Implementation of the realized genomic relationship matrix to open-pollinated white spruce family testing for disentangling additive from nonadditive genetic effects

G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 743-753

  El Dien, Omnia Gamal ^a,b   Ratcliffe, Blaise ^a   Klápště, Jaroslav ^a,c,e   Porth, Ilga ^a,f   Chen, Charles ^d   El Kassaby, Yousry A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b Alexandria University Faculty of Pharmacy   (Egypt)

^c CZECH UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES PRAGUE   (Czech Republic)

^d OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e SCION   (New Zealand)

^f UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Genetic variance decomposition; Genomic selection; GenPred; Mendelian sampling term; Open pollinated families; Pedigree and marker based relationships; Shared data resource

Indexed keywords

BREEDING; CANADA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECOMPOSITION; FAMILY; FAMILY STUDY; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC MODEL; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HEIGHT; HEREDITY; HERITABILITY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MODEL; PEDIGREE; PREDICTION; SIBLING; WHITE SPRUCE; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; GENOTYPING TECHNIQUE; PHENOTYPE; PLANT GENOME; POLLINATION; PROCEDURES; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; SPRUCE;

ALGORITHMS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME, PLANT; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; GENOTYPING TECHNIQUES; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; PICEA; POLLINATION; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE;

EID: 84959570811     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21601836     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/g3.115.025957     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Askew, G. R., and Y. A. El-Kassaby, 1994 Estimation of relationship coefficients among progeny derived from wind-pollinated orchard seeds. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88: 267-272.
2. Avendano, S., J. A. Woolliams, and B. Villanueva, 2004 Mendelian sampling terms as a selective advantage in optimum breeding schemes with restrictions on the rate of inbreeding. Genet. Res. 83: 55-64.
3. Baird, N. A., P. D. Etter, T. S. Atwood, M. C. Currey, A. L. Shiver et al., 2008 Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PLoS One 3: e3376.
4. Beaulieu, J., T. Doerksen, B. Boyle, S. Clément, M. Deslauriers et al., 2011 Association genetics of wood physical traits in the conifer white spruce and relationships with gene expression. Genetics 188: 197-214.
5. Beaulieu, J., T. Doerksen, S. Clément, J. Mackay, and J. Bousquet, 2014 Accuracy of genomic selection models in a large population of open-pollinated families in white spruce. Heredity 113: 343-352.
6. Bradshaw, H. D., Jr, and G. S. Foster, 1992 Marker-aided selection and propagation system in trees: advantages of cloning for studying quantitative inheritance. Can. J. For. Res. 22: 1044-1049.
7. Burdon, R. D., and C. J. A. Shelbourne, 1971 Breeding populations for recurrent selection: conflicts and possible solutions. N. Z. J. For. Sci. 1:174-193.
8. Callaham, R. Z., 1964 Provenance research: investigation of genetic diversity associated with geography. Unasylva 18: 40-50.
9. Chen, C., S. E. Mitchell, R. J. Elshire, E. S. Buckler, and Y. A. El-Kassaby, 2013 Mining conifers' mega-genome using rapid and efficient multiplexed high-throughput genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) SNP discovery platform. Tree Genet. Genomes 9: 1537-1544.
10. Costa, E., J. Silva, N. M. G. Borralho, and B. M. Botts, 2009 Additive and non-additive genetic parameters from clonally replicated and seedling progenies of Eucalyptus globulus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 108:1113-1119.
11. Crow, J. F., 2008 Maintaining evolvability. J. Genet. 87: 349-353.
12. Crow, J. F., 2010 On epistasis: why it is unimportant in polygenic directional selection. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 365: 1241-1244.
13. El-Kassaby, Y. A., 1993 Evaluation of the tree-improvement delivery system: factors affecting genetic potential. Tree Physiol. 15: 545-550.
14. El-Kassaby, Y. A., and H. J. Barclay, 1992 Cost of reproduction in Douglas-fir. Can. J. Bot. 70: 1429-1432.
15. El-Kassaby, Y. A., and O. Sziklai, 1982 Genetic variation of allozyme and quantitative traits in a selected Douglas-fir [Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii (Mirb.) Franco] population. For. Ecol. Manage. 4: 115-126.
