How Should Genes and Taxa be Sampled for Phylogenomic Analyses with Missing Data? An Empirical Study in Iguanian Lizards

Systematic Biology

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 128-145

  Streicher, Jeffrey W ^a,b   Schulte, James A ^c   Wiens, John J ^a  

^a The University of Arizona   (United States)

^b DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

^c CLARKSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Missing data; phylogenomics; Reptilia; species tree; Squamata; taxon sampling; UCEs

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; GENOME; LIZARD; PHYLOGENY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ANIMALS; CLASSIFICATION; GENOME; LIZARDS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84960362109     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syv058     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Alföldi J., Di Palma F., Grabherr M., Williams C., Kong L., Mauceli E., Russell P., Lowe C.B., Glor R.E., Jaffe J.D., Ray D.A., Boissinot S., Shedlock A.M., Botka C., Castoe T.A., Colbourne J.K., Fujita M.K., Godinez Moreno R., ten Hallers B.F., Haussler D., Heger A., Heiman D., Janes D.E., Johnson J., de Jong P.J., Koriabine M.Y., Lara M., Novick P.A., Organ C.L., Peach S.E., Poe S., Pollock D.D., de Queiroz K., Sanger T., Searle S., Smith J.D., Smith Z., Swofford R., Turner-Maier J., Wade J., Young S., Zadissa A., Edwards S.V., Glenn T.C., Schneider C.J., Losos J.B., Lander M.B., Ponting C.P., Lindblad-Toh K. 2011. The genome of the green anole lizard and a comparative analysis with birds and mammals. Nature 477:587-591.
2. Arnold B., Corbett-Detig R.B., Hartl D., Bomblies K. 2013. RADseq underestimates diversity and introduces genealogical biases due to nonrandom haplotype sampling. Mol. Ecol. 22:3179-3190.
3. Bejerano G., Pheasant M., Makunin I., Stephen S., Kent W.J., Mattick J.S., Haussler D. 2004. Ultraconserved elements in the human genome. Science 304:1321-1325.
4. Blankers T., Townsend T.M., Pepe K., Reeder T.W., Wiens J.J. 2013. Contrasting global-scale evolutionary radiations: Phylogeny, diversification, and morphological evolution in the major clades of iguanian lizards. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 108:127-143.
5. Bolger A.M., Lohse M., Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114-2120.
6. Bryant D., Bouckaert R., Felsenstein J., Rosenberg N.A., RoyChoudhury A. 2012. Inferring species trees directly from biallelic genetic markers: Bypassing gene trees in a full coalescent analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29:1917-1932.
7. Cariou M., Duret L., Charlat S. 2013. Is RAD-seq suitable for phylogenetic inference? An in silico assessment and optimization. Ecol. Evol. 3:846-852.
8. Crawford N.G., Faircloth B.C., McCormack J.E., Brumfield R.T., Winker K., Glenn T.C. 2012. More than 1000 ultraconserved elements provide evidence that turtles are the sister group of archosaurs. Biol. Lett. 8:783-786.
9. Crawford N.G., Parham J.F., Sellas A.B., Faircloth B.C., Glenn T.C., Papenfuss T.J., Henderson J.B., Hansen M.H., Simison W.B. 2015. A phylogenomic analysis of turtles. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 83:250-257.
10. Driskell A.C., Ane C., Burleigh J.G., McMahon M.M., O'Meara B.C., Sanderson M.J. 2004. Prospects for building the Tree of Life from large sequence databases. Science 306:1172-1174.
11. Edgar R.C. 2004. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:1792-1797.
12. Edwards S.V., Liu L., Pearl D.K. 2007. High resolution species trees without concatenation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 104:5936-5941.
13. Faircloth B.C., McCormack J.E., Crawford N.G., Harvey M.G., Brumfield R.T., Glenn T.C. 2012. Ultraconserved elements anchor thousands of genetic markers spanning multiple evolutionary timescales. Syst. Biol. 61:717-726.
