Fluid bolus therapy: Monitoring and predicting fluid responsiveness

Current Opinion in Critical Care

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 388-394

  Carsetti, Andrea ^a   Cecconi, Maurizio ^a   Rhodes, Andrew ^a  

^a ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

cardiac output; fluid responsiveness; haemodynamic monitoring; microcirculation; stroke volume

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL PRESSURE; AORTA FLOW; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTERY COMPLIANCE; BLOOD FLOW; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD VOLUME; BOLUS INJECTION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FLUID RESUSCITATION; FLUID THERAPY; GOLD STANDARD; HEART PRELOAD; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; HYPERVOLEMIA; INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); MICROCIRCULATION; PATIENT MONITORING; PERFUSION PRESSURE; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PULSE PRESSURE; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT RESPONSE; VENOUS BLOOD; VENTILATED PATIENT; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; CRITICAL ILLNESS; HEMODYNAMICS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RESUSCITATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD PRESSURE; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; CRITICAL ILLNESS; FLUID THERAPY; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; RESUSCITATION; STROKE VOLUME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84959486505     PISSN: 10705295     EISSN: 15317072     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000240     Document Type: Review

References (58)

1. Zhang L, Chen Z, Diao Y, et al. Associations of fluid overload with mortality and kidney recovery in patients with acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-Analysis. J Crit Care 2015; 30: 860
2. Sirvent J-M, Ferri C, Baro A, et al. Fluid balance in sepsis and septic shock as a determining factor of mortality. Am J Emerg Med 2015; 33: 186-189
3. Lee J, de Louw E, Niemi M, et al. Association between fluid balance and survival in critically ill patients. J Intern Med 2015; 277: 468-477
4. Kelm DJ, Perrin JT, Cartin-Ceba R, et al. Fluid overload in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock treated with early goal-directed therapy is associated with increased acute need for fluid-related medical interventions and hospital death. Shock 2015; 43: 68-73
5. Donati A, Carsetti A, Damiani E, et al. Fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients. Indian J Crit Care Med 2015; 19: 375-376
6. Cecconi M, Parsons AK, Rhodes A. What is a fluid challenge? Curr Opin Crit Care 2011; 17: 290-295
7. Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, et al. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 2014; 40: 1795-1815
8. Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P, et al. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med 2007; 35: 64-68
9. Wiesenack C, Fiegl C, Keyser A, et al. Continuously assessed right ventricular end-diastolic volume as a marker of cardiac preload and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated cardiac surgical patients. Crit Care 2005; 9: R226-R233
10. Endo T, Kushimoto S, Yamanouchi S, et al. Limitations of global end-diastolic volume index as a parameter of cardiac preload in the early phase of severe sepsis: a subgroup analysis of a multicenter, prospective observational study. J Intens Care 2013; 1: 11
11. Patterson SW, Starling EH. On the mechanical factors which determine the output of the ventricles. J Physiol 1914; 48: 357-379
12. Magder S. Bench-To-bedside review: an approach to hemodynamic monitoring-Guyton at the bedside. Crit Care 2012; 16: 236
13. Cecconi M, Aya HD, Geisen M, et al. Changes in the mean systemic filling pressure during a fluid challenge in postsurgical intensive care patients. Intens Care Med 2013; 39: 1299-1305
14. Guinot P-G, Bernard E, Defrancq F, et al. Mini-fluid challenge predicts fluid responsiveness during spontaneous breathing under spinal anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2014. [Epub ahead of print]
15. Muller L, Toumi M, Bousquet P-J, et al. An increase in aortic blood flow after an infusion of 100 ml colloid over 1 min can predict fluid responsiveness. Anesthesiology 2011; 115: 541-547
16. Michard F, Teboul J-L. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002; 121: 2000-2008
17. Jardin F, Farcot JC, Gueret P, et al. Cyclic changes in arterial pulse during respiratory support. Circulation 1983; 68: 266-274
18. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 134-138
19. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 2642-2647
20. Yang X, Du B. Does pulse pressure variation predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients? A systematic review and meta-Analysis. Crit Care 2014; 18: 1-13
21. Cannesson M, Le Manach Y, Hofer CK, et al. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a gray zone approach. Anesthesiology 2011; 115: 231-241
22. Biais M, Ehrmann S, Mari A, et al. Clinical relevance of pulse pressure variations for predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: the grey zone approach. Crit Care 2014; 18: 1-11
23. De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, et al. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 517-523
24. Lakhal K, Ehrmann S, Benzekri-Lefè vre D, et al. Respiratory pulse pressure variation fails to predict fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care 2011; 15: R85
25. De Backer D, Taccone FS, Holsten R, et al. Influence of respiratory rate on stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesthesiology 2009; 110: 1092-1097
26. Wyler von Ballmoos M, Takala J, Roeck M, et al. Pulse-pressure variation and hemodynamic response in patients with elevated pulmonary artery pressure: a clinical study. Crit Care 2010; 14: R111
