Systematic influence of gaze position on pupil size measurement: Analysis and correction

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1171-1181

  Gagl, Benjamin ^a   Hawelka, Stefan ^a   Hutzler, Florian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALZBURG   (Austria)

Author keywords

Cognitive effort; Eye movements; Mindless reading; Pupillometry; Reading; Video based eyetracker

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PUPIL; READING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COGNITION; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PUPIL; READING;

EID: 81255143393     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: 15543528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-011-0109-5     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Atchison, D., & Smith, G. (2000). Optics of the human eye. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
2. Beatty, J. (1982). Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 276-292.
3. Briesemeister, B. B., Hofmann, M. J., Tamm, S., Kuchinke, L., Braun, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2009). The pseudohomophone effect: Evidence for an orthography-phonology-conflict. Neuroscience Letters, 455, 124-128.
4. Granholm, E., Asarnow, R., Sarkin, A., & Dykes, K. (1996). Pupillary responses index cognitive resource limitations. Psychophysiology, 33, 457-461.
5. Hess, E. H., & Polt, J. M. (1964). Pupil size in relation to mental activity during simple problem-solving. Science, 143, 1190-1192.
6. Jay, B. S. (1962). The effective pupillary area at varying perimetric angles. Vision Research, 1, 418-424.
7. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1993). The intensity dimension of thought: Pupillometric indexes of sentence processing. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 310-339.
8. Kahneman, D., & Beatty, J. (1966). Pupil diameter and load on memory. Science, 154, 1583-1585.
9. Kliegl, R., Grabner, E., Rolfs, M., & Engbert, R. (2004). Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 262-284.
10. Kuchinke, L., Võ, M. L.-H., Hofmann, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2007). Pupillary responses during lexical decisions vary with word frequency but not emotional valence. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 65, 132-140.
11. Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2009). Mindless reading revisited: An analysis based on the SWIFT model of eye-movement control. Vision Research, 49, 322-336.
12. Nuthmann, A., Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2007). The IOVP effect in mindless reading: Experiment and modeling. Vision Research, 47, 990-1002.
13. Partala, T., & Surakka, V. (2003). Pupil size variation as an indication of affective processing. International Journal of Human-Computer. Studies, 59, 185-198.
14. Peavler, W. S. (1974). Pupil size, information overload, and performance differences. Psychophysiology, 11, 559-566.
15. Piquado, T., Isaacowitz, D., & Wingfield, A. (2010). Pupillometry as a measure of cognitive effort in younger and older adults. Psychophysiology, 47, 560-569.
16. Porter, G., Troscianko, T., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2007). Effort during visual search and counting: Insights from pupillometry. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 211-229.
17. Raisig, S., Welke, T., Hagendorf, H., & van der Meer, E. (2007). Investigating dimensional organization in scripts using the pupillary response. Psychophysiology, 44, 864-873.
18. Raisig, S., Welke, T., Hagendorf, H., & van der Meer, E. (2010). I spy with my little eye: Detection of temporal violations in event sequences and the pupillary response. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 76, 1-8.
19. Rayner, K., & Fischer, M. H. (1996). Mindless reading revisited: Eye movements during reading and scanning are different. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 734-747.
20. Scheepers, C., & Crocker, M. (2004). Constituent order priming from reading to listening: A visual-world study. In M. Carreiras & C. Clifton Jr. (Eds.), The on-line study of sentence comprehension: Eyetracking, ERP, and beyond (pp. 167-185). Hove, U. K.: Psychology Press.
21. Schluroff, M., Zimmermann, T. E., Freeman, R. B., Jr., Hofmeister, K., Lorscheid, T., & Weber, A. (1986). Pupillary responses to syntactic ambiguity of sentences. Brain and Language, 27, 322-344.
22. Stanners, R., Coulter, M., Sweet, A., & Murphy, P. (1979). The pupillary response as anindicator of arousal and cognition. Motivation and Emotion, 3, 319-340.
23. Vitu, F., Oregan, J. K., Inhoff, A. W., & Topolski, R. (1995). Mindless reading: Eye-movement characteristics are similar in scanning letter strings and reading texts. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 352-364.
24. Võ, M. L.-H., Jacobs, A. M., Kuchinke, L., Hofmann, M., Conrad, M., Schacht, A., et al. (2008). The coupling of emotion and cognition in the eye: Introducing the pupil old/new effect. Psychophysiology, 45, 130-140.