Microbial populations in naked neck chicken ceca raised on pasture flock fed with commercial yeast cell wall prebiotics via an Illumina MiSeq platform

PLoS ONE

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2016, Pages

  Park, Si Hong ^a   Lee, Sang In ^a   Ricke, Steven C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PREBIOTIC AGENT; RNA 16S;

ARTICLE; BACTERIUM IDENTIFICATION; BACTEROIDETES; BURKHOLDERIALES; CAMPYLOBACTER; CAMPYLOBACTERACEAE; CAMPYLOBACTERALES; CECUM; CHICKEN; CLOSTRIDIALES; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIETARY INTAKE; FAECALIBACTERIUM; FIRMICUTES; GENUS; HERD; INTESTINE FLORA; LACTOBACILLUS; METHANOBACTERIALES; MICROBIAL DIVERSITY; MICROBIAL POPULATION DYNAMICS; MICROBIOME; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; PHYLUM; POPULATION ABUNDANCE; PORPHYROMONADACEAE; PROTEOBACTERIA; PYROSEQUENCING; TAXONOMY; YEAST CELL; ANIMAL; ANIMAL HOUSING; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; BACTERIUM; DRUG EFFECTS; GENETICS; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MICROBIOLOGY; MICROFLORA; PROCEDURES;

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMALS; BACTERIA; CAMPYLOBACTER; CECUM; CHICKENS; HOUSING, ANIMAL; MICROBIOTA; PREBIOTICS;

