The elastic phrase: Modeling the dynamics of boundary-adjacent lengthening

Journal of Phonetics

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 149-180

  Byrd, Dani ^a   Saltzman, Elliot ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b HASKINS LABORATORIES   (United States)

^c BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037949203     PISSN: 00954470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0095-4470(02)00085-2     Document Type: Review

References (92)

1. Abry, C., & Lallouache, T. (1995). Modeling lip constriction anticipatory behavior for rounding in French with MEM (Movement Expansion Model). In K. Elenius, & P. Branderud (Eds.), Proceedings of the XIIth international congress of phonetic sciences (pp. 152-155). Stockholm: KTH and Stockholm University.
2. Bailly, G., Laboissière, R., & Schwartz, J. L. (1991). Formant trajectories as audible gestures: an alternative for speech synthesis. Journal of Phonetics, 19, 9-23.
3. Barbosa, P., & Bailly, G. (1994). Characterisation of rhythmic patterns for text-to-speech synthesis. Speech Communication, 15, 127-137.
4. Beckman, M. (1996). The parsing of prosody. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11(1/2), 17-67.
5. Beckman, M. E., & Edwards, J. (1992). Intonational categories and the articulatory control of duration. In Y. Tohkura, E. Vatikiotis-Bateson, & Y. Sagisaka (Eds.), Speech perception, production, and linguistic structure (pp. 359-375). Tokyo: Ohmsha, Ltd.
6. Beckman, M. E., Edwards, J., & Fletcher, J. (1992). Prosodic structure and tempo in a sonority model of articulatory dynamics. In G. J. Docherty, & D. R. Ladd (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology II: gesture, segment, prosody (pp. 68-86). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Berkovits, R. (1993a). Utterance-final lengthening and the duration of final-stop closures. Journal of Phonetics, 21, 479-489.
8. Berkovits, R. (1993b). Progressive utterance-final lengthening in syllables with final fricatives. Language and Speech, 36(1), 89-98.
9. Berkovits, R. (1994). Durational effects in final lengthening, gapping and contrastive stress. Language and Speech, 37(3), 237-250.
10. Birch, S., & Clifton, C. (1995). Focus, accent, and argument structure: effects on language comprehension. Language and Speech, 38, 365-391.
11. Browman, C. P. (1994). Lip aperture and consonant releases. In P. A. Keating (Ed.), Phonological structure and phonetic form: papers in laboratory phonology III (pp. 331-353). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1986). Towards an articulatory phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 219-252.
13. Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1989). Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology, 6, 201-251.
14. Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1990). Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech. In J. Kingston, & M. E. Beckman (Eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology: I. Between the Grammar and the Physics of Speech (pp. 341-376). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1992). Articulatory phonology: an overview. Phonetica, 49, 155-180.
16. Browman, C.P., & Goldstein, L. (1995). Dynamics and articulatory phonology. In R. Port, & T. van Gelder (Eds.), Mind as motion: dynamics, behavior, and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (2000). Competing constraints on intergestural coordination and self-organization of phonological structures. Bulletin de la Communication Parlée, 5, 25-34.
18. Bullock, D., & Grossberg, S. (1988). Neural dynamics of planned arm movements: Emergent invariants and speed-accuracy properties during trajectory formation. Psychological Review, 95, 49-90.
19. Byrd, D. (1996a). Influences on articulatory timing in consonant sequences. Journal of Phonetics, 24(2), 209-244.
20. Byrd, D. (1996b). A phase window framework for articulatory timing. Phonology, 13(2), 139-169.
21. Byrd, D. (2000). Articulatory vowel lengthening and coordination at phrasal junctures. Phonetica, 57(1), 3-16.
22. Byrd, D., Kaun, A., Narayanan, S., & Saltzman, E. (2000). Phrasal signatures in articulation. In M. B. Broe, & J. B. Pierrehumbert (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology V (pp. 70-87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Byrd, D., & Saltzman, E. (1998). Intragestural dynamics of multiple phrasal boundaries. Journal of Phonetics, 26, 173-199.
