Cell differentiation and osseointegration influenced by nanoscale anodized titanium surfaces

Nanomedicine

Volumn 7, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 967-980

  Lavenus, Sandrine ^a,b   Trichet, Valérie ^a   Le Chevalier, Sébastien ^a   Hoornaert, Alain ^a   Louarn, Guy ^a   Layrolle, Pierre ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES   (France)

^b RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

anodized titanium; bone bonding strength; bone to implant contact; mesenchymal stem cells; nanostructured surfaces; osteogenic differentiation

Indexed keywords

NANOMATERIAL; TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE REGENERATION; BONE STRENGTH; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; METAL IMPLANTATION; NANOPORE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; TIBIA;

ANIMALS; BONE SUBSTITUTES; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELLS, CULTURED; ELECTRODES; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; HUMANS; MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS; NANOPORES; NANOSTRUCTURES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OSTEOBLASTS; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIBIA; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS; TITANIUM;

EID: 84864476536     PISSN: 17435889     EISSN: 17486963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2217/nnm.11.181     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Le Guéhennec L, Soueidan A, Layrolle P, Amouriq Y. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent. Mater. 23(7), 844-854 (2007). (Pubitemid 46734313)
2. Davies JE. Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. J. Dent. Educ. 67(8), 932-949 (2003).
3. Marco F, Milena F, Gianluca G, Vittoria O. Peri-implant osteogenesis in health and osteoporosis. Micron 36(7-8), 630-644 (2005). (Pubitemid 41745028)
4. Cai K, Bossert J, Jandt KD. Does the nanometre scale topography of titanium infuence protein adsorption and cell proliferation? Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 49(2), 136-144 (2006). (Pubitemid 44304399)
5. Protivínský J, Appleford M, Strnad J, Helebrant A, Ong JL. Effect of chemically modifed titanium surfaces on protein adsorption and osteoblast precursor cell behavior. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 22(4), 542-550 (2007).
6. Zhao G, Raines AL, Wieland M, Schwartz Z, Boyan BD. Requirement for both micron-and submicron scale structure for synergistic responses of osteoblasts to substrate surface energy and topography. Biomaterials 28(18), 2821-2829 (2007). (Pubitemid 46482664)
7. Yang Y, Tian J, Deng L, Ong JL. Morphological behavior of osteoblast-like cells on surface-modifed titanium in vitro. Biomaterials 23(5), 1383-1389 (2002). (Pubitemid 34121030)
8. Le Guehennec L. Osteoblastic cell behavior on nanostructured metal implants. Nanomedicine (Lond). 3(1), 61-71 (2008). (Pubitemid 351611865)
9. Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Curtis ASG, Oreffo ROC. Nanotopographical control of human osteoprogenitor differentiation. Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2(2), 129-138 (2007). (Pubitemid 46813504)
10. Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Tare R et al. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nat. Mater. 6(12), 997-1003 (2007). (Pubitemid 350210577)
11. Dalby MJ, McCloy, Robertson M, Wilkinson CDW, Oreffo RO. Osteoprogenitor response to defned topographies with nanoscale depths. Biomaterials 27(8), 1306-1315 (2006). (Pubitemid 41739555)
12. Caplan AI. Why are MSCs therapeutic? New data: new insight. J. Pathol. 217(2), 318-324 (2009).
13. Caplan AI, Dennis JE. Mesenchymal stem cells as trophic mediators. J. Cell. Biochem. 98(5), 1076-1084 (2006). (Pubitemid 44128350)
14. Kassem M. Stem cells: potential therapy for age-related diseases. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1067, 436-442 (2006). (Pubitemid 43810011)
15. Marinucci L, Balloni S, Becchetti E et al. Effects of hydroxyapatite and Biostite on osteogenic induction of hMSC. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 38(3), 640-648 (2010).
16. 2+ and PKA-pathway dependent neurogenic differentiation of human adult mesenchymal stem cells as compared with fetal neuronal stem cells. Exp. Cell Res. 316(2), 216-231 (2010).
17. Morganstein DL, Wu P, Mane MR, Fisk NM, White R, Parker MG. Human fetal mesenchymal stem cells differentiate into brown and white adipocytes: a role for ERRa in human UCP1 expression. Cell Res. 20(4), 434-444 (2010).
18. Zannettino ACW, Paton S, Arthur A et al. Multipotential human adipose-derived stromal stem cells exhibit a perivascular phenotype in vitro and in vivo. J. Cell. Physiol. 214(2), 413-421 (2008). (Pubitemid 350308998)
19. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specifcation. Cell 126(4), 677-689 (2006). (Pubitemid 44233625)
20. Oh S, Brammer KS, Li YSJ et al. Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106(7), 2130-2135 (2009).
21. 2 nanotube diameter directs cell fate. Nano Lett. 7(6), 1686-1691 (2007).
