Memory strength and specificity revealed by pupillometry

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 83, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 56-64

  Papesh, Megan H ^a   Goldinger, Stephen D ^a   Hout, Michael C ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Pupillometry; Recognition memory; Specificity effects

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; EPISODIC MEMORY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY; PUPIL; PUPILLOMETRY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIGNAL DETECTION; VOICE ANALYSIS; VOICE CHANGE;

ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PUPIL; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); ROC CURVE; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERBAL LEARNING; VOICE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84855239321     PISSN: 01678760     EISSN: 18727697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Balota D.A., Yap M.J., Cortese M.J., Hutchison K.I., Kessler B., Loftis B., Neely J.H., Nelson D.L., Simpson G.B., Treiman R. The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods 2007, 39:445-459.
2. Beatty J. Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychological Bulletin 1982, 91:276-292. 10.1037/0033-2909.91.2.276.
3. Beatty J., Kahneman D. Pupil diameter and load on memory. Science 1966, 154:1583-1585. 10.1126/science.154.3756.1583.
4. Bowers J.S. In defense of abstractionist theories of word identification and repetition priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2000, 7:83-99.
5. Bradlow A.R., Nygaard L.C., Pisoni D.B. Effects of talker, rate and amplitude variation on recognition memory for spoken words. Perception & Psychophysics 1999, 61:206-219.
6. Brown S., Heathcote A. Averaging learning curves across and within participants. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 2003, 35:656-661. 10.3758/BF03195493.
7. Brysbaert M., New B. Moving beyond Kuçera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved frequency measure for American English. Behavioral Research Methods 2009, 41:977-990. 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977.
8. Cansino S., Trejo-Morales P. Neurophysiology of successful encoding and retrieval of source memory. Cognitive and Affective Behavioral Neuroscience 2008, 8:85-98. 10.3758/CABN.8.1.85.
9. Church B., Schacter D. Perceptual specificity of auditory priming: memory for voice intonation and fundamental frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994, 20:521-533. 10.1037/0278-7393.20.3.521.
10. Clark K.B., Krahl S.E., Smith D.S., Jensen R.A. Post-training unilateral vagal stimulation enhances retention performance in the rat. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 1995, 63:213-216. 10.1006/nlme.1995.1024.
11. Clark K.B., Naritoku D.K., Smith D.C., Browning R.A., Jensen R.A. Enhanced recognition memory following vagus nerve stimulation in human subjects. Nature Neuroscience 1999, 2:94-98. 10.1038/4600.
12. Croiset G., Nijsen M.J.M.A., Kamphuis P.J.G.H. Role of corticotropin-releasing factor, vasopressin and the autonomic nervous system in learning and memory. European Journal of Pharmacology 2000, 405:225-234.
13. Dietrich D.E., Emrich H.M., Waller C., Wieringa B.M., Johannes S., Münte T.F. Emotion/cognition-coupling in word recognition memory of depressive patients: an event-related potential study. Psychiatry Research 2000, 96:15-29.
14. Duarte A., Ranganath C., Winward L., Hayward D., Knight R.T. Dissociable neural correlates for familiarity and recollection during the encoding and retrieval of pictures. Cognitive Brain Research 2004, 18:255-272. 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.10.010.
15. Gianaros P.J., Van der Veen F.M., Jennings J.R. Regional cerebral blood flow correlates with heart period and high-frequency heart period variability during working-memory tasks: implications for the cortical and subcortical regulation of cardiac autonomic activity. Psychophysiology 2004, 41(4):521-530. 10.1111/1469-8986.2004.00179.x.
16. Glanzer M., Adams J.K. The mirror effect in recognition memory: theory and data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1990, 16:5-16. 10.1037/0278-7393.16.1.5.
17. Goh W. Talker variability and recognition memory: instance-specific and voice-specific effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:40-53. 10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.40.
18. Goldinger S.D. Words and voices: episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1996, 22:1166-1183. 10.1037/0278-7393.22.5.1166.
19. Goldinger S.D. Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review 1998, 105:251-279. 10.1037/0033-295X.105.2.251.
20. Goldinger S.D., Azuma T. Auditory episodes reflected in printed word naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2004, 11:716-722.
21. Goldinger S.D., Papesh M.H. Pupil dilation as an index of cognitive effort. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Psychophysiological Research, Berlin, Germany 2009.
22. Goldinger S.D., He Y., Papesh M. Deficits in cross-race face learning: insights from eye-movements and pupillometry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2009, 35:1105-1122. 10.1037/a0016548.
23. Granholm E., Verney S.P. Pupillary responses and attentional allocation on the visual backward masking task in schizophrenia. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2004, 52:37-52. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2003.12.004.
