Corrigendum to "When do species-tree and concatenated estimates disagree? An empirical analysis with higher-level scincid lizard phylogeny" [Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 82A (2015) 146-155], DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.10.004;When do species-tree and concatenated estimates disagree? An empirical analysis with higher-level scincid lizard phylogeny

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 82, Issue PA, 2015, Pages 146-155

  Lambert, Shea M ^a   Reeder, Tod W ^b   Wiens, John J ^a  

^a The University of Arizona   (United States)

^b SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Concatenated analysis; Phylogenetic methods; Reptile; Scincidae; Species tree analysis; Taxon sampling

Indexed keywords

REPTILIA; SCINCIDAE; SQUAMATA;

ANIMAL; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; EVOLUTION; LIZARD; PHYLOGENY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; LIZARDS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84909979108     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2016.02.006     Document Type: Erratum

References (61)

1. Bayzid M.D.S., Warnow T. Estimating optimal species trees from incomplete gene trees under deep coalescence. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19:591-605.
2. Blanga-Kanfi S., Miranda H., Penn O., Pupko T., DeBry R.W., Huchon D. Rodent phylogeny revised: analysis of six nuclear genes from all major rodent clades. BMC Evol. Biol. 2009, 9:71.
3. Brandley M.C., Wang Y., Guo X., Montes Nieto., de Oca A., Feria Ortiz M., Hikida T., Ota H. The phylogenetic systematics of blue-tailed skinks (Plestiodon) and the family Scincidae. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2012, 165:163-189.
4. Camargo A., Avila L.J., Morando M., Sites J.W. Accuracy and precision in species tree estimation: an empirical evaluation of performance in lizards of the Liolaemus darwinii group (Squamata: Liolaemidae) under varying sub-sampling designs. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61:272-288.
5. Crawford N.G., Faircloth B.C., McCormack J.E., Brumfield R.T., Winker K., Glenn T.C. More than 100 ultraconserved elements provide evidence that turtles are the sister group of archosaurs. Biol. Lett. 2012, 8:783-786.
6. Darriba D., Taboada G.L., Doallo R., Posada D. JModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat. Methods 2012, 9:772.
7. Davis M.P., Midford P.E., Maddison W. Exploring power and parameter estimation of the BiSSE method for analyzing species diversification. BMC Evol. Biol. 2013, 13:38.
8. Degnan J.H., Rosenberg N.A. Gene tree discordance, phylogenetic inference and the multispecies coalescent. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24:332-340.
9. Douady C.J., Delsuc F., Boucher Y., Doolittle W.F., Douzery E.J.P. Comparison of Bayesian and maximum likelihood bootstrap measures of phylogenetic reliability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2003, 20:248-254.
10. Drummond A.Y., Ho S.Y.W., Phillips M.J., Rambaut A. Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4:699-710.
11. Drummond A.J., Rambaut A. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 2007, 7:214.
12. Drummond A.J., Suchard M.A., Xie D., Rambaut A. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2012, 29:1969-1973.
13. Edwards S.V. Is a new and general theory of molecular systematics emerging?. Evolution 2009, 63:1-19.
14. Edwards S.V., Liu L., Pearl D.K. High-resolution species trees without concatenation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104:5936-5941.
15. Felsenstein J. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 1985, 125:1-15.
16. Felsenstein J. Inferring Phylogenies 2004, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
17. Graybeal A. Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem?. Syst. Biol. 1998, 47:9-17.
18. Greer A.E. A subfamilial classification of scincid lizards. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard 1970, 139:151-183.
19. Heath T.A., Hedtke S.M., Hillis D.M. Taxon sampling and the accuracy of phylogenetic analyses. J. Syst. Evol. 2008, 46:239-257.
20. Hedges S.B., Conn C.E. A new skink fauna from Caribbean islands (Squamata, Mabuyidae, Mabuyinae). Zootaxa 2012, 3288:1-244.
21. Heled J., Drummond A.J. Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010, 27:570-580.
22. Hothorn T., Hornik R. Exact nonparametic inference in R. Compstat: Proceedings in Computational Statistics 2002 2002, 355-360. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. W. Hardle, B. Ronz (Eds.).
23. Hovmöller R., Knowles L.L., Kubatko L.S. Effects of missing data on species tree estimation under the coalescent. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2013, 69:1057-1062.
24. Kubatko L.S., Carstens B.C., Knowles L.L. STEM: species tree estimation using maximum likelihood for gene trees under coalescence. Bioinformatics 2009, 7:971-973.
25. Lanfear R., Calcott B., Ho S.Y.W., Guindon S. PartitionFinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2012, 29:1695-1701.
26. Larget B.R., Kotha S.K., Dewey C.N., Ané C. BUCKy: gene tree/species tree reconciliation with Bayesian concordance analysis. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:2910-2911.
27. Leaché A.D., Rannala B.R. The accuracy of species tree estimation under simulation: a comparison of methods. Syst. Biol. 2011, 60:126-137.
28. Liu L. BEST: Bayesian estimation of species trees under the coalescent model. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:2542-2543.
29. Maddison W.P. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 1997, 46:523-536.
