The effect of focus marking on supralaryngeal articulation - Is it mediated by accentuation?

Journal of Phonetics

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 47-61

  Mücke, Doris ^a   Grice, Martine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901257486     PISSN: 00954470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2014.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Avesani, C., Vayra M., & Zmarich C. (2007). On the articulatory basis of prominence in Italian. In Proceedings of the 16th international congress of phonetic sciences (pp. 981-984). Saarbrücken, Germany.
2. Baumann S. The intonation of givenness - evidence from German. Linguistische Arbeiten 508 2006, Tübingen, Niemeyer.
3. Baumann S., Grice M. The intonation of accessibility. Journal of Pragmatics 2006, 38(10):1636-1657.
4. Baumann, S., Grice M., & Steindamm S. (2006). Prosodic marking of focus domains - Categorical or gradient? In Proceedings of speech prosody 2006 (pp. 301-304). Dresden, Germany.
5. Beckman M.E. Stress and non-stress accent 1986, Fortis, Dortrecht.
6. Beckman M.E., Edwards J., Fletcher J. Prosodic structure and tempo in a sonority model of articulatory dynamics. Papers in laboratory phonology II: Segment, gesture, prosody 1992, 68-86. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. G.J. Docherty, D.R. Ladd (Eds.).
7. Beckman M.E., Venditti J.J. Tone and intonation. The handbook of phonetic sciences 2010, 603-652. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford. 2nd ed. W.J. Hardcastle, J. Laver, F.E. Gibbon (Eds.).
8. Boersma, P. & Weenink E. (2010). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1.30) [Computer program]. Retrieved 29.05.10. http://www.praat.org/.
9. Breen M., Fedorenko E., Wagner M., Gibson E. Acoustic correlates of information structure. Language and Cognitive Processes 2010, 25(7):1044-1098.
10. Browman C.P., Goldstein L. Towards an articulatory phonology. Phonology yearbook 3 1986, 219-252. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. C. Ewen, J. Anderson (Eds.).
11. Browman C.P., Goldstein L. Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica 1992, 49(3-4):155-180.
12. Byrd D. Articulatory vowel lengthening and coordination at phrasal junctures. Phonetica 2000, 57:3-16.
13. Byrd D., Saltzman E. Intragestural dynamics of multiple phrasal boundaries. Journal of Phonetics 1998, 26:173-199.
14. Büring D. On D-trees, beans, and B-accents. Linguistics and Philosophy 2003, 26:511-545.
15. Cassidy S., Harrington J. Multi-level annotation in the EMU speech database management system. Speech Communication 2001, 33:611-677.
16. Cho T. The effects of prosody on articulation in English 2002, Routledge, New York.
17. Cho T. Prosodic strengthening and featural enhancement: Evidence from acoustic and articulatory realizations of /a,i/ in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2005, 117(6):3867-3878.
18. Cho T. Manifestation of prosodic structure in articulation: Evidence from lip kinematics in English. Laboratory phonology 8 2006, 519-548. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, New York.
19. Cho T., Lee Y., Kim S. Communicatively driven versus prosodically driven hyper-articulation in Korean. Journal of Phonetics 2011, 39(3):344-361.
20. Cruttenden A. Intonation 1997, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 2nd ed.
21. Crystal D. Prosodic systems and intonation in English 1969, Cambridge University Press, London.
22. Culicover P., Rochemont M. Stress and focus in English. Language 1983, 59:123-165.
23. de Jong K. The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: Linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1995, 97:491-504.
24. de Jong K., Beckman M.E., Edwards J. The interplay between prosodic structure and coarticulation. Language and Speech 1993, 36(2-3):197-212.
25. Dohen M., Loevenbruck H. Audiovisual production and perception of contrastive focus in French: A multispeaker study. Interspeech 2005, 2005:2413-2416.
26. Dohen, M., Loevenbruck H., & Hill H. (2006). Visual correlates of prosodic contrastive focus in French: Description and inter-speaker variabilities. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2006 (pp. 221-224). Dresden, Germany.
27. Eady S.J., Cooper W.E., Kloouda G.V., Mueller P.R., Lotts D.W. Acoustical characteristics of sentential focus: Narrow vs. broad and single vs. dual focus environments. Language and Speech 1986, 29:233-251.
28. Féry C., Kügler F. Pitch accent scaling on given, new and focused constituents in German. Journal of Phonetics 2008, 36:680-703.
