Pupillometry

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science

Volumn 5, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 679-692

  Sirois, Sylvain ^a   Brisson, Julie ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À TROIS RIVIÈRES   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE ROUEN   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84961288908     PISSN: 19395078     EISSN: 19395086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1323     Document Type: Review

References (130)

1. Laeng B, Sirois S, Gredebäck G. Pupillometry: a window to the preconscious? Perspect Psychol Sci 2012, 7:18-27. doi: 10.1177/1745691611427305.
2. Hakerem G. Pupillography. In: Venables PH, Martin I, eds. A Manual of Psychophysiological Methods. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.; 1967, 335-349.
3. Schweitzer NMJ. Threshold measurements on the light reflex of the pupil in the pupil in the dark adapted eye. Doc Ophtalmolo Proc Ser 1955, 10:1-28.
4. Lowenstein O, Loewenfeld IE. Electronic pupillography: a new instrument and some clinical applications. AMA Arch Ophtalmol 1958, 59:353-363.
5. Bellarminow L. Anwendung der graphischen methoden bei untersuchungen der pupillenbewegungen: photograph. Pflügers Archiv Eur J Physiol 1885, 19:37.
6. Du Bois-Reymond CI. Uber das photographieren der augen bei magnesiumblitz. Zbl prakt Augenheilk 1888, 12:68.
7. Garten S. Beitrege zur kenntniss des zeitlichen ablaufs der pupillenreaktion nach verdtmkelung. Pfliigers Arch ges Physiol 1897, 68:68-96.
8. Reeves P. The response of the average pupil to various intensities of light. J Opt Soc Am 1920, 4:35-43.
9. Lowenstein O. Experimentalle beitrage zur lehre von den katatonischen pupillenveranderungen. Monatsschrijt Psychiatric Neurologic 1920, 47:194-215.
10. Hakerem G. Conceptual stimuli, pupillary dilation and evoked cortical potentials: a review of recent advances. In: Janisse MP, ed. Pupillary Dynamics and Behavior. New York: Plenum Press; 1974, 135-158.
11. Lowenstein O, Loewenfeld IE. The pupil. In: Davson H, ed. The Eye. Muscular Mechanisms, vol. 3. New York: Academic Press; 1962.
12. Wyatt HJ. The form of the human pupil. Vision Res 1995, 35:2021-2036.
13. Goldwater BC. Psychological significance of pupillary movements. Psychol Bull 1972, 77:340-355.
14. Wilhelm B, Wilhelm H, Ludtke H. Pupillography: principles and applications in basic and clinical research. In: Kuhlmann J, Bottcher M, eds. Pupillography: Principles, Methods and Applications. Munchen, Germany: Zuckschwerdt Verlag; 1999, 1-11.
15. Koss M. Pupillary dilation as an index of central nervous system α2-adrenoceptor activation. J Pharmacol Met 1986, 15:1-19.
16. Samuels ER, Szabadi E. Functional neuroanatomy of the noradrenergic locus coeruleus: its role in the regulation of arousal and autonomic function part i: principles of functional organisation. Curr Neuropharmacol 2008, 6:1-19.
17. Aston-Jones G, Cohen JD. An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. Annu Rev Neurosci 2005, 28:403-450.
18. Sara S. The locus coeruleus and noradrenergic modulation of cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci 2009, 10:211-223.
19. Sterpenich V, D'Argembau A, Desseilles M, Balteau E, Albouy G, Vandewalle G, Degueldre C, Luxen A, Collette F, Maquet P. The locus coeruleus is involved in the successful retrieval of emotional memories in humans. J Neurosci 2006, 26:7416-7423.
20. Foote SL, Morrison JH. Extrathalamic modulation of cortical function. Annu Rev Neurosci 1987, 10:67-95.
21. Aston-Jones G, Foote SL, Bloom FE. Anatomy and physiology of locus coeruleus neurons: functional implications. In: Ziegler M, Lake CR, eds. Norepinephrine: Frontiers of Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 2. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1984, 92-116.
