Dynamic arterial elastance as a predictor of arterial pressure response to fluid administration: A validation study

Critical Care

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2014, Pages

  García, Manuel I M ^a,b   Romero, Manuel G ^a   Cano, Anselmo G ^a   Aya, Hollmann D ^b   Rhodes, Andrew ^b   Grounds, Robert M ^b   Cecconi, Maurizio ^b  

^a HOSPITAL DE JEREZ   (Spain)

^b ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ADULT; ARTERY COMPLIANCE; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEART PRELOAD; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; ISCHEMIA; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE PRESSURE; VALIDATION STUDY; VENTILATED PATIENT; AGED; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; FLUID THERAPY; HEART OUTPUT; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TRENDS;

AGED; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CARDIAC OUTPUT; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; STROKE VOLUME;

EID: 84927702945     PISSN: 13648535     EISSN: 1466609X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-014-0626-6     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Vincent JL, De Backer D. Circulatory shock. N Engl J Med 2013, 369:1726-1734. 10.1056/NEJMra1208943, 24171518.
2. Pinsky MR. Both perfusion pressure and flow are essential for adequate resuscitation. Sepsis 2000, 4:143-146. 10.1023/A:1011406921372.
3. LeDoux D, Astiz ME, Carpati CM, Rackow EC. Effects of perfusion pressure on tissue perfusion in septic shock. Crit Care Med 2000, 28:2729-2732. 10.1097/00003246-200008000-00007, 10966242.
4. Antonelli M, Levy M, Andrews PJ, Chastre J, Hudson LD, Manthous C, Meduri GU, Moreno RP, Putensen C, Stewart T, Torres A. Hemodynamic monitoring in shock and implications for management. International Consensus Conference, Paris, France, 27-28 April 2006. Intensive Care Med 2007, 33:575-590. 10.1007/s00134-007-0531-4, 17285286.
5. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, Bion J, Parker MM, Jaeschke R, Reinhart K, Angus DC, Brun-Buisson C, Beale R, Calandra T, Dhainaut JF, Gerlach H, Harvey M, Marini JJ, Marshall J, Ranieri M, Ramsay G, Sevransky J, Thompson BT, Townsend S, Vender JS, Zimmerman JL, Vincent JL. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Intensive Care Med 2008, 34:17-60. 10.1007/s00134-007-0934-2, 18058085.
6. Ochagavía A, Baigorri F, Mesquida J, Ayuela JM, Ferrándiz A, García X, Monge MI, Mateu L, Sabatier C, Clau-Terré F, Vicho R, Zapata L, Maynar J, Gil A. [Hemodynamic monitoring in the critically patient: recommendations of the Cardiological Intensive Care and CPR Working Group of the Spanish Society of Intensive Care and Coronary Units] [Article in Spanish]. Med Intensiva 2014, 38:154-169. 10.1016/j.medin.2013.10.006, 24296336.
7. Nichols WW, O'Rourke M: The nature of flow of a liquid. In McDonald's Blood Flow in Arteries: Theoretical, Experimental and Clinical Principles. 5th edition. Edited by Nichols WW, O'Rourke M. London: Oxford University Press; 2005:11-48..
8. Pierrakos C, Velissaris D, Scolletta S, Heenen S, De Backer D, Vincent JL. Can changes in arterial pressure be used to detect changes in cardiac index during fluid challenge in patients with septic shock?. Intensive Care Med 2012, 38:422-428. 10.1007/s00134-011-2457-0, 22278593.
9. Dufour N, Chemla D, Teboul JL, Monnet X, Richard C, Osman D. Changes in pulse pressure following fluid loading: a comparison between aortic root (non-invasive tonometry) and femoral artery (invasive recordings). Intensive Care Med 2011, 37:942-949. 10.1007/s00134-011-2154-z, 21380524.
10. Lakhal K, Ehrmann S, Perrotin D, Wolff M, Boulain T. Fluid challenge: tracking changes in cardiac output with blood pressure monitoring (invasive or non-invasive). Intensive Care Med 2013, 39:1953-1962. 10.1007/s00134-013-3086-6, 24061631.
11. Monnet X, Letierce A, Hamzaoui O, Chemla D, Anguel N, Osman D, Richard C, Teboul JL. Arterial pressure allows monitoring the changes in cardiac output induced by volume expansion but not by norepinephrine. Crit Care Med 2011, 39:1394-1399. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31820edcf0, 21336124.
12. Le Manach Y, Hofer CK, Lehot JJ, Vallet B, Goarin JP, Tavernier B, Cannesson M. Can changes in arterial pressure be used to detect changes in cardiac output during volume expansion in the perioperative period?. Anesthesiology 2012, 117:1165-1174. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318275561d, 23135262.
13. Monge García MI, Gil Cano A, Gracia Romero M. Dynamic arterial elastance to predict arterial pressure response to volume loading in preload-dependent patients. Crit Care 2011, 15:R15. 10.1186/cc9420, 21226909.
14. Pinsky MR: Protocolized cardiovascular management based on ventricular-arterial coupling. In Functional Hemodynamic Monitoring. Edited by Pinsky MR, Payen D. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2006:381-395..
15. Sunagawa K, Maughan WL, Burkhoff D, Sagawa K. Left ventricular interaction with arterial load studied in isolated canine ventricle. Am J Physiol 1983, 245:H773-H780. 6638199.
16. Pinsky MR. Defining the boundaries of bedside pulse contour analysis: dynamic arterial elastance. Crit Care 2011, 15:120. 10.1186/cc9986, 21345250.