30. Maddison W.P., Knowles L.L. Inferring phylogeny despite incomplete lineage sorting. Syst. Biol. 2006, 55:21-30.
31. Maddison, W.P., Maddison, D.R., 2000. MacClade 4.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
32. Marshal D.C., Simon S., Buckley T.R. Accurate branch length estimation in partitioned Bayesian analyses requires accommodation of among-partition rate variation and attention to branch length priors. Syst. Biol. 2006, 55:993-1003.
33. McVay J.D., Carstens B.C. Phylogenetic model choice. justifying a species tree or concatenation analysis. J. Phylogen. Evol. Biol. 2013, 1:114.
34. Mulcahy D.G., Noonan B.P., Moss T., Townsend T.M., Reeder T.W., Sites J.W., Wiens J.J. Estimating divergence dates and evaluating dating methods using phylogenomic and mitochondrial data in squamate reptiles. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2012, 65:974-991.
35. Nylander J.A.A., Wilgenbusch J.C., Warren D.L., Swofford D.L. AWTY (are we there yet?): a system for graphical exploration of MCMC convergence in Bayesian phylogenetics. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:581-583.
36. Pamilo P., Nei M. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1988, 5:568-583.
37. Perez S.I., Klaczko J., dos Reis S.F. Species tree estimation for a deep phylogenetic divergence in the New World monkeys (Primates: Platyrrhini). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2012, 65:621-630.
38. Poe S., Swofford D.L. Taxon sampling revisited. Nature 1999, 398:299-300.
39. Pyron R.A., Burbrink F.T., Wiens J.J. A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes. BMC Evol. Biol. 2013, 13:93.
40. Rannala B., Huelsenbeck J.P., Yang Z., Nielsen R. Taxon sampling and the accuracy of large phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 1998, 47:702-710.
41. Rannala B., Yang Z. Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: a new method of phylogenetic inference. J. Mol. Evol. 1996, 43:304-311.
42. Ronquist F., Teslenko M., van der Mark P., Ayres D.L., Darling A., Hohna S., Larget B., Liu L., Suchard M.A., Huelsenbeck J.P. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61:539-542.
43. Rosenberg M.S., Kumar S. Incomplete taxon sampling is not a problem for phylogenetic inference. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98:10751-10756.
44. Stamatakis A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:2688-2690.
45. Streitberg B., Röhmel J. Exact distributions for permutation and rank tests: an introduction to some recently published algorithms. Stat. Software Newslett. 1986, 12:10-17.
46. Sugiura N. Further analysts of the data by Akaike's information criterion and the finite corrections. Commun. Stat. Theory Meth. 1978, 7:13-26.
47. Sullivan J., Swofford D.L., Naylor G.J.P. The effect of taxon sampling on estimating rate-heterogeneity parameters of maximum-likelihood models. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1999, 16:1347-1356.
48. Swofford, D.L., 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony*, Version 4.0b10. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
49. Team RC, 2012. R: A Langauge and Environment for Statistical Computing.http://www.r-project.org/.
50. Townsend T.M., Alegre E.R., Kelley S.T., Wiens J.J., Reeder T.W. Rapid development of multiple nuclear loci for phylogenetic analysis using genomic resources: an example from squamate reptiles. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2008, 47:129-142.
51. Townsend T.M., Mulcahy D.G., Sites J.W., Kuczynski C.A., Wiens J.J., Reeder T.W. Phylogeny of iguanian lizards inferred from 29 nuclear loci, and a comparison of concatenated and species tree approaches for an ancient, rapid radiation. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2011, 61:363-380.
52. Uetz, P., Goll, J., Hallermann, J., 2013. The Reptile Database. (accessed 27.11.13). http://www.reptile-database.org.
53. Wertheim J., Sanderson M.J., Worobey M., Bjork A. Relaxed molecular clocks, the bias-variance tradeoff, and the quality of phylogenetic inference. Syst. Biol. 2010, 59:1-8.
54. Wiens J.J., Hutter C.R., Mulcahy D.G., Noonan B.P., Townsend T.M., Sites J.W., Reeder T.W. Resolving the phylogeny of lizards and snakes (Squamata) with extensive sampling of genes and species. Biol. Lett. 2012, 8:1043-1046.
55. Wiens J.J., Kuczynski C.A., Smith S.A., Mulcahy D., Sites J.W., Townsend T.M., Reeder T.W. Branch lengths, support, and congruence. testing the phylogenomic approach with 20 nuclear loci in snakes. Syst. Biol. 2008, 57:420-431.
56. Wiens J.J., Kuczynski C.A., Stephens P.R. Discordant mitochondrial and nuclear gene phylogenies in emydid turtles: implications for speciation and conservation. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2010, 99:445-461.
57. Wiens J.J., Kuczynski C.A., Townsend T., Reeder T.W., Mulcahy D.G., Sites J.W. Combining phylogenomics and fossils in higher level squamate reptile phylogeny: molecular data change the placement of fossil taxa. Syst. Biol. 2010, 59:674-688.
58. Wiens J.J., Morrill M.C. Missing data in phylogenetic analysis: reconciling results from simulations and empirical data. Syst. Biol. 2011, 60:719-731.
59. Williams J.S., Niedzwiecki J.H., Weisrock D.W. Species tree reconstruction of a poorly resolved clade of salamanders (Ambystomatidae) using multiple nuclear loci. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2013, 68:671-682.
60. Yang Z. Computational Molecular Biology 2006, Oxford University Press, New York, New York.
61. Zwickl D.J., Hillis D.M. Increased taxon sampling greatly reduces phylogenetic error. Syst. Biol. 2002, 51:588-589.