22. Jouvet M. Biogenic amines and the states of sleep. Science 1969, 163:32-41.
23. Rajkowski J, Kubiak P, Aston-Jones G. Correlations between locus coeruleus (LC) neural activity, pupil diameter and behavior in monkey support a role of LC in attention. Soc Neurosci Abs 1993, 19:974.
24. Rajkowski J, Majczynski H, Clayton E, Aston-Jones G. Activation of monkey locus coeruleus neurons varies with difficulty and performance in a target detection task. J Neurophysiol 2004, 92:361-371.
25. Alnæs D, Sneve MH, Espeseth T, Endestad T, van de Pavert SHP, Laeng B. Pupil size signals mental effort deployed during multiple object tracking and predicts brain activity in the dorsal attention network and the locus coeruleus. J Vis 2014, 14:article 1. doi: 10.1167/14.4.1.
26. Usher M, Cohen JD, Servan-Schreiber D, Rajkowski J, Aston-Jones G. The role of locus coeruleus in the regulation of cognitive performance. Science 1999, 283:549-554.
27. Gilzenrat MS, Nieuwenhuis S, Jepma M, Cohen JD. Pupil diameter tracks changes in control state predicted by the adaptive gain theory of locus coeruleus function. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2010, 10:252-269.
28. Aston-Jones G, Rajkowski J, Kubiak P, Alexinsky T. Locus coeruleus neurons in monkey are selectively activated by attended cues in a vigilance task. J Neurosci 1994, 14:4467-4480.
29. Berrien FK, Huntington GH. An exploratory study of pupillary responses during deception. J Exp Psychol 1943, 32:443-449. doi: 10.1037/h0063488.
30. Hess EH, Polt JM. Pupil size as related to interest value of visual stimuli. Science 1960, 132:349-350.
31. Hess EH, Polt JM. Pupil size in relation to mental activity during simple problem-solving. Science 1964, 143:1190-1192.
32. Simms TM. Pupillary response of male and female subjects to pupillary difference in male and female picture stimuli. Percept Psychophys 1967, 2:553-555.
33. Hess EH, Seltzer AL, Shlien JM. Pupil response of hetero- and homosexual males to pictures of men and women: a pilot study. J Abnorm Psychol 1965, 70:165-168.
34. Hess EH. Attitude and pupil size. Sci Am 1965, 212:46-54.
35. Hess EH, Polt JM. Changes in pupil size as a measure of taste difference. Percept Mot Skills 1966, 23:451-455.
36. Loewenfeld I. The Pupil: Anatomy, Physiology, and Clinical Applications. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press; 1993.
37. Ury B, Gellhorn E. Role of the sympathetic system in reflex dilatation of pupil. J Neurophysiol 1939, 2:268-275.
38. Ellermeier W, Westphal W. Gender differences in pain ratings and pupil reactions to painful pressure stimuli. Pain 1995, 61:435-439. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)00203-Q.
39. Chapman CR, Oka S, Bradshaw DH, Jacobson RC, Donaldson GW. Phasic pupil dilation response to noxious stimulation in normal volunteers: relationship to brain evoked potentials and pain report. Psychophysiology 1999, 36:44-52. doi: 10.1017/s0048577299970373.
40. Höfle M, Kenntner-Mabiala R, Pauli P, Alpers GW. You can see pain in the eye: pupillometry as an index of pain intensity under different luminance conditions. Int J Psychophysiol 2008, 70:171-175. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.06.008.
41. Bradshaw JL. Pupil size as a measure of arousal during information processing. Nature 1967, 216:515-516.
42. Bradshaw JL. Pupil size and problem solving. Q J Exp Psychol 1968b, 20:116-122.
43. Payne DT, Parry ME, Harasymiw ST. Percentage of pupillary dilation as a measure of item difficulty. Percept Psychophys 1968, 4:139-143.
44. Schaefer T Jr, Ferguson JB, Klein JA, Rawson EB. Pupillary responses during mental activities. Psychon Sci 1968, 12:137-138.
45. Bradshaw JL. Load and pupillary changes in continuous processing tasks. Br J Psychol 1968a, 59:265-271.
46. Kahneman D. Attention and Effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1973.
47. Ahern S, Beatty J. Pupillary responses during information processing vary with scholastic aptitude test scores. Science 1979, 205:1289-1292.
