Topographic scale-range synergy at the functional bone/implant interface

Biomaterials

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 25-35

  Davies, John E ^a,b   Mendes, Vanessa C ^a,b   Ko, James C H ^a,b   Ajami, Elnaz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bone anchorage; Bone implant; Bone bonding; Surface topography; Three scale ranges; True and functional interfaces

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS; BONE BONDING; BONE IMPLANT; COMMERCIALLY PURE TITANIUMS; FUNCTIONAL INTERFACE; RAT BONE MARROW CELLS; THREE SCALE RANGES; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON;

ANCHORAGES (FOUNDATIONS); BONE; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; CEMENTS; DEPOSITION; MECHANICAL TESTING; NANOCRYSTALS; RATS; SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY; TITANIUM;

BONE CEMENT;

BONE SIALOPROTEIN; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; NANOCRYSTAL; RESIN; TITANIUM;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BONE IMPLANT; BONE MARROW CELL; BONE MATRIX; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR; IN VITRO STUDY; MALE; MICROPHOTOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; OSTEOBLAST; PARTICLE SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; TOPOGRAPHY;

RATTUS;

BONE ANCHORAGE; BONE IMPLANT; BONE-BONDING; SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY; THREE SCALE RANGES; TRUE AND FUNCTIONAL INTERFACES;

ANIMALS; BONE AND BONES; MALE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; RATS; RATS, WISTAR;

EID: 84887015156     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.072     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ueno T., Tsukimura N., Yamada M., Ogawa T. Enhanced bone-integration capability of alkali- and heat-treated nanopolymorphic titanium in micro-to-nanoscale hierarchy. Biomaterials 2011, 32:7297-7308.
2. Le Guehennec L., Soueidan A., Layrolle P., Amouriq Y. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent Mater 2007, 23:844-854.
3. Davies J.E., Ajami E., Moineddin R., Mendes V.C. The roles of different scale ranges of surface implant topography on the stability of the bone/implant interface. Biomaterials 2013, 34:3535-3546.
4. Davies J.E. Bone bonding at natural and biomaterial surfaces. Biomaterials 2007, 28:5058-5067.
5. Clarke B. Normal bone anatomy and physiology. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008, (Suppl 3):S131-S139.
6. Boyde A., Ali N.N., Jones S.J. Resorption of dentine by isolated osteoclasts invitro. Br Dent J 1984, 156:216-220.
7. Hench L.L., Splinter R.J., Allen W.C., Greenlee T.K. Bonding mechanisms at the interface of ceramic prosthetic materials. JBiomed Mater Res 1971, 5:117-141.
8. Jarcho M., Kay J.L., Gumaer R.H., Drobeck H.P. Tissue, cellular and subcellular events at bone-ceramic hydroxyapatite interface. JBioeng 1977, 1:79-92.
9. Lee B.H., Lee C., Kim D.G., Choi K., Lee K.H., Kim Y.D. Effect of surface structure on biomechanical properties and osseointegration. Mat Sci Eng C 2008, 28:1448-1461.
10. Davies J.E. Invitro modeling of the bone/implant interface. Anat Rec 1996, 245:426-445.
11. Davies J.E. Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont 1998, 11:391-401.
12. Nakamura T., Yamamuro T., Higashi S., Kokubo T., Itoo S. Anew glass-ceramic for bone replacement: evaluation of its bonding to bone tissue. JBiomed Mater Res 1985, 19:685-698.
13. Mendes V.C., Moineddin R., Davies J.E. The effect of discrete calcium phosphate nanocrystals on bone-bonding to titanium surfaces. Biomaterials 2007, 28:4748-4755.
14. Maniatopoulos C., Sodek J., Melcher A.H. Bone formation invitro by stromal cells obtained from bone marrow of young adult rats. Cell Tissue Res 1988, 254:317-330.
15. Fisher L.W., Stubbs J.T., Young M.F. Antisera and cDNA probes to human and certain animal model bone matrix noncollagenous proteins. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1995, 266:61-65.
16. Wieland M., Sittig C., Brunette D.M., Textor M., Spencer N.D. Measurement and evaluation of the chemical composition and topography of titanium implant surfaces. Bone engineering 2000, Em Squared Inc, Toronto. J.E. Davies (Ed.).
17. Palmquist A., Lindberg F., Emanuelsson L., Brånemark R., Engqvist H., Thomsen P. Biomechanical, histological, and ultrastructural analyses of laser micro- and nano-structured analyses of laser micro- and nano-structured titanium alloy implants: a study in rabbit. JBiomed Mater Res 2010, 92A:1476-1486.
18. Sul Y.T., Johansson C., Albrektsson T. Anovel invivo method for quantifying the interfacial biochemical bond strength of bone implants. JR Soc Interface 2010, 7:81-90.
19. Regalla S.P. Computer aided analysis and design 2010, I.K. International Publishing House Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
20. Galante J., Rostoker W., Lueck R., Ray R.D. Sintered fiber metal composites as a basis for attachment of implants to bone. JBone Jt Surg Am 1971, 53:101-114.
21. Welsh R.P., Pilliar R.M., Macnab I. Surgical implants. The role of surface porosity in fixation to bone and acrylic. JBone Jt Surg Am 1971, 53:963-977.
22. Hench L.L., Greenlee T.K., Allen W.C. An investigation of bonding mechanisms at the interface of a prosthetic material - report # 1. US Army Medical R & D contract no DADA 17-70-C-0001 August 1970.
23. Baht G.S., Hunter G.K., Goldberg H.A. Bone sialoprotein-collagen interaction promotes hydroxyapatite nucleation. Matrix Biol 2008, 27:600-608.
24. Oldberg A., Jirskog-Hed B., Axelsson S., Heinegård D. Regulation of bone sialoprotein mRNA by steroid hormones. JCell Biol 1989, 109:3183-3186.
25. Sul Y.T., Kwon D.H., Kang B.S., Oh S.J., Johansson C. Experimental evidence for interfacial biochemical bonding in osseointegrated titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011, 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02355.x.
26. Brunski J.B. Invivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental-implant interface. Adv Dent Res 1999, 13:99-119.
27. Omar O., Lennerås M., Svensson S., Suska F., Emanuelsson L., Hall J., et al. Integrin and chemokine receptor gene expression in implant-adherent cells during early osseointegration. JMater Sci Mater Med 2010, 21:969-980.