2849.
70. Tokizaki H. Prosodic hierarchy and prosodic boundary. Bulletin of Universities and Institutes 2002, 56:81-99.
71. Turk A.E., Shattuck-Hufnagel.S. Multiple targets of phrase-final lengthening in American English words. Journal of Phonetics 2007, 35:445-472.
72. Wagner, M. (2005). Prosody and recursion. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
73. Wagner M. Prosody and recursion in coordinate structures and beyond. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2010, 28:183-237.
74. Wagner M., Crivellaro.S. Relative prosodic boundary strength and prior bias in disambiguation. Speech Prosody 2010, 2010. 100238:1-4.
75. Wewers M.E., Lowe N.K. A critical review of Visual Analogue Scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Research in Nursing & Health 1990, 13:227-236.
76. Wightman C.W., Shattuck-Hufnagel S., Ostendorf M., Price P.J. Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1992, 91:1707-1717.
77. Yoon, T. -J. (2007). A predictive model of prosody through grammatical interface: A computational approach. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.