16. El-Kassaby, Y. A., A. M. K. Fashler, and O. Sziklai, 1984 Reproductive phenology and its impact on genetically improved seed production in a Douglas-fir seed orchard. Silvae Genet. 33: 120-125.
17. El-Kassaby, Y. A., A. M. K. Fashler, and M. Crown, 1989 Variation in fruitfulness in a Douglas-fir seed orchard and its effect on crop-management decisions. Silvae Genet. 38: 113-121.
18. El-Kassaby, Y. A., J. Klápště, and R. D. Guy, 2012 Breeding without breeding: selection using the genomic best linear unbiased predictor method (GBLUP). New For. 43: 631-637.
19. Elshire, R. J., J. C. Glaubitz, Q. Sun, J. A. Poland, K. Kawamoto et al., 2011 A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS One 6: e19379.
20. Foster, G. S., and D. V. Shaw, 1988 Using clonal replications to explore genetic variation in a perennial plant species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 76:788-794.
21. Frentiu, F. D., S. M. Clegg, J. Chittock, T. Burke, M. W. Blows et al., 2008 Pedigree-free animal models: the relatedness matrix reloaded. P. Roy. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 275: 639-647.
22. Gamal El-Dien, O., B. Ratcliffe, J. Klápště, C. Chen, I. Porth et al., 2015 Prediction accuracies for growth and wood attributes of interior spruce in space using genotyping-by-sequencing. BMC Genomics 16: 370.
23. Gay, L., M. Siol, and J. Ronfort, 2013 Pedigree-free estimates of heritability in the wild: promising prospects for selfing populations. PLoS One 8: e66983.
24. Gilmour, A. R., R. Thompson, and B. R. Cullis, 1995 Average information REML: an efficient algorithm for variance parameter estimation in linear mixed models. Biometrics 51: 1440-1450.
25. Gilmour, A. R., B. Gogel, B. Cullis, and R. Thompson, 2009 ASReml User Guide Release 3.0, VSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, UK.
26. Habier, D., R. L. Fernando, and J. C. M. Dekkers, 2007 The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics 177: 2389-2397.
27. Habier, D., J. Tetens, F. R. Seefried, P. Lichtner, and G. Thaller, 2010 The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle. Genet. Sel. Evol. 42: 5.
28. Habier, D., R. L. Fernando, and D. J. Garrick, 2013 Genomic BLUP decoded: a look into the black box of genomic prediction. Genetics 194:597-607.
29. Hallingback, H. R., and G. Jansson, 2013 Genetic information from progeny trials: a comparison between progenies generated by open pollination and by controlled crosses. Tree Genet. Genomes 9: 731-740.
30. Hayes, B. J., P. M. Visscher, and M. E. Goddard, 2009 Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. Genet. Res. 91: 47-60.
31. Henderson, C. R., 1975 Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics 31: 423-447.
32. Henderson, C. R., 1976 Simple method for computing inverse of a numerator relationship matrix used in prediction of breeding values. Biometrics 32: 69-83.
33. Henderson, C. R., 1984 Applications of Linear Models in Animal Breeding. University of Guelph, Ontario.
34. Hill, W. G., M. E. Goddard, and P. M. Visscher, 2008 Data and theory point to mainly additive genetic variance for complex traits. PLoS Genet. 4: e1000008.
35. Hill, W. G., and B. S. Weir, 2011 Variation in actual relationship as a consequence of Mendelian sampling and linkage. Genetics 93: 47-64.
36. Jannink, J. L., 2007 Identifying quantitative trait locus by genetic background interactions in association studies. Genetics 176: 553-561.
37. Jayawickrama, K. J. S., and M. J. Carson, 2000 A breeding strategy for the New Zealand radiata pine breeding cooperative. Silvae Genet. 49: 82-90.
38. Johnson, G. R., 1997 Site-to-site genetic correlations and their implications on breeding zone size and optimum number of progeny test sites for coastal Douglas-fir. Silvae Genet. 46: 280-285.
39. Kiss, G. K., and A. D. Yanchuk, 1991 Preliminary evaluation of genetic variation of weevil resistance in interior spruce in British Columbia. Can. J. For. Res. 21: 230-234.
40. Klápště, J., M. Lstiburek, and Y. A. El-Kassaby, 2014 Estimates of genetic parameters and breeding values from western larch open-pollinated families using marker-based relationship. Tree Genet. Genomes 10:241-249.
41. Korecky, J., J. Klápště, M. Lstiburek, J. Kobliha, C. Dana Nelson et al., 2013 Comparison of genetic parameters from marker-based relationship, sibship, and combined models in Scots pine multi-site open-pollinated tests. Tree Genet. Genomes 9: 1227-1235.
42. Lee, S. H., M. E. Goddard, P. M. Visscher, and J. H. J. van der Werf, 2010 Using the realized relationship matrix to disentangle confounding factors for the estimation of genetic variance components of complex traits. Genet. Sel. Evol. 42: 22.