14. Faircloth B.C., Sorenson L., Santini F., Alfaro M.E. 2013. A phylogenomic perspective on the radiation of ray-finned fishes based upon targeted sequencing of ultraconserved elements (UCEs). PLoS One 8:e54848.
15. Faircloth B.C., Branstetter M.G., White N.D., Brady S.G. 2014. Target enrichment of ultraconserved elements from arthropods provides a genomic perspective on relationships among Hymenoptera. Mol. Ecol. Res. 15:489-501.
16. Frost D.R., Etheridge R. 1989. A phylogenetic analysis and taxonomy of iguanian lizards (Reptilia: Squamata). Misc. Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist. Univ. Kansas 81:1-65.
17. Frost D.R., Etheridge R., Janies D., Titus T.A. 2001. Total evidence, sequence alignment, evolution of polychrotid lizards, and a reclassification of the Iguania (Squamata: Iguania). Am. Mus. Nov. 3343:1-38.
18. Graybeal A. 1998. Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem? Syst. Biol. 47:9-17.
19. Heath T.A., Hedtke S.M., Hillis D.M. 2008. Taxon sampling and the accuracy of phylogenetic analyses. J. Syst. Evol. 46:239-257.
20. Heled J., Drummond A.J. 2010. Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27:570-580.
21. Hillis D.M. 1995. Approaches for assessing phylogenetic accuracy. Syst. Biol. 44:3-16.
22. Hillis D.M., Bull J.J. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:182-192.
23. Hovmöller R., Knowles L.L., Kubatko L.S. 2013. Effects of missing data on species tree estimation under the coalescent. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 69:1057-1062.
24. Huang H., Knowles L.L. 2014. Unforeseen consequences of excluding missing data from next-generation sequences: Simulation study of RAD sequences. Syst. Biol. 10.1093/sysbio/syv046, in press.
25. Jiang W., Chen S.-Y., Wang H., Li D.-Z., Wiens J.J. 2014. Should genes with missing data be excluded from phylogenetic analyses? Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 80:308-318.
26. Lambert S.M., Reeder T.W., Wiens J.J. 2015. When do species tree and concatenated estimates disagree? An empirical analysis with higher-level scincid lizard phylogeny. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 82: 146-155.
27. Leaché A.D., Rannala B. 2011. The accuracy of species tree estimation under simulation: A comparison of methods. Syst. Biol. 60:126-137.
28. Leaché A.D., Wagner P., Linkem C.W., Böhme W., Papenfuss T.J., Chong R.A., Lavin B.R., Bauer A.M., Nielsen S.V., Greenbaum E., Rödel M-O., Schmitz A., LeBreton M., Ineich I., Chirio L., Ofori-Boateng C., Eniang E.A., Baha El Din S., Lemmon A.R., Burbrink F.T. 2014. A hybrid phylogenetic-phylogenomic approach for species tree estimation in African Agama lizards with applications to biogeography, character evolution, and diversification. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 79:215-230.
29. Leaché A.D., Chavez A.S., Jones L.N., Grummer J.A., Gottscho A.D., Linkem C.W. 2015. Phylogenomics of phrynosomatid lizards: Conflicting signals from sequence capture versus restriction site associated DNA sequencing. Genome Biol. Evol. 7:706-719.
30. Lemmon E.M., Lemmon A.R. 2013. High-throughput genomic data in systematics and phylogenetics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 44: 99-121.
31. Lemmon A.R., Emme S.A., Lemmon E.M. 2012. Anchored hybrid enrichment for massively high-throughput phylogenomics. Syst. Biol. 61:727-744.
32. Lemmon A.R., Brown J.M., Stranger-Hall K., Lemmon E.M. 2009. The effect of ambiguous data on phylogenetic estimates obtained by maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference. Syst. Biol. 58: 130-145.
33. Liu L., Yu L. 2011. Estimating species trees from unrooted gene trees. Syst. Biol. 60:661-667.
34. Liu L., Yu L., Edwards S.V. 2010. A maximum pseudo-likelihood approach for estimating species trees under the coalescent model. BMC Evol. Biol. 10:302.