48. Beatty J, Kahneman D. Pupillary changes in two memory tasks. Psychon Sci 1966, 5:371-372.
49. Elshtain L, Schaefer T Jr. Effects of storage load and word frequency on pupillary responses during short-term memory. Psychon Sci 1968, 12:143-144.
50. Kahneman D, Beatty J. Pupillary responses in a pitch-discrimination task. Percept Psychophys 1967, 2:101-105.
51. Beatty J, Lucero-Wagoner B. The pupillary system. In: Cacioppo JT, Tassinary LG, Berntson G, eds. Handbook of Psychophysiology. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 2000, 142-162.
52. Whipple B, Ogden G, Komisaruk BR. Physiological correlates of imagery-induced orgasm in women. Arch Sex Behav 1992, 21:121-133.
53. Lowenstein O, Feinberg R, Loewenfeld IE. Pupillary movements during acute and chronic fatigue a new test for the objective evaluation of tiredness. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1963, 2:138-157.
54. Gagl B, Hawelka S, Hutzler F. Systematic influence of gaze position on pupil size measurement: analysis and correction. Behav Res Methods 2011, 43:1171-1181. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0109-5.
55. Brisson J, Mainville M, Mailloux D, Beaulieu C, Serres J, Sirois S. Pupil diameter measurement errors as a function of gaze direction in corneal reflection eyetrackers. Behav Res Methods 2013, 45:1322-1331. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0327-0.
56. Binda P, Pereverzeva M, Murray SO. Pupil constrictions to photographs of the sun. J Vis 2013, 13:1-9. doi: 10.1167/13.6.8.
57. Laeng B, Endestad T. Bright illusions reduce the eye's pupil. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012, 109:2162-2167. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118298109.
58. Naber M, Nakayama K. Pupil responses to high-level image content. J Vis 2013, 13:1-8. doi: 10.1167/13.6.7.
59. Laeng B, Sulutvedt U. The eye pupil adjusts to imaginary light. Psychol Sci 2014, 25:188-197. doi: 10.1177/0956797613503556.
60. Steiner GZ, Barry RJ. Pupillary responses and event-related potentials as indices of the orienting reflex. Psychophysiology 2011, 48:1648-1655. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01271.x.
61. Ramsøy TZ, Friis-Olivarius M, Jacobsen C, Jensen SB, Skov M. Effects of perceptual uncertainty on arousal and preference across different visual domains. J Neurosci Psychol Econ 2012, 5:212-226. doi: 10.1037/a0030198.
62. Yoshimoto S, Imai H, Kashino M, Takeuchi T. Pupil response and the subliminal mere exposure effect. PLoS One 2014, 9:e90670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090670.
63. Zylberberg A, Oliva M, Sigman M. Pupil dilation: a fingerprint of temporal selection during the "attentional blink". Front Psychol 2012, 3:316. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00316.
64. Wykowska A, Anderl C, Schubo A, Hommel B. Motivation modulates visual attention: evidence from pupillometry. Front Psychol 2013, 4:59-71. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00059.
65. Attar N, Schneps M, Pomplun M. Pupil size as a measure of working memory load during a complex visual search task. J Vis 2013, 13:160. doi: 10.1167/13.9.160.
66. Wright TJ, Boot WR, Morgan CS. Pupillary response predicts multiple object tracking load, error rate, and conscientiousness, but not inattentional blindness. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2013, 144:6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.04.018.
67. Burge WK, Ross LA, Amthor FR, Mitchell WG, Zotov A, Visscher KM. Processing speed training increases the efficiency of attentional resource allocation in young adults. Front Hum Neurosci 2013, 7:684. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00684.
68. Geva R, Zivan M, Warsha A, Olchik D. Alerting, orienting or executive attention networks: differential patterns of pupil dilations. Front Behav Neurosci 2013, 7:145. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00145.
69. Wendt M, Kiesel A, Geringswald F, Purmann S, Fischer R. Attentional adjustment to conflict strength: evidence from the effects of manipulating flanker-target SOA on response times and prestimulus pupil size. Exp Psychol 2014, 61:55-67. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000227.
