Pupil dilation and object permanence in infants

Infancy

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 61-78

  Sirois, Sylvain ^a,b   Jackson, Iain R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À TROIS RIVIÈRES   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; EYE MOVEMENT; EYE TRACKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFANCY; INFANT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; PUPIL; PUPIL DILATION; PUPIL REFLEX;

EID: 82555176633     PISSN: 15250008     EISSN: 15327078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-7078.2011.00096.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Aslin, R. N. (2000). Why take the cog out of infant cognition? Infancy, 1(4), 463-470.
2. Aslin, R. N. (2007). What's in a look? Developmental Science, 10(1), 48-53.
3. Baillargeon, R. (1987). Object permanence in 31/2- and 41/2-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 23(5), 655-664.
4. Baillargeon, R. (1991). Reasoning about the height and location of a hidden object in 4.5- and 6.5-month-old infants. Cognition, 38(1), 13-42.
5. Baillargeon, R. (2000). Reply to Bogartz, Shinskey, and Schilling; Schilling; and Cashon and Cohen. Infancy, 1(4), 447-462.
6. Baillargeon, R., Spelke, E. S., & Wasserman, S. (1985). Object permanence in five-month-old infants. Cognition, 20(3), 191-208.
7. Beatty, J. J. (1982). Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychological Bulletin, 91(2), 276-292.
8. Bogartz, R. S., Cashon, C. H., Cohen, L. B., Schilling, T. H., & Shinskey, J. L. (2000a). Reply to Baillargeon, Aslin, and Munakata. Infancy, 1(4), 479-490.
9. Bogartz, R. S., Shinskey, J. L., & Schilling, T. H. (2000b). Object permanence in five-and-a half-month-old infants? Infancy, 1(4), 403-428.
10. Bogartz, R. S., Shinskey, J. L., & Speaker, C. J. (1997). Interpreting infant looking: The event set×event set design. Developmental Psychology, 33(3), 408-422.
11. Cashon, C. H., & Cohen, L. B. (2000). Eight-month-old infants' perceptions of possible and impossible events. Infancy, 1(4), 429-446.
12. Chen, Y., & Weng, J. (2004, August). Developmental learning: A case study in understanding "object permanence." Paper presented at the Fourth International Workshop on Epigenitic Robotics, University of Genoa, Italy.
13. Cohen, L. B. (1995, March). How solid is infants' understanding of solidity? Symposium paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development Meeting, Indianapolis.
14. Cohen, L. B. (2004). Uses and misuses of habituation and related preference paradigms. Infant and Child Development, 13(4), 349-352.
15. Cohen, L. B., Gilbert, K., & Brown, P.-S. (1996). Infants' understanding of solidity: Replicating a failure to replicate. Infant Behavior and Development, 19(Suppl. 1), 398.
16. Durand, K., & Lécuyer, R. (2002). Object permanence observed in 4-month-old infants with a 2D display. Infant Behavior and Development, 25(3), 269-278.
17. Fantz, R. L. (1964). Visual experience in infants: Decreased attention to familiar patterns relative to novel ones. Science, 146(3644), 668-670.
18. Fitzgerald, H. E. (1968). Autonomic pupillary reflex activity during early infancy and its relation to social and nonsocial visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 6, 470-482.
19. Fitzgerald, H. E., Lintz, L. M., Brackbill, Y., & Adams, G. (1967). Time perception and conditioning an autonomic response in human infants. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 24, 479-486.
20. Gredebäck, G., & Melinder, A. M. D. (2010). Infants understanding of everyday social interactions: A dual process account. Cognition, 114, 197-206.
21. Groves, P. M., & Thompson, R. F. (1970). Habituation: A dual-process theory. Psychological Review, 77(5), 419-450.
22. Haith, M. M. (1998). Who put the cog in infant cognition? Is rich interpretation too costly? Infant Behavior & Development, 21(2), 167-179.
23. Hespos, S. J., & Baillargeon, R. (2001). Reasoning about containment events in very young infants. Cognition, 78(3), 207-245.