24. Granholm E., Asarnow R.F., Sarkin A.J., Dykes K.L. Pupillary responses index cognitive resource limitations. Psychophysiology 1996, 33:457-461. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb01071.x.
25. Guo C., Duan L., Li W., Paller K.A. Distinguishing source memory and item memory: brain potentials at encoding and retrieval. Brain Research 2006, 1118:142-154. 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.034.
26. Hintzman D.L. "Schema abstraction" in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review 1986, 93:411-428. 10.1037//0033-295X.93.4.411.
27. Hintzman D.L. Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review 1988, 95:528-551. 10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.528.
28. Johansson M., Mecklinger A., Treese A. Recognition memory for emotional and neutral faces: an event-related potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2004, 16:1840-1853. 10.1162/0898929042947883.
29. Joos M.A. Acoustic phonetics. Language 1948, 24:1-136.
30. Kafkas A., Montaldi D. Recognition memory strength is predicted by pupillary responses at encoding while fixation patterns distinguish recollection from familiarity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2011, 64(10):1971-1989.
31. Kahneman D. Attention and effort 1973, Prentice Hall, New York.
32. Karatekin C., Couperus J.W., Marcus D.J. Attention allocation on the dual task paradigm as measured through behavioral and psychophysiological responses. Psychophysiology 2004, 41:175-185. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2004.00147.x.
33. Kučera H., Francis W. Computational analysis of present-day American English 1967, Brown University Press, Providence: RI.
34. Kuchinke L., Võ M.L., Hofmann M., Jacobs A.M. Pupillary responses during lexical decisions vary with word frequency but not emotional valence. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2007, 65:132-140. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.04.004.
35. Lahiri A., Marslen-Wilson W.D. The mental representation of lexical form: a phonological approach to the mental lexicon. Cognition 1991, 38:245-294. 10.1016/0010-0277(91)90008-R.
36. Leboe J.P., Whittlesea B.W.A. The inferential basis of familiarity and recall: evidence for a common underlying process. Journal of Memory and Language 2002, 46:804-829. 10.1006/jmla.2001.2828.
37. Lively R.E. Preserving the perceptual record: Retention of talker-specific information in long-term memory 1994, Technical Report No. 9, Bloomington, Indiana.
38. Lively S.E., Logan J.S., Pisoni D.B. Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: II. The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1993, 94:1242-1255. 10.1121/1.408177.
39. Luce P., Lyons E. Specificity for memory representations for spoken words. Memory & Cognition 1998, 26:708-715.
40. Macmillan N.A., Creelman C.D. Detection theory: A user's guide 2005, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. (2nd ed.).
41. Magnuson J.S., Nusbaum H.C. Acoustic differences, listener expectations, and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:391-409. 10.1037/0096-1523.33.2.391.
42. Mandler G. Recognizing: the judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review 1980, 87:252-271. 10.1037//0033-295X.87.3.252.
43. Marslen-Wilson W.D., Warren P. Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: words, phonemes, and features. Psychological Review 1994, 101:653-675. 10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.653.
44. Masson M.E.J. Fluent reprocessing as an implicit expression of memory for experience. Implicit Memory: Theoretical Issues 1989, 123-138. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, England. S. Lewandowsky, J.C. Dunn (Eds.).
45. McClelland J.L., Elman J.L. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology 1986, 18:1-86. 10.1016/0010-0285(86)90015-0.
46. McLennan C.T., Luce P.A. Examining the time course of indexical specificity effects in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:306-321. 10.1037/0278-7393.31.2.306.
47. McQueen J.M., Cutler A., Norris D. Flow of information in the spoken word recognition system. Speech Communication 2003, 41:257-270. 10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00108-5.
48. McQueen J.M., Cutler A., Norris D. Phonological abstraction in the mental lexicon. Cognitive Science 2006, 30:1113-1126. 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_79.
49. Montaldi D., Spencer T.J., Roberts N., Mayes A.R. The neural system that mediates familiarity memory. Hippocampus 2006, 16:504-520. 10.1002/hipo.20178.
50. Neisser U. Cognitive Psychology 1967, Appleton-Century Crofts, New York.
51. Nygaard L.C., Sommers M., Pisoni D.B. Effects of stimulus variability on perception and representation of spoken words in memory. Perception & Psychophysics 1995, 57:989-1001.
52. Palmeri T.J., Goldinger S.D., Pisoni D.B. Episodic encoding of speaker's voice and recognition memory for spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1993, 19:309-328. 10.1037/0278-7393.19.2.309.
53. Papesh M.H., Goldinger S.D. Pupil-blah-metry: Word frequency reflected in cognitive effort. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago, IL 2008.