EID: 84962079675     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151944     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. AMS/USDA (2008) The national organic program. Agricultural Marketing Service-USDA, Washington, DC. Available: http://www.ams.usda.gov/about-ams/programs-offices/national-organic-program. Accessed 18 August 2015.
2. Park SH, Hanning I, Perrota A, Bench BJ, Alm E, Ricke SC. Modifying the gastrointestinal ecology in alternatively raised poultry and the potential for molecular and metabolomics assessment. Poult Sci. 2013; 92: 546-561. doi: 10.3382/ps.2012-02734 PMID: 23300323
3. Ricke SC. Potential of fructooligosaccharide prebiotics in alternative and nonconventional poultry production systems. Poult Sci. 2015; 94:1411-1418. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev049 PMID: 25717086
4. Fanatico AC, Cavitt LC, Pillai PB, Emmert JL, Owens CM. Evaluation of slower-growing broiler genotypes grown with and without outdoor access: Meat quality. Poult Sci. 2005; 84:1785-1790. PMID: 16463978
5. Fanatico AC, Owens CM, Emmert JL. Organic poultry production in the United States: Broilers. J Appl Poult Res. 2009; 18:355-366.
6. Van Loo EJ, Alali W, Ricke SC. Food safety and organic meats. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2012; 3: 203-225. doi: 10.1146/annurev-food-022811-101158 PMID: 22385165
7. Roberfroid MB. Introducing inulin-typefructans. Br J Nutr. 2005; 93: Suppl 1, S13-S25. PMID: 15877886
8. Józefiak D, Kaczmarek S, Rutkowski A. A note on the effects of selected prebiotics on the performance and ileal microbiota of broiler chickens. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 2008; 17: 392-397.
9. Pelicia K, Mendes AA, Saldanha ESPB, Pizzolante CC, Takahashi SE, Moreira J, et al. Use of prebiotics and probiotics of bacterial and yeast origin for free-range broiler chickens. Braz J Poult Sci. 2004; 6: 163-169.
10. Rastall RA, Gibson GR. Recent developments in prebiotics to selectively impact beneficial microbes and promote intestinal health. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2015; 32: 42-46. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2014.11.002 PMID: 25448231
11. Shakouri MD, Lji PA, Mikkelsen LL, Cowieson AJ. Intestinal function and gut microflora of broiler chickens as influenced by cereal grains and microbial enzyme supplementation. Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2009; 93: 647-658.
12. Yeoman CJ, Chia N, Jeraldo P, Sipos M, Goldenfeld ND, White BA. The microbiome of the chicken gastrointestinal tract. Anim Health Res Rev. 2012; 13: 89-99. doi: 10.1017/S1466252312000138 PMID: 22853945
13. Hai Y, Zhou T, Gong J, Young C, Su X, Li XZ, et al. Isolation of deoxynivalenol-transforming bacteria from the chicken intestines using the approach of PCR-DGGE guided microbial selection. BMC Microbiol. 2010; 10:182. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-10-182 PMID: 20576129
14. Kohl KD. Diversity and function of the avian gut microbiota. J Comp Physiol B. 2012; 182:591-602. doi: 10.1007/s00360-012-0645-z PMID: 22246239
15. Ding G, Chang Y, Zhao L, Zhou Z, Ren L, Meng Q. Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on alfalfa nutrient degradation characteristics and rumen microbial populations of steers fed diets with different concentrate-to-forage ratios. J Anim Sci Biotech. 2014; 5: 24.
16. Santin E, Maiorka A, Macari M. Performance and intestinal mucosa development of broilers chickens fed diets containing Saccharomyces cerevisiaes cell wall. J Appl Poult Res. 2001; 10: 236-244.
17. Zhang AW, Lee BD, Lee SK, Lee KW, An GH, Song KB, et al. Effects of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) cell components on growth performance, meat quality, and ileal mucosa development of broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2005; 84:1015-1021. PMID: 16050118
18. Morales-López R, Auclair E, García F, Esteve-Garcia E, Brufau J. Use of yeast cell walls; β-1, 3/1, 6-glucans; and mannoproteins in broiler chicken diets. Poult Sci. 2009; 88: 601-607. doi: 10.3382/ps.2008-00298 PMID: 19211531
19. Hanning I, Clement A, Owens C. Park SH, Pendleton S, Scott EE, et al. Assessment of production performance in 2 breeds of broilers fed prebiotics as feed additives. Poult Sci. 2012; 91: 3295-3299. doi:10.3382/ps.2012-02557 PMID: 23155043
20. Park SH, Hanning I, Gilbert W, Munro M, Devareddy L, Ricke SC. Feeding mice aged and fresh blackberries powder supplements result in shifts in the gastrointestinal microflora. Food Biosci. 2013; 1: 66-72.
21. Park SH, Gibson KE, Almeida G, Ricke SC Assessment of gastrointestinal microflora in pasture raised chickens fed two commercial prebiotics. J Prob Health. 2014; 2:122.
22. Fadrosh DW, Ma B, Gajer P, Sengamalay N, Ott S, Brotman RM, et al. An improved dual-indexing approach for multiplexed 16S rRNA gene sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform. Microbiome. 2014; 2: 6. doi: 10.1186/2049-2618-2-6 PMID: 24558975
23. Mojd Shaufi MA, Sieo CC, Chong CW, Gan HM, Ho YW. Deciphering chicken gut microbial dynamics based on high-throughput 16S rRNA metagenomics analyses. Gut Pathog. 2015; 7:4. doi: 10.1186/s13099-015-0051-7 PMID: 25806087
24. Oakley BB, Morales CA, Line JE, Seal BS, Hiett KL. Application of high-throughput sequencing to measure the performance of commonly used selective cultivation methods for the foodborne pathogen Campylobacter. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2012; 79: 327-336. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01219.x PMID: 22092388
25. Oakley BB, Morales CA, Line J, Berrang ME, Meinersmann RJ, Tillman GE, et al. The poultry-associated microbiome: network analysis and farm-to-fork characterizations. PLoS One. 2013; 8: e57190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057190 PMID: 23468931
26. Sergeant MJ, Constantinidou C, Cogan TA, Bedford MR, Penn CW, Pallen MJ. Extensive microbial and functional diversity within the chicken cecal microbiome. PLoS One. 2014; 9: e91941. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091941 PMID: 24657972
27. Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Huntley J, Fierer N, et al. Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. The ISME J. 2012; 6:1621-1624. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.8 PMID: 22402401
28. Sirri F, Castellini C, Bianchi M, Petracci M, Meluzzi A, Franchini A. Effect of fast-, medium-and slow-growing strains on meat quality of chickens reared under the organic farming method. Animal. 2010; 5: 312-319.