24. Cambier-Langeveld, T. (1997). The domain of final lengthening in production of Dutch. In Coerts, & de Hoop (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands. (pp. 13-24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
25. Chitoran, I., Goldstein, L., & Byrd, D. (2002). Gestural overlap and recoverability: articulatory evidence from Georgian. In C. Gussenhoven, & N. Warner (Eds.), Laboratory phonology VII (pp. 419-448). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
26. Cho, T. Manifestation of prosodic structure in articulatory variation: evidence from lip movement kinematics in English. Laboratory Phonology VIII (submitted).
27. Cho, T. (2001). Effects of prosody on articulation in English. PhD dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles. (Distributed as UCLA Dissertations in Linguistics, number 22).
28. Cho, T., & Jun, S.-A. (2000). Domain initial strengthening as enhancement of laryngeal features: aerodynamic evidence from Korean. Chicago Linguistics Society, 36, 31-44.
29. Cho, T., & Keating, P. A. (2001). Articulatory and acoustic studies on domain-initial strengthening in Korean. Journal of Phonetics, 29(2), 155-190.
30. Coker, C. H. (1976). A model of articulatory dynamics and control. Proceedings of the IEEE, 64, 452-460.
31. Cutler, A., Dahan, D., & van Donselaar, W. (1997). Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: a literature review. Language and Speech, 40, 141-201.
32. Docherty, G. (1992). The timing of voicing in British English obstruents. Berlin: Foris.
33. Edwards, J., Beckman, M. E., & Fletcher, J. (1991). The articulatory kinematics of final lengthening. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(1), 369-382.
34. Ferriera, F. (1993). The creation of prosody during sentence production. Psychological Review, 150, 233-253.
35. Flash, T., & Sejnowski, T. (2001). Computational approaches to motor control. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 655-662.
36. Fletcher, J. (1991). Rhythm and final lengthening in French. Journal of Phonetics, 19(2), 193-212.
37. Fougeron, C. (2001). Domain-initial articulatory variations in French. Journal of Phonetics, 29(2), 109-135.
38. Fougeron, C., & Keating, P. A. (1997). Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 3728-3740.
39. Fowler, C. (1980). Coarticulation and theories of extrinsic timing. Journal of Phonetics, 8, 113-133.
40. Fujimura, O. (2000). The C/D model and prosodic control of articulatory behavior. Phonetica, 57, 128-138.
41. Gaitenby, J. H. (1965). The elastic word. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research, SR-2.
42. Gibson, J. J. (1975). Events are perceivable but time is not. In J. T. Fraser, & N. Lawrence (Eds.), The study of time II (pp. 295-301). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43. Gibson, J.J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum (Originally published: Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1979).
44. Goldstein, L., & Fowler, C. Articulatory phonology: a phonology for public language use (submitted).
45. Hardcastle, W. J. (1985). Some phonetic and syntactic constraints on lingual coarticulation during /kl/ sequences. Speech Communication, 4, 247-263.
46. Harrington, J., Fletcher, J., & Roberts (1995). Coarticulation and the accented/unaccented distinction: evidence from jaw movement data. Journal of Phonetics, 23, 305-322.
47. Hawkins, S. (1992). An introduction to task dynamics. In G. Docherty, & D. R. Ladd (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology I: gesture, segment, prosody (pp. 9-25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Jun, S.-A. (1993). The phonetics and phonology of Korean prosody. PhD dissertation, Ohio State University.
