Pupil size changes during recognition memory

Psychophysiology

Volumn 48, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1346-1353

  Otero, Samantha C ^a,b   Weekes, Brendan S ^a,c   Hutton, Samuel B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Cognitive load; False memory; Old new effect; Pupil size; Pupillometry; Recognition memory

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959338304     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01217.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Beatty, J., & Lucero-Wagoner, B. (2000). The pupillary system. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd ed., pp. 142-162). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
2. Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2005). The science of false memory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
3. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
4. Dewhurst, S. A., Holmes, S. J., Brandt, K. R., & Dean, G. M. (2006). Measuring the speed of the conscious components of recognition memory: Remembering is faster than knowing. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 147-162.
5. Donaldson, W. (1996). The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing. Memory & Cognition, 24, 523-533.
6. Duarte, A., Ranganath, C., Winward, L., Haward, D., & Knight, R. T. (2004). Dissociable neural correlates for familiarity and recollection during the encoding and retrieval of pictures. Cognitive Brain Research, 18, 255-272.
7. Gallo, D. A., & Roediger, H. L. (2002). Variability among word lists in eliciting memory illusions: Evidence for associative activation and monitoring. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 469-497.
8. Gardiner, J. M. (1988). Functional aspects of recollective experience. Memory & Cognition, 16, 309-313.
9. Gardner, R. M., Mo, S. S., & Borrego, R. (1974). Inhibition of pupillary orienting reflex by novelty in conjunction with recognition memory. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 3, 237-238.
10. Gardner, R. M., Mo, S. S., & Krinsky, R. (1974). Inhibition of pupillary orienting reflex by heteromodal novelty. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 4, 510-512.
11. Granholm, E., Morris, S. K., Sarkin, A. J., Asarnow, R. F., & Jeste, D. V. (1997). Pupillary responses index overload of working memory resources in schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 458-467.
12. Granholm, E., & Steinhauer, S. R. (2004). Pupillometric measures of cognitive and emotional processing. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 52, 1-6.
13. Hess, E. H. (1965). Attitude and pupil size. Scientific American, 212, 46-54.
14. Hintzman, D. L., & Caulton, D. A. (1997). Recognition memory and modality judgments: A comparison of retrieval dynamics. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 1-23.
15. Janisse, M. P. (1977). Pupillometry: The psychology of the pupillary response. London, UK: Wiley.
16. Just, M.A, & Carpenter, P. A. (1993). The intensity dimension of thought: Pupillometric indices of sentence processing. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 310-339.
17. Malmberg, K. (2008). Recognition memory: A review of the critical findings and an integrated theory for relating them. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 335-384.
18. Maw, N., & Pomplun, M. (2004). Studying human face recognition with the gaze-contingent window technique. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Chicago, IL.
19. Nelson, H. E. (1982). National Adult Reading Test (NART): Test Manual. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
20. Otero, S., Weekes, B., & Hutton, S. (2006). A novel association between pupil size and recollective experience during recognition memory. Proceedings of the Second Biennial Conference on Cognitive Science. St. Petersburg, Russia.
21. Partala, T., & Surakka, V. (2003). Pupil size variation as an indication of affective processing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 99, 185-198.
22. Polt, J. M. (1970). Effect of threat of shock on pupillary response in a problem-solving task. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 31, 587-593.
23. Rajaram, S. (1993). Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past. Memory & Cognition, 21, 89-102.
24. Roediger, H. L. III, & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 108-114.
25. Rugg, M. D., & Allan, K. (2000). Event-related potential studies of memory. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 521-537). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
26. Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215.
27. Tarr, M. (2004). TarrLab Stimuli. Retrieved January 11, 2004 from.
28. Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology, 25, 1-12.
29. Võ, M. L.-H., Jacobs, A. M., Kuchinke, L., Hofmann, M., Conrad, M., Schacht, A., & Hutzler, F. (2008). The coupling of emotion and cognition in the eye: Introducing the pupil old/new effect. Psychophysiology, 45, 130-140.
30. Volz, K. G., Schooler, L. J., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2010). It just felt right: The neural correlates of the fluency heuristic. Conscious Cognition, 19, 829-37.
31. Walther, E., Bless, H., Strack, F., Rackstraw, P., Wagner, D., & Werth, L. (2002). Conformity effects in memory as a function of group size, dissenters and uncertainty. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 793-810.
32. Wheeler, M. E., & Buckner, R. L. (2004). Functional-anatomic correlates of remembering and knowing. NeuroImage, 21, 1337-1349.
33. Wiese, H., & Daum, I. (2006). Frontal positivity discriminates true from false recognition. Brain Research, 1075, 183-192.
34. Wilder, J. (1962). Basimetric approach (law of initial value) to biological rhythms. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 98, 1211-1228.
35. Wixted, J. T. (2007). Dual process theory and signal detection theory of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 114, 152-176.
36. Wixted, J. T., & Stretch, V. (2004). In defense of the signal-detection interpretation of remember/know judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 616-641.
37. Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441-517.
38. Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (1996). Noncriterial recollection: Familiarity as automatic, irrelevant recollection. Consciousness and Cognition, 5, 131-141.