On the additive and dominant variance and covariance of individuals within the genomic selection scope

Genetics

Volumn 195, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 1223-1230

  Vitezica, Zulma G ^a   Varona, Luis ^b   Legarra, Andres ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

^c CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY MASS; COVARIANCE; EVALUATION; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC PARAMETERS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; HEREDITY; HETEROZYGOTE; HUMAN; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; INCIDENCE; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE GENETICS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; VARIANCE;

DOMINANCE; GENOMIC EVALUATION; MIXED MODELS; RELATIONSHIP; VARIANCE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BREEDING; CATTLE; GENES, DOMINANT; GENOME; MICE; MODELS, GENETIC; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84888984101     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 19432631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.113.155176     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Cockerham, C. C., 1954 An extension of the concept of partitioning hereditary variance for analysis of covariances among relatives when epistasis is present. Genetics 39: 859.
2. Crow, J. F., and M. Kimura, 1970 An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Harper & Row, New York.
3. De Boer, I. J. M., and I. Hoeschele, 1993 Genetic evaluation methods for populations with dominance and inbreeding. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86: 245-258.
4. de los Campos, G., H. Naya, D. Gianola, J. Crossa, A. Legarra et al., 2009 Predicting quantitative traits with regression models for dense molecular markers and pedigrees. Genetics 182: 375-385
5. Ertl, J., A. Legarra, Z. G. Vitezica, L. Varona, C. Edel et al., 2013 Genomic analysis of dominance effects in milk production and conformation traits of Fleckvieh cattle. Interbull Bull. 47 (in press)
6. Falconer, D. S., 1981 Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman, New York.
7. Forni, S., I. Aguilar, and I. Misztal, 2011 Different genomic relationship matrices for single-step analysis using phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information. Genet. Sel. Evol. 43: 1
8. Gianola, D., G. de los Campos, W. G. Hill, E. Manfredi, and R. Fernando, 2009 Additive genetic variability and the Bayesian alphabet. Genetics 183: 347-363.
9. Goddard, M. E., 2009 Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica 136: 245-257
10. Hayes, B. J., P. M. Vissher, and M. E. Goddard, 2009 Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. Genet. Res. 91: 47-60.
11. Henderson, C. R., 1985 Best linear unbiased prediction of nonadditive genetic merits. J. Anim. Sci. 60: 111-117
12. Hill, W. G., M. E. Goddard, and P. M. Visscher, 2008 Data and theory point to mainly additive genetic variance for complex traits. PLoS Genet. 4(2): e1000008.
13. Kempthorn, O., 1954 The correlation between relatives in a random mating population. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 143: 103-113
14. Legarra, A., C. Robert-Granié, E. Manfredi, and J. M. Elsen, 2008 Performance of genomic selection in mice. Genetics 180: 611-618.
15. Legarra, A., A. Ricard, and O. Filangi, 2011a GS3: Genomic Selection, Gibbs Sampling, Gauss-Seidel (and BayesCpi). Available at: http://genoweb.toulouse.inra.fr/~alegarra/
16. Legarra, A., C. Robert-Granié, P. Croiseau, F. Guillaume, and S. Fritz, 2011b Improved Lasso for genomic selection. Genet. Res. 93: 77-87.
17. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh, 1998 Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA
18. Meuwissen, T. H. E., B. J. Hayes, and M. E. Goddard, 2001 Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157: 1819-1829.
19. Misztal, I., L. Varona, L. Culbertson, J. K. Bertrand, J. W. Wabry et al., 1998 Studies on the value of incorporating the effect of dominance in genetic evaluations of dairy cattle, beef cattle and swine. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ. 2: 227-233.
20. Misztal, I., S. Tsuruta, T. Strabel, B. Auvray, T. Druet et al., 2002 BLUPF90 and related programs (BGF90). Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Montpellier, France, Communication 28-07.
21. Mrode, R. A., and R. Thompson, 2005 Linear Models for the Prediction of Animal Breeding Values. CABI Publishing, Cambridge, MA
22. Sillanpää, M. J., 2011 On statistical methods for estimating heritability in wild populations. Mol. Ecol. 20: 1324-1332
23. Su, G., O. F. Christensen, T. Ostersen, M. Henryon, and M. S. Lund, 2012 Estimating additive and non-additive genetic variances and predicting genetic merits using genome-wide dense single nucleotide polymorphism markers. PLoS ONE 7(9): e45293
24. Toro, M. A., and L. Varona, 2010 A note on mate allocation for dominance handling in genomic selection. Genet. Sel. Evol. 42: 33
25. Valdar, W., L. C. Solberg, D. Gauguier, S. Burnett, P. Klenerman et al., 2006 Genome-wide genetic association of complex traits in heterogeneous stock mice. Nat. Genet. 38: 879-887.
26. VanRaden, P. M., 2008 Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J. Dairy Sci. 91: 4414-4423.
27. Varona, L., and I. Misztal, 1999 Prediction of parental dominance combinations for planned matings, methodology, and simulation results. J. Dairy Sci. 82(10): 2186-2191.
28. Wellmann, R., and J. Bennewitz, 2012 Bayesian models with dominance effects for genomic evaluation of quantitative traits. Genet. Res. 94: 21-37.
29. Yang, J., B. Benyamin, B. P. McEvoy, S. Gordon, A. K. Henders et al., 2010 Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nat. Genet. 42: 565-569.