Breeding without breeding: Selection using the genomic best linear unbiased predictor method (GBLUP)

New Forests

Volumn 43, Issue 5-6, 2012, Pages 631-637

  El Kassaby, Yousry A ^a   Klápště, Jaroslav ^a,b   Guy, Robert D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b CZECH UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES PRAGUE   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

GBLUP; Genetic diversity; Genetic gain; Quantitative genetic parameters selection

Indexed keywords

ABIOTIC FACTORS; BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTOR; DNA FINGERPRINTING; EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE; GBLUP; GENETIC DIVERSITY; GENETIC GAIN; GENETIC NETWORKS; GENETIC PARAMETERS; GENETIC SOURCES; GENOME EQUIVALENT; RELATIONSHIP MATRIX;

BIODIVERSITY;

GENES;

CONSERVATION GENETICS; DNA FINGERPRINTING; EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE; GENEALOGY; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOMICS; INBREEDING AVOIDANCE; MORTALITY; PLANTATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY; STAND STRUCTURE;

EID: 84865405495     PISSN: 01694286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11056-012-9338-4     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Baltunis BS, Russell JH, van Niejenhuis A, El-Kassaby YA (2011) Genetic analysis and clonal stability of a yellow cypress clonal population from bulked seedlots using a post hoc reconstructed pedigree. Tree Gen Genomes (in press).
2. Blouin MS (2003) DNA-based methods for pedigree reconstruction and kinship analysis in natural populations. Trends Ecol Evol 18: 503-511.
3. Caballero A, Toro MA (2000) Interrelations between effective population size and other pedigree tools for the management of conserved populations. Genet Res 75: 331-343.
4. Dekker JCM (2004) Commercial application of marker- and gene assisted selection in livestock: strategies and lessons. Anim Sci 82((E-Suppl)): E313-E328.
5. Dekker JCM, Hospital F (2002) The use of molecular genetics in improvement of agricultural populations. Nat Rev Genet 3: 22-32.
6. El-Kassaby YA, Lstibůrek M (2009) Breeding without breeding. Genet Res 91: 111-120.
7. El-Kassaby YA, Lstibu°rek M, Liewlaksaneeyanawin C, Slavov GT, Howe GT (2006) In: IUFRO Proceedings of low input breeding and genetic conservation of forest tree species. Antalya, Turkey, pp 43-54.
8. El-Kassaby YA, Cappa EP, Liewlaksaneeyanawin C, Klápště J, Lstibůrek M (2011) Breeding without breeding: is a complete pedigree necessary for efficient breeding? PLoS ONE 6(10): e25737. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pone. 0025737.
9. Emik LO, Terrill CE (1949) Systematic procedures for calculating inbreeding coefficients. J Hered 40: 51-55.
10. Fisher RA (1918) The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Trans R Soc Edinburgh 52: 399-433.
11. Frentiu FD, Clegg SM, Chittock J, Burke T, Blows MW et al (2007) Pedigree-free animal models: the relatedness matrix reloaded. Proc R Soc B 275: 639-647.
12. Funda T, El-Kassaby YA (2012) Seed Orchards Genetics. CAB Reviews (in press).
13. Geraldes A, Pang J, Thiessen N, Cezard T, Moore R et al (2011) SNP discovery in black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa) by population transcriptome resequencing. Mol Ecol Res 11(Suppl. 1): 81-92.
14. Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2006) ASReml user guide. Release 2. 0 VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, UK.
15. Henderson CR (1984) Applications of linear models in animal breeding. U. Guelph, ON.
16. Lindgren D, Mullin TJ (1998) Relatedness and status number in seed orchard crops. Can J For Res 28: 276-283.
17. Lynch M, Ritland K (1999) Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers. Genetics 152: 1753-1766.
18. Massah N, Wang J, Russell JH, van Niejenhuis A, El-Kassaby YA (2010) Genealogical relationship among members of selection and production populations of yellow-cedar (Callitropsis nootkatensis) in the absence of parental information. J Hered 101: 154-163.
19. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME (2001) Prediction of total genetic value using genome wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157: 1819-1829.
20. Misztal I, Legarra A, Aguilar I (2009) Computing procedures for genetic evaluation including phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information. J Dairy Sci 92: 4648-4655.
21. Namkoong G, Kang HC, Brouard JS (1988) Tree breeding: principles and strategies. Theor Appl Genet Monograph 11.
22. Nejati-Javaremi A, Smith C, Gibson J (1997) Effect of total allelic relationship on accuracy of evaluation and response to selection. J Anim Sci 75: 1738-1745.
23. Oliehoek PA, Windig JJ, van Arendonk JAM, Bijma P (2006) Estimating relatedness between individuals in general populations with a focus on their use in conservation programs. Genetics 173: 483-496.
24. Ritland K (1996) A marker-based method for inferences about quantitative inheritance in natural populations. Evolution 50: 1062-1073.
25. Sanna S, Jackson AU, Nagaraja R, Willer CJ, Chen WM et al (2008) Common variants in the GDF5-UQCC region are associated with variation in human height. Nat Genet 40: 198-203.
26. van Raden PM (2008) Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci 91: 4414-4423.
27. Villanueva B, Pong-Wong R, Fernandez J, Toro MA (2005) Benefits from marker-assisted selection under an additive polygenic model. J Anim Sci 83: 1747-1752.
28. Visscher PM (2008) Sizing up human height variation. Nat Genet 40: 489-490.
29. Wang JL (2002) An estimator for pairwise relatedness using molecular markers. Genetics 160: 1203-1215.
30. White TL, Adams WT, Neale DB (2007) Forest genetics. CABI Publishing, Cambridge.
31. Xie C-Y, Ying CC, Yanchuk AD, Holowachuk DL (2009) Ecotypic mode of regional differentiation due to restricted gene migration: a case in black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa) along the Pacific Northwest coast. Can J For Res 39: 519-526.
32. Xu Y, Crouch JH (2008) Marker-assisted selection in plant breeding: from publications to practice. Crop Sci 48: 391-407.