Evaluation of slower-growing broiler genotypes grown with and without outdoor access: Meat quality

Poultry Science

Volumn 84, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 1785-1790

  Fanatico, A C ^a   Cavitt, L C ^a,b   Pillai, P B ^a   Emmert, J L ^a   Owens, C M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

^b Tyson Foods Incorporated   (United States)

Author keywords

Broiler; Free range; Meat quality; Natural; Organic

Indexed keywords

AVES;

WATER;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL HOUSING; ARTICLE; CHICKEN; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MEAT; STANDARD;

ANIMALS; CHICKENS; GENOTYPE; HOUSING, ANIMAL; MEAT; WATER;

EID: 33645946361     PISSN: 00325791     EISSN: 15253171     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ps/84.11.1785     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, MD.
2. Baeza, E., H. Juin, G. Rebours, P. Constantin, G. Marche, and C. Leterrier. 2001. Effect of genotype, sex and rearing temperature on carcass and meat quality of guinea fowl. Br. Poult. Sci. 42:470-476.
3. Berri, C., N. Wacrenier, N. Millet, and E. Le Bihan-Duval. 2001. Effect of selection for improved body composition on muscle and meat characteristics of broilers from experimental and commercial lines. Poult. Sci. 80:833-838.
4. Bianchi, M. and D. L. Fletcher. 2002. Effects of broiler breast meat thickness and background on color measurements. Poult. Sci. 81:1766-1769.
5. Cavitt, L. C. 2004. Development of a novel instrumental shearing method utilizing razor blade shear to evaluate tenderness and predict consumer acceptability of broiler breast fillets. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR.
6. Cavitt, L. C., G. W. Youm, J. F. Meullenet, C. M. Owens, and R. Xiong. 2004. Prediction of poultry meat tenderness using razor blade shear, Allo-Kramer shear, and sarcomere length. J. Food Sci. 69:11-15.
7. Castellini, C., C. Mugnai, and A. Dal Bosco. 2002. Meat quality of three chicken genotypes reared according to the organic system. Meat Sci. 60:219-225.
8. Debut, M., C. Berri, E. Baéza, N. Sellier, C. Arnould, D. Guémené, N. Jehl, B. Boutten, Y. Jego, C. Beaumont, and E. Le Bihan-Duval. 2003. Variation of chicken technological meat quality in relation to genotype and preslaughter stress conditions. Poult. Sci. 82:1829-1838.
9. Dransfield, E. and A. A Sosnicki. 1999. Relationship between muscle growth and poultry meat quality. Poult. Sci. 78:743-746.
10. European Economic Community. 1991. Council Regulation (EEC) 2092/91 on organic production of agricultural products and indications referring thereto on agricultural products and foodstuffs. http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/consleg/ pdf/1991/en_1991R2092_do_001.pdf Accessed May 2005.
11. Economic Research Service, USDA. 2002. Recent growth patterns in the U.S. organic foods market. Agriculture Information Bulletin 777. US Government Printing Service, Washington, DC.
12. Fanatico, A. C. and H. M. Born. 2001. Label Rouge: Pasture-raised poultry in France. ATTRA publication. Natl. Center Appropriate Technol., Fayetteville, AR.
13. Fanatico, A. C., P. B. Pillai, L. C. Cavitt, J. L. Emmert, and C. M. Owens. 2004. Comparison of broiler growth and carcass yield among alternative slow-growing breeds and a commercial breed grown with or without outdoor access. Poult. Sci. 83(Suppl. 1):1766. (Abstr.)
14. Fletcher, D. L. 2002. Poultry meat quality. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 58:131-145.
15. Gordon, S. H. and D. R. Charles. 2002. Niche and Organic Chicken Products. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.
16. Greene, D., E. Wenger, C. Alvarado, L. Thompson, and S. O'Keefe. 2005. Consumer perception of meat quality and shelf-life in commercially raised broilers compared to organic free range broilers. Abstract 158 in 2005 Int. Poult. Sci. Forum, Atlanta, GA. SPSS, Tucker, GA. (Abstr.)
17. Havenstein, G. B., P. R. Ferket, and M. A. Qureshi. 2003. Carcass composition and yield of 1957 versus 2001 broilers when fed representative 1957 and 2001 broiler diets. Poult. Sci. 82:1509-1518.
18. Latter-Dubois. 2000. Poulets Fermiers: Leurs Qualités Nutritionnelle et Organoleptiques et la Perception du Consommateur. M. S. Thesis. Faculté des Sci. de l'Agric. de L'Alimentation, Univ. Laval, Quebec, Canada.
19. Le Bihan-Duval, E. 2003. Genetic variability of poultry meat. Pages 11-20 in Proceedings of the 52nd Annu. Natl. Breeders Roundtable, St. Louis, MO. US Poult. Egg. Assoc., Tucker, GA.
20. Le Bihan-Duval, E., C. Berri, E. Baeza, N. Millet, and C. Beaumont. 2001. Estimation of the genetic parameters of meat characteristics and their genetic correlations with growth and body composition in an experimental broiler line. Poult. Sci. 80:839-843.
21. Le Bihan-Duval, E., N. Millet, and H. Remignon. 1999. Broiler meat quality: Effect of selection for increased carcass quality and estimates of genetic parameters. Poult. Sci. 78:822-826.
22. Lewis, P. D., G. C. Perry, L. J. Farmer, and R. L. S. Patterson. 1997. Responses of two genotypes of chicken to the diets and stocking densities typical of UK and "Label Rouge" systems: I. Performance, behaviour and carcass compositon. Meat Sci. 45:501-516.
23. Lonergan, S. M., N. Deeb, C. A. Fedlet, and S. J. Lamont. 2003. Breast meat quality and composition in unique chicken populations. Poult. Sci. 82:1990-1994.
24. Melton, S. L. 1990. Effects of feeds on flavour of red meat: A review. J. Anim. Sci. 68:4421-4435.
25. National Research Council. 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th rev. ed. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.
26. Qiao, M., D. L. Fletcher, D. P. Smith, and J. K. Northcutt. 2001. The effect of broiler breast meat color on pH, moisture, water-holding capacity, and emulsification capacity. Poult. Sci. 80:676-680.
27. Sante, V., G. Bielicki, M. Renerre, and A. Lacourt. 1991. Post mortem evolution in the Pectoralis superficialis muscle from two turkey breeds: Relationship between pH and colour changes. Pages 465-468 in 37th Int. Congr. Meat Technol., Kulmbach, Germany. Vol. 1. Fed. Center Meat Res., Kulmbach, Germany.
28. Sauveur, B. 1997. Les critères et facteurs de la qualité des poulets "label rouge." INRA Prod. Anim. 10:219-226.
29. SAS Institute. 1999. SAS/STAT User's Guide: Statistics. Version 8.2 ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
30. Touraille, C., J. Kopp, C. Valin, and F. H. Ricard. 1981. Chicken meat quality. 1. Influence of age and growth rate on physicochemical and sensory characteristics of the meat. Arch. Geflugelkd. 45:69-76.
31. Westgren, R. E. 1999. Delivering food safety, food quality, and sustainable production practices: The Label Rouge poultry system in France. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 81:1107.
32. Woelfel, R. L., C. M. Owens, E. M. Hirschler, R. Martinez-Dawson, A. R. Sams. 2002. The characterization and incidence of pale, soft, and exudative broiler meat in a commercial processing plant. Poult. Sci. 81:579-584.
33. U. S. Department of Agriculture, 2002. National Organic Program. http://www.ams.gov/nop Accessed Nov. 2003.