27. Shim J-K, Song J-W, Song Y, et al. Pulse pressure variation is not a valid predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients with elevated left ventricular filling pressure. J Crit Care 2014; 29: 987-991
28. Mahjoub Y, Lejeune V, Muller L, et al. Evaluation of pulse pressure variation validity criteria in critically ill patients: a prospective observational multicentre point-prevalence study. Br J Anaesth 2014; 112: 681-685
29. Fischer M-O, Mahjoub Y, Boisselier C, et al. Arterial pulse pressure variation suitability in critical care: a French national survey. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2015; 34: 23-28
30. Monnet X, Osman D, Ridel C, et al. Predicting volume responsiveness by using the end-expiratory occlusion in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 951-956
31. Monnet X, Bleibtreu A, FerréA, et al. Passive leg-raising and end-expiratory occlusion tests perform better than pulse pressure variation in patients with low respiratory system compliance. Crit Care Med 2012; 40: 152-157
32. Silva S, Jozwiak M, Teboul J-L, et al. End-expiratory occlusion test predicts preload responsiveness independently of positive end-expiratory pressure during acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 2013; 41: 1692-1701
33. Charron C, Caille V, Jardin F, Vieillard-Baron A. Echocardiographic measurement of fluid responsiveness. Curr Opin Crit Care 2006; 12: 249-254
34. Barbier C, Loubiè res Y, Schmit C, et al. Respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30: 1740-1746
35. Feissel M, Michard F, Faller JP, Teboul JL. The respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30: 1834-1837
36. Vieillard-Baron A, Augarde R, Prin S, et al. Influence of superior vena caval zone condition on cyclic changes in right ventricular outflow during respiratory support. Anesthesiology 2001; 95: 1083-1088
37. Vieillard-Baron A, Chergui K, Rabiller A, et al. Superior vena caval collapsibility as a gauge of volume status in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30: 1734-1739
38. Slama M, Masson H, Teboul J-L, et al. Respiratory variations of aortic VTI: a new index of hypovolemia and fluid responsiveness. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2002; 283: H1729-H1733
39. Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D, et al. Esophageal Doppler monitoring predicts fluid responsiveness in critically ill ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 1195-1201
40. Monnet X, Richard C, Teboul JL. Passive leg raising. Intensive Care Med Annu Updat 2007; 2007: 542-548
41. Monnet X, Teboul J-L Passive leg raising: five rules, not a drop of fluid! Crit Care 2015 19 1-3
42. Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D, et al. Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 2006; 34: 1402-1407
43. Cavallaro F, Sandroni C, Marano C, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of passive leg raising for prediction of fluid responsiveness in adults: systematic review and meta-Analysis of clinical studies. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36: 1475-1483
44. Mahjoub Y, Touzeau J, Airapetian N, et al. The passive leg-raising maneuver cannot accurately predict fluid responsiveness in patients with intra-Abdominal hypertension. Crit Care Med 2010; 38: 1824-1829
45. Monge García MI, Guijo Gonźalez P, Gracia Romero M, et al. Effects of fluid administration on arterial load in septic shock patients. Intensive Care Med 2015; 41: 1247-1255
46. Monge García MI, Gil Cano A, Gracia Romero M. Dynamic arterial elastance to predict arterial pressure response to volume loading in preload-dependent patients. Crit Care 2011; 15: R15
47. Monge García MI, Romero MG, Cano AG, et al. Dynamic arterial elastance as a predictor of arterial pressure response to fluid administration: a validation study. Crit Care 2014; 18: 1-11
48. Cecconi M, Monge García MI, Gracia Romero M, et al. The use of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in spontaneously breathing patients to assess dynamic arterial elastance and to predict arterial pressure response to fluid administration. Anesth Analg 2015; 120: 76-84
49. Ince C. The microcirculation is the motor of sepsis. Crit Care 2005; 9 (Suppl 4): S13-S19
50. De Backer D, Creteur J, Dubois M-J, et al. The effects of dobutamine on microcirculatory alterations in patients with septic shock are independent of its systemic effects. Crit Care Med 2006; 34: 403-408
51. Dubin A, Pozo MO, Casabella CA, et al. Increasing arterial blood pressure with norepinephrine does not improve microcirculatory blood flow: a prospective study. Crit Care 2009; 13: R92
52. Jhanji S, Stirling S, Patel N, et al. The effect of increasing doses of norepinephrine on tissue oxygenation and microvascular flow in patients with septic shock. Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 1961-1966
53. De Backer D, Donadello K, Taccone FS, et al. Microcirculatory alterations: potential mechanisms and implications for therapy. Ann Intensive Care 2011; 1: 27
54. De Backer D, Ortiz JA, Salgado D. Coupling microcirculation to systemic hemodynamics. Curr Opin Crit Care 2010; 16: 250-254
55. Donati A, Domizi R, Damiani E, et al. From macrohemodynamic to the microcirculation. Crit Care Res Pract 2013; 2013: 892710
56. Donati A, Tibboel D, Ince C. Towards integrative physiological monitoring of the critically ill: from cardiovascular to microcirculatory and cellular function monitoring at the bedside. Crit Care 2013; 17 (Suppl 1): S5
57. Pranskunas A, Koopmans M, Koetsier PM, et al. Microcirculatory blood flow as a tool to select ICU patients eligible for fluid therapy. Intensive Care Med 2013; 39: 612-619
58. Edul V, Ince C, Navarro N, et al. Dissociation between sublingual and gut microcirculation in the response to a fluid challenge in postoperative patients with abdominal sepsis. Ann Intensive Care 2014; 4: 39