70. Zellin M, Pannekamp A, Toepel U, van der Meer E. In the eye of the listener: pupil dilation elucidates discourse processing. Int J Psychophysiol 2011, 81:133-141. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.05.009.
71. Zekveld AA, Kramer SE. Cognitive processing load across a wide range of listening conditions: insights from pupillometry. Psychophysiology 2014, 51:277-284. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12151.
72. Kramer SE, Lorens A, Coninx F, Zekveld AA, Piotrowska A, Skarzynski H. Processing load during listening: the influence of task characteristics on the pupil response. Lang Cognitive Proc 2012, 28:426-442. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2011.642267.
73. Kuchinsky SE, Ahlstrom JB, Vaden KI, Cute SL, Humes LE, Dubno JR, Eckert MA. Pupil size varies with word listening and response selection difficulty in older adults with hearing loss. Psychophysiology 2013, 50:23-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01477.x.
74. Schmidtke J. Second language experience modulates word retrieval effort in bilinguals: evidence from pupillometry. Front Psychol 2014, 5:1-16.doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00137.
75. Kuipers J-R, Thierry G. ERP-pupil size correlations reveal how bilingualism enhances cognitive flexibility. Cortex 2013, 49:2853-2860.doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.01.012.
76. Franklin MS, Broadway JM, Mrazek MD, Smallwood J, Schooler JW. Window to the wandering mind: pupillometry of spontaneous thought while reading. Q J Exp Psychol 2013, 66:2289-2294.doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.858170.
77. Scheepers C, Mohr S, Fischer MH, Roberts AM. Listening to limericks: a pupillometry investigation of perceivers' expectancy. PLoS One 2013, 8:e74986. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074986.
78. Cavanagh JF, Wiecki TV, Kochar A, Frank MJ. Eye tracking and pupillometry are indicators of dissociable latent decision processes. J Exp Psychol Gen 2014, 143:1476-1488. doi: 10.1037/a0035813.
79. de Gee JW, Knapen T, Donner TH. Decision-related pupil dilation reflects upcoming choice and individual bias. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014, 111:E618-E625. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317557111.
80. van Steenbergen H, Band GP. Pupil dilation in the Simon task as a marker of conflict processing. Front Hum Neurosci 2013, 7:215.doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00215.
81. Chiew KS, Braver TS. Temporal dynamics of motivation-cognitive control interactions revealed by high-resolution pupillometry. Front Psychol 2013, 4:1-15. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00015.
82. Lavin C, San Martín R, Rosales Jubal E. Pupil dilation signals uncertainty and surprise in a learning gambling task [Original Research]. Front Behav Neurosci 2014, 7:218. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00218.
83. Jepma M, Nieuwenhuis S. Pupil diameter predicts changes in the exploration-exploitation trade-off: evidence for the adaptive gain theory. J Cogn Neurosci 2011, 23:1587-1596. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21548.
84. Nowack K, Milfont TL, van der Meer E. Future versus present: time perspective and pupillary response in a relatedness judgment task investigating temporal event knowledge. Int J Psychophysiol 2013, 87:173-182. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.12.006.
85. Prehn K, Heekeren HR, van der Meer E. Influence of affective significance on different levels of processing using pupil dilation in an analogical reasoning task. Int J Psychophysiol 2011, 79:236-243.doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.10.014.
86. Bayer M, Sommer W, Schacht A. Emotional words impact the mind but not the body: evidence from pupillary responses. Psychophysiology 2011, 48:1554-1562.doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01219.x.
87. Goldinger SD, Papesh MH. Pupil dilation reflects the creation and retrieval of memories. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2012, 21:90-95.doi: 10.1177/0963721412436811.
88. Ariel R, Castel A. Eyes wide open: enhanced pupil dilation when selectively studying important information. Exp Brain Res 2014, 232:337-344.doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3744-5.
89. Guillory SB, Blaser E, Eglington L, Kaldy Z. Task-evoked pupillary responses in iconic memory. Psychol Bull 2013, 91:276-292.