49. Jun, S.-A. (1995). Asymmetrical prosodic effects on the laryngeal gesture in Korean. In B. Connell, & A. Arvaniti (Eds.), Phonology and phonetic evidence: papers in laboratory phonology IV (pp. 235-253). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Keating, P. A., Cho, T., Fougeron, C., & Hsu, C.-S. (1999). Domain-initial strengthening in four languages. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics, 97, 139-156 (Also to appear in Papers in laboratory phonology VI. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
51. Klatt, D. H. (1976). Structure of a phonological rule component for a synthesis-by-rule program. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics Speech, and Signal Processing, 24, 391-398.
52. Koiso, H., Shimojima, A., & Katagiri, Y. (1998). Collaborative signaling of information structures by dynamic speech rate. Language and Speech, 41, 323-350.
53. Kröger, B. J., Schröder, G., & Opgen-Rhein, C. (1995). A gesture-based dynamic model describing articulatory movement data. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98, 1878-1889.
54. Laboissière, R., Schwartz, J.-L., & Bailly, G. (1991). Motor control for speech skills: a connectionist approach. In D. S. Tonretzky, J. L. Elman, T. J. Sejnowski, & G. E. Hinton (Eds.), Connectionist models. Proceedings of the 1990 summer school (pp. 319-327). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
55. Lindblom, B. (1963). Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 35, 1773-1781.
56. McClean, M. (1973). Forward coarticulation of velar movement at marked junctural boundaries. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 16(2), 286-296.
57. Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. (1995). Geometrical principles in motor control. In M. Arbib (Ed.), The handbook of brain theory and neural networks (pp. 434-438). Cambridge: MIT Press.
58. Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dodrecht: Foris Publications.
59. O'Dell, M. L., & Nieminen, T. (1999). Coupled oscillator model of speech rhythm. In J. J. Ohala, Y. Hasegawa, M. Ohala, D. Granville, & A. C. Bailey (Eds.), Proceedings of the XIVth international congress of phonetic sciences, Vol. 2 (pp. 1075-1078). New York: American Institute of Physics.
60. Ostry, D. J., Gribble, P., & Gracco, V. L. (1996). Coarticulation of jaw movements in speech production: is context sensitivity in speech kinematics centrally planned? The Journal of Neuroscience, 16(4), 1570-1579.
61. Perrier, P., Ostry, D. J., & Laboissière, R. (1996). The equilibrium point hypothesis and its application to speech motor control. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 365-377.
62. Pierrehumbert, J. B., & Beckman, M. E. (1988). Japanese tone structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Linguistic Inquiry Monograph Series, 15].
63. Pierrehumbert, J., & Talkin, D. (1992). Lenition of /h/ and glottal stop. In G. Docherty, & D. R. Ladd (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology I: gesture, segment, prosody (pp. 90-117). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64. Plaut, D. C. (1995). Lesioned attractor networks as models of neuropsychological deficits. In M. Arbib (Ed.), The handbook of brain theory and neural networks (pp. 540-543). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
65. Price, P. J., Ostendorf, S., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Fong, C. (1991). The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90(6), 2956-2970.
66. Port, R. F., & Cummins, F. (1992). The English voicing contrast as velocity perturbation. In Proceedings of the 1992 International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP '92), Vol. 2 (pp. 1311-1314). Banff, Alberta, Canada. Edmonton: Priority Printing.
67. Repp, B. (1998). A microcosm of musical expression: I. Quantitative analysis of pianists' timing in the initial measures of Chopin's Etude in E major. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104, 1085-1100.
68. Saltzman, E. L. (1986). Task dynamic coordination of the speech articulators: A preliminary model. Generation and modulation of action patterns. In H. Heuer, & C. Fromm (Eds.), Experimental brain research, Series 15 (pp. 129-144). New York: Springer-Verlag.
69. Saltzman, E. L. (1995). Dynamics and coordinate systems in skilled sensorimotor activity. In R. Port, & T. van Gelder (Eds.), Mind as motion: Dynamic, behavior, and cognition (pp. 149-173). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
70. Saltzman, E. (1999). Nonlinear dynamics of temporal patterning in speech. In P. L. Divenyi, & R. J. Porter (Eds.), Proceedings of symposium on the dynamics of the production and perception of speech, a satellite symposium of the XIVth international congress of phonetic sciences. Martinez, CA: East Bay Institute for Research and Education, Inc.