17. Monnet X, Teboul JL. Assessment of volume responsiveness during mechanical ventilation: recent advances. Crit Care 2013, 17:217. 23510457.
18. Chemla D, Hébert JL, Coirault C, Zamani K, Suard I, Colin P, Lecarpentier Y. Total arterial compliance estimated by stroke volume-to-aortic pulse pressure ratio in humans. Am J Physiol 1998, 274:H500-H505. 9486253.
19. Kelly RP, Ting CT, Yang TM, Liu CP, Maughan WL, Chang MS, Kass DA. Effective arterial elastance as index of arterial vascular load in humans. Circulation 1992, 86:513-521. 10.1161/01.CIR.86.2.513, 1638719.
20. Segers P, Stergiopulos N, Westerhof N. Relation of effective arterial elastance to arterial system properties. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2002, 282:H1041-H1046. 11834502.
21. Pinsky MR: Functional hemodynamic monitoring: applied physiology at the bedside. In Yearbook of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine. Edited by Vincent JL. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2002:534-551..
22. Michard F, Teboul JL. Using heart-lung interactions to assess fluid responsiveness during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care 2000, 4:282-289. 10.1186/cc710, 11094507.
23. Guarracino F, Baldassarri R, Pinsky MR. Ventriculo-arterial decoupling in acutely altered hemodynamic states. Crit Care 2013, 17:213. 10.1186/cc12522, 23510336.
24. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988, 44:837-845. 10.2307/2531595, 3203132.
25. Ray P, Le Manach Y, Riou B, Houle TT. Statistical evaluation of a biomarker. Anesthesiology 2010, 112:1023-1040. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181d47604, 20234303.
26. Cannesson M, Le Manach Y, Hofer CK, Goarin JP, Lehot JJ, Vallet B, Tavernier B. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a " gray zone" approach. Anesthesiology 2011, 115:231-241. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318225b80a, 21705869.
27. MedCalc Statistical Software, MedCalc Software bvba, Ostend, Belgium; 2014. [http://www.medcalc.org].
28. Lamia B, Chemla D, Richard C, Teboul JL. Clinical review: interpretation of arterial pressure wave in shock states. Crit Care 2005, 9:601-606. 10.1186/cc3891, 16356245.
29. Nichols WW, O'Rourke M. McDonald's Blood Flow in Arteries: Theoretical, Experimental and Clinical principles 2005, Oxford University Press, London, 5.
30. Beck V, Chateau D, Bryson GL, Pisipati A, Zanotti S, Parrillo JE, Kumar A. Timing of vasopressor initiation and mortality in septic shock: a cohort study. Crit Care 2014, 18:R97. 10.1186/cc13868, 24887489.
31. Garcia X, Pinsky MR. Clinical applicability of functional hemodynamic monitoring. Ann Intensive Care 2011, 1:35. 10.1186/2110-5820-1-35, 21906267.
32. Pinsky MR. Heart lung interactions during mechanical ventilation. Curr Opin Crit Care 2012, 18:256-260. 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283532b73, 22473256.
33. Nichols WW, O'Rourke M: Contours of pressure and flow waves in arteries. In McDonald's Blood Flow in Arteries: Theoretical, Experimental and Clinical principles. 5th edition. Edited by Nichols WW, O'Rourke M. London: Oxford University Press; 2005:165-191..
34. Peyton PJ, Chong SW. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. Anesthesiology 2010, 113:1220-1235. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181ee3130, 20881596.
35. Monnet X, Chemla D, Osman D, Anguel N, Richard C, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL. Measuring aortic diameter improves accuracy of esophageal Doppler in assessing fluid responsiveness. Crit Care Med 2007, 35:477-482. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000254725.35802.17, 17204996.
36. Gunn SR, Kim HK, Harrigan PW, Pinsky MR. Ability of pulse contour and esophageal Doppler to estimate rapid changes in stroke volume. Intensive Care Med 2006, 32:1537-1546. 10.1007/s00134-006-0284-5, 16874496.
37. Marquez J, McCurry K, Severyn DA, Pinsky MR. Ability of pulse power, esophageal Doppler, and arterial pulse pressure to estimate rapid changes in stroke volume in humans. Crit Care Med 2008, 36:3001-3007. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31818b31f0, 18824912.
38. Guinot PG, de Broca B, Abou Arab O, Diouf M, Badoux L, Bernard E, Lorne E, Dupont H. Ability of stroke volume variation measured by oesophageal Doppler monitoring to predict fluid responsiveness during surgery. Br J Anaesth 2013, 110:28-33. 10.1093/bja/aes301, 22918700.
39. Guinot PG, de Broca B, Bernard E, Abou Arab O, Lorne E, Dupont H. Respiratory stroke volume variation assessed by oesophageal Doppler monitoring predicts fluid responsiveness during laparoscopy. Br J Anaesth 2014, 112:660-664. 10.1093/bja/aet430, 24366723.
40. Monge Garcia MI, Gracia Romero M, Gil Cano A, Rhodes A, Grounds RM, Cecconi M. Impact of arterial load on the agreement between pulse pressure analysis and esophageal Doppler. Crit Care 2013, 17:R113. 10.1186/cc12785, 23787086.
41. Vos JJ, Kalmar AF, Struys MM, Wietasch JK, Hendriks HG, Scheeren TW. Comparison of arterial pressure and plethysmographic waveform-based dynamic preload variables in assessing fluid responsiveness and dynamic arterial tone in patients undergoing major hepatic resection. Br J Anaesth 2013, 110:940-946. 10.1093/bja/aes508, 23348202.