Greater osteoblast proliferation on anodized nanotubular titanium upon electrical stimulation

International Journal of Nanomedicine

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 477-485

  Ercan, Batur ^a   Webster, Thomas J ^a,b  

^a Brown University   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anodization; Electrical stimulation; Nanotubular; Osteoblast; Proliferation; Titanium

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; NANOTUBE; TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL DENSITY; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTROSTIMULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMPLANTATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ORTHOPEDIC EQUIPMENT; OSTEOBLAST; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL LINE; CELL PROLIFERATION; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTRODES; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; NANOTUBES; OSTEOBLASTS; OSTEOGENESIS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 69749103428     PISSN: 11769114     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Aaron RK, Ciombor DM, Simon BJ, et al. 2004a. Treatment of nonunions with electric and electromagnetic fields. Clin Orthoped Relat Res, 419:21-9.
2. Aaron RK, Boyan BD, Ciombor DM. 2004b. Stimulation of growth factor synthesis by electric and electromagnetic fields. Clin Orthoped, 419:30-7.
3. Black J. 1987. Electrical stimulation. Its role in growth, repair and remodeling of the musculoskeletal system. New York, NY: Praeger Publishers.
4. Hartig M, Joos U, Wiesmann HP. 2000. Capacitively coupled electric fields accelerate proliferation of osteoblast-like primary cells and increase bone extracellular matrix formation in vitro. Eur Biophys J, 29:499-506.
5. Karlsson M, Palsgard E, Wilshaw PR, et al. 2003. Initial in vitro interaction of osteoblasts with nano-porous alumina. Biomaterials, 24:3039-46.
6. Khang D, Park GE, Webster TJ. 2008. Enhanced chondrocyte densities on carbon nanotube composites: The combined role of nano-surface roughness and electrical stimulation. J Biomed Mater Res Part A, 86A:253-60.
7. Kirson ED, Dbaly V, Tovarys F, et al. 2007. Alternating electric fields arrest cell proliferation in animal tumor models and human brain tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 104:10152-7.
8. Lee WJ, Alhoshan M, Smyrl WH. 2006. Titanium dioxide nanotube arrays fabricated by anodizing processes. J Electrochem Soc, 153: B499-505.
9. Mor GK, Varghese OK. 2003. Fabrication of tapered, conical-shaped titania nanotubes. J Mater Res, 18:2588-93.
10. Nelson FRT, Brighton CT, Ryaby J, et al. 2003. Use of physical forces in bone healing. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 11:344-54.
11. Rodriguez R, Kim K, Ong JL. 2002. In vitro osteoblast response to anodized titanium and anodized titanium followed by hydrothermal treatment. J Biomed Mater Res A, 65A:352-8.
12. Son W, Zhu X, Shin H, et al. 2003. In vivo histological response to anodized and anodized/hydrothermally treated titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 66B:520-5.
13. Supronowicz PR, Ajayan PM, Ullmann KR, et al. 2001. Novel current-conducting composite substrates for exposing osteoblasts to alternating current stimulation. J Biomed Mater Res, 59:499-506.
14. 4V possessing nanometer surface features enhances osteoblast adhesion. J Biomed Nanotechnol, 1:68-73.