29. Féry, Caroline (1993): German intonational patterns. Tübingen (=Linguistische Arbeiten 285).
30. Fougeron C., Keating P.A. Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1997, 101:3728-3740.
31. Fuchs S., Perrier P., Hartinger M. A critical evaluation of gestural stiffness estimations in speech production based on a linear second-order model. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 2011, 54:1067-1076.
32. Grice M., Baumann S., Benzmüller R. German intonation in autosegmental-metrical phonology. Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing 2005, 55-83. Oxford University Press, Oxford. J. Sun-Ah (Ed.).
33. Grice M., Ladd D.R., Arvaniti A. On the place of "phrase accents" in intonational phonology. Phonology 2000, 17:143-185.
34. Halliday M.A.K. A course in spoken English: Intonation 1970, Oxford University Press, London.
35. Harrington J., Fletcher J., Beckman M.E. Manner and place conflicts in the articulation of accent in Australian English. Papers in laboratory phonology 5 2000, 40-55. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. M. Broe (Ed.).
36. Harrington J., Fletcher J., Roberts C. Coarticulation and the accented/unaccented distinction: Evidence from jaw movement data. Journal of Phonetics 1995, 23:305-322.
37. Hawkins S. An introduction to task dymanics. Papers in laboratory phonology II: Gesture, segment, prosody 1992, 9-25. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. J. Docherty, D.R. Ladd (Eds.).
38. Hermes, A., Becker J., Mücke D., Baumann S., & Grice M. (2008). Articulatory gestures and focus marking in German. In Proceedings of the 4th conference on speech prosody 2008 (pp. 457-460). Campinas, Brazil.
39. Iskarous D.R., Kavitskaya The interaction between contrast, prosody, and coarticulation in structuring phonetic variability. Journal of Phonetics 2010, 38(4):625-639.
40. Kohler K. Terminal intonation patterns in single accent utterances of German: Phonetics, phonology and semantics. AIPUK 1991, 25:115-185.
41. Krifka, M. (2007). Basic notions of information structure. In C. Fery, & M. Krifka (Eds.), Interdisciplinary studies of information structure 6, Potsdam.
42. Kügler, F. (2008). The role of duration as a phonetic correlate of focus. Speech Prosody, 6-9 May 2008, Campinas, Brazil.
43. Ladd D.R. The structure of intonational meaning: Evidence from English 1980, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
44. Ladd D.R. Intonational phonology 2008, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 2nd ed.
45. Lambrecht K. Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents 1994, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
46. Lehiste I. Suprasegmental features of speech. Principles of experimental phonetics 1996, 226-244. Mosby, St. Louis. N. Lass (Ed.).
47. Lindblom B. Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. Speech production and speech modeling 1990, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dortrecht. W.J. Hardcastle, A. Marchal (Eds.).
48. Munhall K.G., Ostry D.J., Parush A. Characteristics of velocity profiles of speech movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1985, 11:457-474.
49. Pierrehumbert J.B., Hirschberg J. The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. Intentions in communication 1990, 271-311. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. P. Cohen, J. Morgan, M. Pollack (Eds.).
50. Roon K., Gafos A., Hoole P., Zeroual C. Influence of articulator and manner on stiffness. Proceedings of the 16th international congress of phonetic sciences August 2007 2007, 409-412. Saarbrücken, Germany. J. Trouvain, W. Barry (Eds.).
51. Selkirk E. Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure 1984, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
52. Selkirk E. Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress, and phrasing. The Handbook of phonological theory 1995, 550-569. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA/Oxford, UK. J.A. Goldsmith (Ed.).
53. Uhmann, Susanne (1991). Fokusphonologie. Eine Analyse deutscher Intonationskonturen im Rahmen der nicht-linearen Phonologie. Tübingen (=Linguistische Arbeiten 252).
54. Wagner M. Focus and givenness: A unified approach. Contrasts and positions in information structure 2012, 102-148. Cambridge University Press. K. Ivona, N. Ad (Eds.).
55. Welby P. Effects of pitch accent position, type, and status on focus projection. Language and Speech 2003, 46(1):3-81.