24. Hess, E. H., & Polt, J. M. (1960). Pupil size as related to interest value of visual stimuli. Science, 132, 349-350.
25. Horowitz, F. D., Paden, L., Bhana, K., & Self, P. (1972). An infant-control procedure for studying infant visual fixations. Developmental Psychology, 7(1), 90.
26. Hunter, M. A., & Ames, E. W. (1988). A multifactor model of infant preferences for novel and familiar stimuli. In C. Rovee-Collier & L. P. Lipsitt (Eds.) Advances in infancy research (vol. 5) (pp. 69-95). Westport, CT, US: Ablex Publishing.
27. Jackson, I., & Sirois, S. (2009). Infant cognition: Going full factorial with pupil dilation. Developmental Science, 12(4), 670-679.
28. Johnson, S. P., & Náñez, J. E. (1995). Young infant's perception of object unity in two-dimensional displays. Infant Behavior and Development, 18(2), 133-143.
29. Jowkar-Baniani, G., & Schmuckler, M. A. (2011). Picture perception in infants: Generalization from two-dimensional to three-dimensional displays. Infancy, 16, 211-226.
30. Kagan, J. (2008). In defense of qualitative changes in development. Child Development, 79(6), 1606-1624.
31. Karatekin, C. (2004). Development of attentional allocation in the dual task paradigm. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 52(1), 7-21.
32. Karatekin, C. (2007). Eye tracking studies of normative and atypical development. Developmental Review, 27(3), 283-348.
33. Loewenfeld, I. E. (1993). The pupil: Anatomy, physiology, and clinical applications. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.
34. Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1998). Object representation, identity, and the paradox of early permanence: Steps toward a new framework. Infant Behavior & Development, 21(2), 201-235.
35. Munakata, Y. (2000). Challenges to the violation-of-expectation paradigm: Throwing the conceptual baby out with the perceptual processing bathwater? Infancy, 1(4), 471-477.
36. Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic.
37. Porter, G., Troscianko, T., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2007). Effort during visual search and counting: Insights from pupillometry. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(2), 211-229.
38. Ramsay, J. O., & Silverman, B. W. (1997). Functional data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.
39. Rivera, S. M., Wakeley, A., & Langer, J. (1999). The drawbridge phenomenon: Representational reasoning or perceptual preference? Developmental Psychology, 35(2), 427-435.
40. Roder, B. J., Bushnell, E. W., & Sasseville, A. M. (2000). Infants' preferences for familiarity and novelty during the course of visual processing. Infancy, 1(4), 491-507.
41. Saxe, R., Tzelnic, T., & Carey, S. (2006). Five-month-old infants know humans are solid, like inanimate objects. Cognition, 101(1), B1-B8.
42. Schilling, T. H. (2000). Infants' looking at possible and impossible screen rotations: The role of familiarization. Infancy, 1(4), 389-402.
43. Schöner, G., & Thelen, E. (2006). Using dynamic field theory to rethink infant habituation. Psychological Review, 113(2), 273-299.
44. Sirois, S., & Jackson, I. (2007). Social cognition in infancy: A critical review of research on higher order abilities. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4(1), 46-64.
45. Sirois, S., & Mareschal, D. (2002). Models of habituation in infancy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(7), 293-298.
46. Sirois, S., & Mareschal, D. (2004). An interacting systems model of infant habituation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(8), 1352-1362.
47. Spelke, E. S., Breinlinger, K., Macomber, J., & Jacobson, K. (1992). Origins of knowledge. Psychological Review, 99(4), 605-632.
48. Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
49. Thompson, R. F., & Spencer, W. A. (1966). Habituation: A model phenomenon for the study of neuronal substrates of behavior. Psychological Review, 73(1), 16-43.
50. Wetherford, M. J., & Cohen, L. B. (1973). Developmental changes in infant visual preferences for novelty and familiarity. Child Development, 44(3), 416-424.