Temporal dynamics of motivation-cognitive control interactions revealed by high-resolution pupillometry

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 4, Issue JAN, 2013, Pages

  Chiew, Kimberly S ^a   Braver, Todd S ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive control; Incentive; Motivation; Pupillometry; Reward

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874710798     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00015     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ahern, S., and Beatty, J. (1979). Pupil-lary responses during information processing vary with Scholastic Aptitude Test scores. Science 205, 1289-1292.
2. Aston-Jones, G., and Cohen, J. D. (2005). An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 28, 403-450.
3. Beatty, J. (1982a). Phasic not tonic pupillary responses vary with auditory vigilance per-formance. Psychophysiology 19, 167-172.
4. Beatty, J. (1982b). Task-evoked pupil-lary responses, processing load, and the structure of process-ing resources. Psychol. Bull. 91, 276-292.
5. Bradley,M. M.,Miccoli,L.,Escrig,M.A., and Lang, P. J. (2008). The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. Psychophysi-ology 45, 602-607.
6. Braem, S., Verguts, T., Roggeman, C., and Notebaert, W. (2012). Reward modulates adaptations to conflict. Cognition 125, 324-332.
7. Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Keys, B. A., Carter, C. S., Cohen, J. D., Kaye, J. A., et al. (2001). Context processing in older adults: evidence for a the-ory relating cognitive control to neu-robiology in healthy aging. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 130, 746-763.
8. Chatham, C. H., Frank, M. J., and Munakata, Y. (2009). Pupillomet-ric and behavioral markers of a developmental shift in the tempo-ral dynamics of cognitive control. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 5529-5533.
9. Chiew, K. S., and Braver, T. S. (2011). Positive affect versus reward: emotional versus moti-vational influences on cognitive control. Front. Psychol. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00279. 2:279
10. Cohen, J. D., and Servan-Schreiber, D. (1992). Context, cortex, and dopamine: a connectionist approach to behavior and biology in schizo-phrenia. Psychol. Rev. 99, 45-77.
11. Dreisbach, G. (2006). How positive affect modulates cognitive control: the costs and benefits of reduced maintenance capability. Brain Cogn. 60, 11-19.
12. Edwards, B. G., Barch, D. M., and Braver, T. S. (2010). Improving prefrontal cortex function in schizophrenia through focused training of cognitive control. Front. Hum. Neurosci. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2010.00032. 4:32
13. How positive affect modulates proactive control: reduced usage of informative cues under positive affect with low arousal
14. Gilzenrat, M. S., Nieuwenhuis, S., Jepma, M., and Cohen, J. D. (2010). Pupil diameter tracks changes in control state predicted by the adap-tive gain theory of locus coeruleus function. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neu-rosci. 10, 252-269.
15. Granholm, E., Asarnow, R. F., Sarkin, A. J., and Dykes, K. L. (1996). Pupillary responses index cognitive resource limitations. Psychophysiol-ogy 33, 457-461.
16. Heitz, R. P., Schrock, J. C., Payne, T. W., and Engle, R. W. (2008). Effects of incentive on working memory capacity: behavioral and pupillo-metric data. Psychophysiology 45, 119-129.
17. Jimura, K., Locke, H. S., and Braver, T. S. (2010). Prefrontal cortex medi-ation of cognitive enhancement in rewarding motivational contexts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 8871-8876.
18. Kahneman, D., and Beatty, J. (1966). Pupil diameter and load on memory. Science 154, 1583-1585.
19. Locke, H. S., and Braver, T. S. (2008). Motivational influences on cognitive control: behavior, brain activation, and individual differences. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 8, 99-112.
20. MacDonald, A. W. III, and Carter, C. S. (2003). Event-related FMRI study of context processing in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of patients with schizophrenia. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 112, 689-697.
21. Marshall, S. P. (2007). Identifying cog-nitive state from eye metrics. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 78, B165-B175.
22. Murphy, P. R., Robertson, I. H., Bal-sters, J. H., and O'Connell, R. G. (2011). Pupillometry and P3 index the locus coeruleus-noradrenergic arousal function in humans. Psy-chophysiology 48, 1532-1543.
23. Padmala, S., and Pessoa, L. (2011). Reward reduces conflict by enhanc-ing attentional control and biasing visual cortical processing. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23, 3419-3432.
24. Paxton, J. L., Barch, D. M., Racine, C. A., and Braver, T. S. (2008). Cogni-tive control, goal maintenance, and prefrontal function in healthy aging. Cereb. Cortex 18, 1010-1028.
25. Pessoa, L. (2009). How do emotion and motivation direct executive control? Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 13, 160-166.
26. Pochon, J. B., Levy, R., Fossati, P., Lehericy, S., Poline, J. B., Pillon, B., et al. (2002). The neural system that bridges reward and cognition in humans: an fMRI study. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 5669-5674.
27. Richmond, L. L., Redick, T. S., and Braver, T. (2012). "Working mem-ory capacity influences strategic choice on a cognitive control task," in Poster Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Minneapolis.
28. Satterthwaite, T. D., Green, L., Myerson, J., Parker, J., Ramaratnam, M., and Buckner, R. L. (2007). Dissociable but inter-relatedsystemsof cognitive control and reward during decision making: evidence from pupillome-try and event-related fMRI. Neu-roimage 37, 1017-1031.
29. Savine, A. C., Beck, S. M., Edwards, B. G., Chiew, K. S., and Braver, T. S. (2010). Enhancement of cognitive control by approach and avoidance motivational states. Cogn. Emot. 24, 338-356.
30. Savine, A. C., and Braver, T. S. (2010). Motivated cognitive con-trol: reward incentives modulate preparatory neural activity dur-ing task-switching. J. Neurosci. 30, 10294-10305.
31. Savine, A. C., and Braver, T. S. (2012). Local and global effects of motivation on cognitive control. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 12, 692-718.
32. Servan-Schreiber, D., Cohen, J. D., and Steingard, S. (1996). Schizophrenic deficits in the processing of context. A test of a theoretical model. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 53, 1105-1112.
33. van Steenbergen, H., Band, G. P., and Hommel, B. (2009). Reward counteracts conflict adaptation. Evi-dence for a role of affect in executive control. Psychol. Sci. 20, 1473-1477.