43. Lippert, C., G. Quon, E. Y. Kang, C. M. Kadie, J. Listgarten et al., 2013 The benefits of selecting phenotype-specific variants for applications of mixed models in genomics. Sci. Rep. 3: 1815.
44. Loberg, A., J. W. Durr, W. F. Fikse, H. Jorjani, and L. Crooks, 2015 Estimates of genetic variance and variance of predicted genetic merits using pedigree or genomic relationship matrices in six Brown Swiss cattle populations for different traits. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 10.1111/jbg.12142
45. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh, 1998 Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
46. Mackay, T. F. C., 2014 Epistasis and quantitative traits: using model organisms to study gene-gene interactions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15: 22-33.
47. Mrode, R. A., 2014 Linear Models for the Prediction of Animal Breeding Values. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxfordshire.
48. Muñoz, P. R., M. F. R. Resende, Jr, S. A. Gezan, M. D. V. Resende, G. De los Campos et al., 2014 Unraveling additive from nonadditive effects using genomic relationship matrices. Genetics 198: 1759-1768.
49. Namkoong, G., 1966 Inbreeding effects on estimation of genetic additive variance. For. Sci. 12: 8-13.
50. Namkoong, G., H. C. Kang, and J. S. Brouard, 1988 Tree Breeding: Principles and Strategies. Monographs on Theoretical and Applied Genetics. Springer, New York.
51. Peterson, B. K., J. N. Weber, E. H. Kay, H. S. Fisher, and H. E. Hoekstra, 2012 Double digest RADseq: an inexpensive method for de novo SNP discovery and genotyping in model and non-model species. PLoS One 7: e37135.
52. Poland, J., J. Endelman, J. Dawson, J. Rutkoski, S. Wu et al., 2012 Genomic selection in wheat breeding using genotyping-by-sequencing. Plant Genome 5: 103-113.
53. Porth, I., J. Klápště, O. Skyba, B. S. K. Lai, A. Geraldes et al., 2013 Populus trichocarpa cell wall chemistry and ultrastructure trait variation, genetic control and genetic correlations. New Phytol. 197: 777-790.
54. Ratcliffe, B., F. J. Hart, J. Klápště, B. Jaquish, S. D. Mansfield et al., 2014 Genetics of wood quality attributes in western larch. Ann. For. Sci. 71: 415-424.
55. Ratcliffe, B., O. Gamal El-Dien, J. Klápště, I. Porth, C. Chen et al., 2015 A comparison of genomic selection models across time in interior spruce (Picea engelmannii x glauca) using unordered SNP imputation methods. Heredity 115: 547-555 10.1038/hdy.2015.57.
56. Rigault, P., B. Boyle, P. Lepage, J. E. K. Cooke, J. Bousquet et al., 2011 A white spruce gene catalog for conifer genome analyses. Plant Physiol. 193(157): 14-28.
57. Santure, A. W., J. Syapley, A. D. Ball, T. I. M. R. Birkhead, T. Burke et al., 2010 On the use of large marker panels to estimate inbreeding and relatedness: empirical and simulation studies of a pedigreed zebra finch population types at 771 SNPs. Mol. Ecol. 19: 1439-1451.
58. Squillace, A. E., 1974 Average genetic correlations among offspring from open-pollinated forest trees. Silvae Genet. 23: 149-156.
59. Su, G., O. F. Christensen, T. Ostersen, M. Henryon, and M. S. Lund, 2012 Estimating additive and non-additive genetic variances and predicting genetic merits using genome-wide dense single nucleotide polymorphism markers. PLoS One 7: e45293.
60. Thomas, S. C., D. W. Coltman, and J. M. Pemberton, 2002 The use of marker-based relationship information to estimate the heritability of body weight in a natural population: a cautionary tale. J. Evol. Biol. 15:92-99.
61. Truong, H. T., A. M. Ramos, F. Yalcin, M. de Ruiter, H. J. A. van der Poel et al., 2012 Sequence-based genotyping for marker discovery and codominant scoring in germplasm and populations. PLoS One 7: e37565.
62. VanRaden, P. M., 2008 Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J. Dairy Sci. 91: 4414-4423.
63. Visscher, P. M., S. E. Medland, M. A. R. Ferreira, K. I. Morley, G. Zhu et al., 2006 Assumption-free estimation of heritability from genome-wide identity-by-descent sharing between full siblings. PLoS Genet. 2: e41.
64. Vitezica, Z. G., L. Varona, and A. Legarra, 2013 On the additive and dominance and covariance of individuals within the genomic selection scope. Genetics 195: 1223-1230.
65. Wright, S., 1922 Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. Am. Nat. 56:330-338.
66. Zapata-Valenzuela, J., R. W. Whetten, D. Neale, S. McKeand, and F. Isik, 2013 Genomic estimated breeding values using genomic relationship matrices in a cloned population of loblolly pine. G3 Genes Genom. Genet. 3: 909-916.