35. Liu L., Yu L., Pearl D.K., Edwards S.V. 2009. Estimating species phylogenies using coalescence times among sequences. Syst. Biol. 58:468-477.
36. McCormack J.E., Faircloth B.C. 2013. Next-generation phylogenetics takes root. Mol. Ecol. 22:19-21.
37. McCormack J.E., Faircloth B.C., Crawford N.G., Gowaty P.A., Brumfield R.T., Glenn T.C. 2012. Ultraconserved elements are novel phylogenomic markers that resolve placental mammal phylogeny when combined with species tree analysis. Genome Res. 22:746-754.
38. McCormack J.E., Harvey M.G., Faircloth B.C., Crawford N.G., Glenn T.C., Brumfield R.T. 2013. A phylogeny of birds based on over 1, 500 loci collected by target enrichment and high-throughput sequencing. PLoS One 8:e54848.
39. Miller W., Rosenbloom K., Hardison R.C., Hou M., Taylor J., Raney B., Burhans R., King D.C., Baertsch R., Kosakovsky-Pond S.L., Nekrutenko A., Giardine B., Harris R.S., Tyekucheva S., Diekhans M., Pringle T.H., Murphy J., Lesk A., Weinstock G.M., Linblad-Toh K., Gibbs R.A., Lander E.S., Siepel A., Haussler D., Kent W.J. 2007. 28-way vertebrate alignment and conservation track in the UCSC genome browser. Genome Res. 17:1797-1808.
40. Miller M.A., Pfeiffer W., Schwartz T. 2010. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In: Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE). New Orleans (LA): IEEE. p. 1-8.
41. Mirarab S., Bayzid M.S., Warnow T. 2014. Evaluating summary methods for multilocus species tree estimation in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting. Syst. Biol. 10.1093/sysbio/syv063, in press.
42. Mirabab S., Reaz R., Bayzid M.S., Zimmermann T., Swenson M.S., Warnow T. 2014. ASTRAL: Genome-scale coalescent-based species tree estimation. Bioinformatics 30:i541-i548.
43. Noonan B.P., Chippindale P.T. 2006. Vicariant origin of Malagasy reptiles supports Late Cretaceous Antarctic landbridge. Am. Nat. 168:730-741.
44. Paradis E., Claude J., Strimmer K. 2004. APE: Analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289-290.
45. Philippe H., Snell E.A., Bapteste E., Lopez P., Holland P.W.H., Casane D. 2004. Phylogenomics of eukaryotes: Impacts of missing data on large alignments. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1740-1752.
46. Poe S., Swofford D.L. 1999. Taxon sampling revisited. Nature 398: 299-300.
47. Pyron R.A., Burbrink F.T., Wiens J.J. 2013. A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes. BMC Evol. Biol. 13:93.
48. Rannala B., Huelsenbeck J.P., Yang Z., Nielsen R. 1998. Taxon sampling and the accuracy of large phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 47:702-710.
49. Reeder T.W., Townsend T.M., Mulcahy D.G., Noonan B.P., Wood P.L. Jr., Sites J.W. Jr., Wiens J.J. 2015. Integrated analyses resolve conflicts over squamate reptile phylogeny and reveal unexpected placements for fossil taxa. PLoS One 10:e0118199.
50. Rohland N., Reich D. 2012. Cost-effective, high-throughput DNA sequencing libraries for multiplexed target capture. Genome Res. 22:939-946.
51. Rosenberg M.S., Kumar S. 2001. Incomplete taxon sampling is not a problem for phylogenetic inference. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:10751-10756.
52. Roure B., Baurain D., Philippe H. 2013. Impact of missing data on phylogenies inferred from empirical phylogenomic data sets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30:197-214.
53. Rubin B.E.R., Ree R.H., Moreau C.S. 2012. Inferring phylogenies from RAD sequence data. PLoS One 7:e33394.
54. Sandelin A., Bailey P., Bruce S., Engström P.G., Klos J.M., Wasserman W.W., Ericson J., Lenhard B. 2004. Arrays of ultraconserved noncoding regions span the loci of key developmental genes in vertebrate genomes. BMC Genomics 5:99.