90. Heaver B, Hutton SB. Keeping an eye on the truth? Pupil size changes associated with recognition memory. Memory 2011, 19:398-405.doi: 10.1080/09658211.2011.575788.
91. Kafkas A, Montaldi D. Recognition memory strength is predicted by pupillary responses at encoding while fixation patterns distinguish recollection from familiarity. Q J Exp Psychol 2011, 64:1971-1989.doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.588335.
92. Naber M, Frässle S, Rutishauser U, Einhäuser W. Pupil size signals novelty and predicts later retrieval success for declarative memories of natural scenes. J Vis 2013, 13:11. doi: 10.1167/13.2.11.
93. Kafkas A, Montaldi D. Familiarity and recollection produce distinct eye movement, pupil and medial temporal lobe responses when memory strength is matched. Neuropsychologia 2012, 50:3080-3093. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.08.001.
94. Otero SC, Weekes BS, Hutton SB. Pupil size changes during recognition memory. Psychophysiology 2011, 48:1346-1353. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01217.x.
95. Papesh MH, Goldinger SD, Hout MC. Memory strength and specificity revealed by pupillometry. Int J Psychophysiol 2012, 83:56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.10.002.
96. Qin S, Hermans EJ, van Marle HJ, Fernandez G. Understanding low reliability of memories for neutral information encoded under stress: alterations in memory-related activation in the hippocampus and midbrain. J Neurosci 2012, 32:4032-4041.doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.3101-11.2012.
97. Bradley MM, Miccoli L, Escrig MA, Lang PJ. The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. Psychophysiology 2008, 45:602-607.doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00654.x.
98. Ellingsen D-M, Wessberg J, Chelnokova O, Olausson H, Laeng B, Leknes S. In touch with your emotions: oxytocin and touch change social impressions while others' facial expressions can alter touch. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2014, 39:11-20.doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.09.017.
99. Honma M, Tanaka Y, Osada Y, Kuriyama K. Perceptual and not physical eye contact elicits pupillary dilation. Biol Psychol 2012, 89:112-116.doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.09.015.
100. Blackburn K, Schirillo J. Emotive hemispheric differences measured in real-life portraits using pupil diameter and subjective aesthetic preferences. Exp Brain Res 2012, 219:447-455.doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3091-y.
101. Prehn K, Kazzer P, Lischke A, Heinrichs M, Herpertz SC, Domes G. Effects of intranasal oxytocin on pupil dilation indicate increased salience of socioaffective stimuli. Psychophysiology 2013, 50:528-537.doi: 10.1111/psyp.12042.
102. Rieger G, Savin-Williams RC. The eyes have it: sex and sexual orientation differences in pupil dilation patterns. PLoS One 2012, 7:e40256. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040256.
103. Duque A, Sanchez A, Vazquez C. Gaze-fixation and pupil dilation in the processing of emotional faces: the role of rumination. Cogn Emot 2014.doi: 10.1080/02699931.2014.881327.
104. Alghowinem S, AlShehri M, Goecke R, Wagner M. Exploring eye activity as an indication of emotional states using an eye-tracking sensor. In: Chen L, Kapoor S, Bhatia R, eds. Intelligent Systems for Science and Information, vol. 542. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2014, 261-276.
105. Kret ME, Roelofs K, Stekelenburg JJ, de Gelder B. Emotional signals from faces, bodies and scenes influence observers' face expressions, fixations and pupil-size. Front Hum Neurosci 2013a, 7:810.doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00810.
106. Kret ME, Stekelenburg JJ, Roelofs K, de Gelder B. Perception of face and body expressions using electromyography, pupillometry and gaze measures. Front Psychol 2013b, 4:1-28. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00028.
107. Wiemer J, Mühlberger A, Pauli P. Illusory correlations between neutral and aversive stimuli can be induced by outcome aversiveness. Cogn Emot 2013, 28:193-207. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.809699.
108. Roecklein K, Wong P, Ernecoff N, Miller M, Donofry S, Kamarck M, Wood-Vasey WM, Franzen P. The post illumination pupil response is reduced in seasonal affective disorder. Psychiatry Res 2013, 210:150-158. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.05.023.
