The benefits of selecting phenotype-specific variants for applications of mixed models in genomics

Scientific Reports

Volumn 3, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Lippert, Christoph ^a   Quon, Gerald ^b   Kang, Eun Yong ^a   Kadie, Carl M ^a   Listgarten, Jennifer ^a   Heckerman, David ^a  

^a MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOMICS; HUMAN; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; THEORETICAL MODEL;

GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; GENOMICS; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84877763248     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep01815     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Meuwissen, T. H., Hayes, B. J. & Goddard, M. E. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157, 1819-1829 (2001). (Pubitemid 32298846)
2. Makowsky, R., Pajewski, N. M., Klimentidis, Y. C., Vazquez, A. I., Duarte, C. W., Allison, D. B. & De los Campos, G. Beyond missing heritability: prediction of complex traits. PLoS Genetics 7, e1002051 (2011).
3. Moser, G., Tier, B., Crump, R. E., Khatkar, M. S. & Raadsma, H. W. A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genomewide SNP markers. Genetics, Selection, Evolution: GSE 41, 56 (2009).
4. Goddard, M. E.,Wray, N. R., Verbyla, K. & Visscher, P. M. Estimating Effects and Making Predictions from Genome-Wide Marker Data. Statistical Science 24, 517-529 (2009).
5. Yu, J., Pressoir, G., Briggs, W. H., Vroh Bi, I., Yamasaki, M., Doebley, J. F., McMullen, M. D., Gaut, B. S., Nielsen, D. M. & Holland, J. B. et al. A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nature Genetics 38, 203-208 (2006). (Pubitemid 43177234)
6. Kang, H. M., Zaitlen, N. a., Wade, C. M., Kirby, A., Heckerman, D., Daly, M. J. & Eskin, E. Efficient control of population structure in model organism association mapping. Genetics 178, 1709-1723 (2008).
7. Kang, H. M., Sul, J. H., Service, S. K., Zaitlen, N. a., Kong, S.-Y., Freimer, N. B., Sabatti, C.&Eskin, E. Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies. Nature Genetics 42, 348-354 (2010).
8. Lippert, C., Listgarten, J., Liu, Y., Kadie, C. M., Davidson, R. I. & Heckerman, D. FaST linear mixed models for genome-wide association studies. Nature Methods 8, 833-835 (2011).
9. Listgarten, J., Lippert, C., Kadie, C. M., Davidson, R. I., Eskin, E. &Heckerman, D. Improved linear mixed models for genome-wide association studies. Nature Methods 9, 525-526 (2012).
10. Listgarten, J., Lippert, C. & Heckerman, D. FaST-LMM-Select for addressing confounding from spatial structure and rare variants. Nature Genetics 45, 470-471 (2013).
11. Yang, J., Benyamin, B., Mcevoy, B. P., Gordon, S., Henders, A. K., Nyholt, D. R., Madden, P. A., Heath, A. C.,Martin, N. G. &Montgomery, G. W. et al. Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nature Genetics 42, (2010).
12. Zaitlen, N. & Kraft, P. Heritability in the genome-wide association era. Human Genetics 131, 1655-1664 (2012).
13. Wu, M. C., Lee, S., Cai, T., Li, Y., Boehnke, M. & Lin, X. Rare-variant association testing for sequencing data with the sequence kernel association test. American Journal of Human Genetics 89, 82-93 (2011).
14. Listgarten, J., Lippert, C., Kang, E. Y., Xiang, J., Kadie, C. & Heckerman, D. A powerful and efficient set test for genetic markers that handles confounders. Bioinformatics, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt177 (2013).
15. Vilhjálmsson, B. J. & Nordborg, M. The nature of confounding in genome-wide association studies. Nature Reviews. Genetics 14, 1-2 (2012).
16. Hayes, B. J., Visscher, P. M. & Goddard, M. E. Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. Genetics Research 91, 47-60 (2009).
17. Review, P. A., Random, G. & Tech-, C. F. C. E. Rasmussen & C. K. I. Williams, Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning, the MIT Press, 2006, ISBN 026218253X. c 2006 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. www. GaussianProcess.org/gpml (2006).
18. Bernardo, J. & Smith, A. Bayesian Analysis (Chichester: John Wiley) (1994).
19. Yang, J., Weedon,M. N., Purcell, S., Lettre, G., Estrada, K., Willer, C. J., Smith, A. V., Ingelsson, E., O'Connell, J. R. & Mangino,M. et al. Genomic inflation factors under polygenic inheritance. European Journal of Human Genetics: EJHG 19, 807-812 (2011).
20. Balding, D. J. & Nichols, R. a. A method for quantifying differentiation between populations at multi-allelic loci and its implications for investigating identity and paternity. Genetica 96, 3-12 (1995).
21. Yu, J., Pressoir, G., Briggs, W. H., Vroh Bi, I., Yamasaki, M., Doebley, J. F., McMullen, M. D., Gaut, B. S., Nielsen, D. M. & Holland, J. B. et al. A unified mixed-modelmethod for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nature Genetics 38, 203-208 (2006). (Pubitemid 43177234)
22. Zaitlen, N., Lindström, S., Pasaniuc, B., Cornelis, M., Genovese, G., Pollack, S., Barton, A., Bickeböller, H., Bowden,D.W.&Eyre, S. et al. Informed Conditioning on Clinical Covariates Increases Power in Case-Control Association Studies. PLoS Genetics 8, e1003032 (2012).
23. Mathieson, I. & McVean, G. Differential confounding of rare and common variants in spatially structured populations. Nature Genetics 44, 243-246 (2012).
24. Lange, K. Mathematical and statistical methods for genetic analysis (New York: Springer) (2002).
25. Zuk, O., Hechter, E., Sunyaev, S. R. & Lander, E. S. The mystery of missing heritability: Genetic interactions create phantom heritability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2012).
26. Searle, S. R., Casella, G. & McCulloch, C. Variance Components, Volume 631, (Wiley-Interscience) (2006).
27. Cramér, H. Mathematical methods of statistics (Princeton: Princeton University Press) (1946).
28. Quon, G., Lippert, C., Heckerman, D. & Listgarten, J. Patterns of methylation heritability in a genome-wide analysis of four brain regions. Nucleic Acids Research.
29. Li, Q. &Ã, K. Y. Improved Correction for Population Stratification in Genomewide Association Studies by Identifying Hidden Population Structures. October 1-12 (2007).
30. Lee, S. H., Goddard, M. E., Wray, N. R. & Visscher, P. M. A better coefficient of determination for genetic profile analysis. Genetic Epidemiology 36, 214-224 (2012).
31. Speed, D., Hemani, G., Johnson, M. R. & Balding, D. J. Improved heritability estimation from genome-wide SNPs. American Journal of Human Genetics 91, 1011-1021 (2012).
32. Devlin, A. B., Roeder, K. & Devlin, B. Genomic Control for Association. 55, 997-1004 (2008).
33. Gibbs, J. R., Van der Brug, M. P., Hernandez, D. G., Traynor, B. J. & Nalls, M. a, Lai, S.-L., Arepalli, S., Dillman, A., Rafferty, I. P., Troncoso, J. et al. Abundant quantitative trait loci exist for DNA methylation and gene expression in human brain. PLoS Genetics 6, e1000952 (2010).