55. Schulte J.A. II, Valladares J.P., Larson A. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships within Iguanidae inferred using molecular and morphological data and a phylogenetic taxonomy of iguanian lizards. Herpetologica 59:399-419.
56. Seo T.K. 2008. Calculating bootstrap probabilities of phylogeny using multilocus sequence data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25:960-971.
57. Shaw T., Ruan Z., Glenn T., Liu L. 2013. STRAW: Species TRee Analysis Web Server. Nucleic Acids Res. 41:W230-W241.
58. Simmons M.P., Norton A.P. 2014. Divergent maximum-likelihoodbranch- support values for polytomies. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 73: 87-96.
59. Sites J.W. Jr., Reeder T.W., Wiens J.J. 2011. Phylogenetic insights on evolutionary novelties in lizards and snakes: Sex, birth, bodies, niches, and venom. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 42:227-244.
60. Smith B.T., Harvey M.G., Faircloth B.C., Glenn T.C., Brumfield R.T. 2014. Target capture and massively parallel sequencing of ultraconserved elements (UCEs) for comparative studies at shallow evolutionary timescales. Syst. Biol. 63:83-95.
61. Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML Version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30: 1312-1315.
62. Streicher J.W., Devitt T.J., Goldberg C.S., Malone J.H., Blakmon H., Fujita M.K. 2014. Diversification and asymmetrical gene flowacross time and space: Lineage sorting and hybridization in polytypic barking frogs. Mol. Ecol. 23:3273-3291.
63. Sun K., Meiklejohn K.A., Faircloth B.C., Glenn T.C., Braun E. L., Kimball R.T. 2014. The evolution of peafowl and other taxa with ocelli (eyespots): A phylogenomic approach. Proc. R. Soc. B 281: 20140.
64. Townsend T., Mulcahy D.G., Sites J.W. Jr., Kuczynski C.A., Wiens J.J., Reeder T.W. 2011. Phylogeny of iguanian lizards inferred from 29 nuclear loci, and a comparison of concatenated and species-tree approaches for an ancient, rapid radiation. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 61:363-380.
65. Uetz P., Hošek J. (eds). 2014. The Reptile Database. Available from: URL http://www.reptile-database.org (accessed 11 November 2014).
66. Wagner C.E., Keller I., Wittwer S., Selz O.M., Mwaiko S., Greuter L., Sivasundar A., Seehausen O. 2013. Genome-wide RAD sequence data provide unprecedented resolution of species boundaries and relationships in the Lake Victoria cichlid adaptive radiation. Mol. Ecol. 22:787-798.
67. Wiens J.J. 1998. Does adding characters with missing data increase or decrease phylogenetic accuracy? Syst. Biol. 47:625-640.
68. Wiens J.J. 2003. Missing data, incomplete taxa, and phylogenetic accuracy. Syst. Biol. 52:528-538.
69. Wiens J.J. 2005. Can incomplete taxa rescue phylogenetic analyses from long-branch attraction? Syst. Biol. 54:731-742.
70. Wiens J.J., Morrill M.C. 2011. Missing data in phylogenetic analysis: Reconciling results from simulations and empirical data. Syst. Biol. 60:719-731.
71. Wiens J.J., Hutter C.R., Mulcahy D.G., Noonan B.P., Townsend T.M., Sites J.W. Jr., Reeder T.W. 2012. Resolving the phylogeny of lizards and snakes (Squamata) with extensive sampling of genes and species. Biol. Lett. 8:1043-1046.
72. Wiens J.J., Tiu J. 2012. Highly incomplete taxa can rescue phylogenetic analyses from the negative impacts of limited taxon sampling. PLoS One 7:42925.
73. Xi Z., Liu L., Rest J.S., Davis C.C. 2014. Coalescent versus concatenation methods and the placement of Amborella as sister towater lilies. Syst. Biol. 63:919-932.
74. Zerbino D.R., Birney E. 2008. Velvet: Algorithms for de novo short read assemble using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 18:821-829.
75. Zhou L., Holliday J.A. 2012. Targeted enrichment of the black cottonwood (Populus trichocapra) gene space using sequence capture. BMC Genomics 13:703.
76. Zwickl D.J., Hillis D.M. 2002. Increased taxon sampling greatly reduces phylogenetic error. Syst. Biol. 51:588-598.