71. Saltzman, E., & Byrd, D. (1999). Dynamical simulations of a phase window model of relative timing. In J. J. Ohala, Y. Hasegawa, M. Ohala, D. Granville, & A. C. Bailey (Eds.), Proceedings of the XIVth international congress of phonetic sciences (pp. 2275-2278). New York: American Institute of Physics.
72. Saltzman, E., & Byrd, D. (2000a). Task-dynamics of gestural timing: Phase windows and multifrequency rhythms. Human Movement Science, 19(4), 499-526.
73. Saltzman, E., & Byrd, D. (2000b). Demonstrating effects of parameter dynamics on gestural timing. May 2000 meeting of the Acoustical Society of America. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107(5,2), 2904.
74. Saltzman, E., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1987). Skilled actions: A task dynamic approach. Psychological Review, 94, 84-106.
75. Saltzman, E., Löfqvist, A., Kay, B., Kinsella-Shaw, J., & Rubin, P. (1998). Dynamics of intergestural timing: a perturbation study of lip-larynx coordination. Experimental Brain Research, 123, 412-424.
76. Saltzman, E., Löfqvist, A., & Mitra, S. (2000). "Clocks" and "glue- Global timing and intergestural cohesion. In M. B. Broe, & J. B. Pierrehumbert (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology V (pp. 88-101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77. Saltzman, E. L., & Munhall, K. G. (1989). A dynamical approach to gestural patterning in speech production. Ecological Psychology, 1, 333-382.
78. Sancier, M., & Fowler, C. (1997). Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 421-436.
79. Sanderman, A. A., & Collier, R. (1997). Prosodic phrasing and comprehension. Language and Speech, 40, 391-409.
80. Selkirk, E. O. (1984). Phonology and syntax: the relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
81. Schafer, A. J. (1997). Prosodic parsing: The role of prosody in sentence comprehension. University of Massachusetts Doctoral Dissertation.
82. Schafer, A. J., & Speer, S. R. (1997). The influence of prosodic phrasal boundaries on the resolution of semantic lexical ambiguity. 134th meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, San Diego, CA. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 3138.
83. Schepman, A., & Rodway, P. (2000). Prosody and parsing in coordination structures. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53(2), 377-396.
84. Shadmehr, R. (1995). Equilibrium point hypothesis. In M. Arbib (Ed.), The handbook of brain theory and neural networks (pp. 370-372). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
85. Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Turk, A. (1996). A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(2), 193-247.
86. Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Turk, A. (1998). The domain of final-lengthening in English. Proceedings of 16th international congress on acoustics and 135th meeting Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 2, pp. 1235-1236.
87. Steedman, M. (1991). Structure and intonation. Language, 67, 262-296.
88. Steedman, M. (2000). The syntactic process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
89. Swerts, M. (1997). Prosodic features at discourse boundaries of different strength. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(1), 514-521.
90. van Lieshout, P. H., Starkweather, C. W., Hulstijn, W., & Peters, H. F. M. (1995). Effects of linguistic correlates of stuttering on emg activity in nonstuttering speakers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 30-372.
91. van Santen, J. P. H. (1997). Segmental duration and speech timing. In Y. Sagisaka, N. Campbell, & N. Higuchi (Eds.), Computing prosody (pp. 225-249). New York: Springer.
92. Vatikiotis-Bateson, E., Hirayama, M., Honda, K., & Kawato, M. (1992). The articulatory dynamics of running speech: Gestures from phonemes. In Proceedings of the 1992 International conference on spoken language processing (ICSLP '92), Vol. 2 (pp. 887-890). Banff, Alberta, Canada. Edmonton: Priority Printing.