109. Fitzgerald HE. Autonomic pupillary reflex activity during early infancy and its relation to social and nonsocial visual stimuli. J Exp Child Psychol 1968, 6:470-482.
110. Fitzgerald HE, Lintz LM, Brackbill Y, Adams G. Time perception and conditioning an autonomic response in human infants. Percept Mot Skills 1967, 24:479-486.
111. Jackson I, Sirois S. Infant cognition: going full factorial with pupil dilation. Dev Sci 2009, 12:670-679.doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00805.x.
112. Sirois S, Jackson IR. Pupil dilation and object permanence in infants. Infancy 2012, 17:61-78.doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7078.2011.00096.x.
113. Verschoor SA, Spapé M, Biro S, Hommel B. From outcome prediction to action selection: developmental change in the role of action-effect bindings. Dev Sci 2013, 16:801-814. doi: 10.1111/desc.12085.
114. Gredebäck G, Melinder A. Infants' understanding of everyday social interactions: a dual process account. Cognition 2010, 114:197-206.
115. Gredebäck G, Melinder A. Teleological reasoning in 4-month-old infants: pupil dilations and contextual constraints. PLoS One 2011, 6:e26487.doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026487.
116. Gredebäck G, Eriksson M, Schmitow C, Laeng B, Stenberg G. Individual differences in face processing: infants' scanning patterns and pupil dilations are influenced by the distribution of parental leave. Infancy 2012, 17:79-101.doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7078.2011.00091.x.
117. Hepach R, Westermann G. Infants' sensitivity to the congruence of others' emotions and actions. J Exp Child Psychol 2013, 115:16-29.doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.12.013.
118. Geangu E, Hauf P, Bhardwaj R, Bentz W. Infant pupil diameter changes in response to others' positive and negative emotions. PLoS One 2011, 6:e27132.doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027132.
119. Hepach R, Vaish A, Tomasello M. Young children are intrinsically motivated to see others helped. Psychol Sci 2012, 23:967-972.doi: 10.1177/0956797612440571.
120. Silk JS, Stroud LR, Siegle GJ, Dahl RE, Lee KH, Nelson EE. Peer acceptance and rejection through the eyes of youth: pupillary, eyetracking and ecological data from the Chatroom Interact task. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2012, 7:93-105. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr044.
121. Blaser E, Eglington L, Carter AS, Kaldy Z. Pupillometry reveals a mechanism for the autism spectrum disorder (ASD) advantage in visual tasks. Sci Rep 2014, 4:1-5. doi: 10.1038/srep04301.
122. Anderson CJ, Colombo J, Jill Shaddy D. Visual scanning and pupillary responses in young children with autism spectrum disorder. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2006, 28:1238-1256.doi: 10.1080/13803390500376790.
123. Martineau J, Hernandez N, Hiebel L, Roche L, Metzger A, Bonnet-Brilhault F. Can pupil size and pupil responses during visual scanning contribute to the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder in children? J Psychiatr Res 2011, 45:1077-1082.doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.01.008.
124. Dietz J, Bradley MM, Okun MS, Bowers D. Emotion and ocular responses in Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:3247-3253.doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.07.029.
125. Verney SP, Granholm E, Dionisio DP. Pupillary responses and processing resources on the visual backward masking task. Psychophysiology 2001, 38:76-83.
126. Jainta S, Baccino T. Analyzing the pupil response due to increased cognitive demand: an independent component analysis study. Int J Psychophysiol 2010, 77:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.03.008.
127. Ramsay JO, Silverman BW. Functional Data Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1997.
128. Wierda SM, van Rijn H, Taatgen NA, Martens S. Pupil dilation deconvolution reveals the dynamics of attention at high temporal resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012, 109:8456-8460.doi: 10.1073/pnas.1201858109.
129. Clayson PE, Baldwin SA, Larson MJ. How does noise affect amplitude and latency measurement of event-related potentials (ERPs)? A methodological critique and simulation study. Psychophysiology 2013, 50:174-186. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12001.
130. Dien J. Issues in the application of the average reference: review, critiques, and recommendations. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 1998, 30:34-43.doi: 10.3758/bf03209414.