29. Kozich JJ, Westcott SL, Baxter NT, Highlander SK, Schloss PD. Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013; 79: 5112-5120. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01043-13 PMID: 23793624
30. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2010; 7: 335-336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303 PMID: 20383131
31. Deusch S, Tilocca B, Camarinha-Silva A, Seifert J. News in livestock research - use of Omics-technologies to study the microbiota in the gastrointestinal tract of farm animals. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2015; 13: 55-63. PMID: 26900430
32. Meng H, Zhang Y, Zhao L, Zhao W, He C, Zhai Z et al. Body weight selection affects quantitative genetic correlated responses in gut microbiota. PLoS One. 2014; 9: e89862. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089862 PMID: 24608294
33. Ricke SC, Pillai SD. Conventional and molecular methods for understanding probiotic bacteria functionality in gastrointestinal tracts. Crit Rev Microbiol. 1999; 25:19-38. PMID: 10342098
34. Salanitro J, Fairchilds I, Zgornicki Y. Isolation, culture characteristics, and identification of anaerobic bacteria from the chicken cecum. Appl Microbiol. 1974; 27: 678-687. PMID: 4596749
35. Stanley D, Hughes RJ, Moore RJ. Microbiota of the chicken gastrointestinal tract: influence on health, productivity and disease. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014; 98: 4301-4310. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-5646-2 PMID: 24643736
36. Diaz-Sanchez S, Hanning I, Pendleton S, D'Souza D. Next-generation sequencing: the future of molecular genetics in poultry production and food safety. Poult Sci. 2013; 92: 562-572. doi: 10.3382/ps.2012-02741 PMID: 23300324
37. Zoetendal EG, Collier CT, Koike S, Mackie RI, Gaskin HR. Molecular ecological analysis of the gastrointestinal microbiota: a review. J Nutr. 2004; 134: 465-472. PMID: 14747690
38. Tillman GE, Haas GJ, Wise MG, Oakley B, Smith MA, Siragusa GR. Chicken intestine microbiota following the administration of lupulone, a hop-based antimicrobial. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2011; 77: 395-403. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01119.x PMID: 21517917
39. Wise MG, Siragusa GR. Quantitative analysis of the intestinal bacterial community in one-to three-week-old commercially reared broiler chickens fed conventional or antibiotic-free vegetable-based diets. J Appl Microbiol. 2007; 102:1138-1149. PMID: 17381758
40. Suzuki MT, Giovannoni SJ. Bias caused by template annealing in the amplification of mixture of 16S rRNA genes by PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996; 62: 625-630. PMID: 8593063
41. Zhao L, Wang G, Siegel P, Chuan H, Wang H, Zhao W, et al. Quantitative genetic background of the hos influences gut microbiomes in chickens. Sci Rep. 2013; 3:1163. doi: 10.1038/srep01163 PMID: 23362462
42. Ley RE, Bãcked F, Turnbaugh P, Lozupone CA, Knight RD, Gordon JI. Obesity alters gut microbial ecology. PNAS. 2005; 102:11070-11075. PMID: 16033867
43. Mariat D, Firmesse O, Levenez F, Guimarães VD, Sokol H, Doré J, et al. The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio of the human microbiota changes with age. BMC Microbiol. 2009; 9:123. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-9-123 PMID: 19508720
44. Zhu XY, Zhong T, Pandya Y, Joerger RD. 16S rRNA-based analysis of microbiota from the cecum of broiler chickens. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002; 68:124-127. PMID: 11772618
45. Danzeisen JL, Kim HB, Isaacson RE, Tu ZJ, Johnson TJ. Modulation of the chicken cecal microbiome and metagenome in response to anticoccidial and growth promoter treatment. PLoS One. 2011; 11: e27949.
46. Qu A, Brulc JM, Wilson MK, Law BF, Theoret JR, Joens LA, et al. Comparative metagenomics reveals host specific metavirulomes and horizontal gene transfer elements in the chicken cecum microbiome. PLoS One. 2008; 8: e2945.
47. Gabriel I, Lessire M, Mallet S, Guillot JF. Microflora of the digestive tract: critical factors and consequences for poultry. World's Poult Sci J. 2006; 62: 499-511.
48. Saengkerdsub S, Herrera P, Woodward CL, Anderson RC, Nisbet DJ, Ricke SC. Identification and quantification of methanogenic archaea in adult chicken ceca. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007; 73: 353-356. PMID: 17085694
49. Jones FT, Ricke SC. Observation on the history of the development of antimicrobials and their use in poultry feeds. Poult Sci. 2003; 82: 613-617. PMID: 12710481
50. Lu J, Idris U, Harmon B, Hofacre C, Maurer JJ, Lee MD. Diversity and succession of the intestinal bacterial community of the maturing broiler chicken. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003; 69: 6816-6824. PMID: 14602645
51. Stanley VG, Gray C, Daley M, Krueger WF, Sefton AE. An alternative to antibiotic-based drugs in feed for enhancing performance of broilers grown on Eimeria spp. - infected litter. Poult Sci. 2004; 83:39-44. PMID: 14761082
52. Zhang AW, Lee BD, Lee SK, Lee KW, An GH, Song KB, et al. Effects of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) cell components on growth performance, meat quality, and ileal mucosa development of broiler chicks. Poult Sci. 2005; 84:1015-1021. PMID: 16050118
53. Gao J, Zhang HJ, Yu SH, Wu SG, Yoon I, Quigley J, et al. Effects of yeast culture in broiler diets on performance and immunomodulatory functions. Poult Sci. 2008; 87:1377-1384. doi: 10.3382/ps.2007-00418 PMID: 18577619
54. Hooge DM. Meta-analysis of broiler chicken pen trials evaluating dietary mannan oligosaccharide, 1993-2003. Int J Poult Sci. 2004; 3:163-174.
55. th annual symposium, Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK. 1994; 167-174.
56. Park SH, Hanning I, Jarquin R, Moore P, Donoghue DJ, Donoghue AM, et al. Multiplex PCR assay for the detection and quantification of Campylobacter spp., Escherichia coli O157:H7, and Salmonella serotypes in water samples. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2013; 316: 7-15.
57. Chon JW, Hyeon JY, Park JH, Song KY, Seo KH. Comparison of 2 types of broths and 3 selective agars forthe detection of Campylobacter species in whole-chicken carcass-rinse samples. Poult Sci. 2012; 59:2382-2385.
58. Line JE, Berrang ME. Comparison of two types of plating media for detection and enumeration of Campylobacter from poultry samples. Int J Poult Sci. 2005; 4: 81-84.