Eye tracking and pupillometry are indicators of dissociable latent decision processes

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 143, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1476-1488

  Cavanagh, James F ^a,b   Wiecki, Thomas V ^a   Kochar, Angad ^a   Frank, Michael J ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision making; Decision threshold; Drift rate; Eye tracking; Pupil

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONFLICT; DECISION MAKING; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; OCULOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PUPIL; YOUNG ADULT;

ATTENTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); DECISION MAKING; EYE MOVEMENT MEASUREMENTS; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PUPIL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84905159264     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0035813     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Armel, K. C., Beaumel, A., & Rangel, A. (2008). Biasing simple choices by manipulating relative visual attention. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 396-403.
2. Aron, A. R., Behrens, T. E., Smith, S., Frank, M. J., & Poldrack, R. A. (2007). Triangulating a cognitive control network using diffusionweighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional MRI. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 3743-3752. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0519-07.2007
3. Beatty, J., & Lucero-Wagoner, B. (2000). The pupillary system. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd ed., pp. 142-162). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bogacz, R., Brown, E., Moehlis, J., Holmes, P., & Cohen, J. D. (2006). The physics of optimal decision making: A formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. Psychological Review, 113, 700-765. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.700
5. Brisson, J., Mainville, M., Mailloux, D., Beaulieu, C., Serres, J., & Sirois, S. (2013). Pupil diameter measurement errors as a function of gaze direction in corneal reflection eyetrackers. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 1322-1331. doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0327-0
6. Brown, S. D., & Heathcote, A. (2008). The simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 153-178. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.12.002
7. Cavanagh, J. F., Bismark, A. J., Frank, M. J., & Allen, J. J. B. (2012). Larger error signals in major depression are associated with better avoidance learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 331. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00331
8. Cavanagh, J. F., Wiecki, T. V., Cohen, M. X., Figueroa, C. M., Samanta, J., Sherman, S. J., & Frank, M. J. (2011). Subthalamic nucleus stimulation reverses mediofrontal influence over decision threshold. Nature Neuroscience, 14, 1462-1467. doi:10.1038/nn.2925
9. Chatham, C. H., Frank, M. J., & Munakata, Y. (2009). Pupillometric and behavioral markers of a developmental shift in the temporal dynamics of cognitive control. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, 5529-5533. doi:10.1073/pnas.0810002106
10. Cornelissen, F. W., Peters, E. M., & Palmer, J. (2002). The Eyelink Toolbox: Eye tracking with MATLAB and the Psychophysics Toolbox. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 613-617.
11. Craig, A. D. (2002). How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 655-666. doi:10.1038/nrn894
12. Critchley, H. D., Tang, J., Glaser, D., Butterworth, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2005). Anterior cingulate activity during error and autonomic response. NeuroImage, 27, 885-895. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.05.047
13. Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9-21.
14. Devinsky, O., Morrell, M. J., & Vogt, B. A. (1995). Contributions of anterior cingulate cortex to behaviour. Brain, 118, 279-306.
15. Domenech, P., & Dreher, J.-C. (2010). Decision threshold modulation in the human brain. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 14305-14317. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2371-10.2010
16. Donkin, C., Brown, S., Heathcote, A., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011). Diffusion versus linear ballistic accumulation: Different models but the same conclusions about psychological processes? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 61-69. doi:10.3758/s13423-010-0022-4
17. Eldar, E., Cohen, J. D., & Niv, Y. (2013). The effects of neural gain on attention and learning. Nature Neuroscience, 16, 1146-1153. doi: 10.1038/nn.3428
18. Fiedler, S., & Glöckner, A. (2012). The dynamics of decision making in risky choice: An eye-tracking analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 335. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00335
19. Forstmann, B. U., Anwander, A., Schafer, A., Neumann, J., Brown, S., Wagenmakers, E. J.,... Turner, R. (2010). Cortico-striatal connections predict control over speed and accuracy in perceptual decision making. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 107, 15916- 15920. doi:10.1073/pnas.1004932107
20. Frank, M. J. (2006). Hold your horses: A dynamic computational role for the subthalamic nucleus in decision making. Neural Networks, 19, 1120-1136.
21. Frank, M. J., Samanta, J., Moustafa, A. A., & Sherman, S. J. (2007, November 23). Hold your horses: Impulsivity, deep brain stimulation, and medication in Parkinsonism. Science, 318, 1309-1312. doi:10.1126/ science.1146157
22. Frank, M. J., Seeberger, L. C., & O'Reilly, R. C. (2004, December 10). By carrot or by stick: Cognitive reinforcement learning in Parkinsonism. Science, 306, 1940-1943. doi:10.1126/science.1102941
23. Frank, M. J., Woroch, B. S., & Curran, T. (2005). Error-related negativity predicts reinforcement learning and conflict biases. Neuron, 47, 495- 501. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.06.020
24. Gagl, B., Hawelka, S., & Hutzler, F. (2011). Systematic influence of gaze position on pupil size measurement: Analysis and correction. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 1171-1181. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0109-5
25. Gelman, A. (2004). Bayesian data analysis (Texts in statistical science series, 2nd ed., p. xxv, 668 p.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
26. Glaholt, M. G., Wu, M., & Reingold, E. M. (2009). Predicting preference from fixations. PsychNology Journal, 7, 141-158.
27. Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2007). The neural basis of decision making. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 30, 535-574. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113038
28. Goldwater, B. C. (1972). Psychological significance of pupillary movements. Psychological Bulletin, 77, 340-355. doi:10.1037/h0032456
29. Hare, T. A, Schultz, W., Camerer, C. F., O'Doherty, J. P., & Rangel, A. (2011). Transformation of stimulus value signals into motor commands during simple choice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 108, 18120-18125. doi:10.1073/pnas.1109322108
30. Hess, E. H., & Polt, J. M. (1960, August 5). Pupil size as related to interest value of visual stimuli. Science, 132, 349-350. doi:10.1126/science.132.3423.349
31. Kahneman, D., & Beatty, J. (1966, December 23). Pupil dilation and load on memory. Science, 154, 1583-1585. doi:10.1126/science.154.3756.1583
32. Krajbich, I., Armel, C., & Rangel, A. (2010). Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice. Nature Neuroscience, 13, 1292-1298. doi:10.1038/nn.2635
33. Krajbich, I., Lu, D., Camerer, C., & Rangel, A. (2012). The attentional drift-diffusion model extends to simple purchasing decisions. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 193. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00193
34. Krajbich, I., & Rangel, A. (2011). Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in valuebased decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 108, 13852-13857. doi:10.1073/pnas.1101328108
35. Laeng, B., Sirois, S., & Gredeback, G. (2012). Pupillometry: A window to the preconscious? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 18-27. doi:10.1177/1745691611427305
36. Lim, S.-L., O'Doherty, J. P., & Rangel, A. (2011). The decision value computations in the vmPFC and striatum use a relative value code that is guided by visual attention. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 13214- 13223. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1246-11.2011
37. Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2009). Psychological interpretation of the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters: A diffusion model analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 798-817. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.5.798
38. Nassar, M. R., Rumsey, K. M., Wilson, R. C., Parikh, K., Heasly, B., & Gold, J. I. (2012). Rational regulation of learning dynamics by pupillinked arousal systems. Nature Neuroscience, 15, 1040-1046. doi: 10.1038/nn.3130
39. O'Connell, R. G., Dockree, P. M., & Kelly, S. P. (2012). A supramodal accumulation-to-bound signal that determines perceptual decisions in humans. Nature Neuroscience, 15, 1729-1735. doi:10.1038/nn.3248
40. Preuschoff, K., 't Hart, B. M., & Einhäuser, W. (2011). Pupil dilation signals surprise: Evidence for noradrenaline's role in decision making. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 5, 115. doi:10.3389/fnins.2011.00115
41. Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59-108. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.85.2.59
42. Ratcliff, R., & Frank, M. J. (2012). Reinforcement-based decision making in corticostriatal circuits: Mutual constraints by neurocomputational and diffusion models. Neural Computation, 24, 1186-1229. doi:10.1162/ NECO_a_00270
43. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2008a). The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Computation, 20, 873- 922. doi:10.1162/neco.2008.12-06-420
44. Richer, F., & Beatty, J. (1985). Pupillary dilations in movement preparation and execution. Psychophysiology, 22, 204-207. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1985.tb01587.x
45. Schotter, E. R., Gerety, C., & Rayner, K. (2012). Heuristics and criterion setting during selective encoding in visual decision-making: Evidence from eye movements. Visual Cognition, 20, 1110-1129. doi:10.1080/ 13506285.2012.735719
46. Shackman, A. J., Salomons, T. V., Slagter, H. A., Fox, A. S., Winter, J. J., & Davidson, R. J. (2011). The integration of negative affect, pain and cognitive control in the cingulate cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12, 154-167. doi:10.1038/nrn2994
47. Shimojo, S., Simion, C., Shimojo, E., & Scheier, C. (2003). Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 1317-1322. doi:10.1038/nn1150
48. Siegle, G. J., Ichikawa, N., & Steinhauer, S. (2008). Blink before and after you think: Blinks occur prior to and following cognitive load indexed by pupillary responses. Psychophysiology, 45, 679-687. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00681.x
49. Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P., & van der Linde, A. (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 64, 583-639. doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00353
50. Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2001). The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychological Review, 108, 550-592. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.550
51. van Steenbergen, H., & Band, G. P. H. (2013). Pupil dilation in the Simon task as a marker of conflict processing. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 215. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00215
52. Wagenmakers, E.-J., Krypotos, A.-M., Criss, A. H., & Iverson, G. (2012). On the interpretation of removable interactions: A survey of the field 33 years after Loftus. Memory & Cognition, 40, 145-160. doi:10.3758/ s13421-011-0158-0
53. Wagenmakers, E.-J., Lodewyckx, T., Kuriyal, H., & Grasman, R. (2010). Bayesian hypothesis testing for psychologists: A tutorial on the Savage- Dickey method. Cognitive Psychology, 60, 158-189. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.12.001
54. Wang, J. T., Spezio, M., & Camerer, C. F. (2010). Pinocchio's pupil: Using eyetracking and pupil dilation to understand truth-telling and deception in games. American Economic Review, 3, 984 -1007. doi: 10.1257/aer.100.3.984
55. Wiecki, T. V., Sofer, I., & Frank, M. J. (2013). HDDM: Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of the drift-diffusion model in Python. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 14-24. doi:10.3389/fninf.2013.00014
56. Wierda, S. M., van Rijn, H., Taatgen, N. A., & Martens, S. (2012). Pupil dilation deconvolution reveals the dynamics of attention at high temporal resolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 109, 8456-8460. doi:10.1073/pnas.1201858109