22. 2 nanotubes on microstructured surfaces of blasted, screw-shaped titanium implants. Int. J. Nanomedicine 5, 87-100 (2010).
23. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong Y, Röser K, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Oxidized implants and their infuence on the bone response. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 12(10-12), 1025-1031 (2001). (Pubitemid 34062130)
24. Bjursten LM, Rasmusson L, Oh S, Smith GC, Brammer KS, Jin S. Titanium dioxide nanotubes enhance bone bonding in vivo. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 92(3), 1218-1224 (2010).
25. Le Guehennec L, Marco-Antonio, Benedicte, Weiss P, Amouriq Y, Layrolle P. Osteoblastic cell behaviour on different titanium implant surfaces. Acta Biomater. 4(3), 535-543 (2008).
26. Kilian KA, Bugarija B, Lahn BT, Mrksich M. Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107(11), 4872-4877 (2010).
27. Itano N, Okamoto S, Zhang D, Lipton SA, Ruoslahti E. Cell spreading controls endoplasmic and nuclear calcium: a physical gene regulation pathway from the cell surface to the nucleus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 100(9), 5181-5186 (2003). (Pubitemid 36542679)
28. McBeath R, Pirone DM, Nelson CM, Bhadriraju K, Chen CS. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev. Cell 6(4), 483-495 (2004). (Pubitemid 38456178)
29. Keene DR, Sakai LY, Burgeson RE. Human bone contains type III collagen, type VI collagen, and fbrillin: type III collagen is present on specifc fbers that may mediate attachment of tendons, ligaments, and periosteum to calcifed bone cortex. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 39(1), 59-69 (1991).
30. Hong D, Chen HX, Yu HQ et al. Morphological and proteomic analysis of early stage of osteoblast differentiation in osteoblastic progenitor cells. Exp. Cell Res. 316(14), 2291-2300 (2010).
31. Liu X, Wu H, Byrne M, Krane S, Jaenisch R. Type III collagen is crucial for collagen I fbrillogenesis and for normal cardiovascular development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94(5), 1852-1856 (1997). (Pubitemid 27113925)
32. Kadler KE, Hojima Y, Prockop DJ. Collagen fbrils in vitro grow from pointed tips in the C-to N-terminal direction. Biochem. J. 268(2), 339-343 (1990). (Pubitemid 20193971)
33. Chiquet M, Mumenthaler U, Wittwer M, Jin W, Koch M. The chick and human collagen a1(XII) gene promoter-activity of highly conserved regions around the frst exon and in the frst intron. Eur. J. Biochem. 257(2), 362-371 (1998).
34. Singh SP, Chang EI, Gossain AK et al. Cyclic mechanical strain increases production of regulators of bone healing in cultured murine osteoblasts. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 204(3), 426-434 (2007). (Pubitemid 46283489)
35. Lindahl GE, Chambers RC, Papakrivopoulou J et al. Activation of fbroblast procollagen a1(I) transcription by mechanical strain is transforming growth factor-b-dependent and involves increased binding of CCAAT-binding factor (CBF/NF-Y) at the proximal promoter. J. Biol. Chem. 277(8), 6153-6161 (2002). (Pubitemid 34968404)
36. Arai K, Nagashima Y, Takemoto T, Nishiyama T. Mechanical strain increases expression of type XII collagen in murine osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. Cell Struct. Funct. 33(2), 203-210 (2008).
37. Tanaka Y, Morimoto I, Nakano Y et al. Osteoblasts are regulated by the cellular adhesion through ICAM-1 and VCAM-1. J. Bone Miner. Res. 10(10), 1462-1469 (1995).
38. Di Cesare PE, Fang C, Leslie MP, Tulli H, Perris R, Carlson CS. Expression of cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) by embryonic and adult osteoblasts. J. Orthop. Res. 18(5), 713-720 (2000).
39. DiCesare P, Hauser N, Lehman D, Pasumarti S, Paulsson M. Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) is an abundant component of tendon. FEBS Lett. 354(2), 237-240 (1994).
40. Halász K, Kassner A, Mörgelin M, Heinegård D. COMP acts as a catalyst in collagen fbrillogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 282(43), 31166-31173 (2007). (Pubitemid 350044871)
41. Briggs MD, Hoffman SM, King LM et al. Pseudoachondroplasia and multiple epiphyseal dysplasia due to mutations in the cartilage oligomeric matrix protein gene. Nat. Genet. 10(3), 330-336 (1995).
42. Rosenberg K, Olsson H, Mörgelin M, Heinegård D. Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein shows high affnity zinc-dependent interaction with triple helical collagen. J. Biol. Chem. 273(32), 20397-20403 (1998). (Pubitemid 28377606)
43. 2 nanotubes: an experimental study in the pig. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 89(1), 165-171 (2009).
44. Bigerelle M, Anselme K, Noël B, Ruderman I, Hardouin P, Iost A. Improvement in the morphology of Ti-based surfaces: a new process to increase in vitro human osteoblast response. Biomaterials 23(7), 1563-1577 (2002). (Pubitemid 34158579)
45. Buser D, Nydegger T, Oxland T et al. Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 45(2), 75-83 (1999). (Pubitemid 29114154)