Genomic estimated breeding values using genomic relationship matrices in a cloned population of loblolly pine

G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics

Volumn 3, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 909-916

  Zapata Valenzuela, Jaime ^a   Whetten, Ross W ^a   Neale, David ^b   McKeand, Steve ^a   Isik, Fikret ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Best linear unbiased prediction; GenPred; Pinus taeda; Quantitative genetics; Shared data resource

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTION; BREEDING; FOREST; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LOCUS; GENE REPLICATION; GENETICS; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; GENPRED; LOBLOLLY PINE; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR CLONING; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PLANT GENOME; POPULATION GENETICS; PREDICTION; QUANTITATIVE GENETICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SHARED DATA RESOURCE; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; STATISTICAL MODEL; TREE;

PINUS TAEDA;

EID: 84883237547     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21601836     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/g3.113.005975     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Avendano, S., J. A. Woolliams, and B. Villanueva, 2005 Prediction of accuracy of estimated Mendelian sampling terms. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 122: 302-308.
2. Bettinger, P., M. Clutter, J. Siry, M. Kane, and J. Pait, 2009 Broad implications of southern United States pine clonal forestry on planning and management of forests. Int. Rev. 11(3): 331-345.
3. Brown, G. R., G. P. Gill, R. J. Kuntz, C. H. Langley, and D. B. Neale, 2004 Nucleotide diversity and linkage disequilibrium in loblolly pine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 15255-15260.
4. Daetwyler, H. D., G. R. Wiggans, B. J. Hayes, J. A. Woolliams, and M. E. Goddard, 2011 Imputation of missing genotypes from sparse to high density using long-range phasing. Genetics 189: 317-327.
5. Eckert, A. J., J. van Heerwaarden, J. L. Wegrzyn, C. D. Nelson, J. Ross-Ibarra et al., 2010 Patterns of population structure and environmental associations to aridity across the range of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L., Pinaceae). Genetics 185(3): 969-982.
6. El-Kassaby, Y. A., and M. Lstiburek, 2009 Breeding without breeding. Genet. Res. 91: 111-120.
7. El-Kassaby, Y. A., E. P. Cappa, C. Liewlaksaneeyanawin, J. Klápŝte, and M. Lstiburek, 2011 Breeding without breeding: is a complete pedigree necessary for efficient breeding? PLoS ONE 6: e25737.
8. Falconer, D. S., and T. F. C. Mackay, 1996 Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, Ed. 4., Longman Group, Ltd., Essex, England.
9. Forni, S., I. Aguilar, and I. Misztal, 2011 Different genomic relationship matrices for single-step analysis using phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information. Genet. Sel. Evol. 43:1.
10. Garrick, D. J., J. F. Taylor, and R. L. Fernando, 2009 Deregressing estimated breeding values and weighting information for genomic regression analyses. Genet. Sel. Evol. 41: 55.
11. Gengler, N., P. Mayeres, and M. Szydlowski, 2007 A simple method to approximate gene content in large pedigree populations: application to the myostatin gene in dual-purpose Belgian Blue cattle. Animal 1: 21-28.
12. Gilmour, A. R., B. J. Gogel, B. R. Cullis, and R. Thompson, 2009 ASReml User Guide Release 3.0. VSN International Ltd., Hemel Hempstead, United Kingdom.
13. Goddard, M. E., and B. J. Hayes, 2007 Genomic selection. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 124: 323-330.
14. Goebel, N. B., and J. R. Warner, 1966 Total and Bark Volume Tables for Small Diameter Loblolly, Shortleaf, and Virginia Pine in the Upper South Carolina Piedmont. Forest Research Series No. 9. Clemson University, Clemson, SC.
15. Grattapaglia, D., and M. D. V. Resende, 2011 Genomic selection in forest tree breeding. Tree Genet. Genomes 7: 241-255.
16. Habier, D., R. L. Fernando, and J. C. M. Dekkers, 2007 The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics 177: 2389-2397.
17. Henderson, C. R., 1975 Use of relationships among sires to increase accuracy of sire evaluation. J. Dairy Sci. 58: 1731-1738.
18. Lambeth, C., B. C. Lee, D. O'Malley, and N. Wheeler, 2001 Polymix breeding with parental analysis of progeny: an alternative to full-sib breeding and testing. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103: 930-943.
19. Legarra, A., and I. Misztal, 2008 Technical note: computing strategies in genome-wide selection. J. Dairy Sci. 91: 360-366.
20. Legarra, A., I. Aguilar, and I. Misztal, 2009 A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information. J. Dairy Sci. 92: 4656-4663.
21. Legarra, A., C. Robert-Granie, E. Manfredi, and J. M. Elsen, 2008 Performance of genomic selection in mice. Genetics 180: 611-618.
22. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh, 1998 Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Simauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
23. McKeand, S. E., and F. E. Bridgwater, 1998 A strategy for the third breeding cycle of loblolly pine in the Southeastern U.S. Silvae Genet. 47: 223-234.
24. Meuwissen, T. H. E., and M. E. Goddard, 2010 Accurate prediction of genetic values for complex traits by whole-genome resequencing. Genetics 185: 623-631.
25. Meuwissen, T. H. E., B. J. Hayes, and M. E. Goddard, 2001 Prediction of total genetic value using genome wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157: 1819-1829.
26. Mrode, R. A., 2005 Linear Models for the Prediction of Animal Breeding Values, Ed 2. CAB International, Wallingford, United Kingdom.
27. Muir, W. M., 2007 Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 124: 342-355.
28. Resende, Jr., M. F. R., P. Munoz, J. J. Acosta, G. F. Peter, J. M. Davis et al., 2012 Accelerating the domestication of trees using genomic selection: accuracy of prediction models across ages and environments. New Phytologist. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469- 8137.2011.03895.x/full.
29. SAS Institute Inc, 2010 SAS 9.2 User's Guide Statistics. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
30. Stranden, I., and D. J. Garrick, 2009 Technical note: derivation of equivalent computing algorithms for genomic predictions and reliabilities of animal merit. J. Dairy Sci. 92: 2971-2975.
31. van Arendonk, J. A. M., B. Tier, and B. P. Kinghorn, 1994 Use of multiple genetic markers in prediction of breeding values. Genetics 137: 319-329.
32. VanRaden, P. M., 2007 Genomic measures of relationship and inbreeding. Interbull. Bull. 37: 33-36.
33. VanRaden, P. M., 2008 Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J. Dairy Sci. 91: 4414-4423.
34. Villanueva, B., R. Pong-Wong, J. Fernandez, and M. A. Toro, 2005 Benefits from marker-assisted selection under an additive polygenic genetic model. J. Anim. Sci. 83: 1747-1752.
35. Zapata-Valenzuela, J., F. Isik, C. Maltecca, J. Wegrzyn, D. Neale et al., 2012 SNP markers trace familial linkages in a cloned population of Pinus taeda-prospects for genomic selection. Tree Genet. Genomes 8: 1307-1318.