Genetic information from progeny trials: A comparison between progenies generated by open pollination and by controlled crosses

Tree Genetics and Genomes

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 731-740

  Hallingbäck, Henrik R ^a   Jansson, Gunnar ^a,b  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b THE FORESTRY RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF SWEDEN   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Coancestry; Controlled crossing; Genetic parameters; Norway spruce; Open pollination; Scots pine

Indexed keywords

CONIFEROPHYTA; PICEA ABIES; PINUS SYLVESTRIS;

EID: 84877712389     PISSN: 16142942     EISSN: 16142950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11295-012-0588-2     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Askew GR, El-Kassaby YA (1994) Estimation of relationship coefficients among progeny derived from wind-pollinated orchard seeds. Theor Appl Genet 88: 267-272.
2. Borralho NMG (1994) Heterogeneous selfing rates and dominance effects in estimating heritabilities from open-pollinated progeny. Can J For Res 24: 1079-1082.
3. Burczyk J, Lewandowski A, Chalupka W (2004) Local pollen dispersal and distant gene flow in Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) For Ecol Manag 197: 39-48. doi: 10. 1016/j. foreco. 2004. 05. 003.
4. Burdon RD (1977) Genetic correlation as a concept for studying genotype-environment interaction in forest tree breeding. Silvae Genet 26(5-6): 168-175.
5. Costa e Silva J, Hardner CM, Potts BM (2010) Genetic variation and parental performance under inbreeding for growth in Eucalyptus globulus. Ann For Sci 67: 606p1-606p8. doi: 10. 1051/forest/2010019.
6. Doerksen TK, Herbinger CM (2010) Impact of reconstructed pedigrees on progeny-test breeding values in red spruce. Tree Genet Genomes 6: 591-600. doi: 10. 1007/s11295-010-0274-1.
7. El-Kassaby YA, Lstibůrek M (2009) Breeding without breeding. Genet Res Camb 91: 111-120. doi: 10. 1017/S001667230900007X.
8. El-Kassaby YA, Cappa EP, Liewlaksaneeyanawin C, Klápště J, Lstibůrek M (2011) Breeding without breeding: is a complete pedigree necessary for efficient breeding?PLoS One 6(10): e25-737. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pone. 0025737.
9. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Pearson, Prentice Hall.
10. Gaspar MJ, de Lucas AI, Alia R, Pinto Paiva JA, Hidalgo E, Louzada JL, Almeida MH, González-Martínez SC (2009) Use of molecular markers for estimating breeding parameters: a case study in a Pinus pinaster Ait. progeny trial. Tree Genet Genomes 5: 609-616. doi: 10. 1007/s11295-009-0213-1.
11. Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2009) ASReml user guide, 3rd edn. VSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, HP1 1ES, UK.
12. Griffin AR, Cotterill PP (1987) Genetic variation in growth of outcrossed, selfed and open-pollinated progenies of Eucalyptus regnans and some implication for breeding strategy. Silvae Genet 37(3-4): 124-131.
13. Hannrup B, Jansson G, Danell Ö (2008) Genotype by environment interaction in Pinus sylvestris L. in southern Sweden. Silvae Genet 57(6): 306-311.
14. Hansen OK, Nielsen UB (2010) Microsatellites used to establish full pedigree in a half-sib trial and correlation between number of male strobili and paternal success. Ann For Sci 67: 703p1-703p10. doi: 10. 1051/forest/2010028.
15. Hardner CM, Potts BM (1997) Postdispersal selection following mixed mating in Eucalyptus regnans. Evolution 51(1): 103-111.
16. Hodge GR, Volker PW, Potts BM, Owen JW (1996) A comparison of genetic information from open-pollinated and control-pollinated progeny tests in two eucalypt species. Theor Appl Genet 92: 53-63.
17. Jordan GJ, Potts BM, Wiltshire RJE (1999) Strong, independent, quantitative genetic control of the timing of vegetative phase change and first flowering in Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus (Tasmanian Blue Gum). Heredity 83: 179-187.
18. Kärkkäinen K, Savolainen O (1993) The degree of early inbreeding depression determines the selfing rate at the seed stage: model and results from Pinus sylvestris (Scots pine). Heredity 71: 160-166.
19. Kempthorne O, Curnow RN (1961) The partial diallel cross. Biometrics 17(2): 229-250.
20. Koski V (1971) Embryonic lethals of Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris. Commun Inst For Fenn 75: 1-30.
21. Muona O, Harju A (1989) Effective population sizes, genetic variability, and mating system in natural stands and seed orchards of Pinus sylvestris. Silvae Genet 38(5-6): 221-228.
22. Pakkanen A, Nikkanen T, Pulkkinen P (2000) Annual variation in pollen contamination and outcrossing in a Picea abies seed orchard. Scand J For Res 15: 399-404.
23. Self SG, Liang KY (1987) Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators and likelihood ratio tests under nonstandard conditions. J Am Stat Ass 82(398): 605-610.
24. Shimono A, Wang XR, Torimaru T, Lindgren D, Karlsson B (2011) Spatial variation in local pollen flow and mating success in a Picea abies clone archive and their implications for a novel "breeding without breeding" strategy. Tree Genet Genomes 7(3): 499-509. doi: 10. 1007/s11295-010-0351-5.
25. Squillace AE (1974) Average genetic correlations among offspring from open-pollinated forest trees. Silvae Genet 23(5): 149-156.
26. Torimaru T, Wennström U, Lindgren D, Wang XR (2012) Effects of male fecundity, interindividual distance and anisotropic pollen dispersal on mating success in a Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) seed orchard. Heredity 108: 312-321. doi: 10. 1038/hdy. 2011. 76.
27. Williams CG (2007) Re-thinking the embryo lethal system within the Pinaceae. Can J Bot 85: 667-677. doi: 10. 1139/B07-056.