54. Papesh M.H., Goldinger S.D. Your effort is showing! Pupil dilation reveals memory heuristics. Constructions of Remembering and Metacognition 2011, 215-224. Palgrave Macmillan. P. Higham, J. Leboe (Eds.).
55. Pardo J. On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2006, 119:2382-2393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.2178720.
56. Pilotti M., Bergman E.T., Gallo D.A., Sommers M., Roediger H.L. Direct comparison of auditory implicit memory tests. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2000, 7:347-353.
57. Pisoni D.B. Long-term memory in speech perception: some new findings on talker variability, speaking rate and perceptual learning. Speech Communication 1993, 13:109-125. 10.1016/0167-6393(93)90063-Q.
58. Porter G., Troscianko T., Gilchrist I.D. Effort during visual search and counting: insights from pupillometry. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2007, 60:211-229.
59. Psychology Software Tools E-Prime (Version 1.2) http://www.pstnet.com.
60. Ranganath C., Cohen M.X., Brozinsky C.J. Working memory maintenance contributes to long-term memory formation: neural and behavioral evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2005, 17:994-1010. 10.1162/0898929054475118.
61. Schacter D., Church B. Auditory priming: Implicit and explicit memory for words and voices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1992, 18:915-930. 10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.915.
62. Senkfor A., Van Petten C. Who said what? An event-related potential investigation of source and item memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1998, 24:1005-1025. 10.1037/0278-7393.24.4.1005.
63. Sheffert S. Contributions of surface and conceptual information to recognition memory. Perception & Psychophysics 1998, 60:1141-1152.
64. Sheffert S., Fowler C.A. The effects of voice and visible speaker change on memory for spoken words. Journal of Memory and Language 1995, 34:665-685. 10.1006/jmla.1995.1030.
65. Shockley K., Sabadini L., Fowler C. Imitation in shadowing words. Perception & Psychophysics 2004, 66:422-429.
66. Steinhauer S.R., Siegle G.J., Condray R., Pless M. Sympathetic and parasympathetic innervations of pupillary dilation during sustained processing. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2004, 52:77-86. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2003.12.005.
67. Van Gerven P.W.M., Paas F., Van Merriënboer J.J.G., Schmidt H.G. Memory load and the cognitive pupillary response in aging. Psychophysiology 2004, 41:167-174. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2003.00148.x.
68. Võ M.L., Jacobs A.M., Kuchinke L., Hofmann M., Conrad M., Schacht A., Hutzler F. The coupling of emotion and cognition in the eye: introducing the pupil old/new effect. Psychophysiology 2008, 45:30-40. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00745.x.
69. Was C.A. The persistence of content-specific memory operations: priming effects following a 24-h delay. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2010, 17:362-368. 10.3758/PBR.17.3.362.
70. Whittlesea B.W.A. Production, evaluation and preservation of experiences: constructive processing in remembering and performance tasks. The psychology of learning and motivation 1997, Vol. 37:221-264. Academic Press, New York. D. Medin (Ed.).
71. Whittlesea B.W.A., Cantwell A. Enduring influences of the purpose of experiences: encoding-retrieval interactions in word and pseudoword perception. Memory & Cognition 1987, 15:465-472.
72. Whittlesea B.W.A., Leboe J.P. The heuristic basis of remembering and classification: fluency, generation, and resemblance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2000, 129:84-106. 10.1037//0096-3445.129.1.84.
73. Whittlesea B.W.A., Williams L.D. Why do strangers feel familiar, but friends don't? The unexpected basis of feelings of familiarity. Acta Psychologica 1998, 98:141-166. 10.1016/S0001-6918 (97)00040-1.
74. Whittlesea B.W.A., Williams L.D. The discrepancy attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001, 27:3-13. 10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.3.
75. Wickens T.D. Elementary Signal-detection Theory 2002, Oxford University Press, New York.
76. Wixted J.T. Dual-process theory and signal detection theory of recognition memory. Psychological Review 2007, 114:152-176. 10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.152.
77. Wixted J.T., Mickes L. A continuous, dual-process model of remember/know judgments. Psychological Review 2010, 117:1025-1054. 10.1037/a0020874.
78. Yonelinas A.P. Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 1994, 20:1341-1354. 10.1037//0278-7393.20.6.1341.
79. Yonelinas A.P. Components of episodic memory: the contribution of recollection and familiarity. The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B 2001, 356:1363-1374.
80. Yonelinas A.P. The nature of recollection and familiarity: a review of 30years of research. Journal of Memory and Language 2002, 46:441-517. 10.1006/jmla.2002.2864.
81. Yonelinas A.P., Parks C.M. Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: a review. Psychological Bulletin 2007, 133:800-832. 10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.800.