Does pulse pressure variation predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Critical Care

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2014, Pages

  Yang, Xiaobo ^a   Du, Bin ^a  

^a PEKING UNION MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HETASTARCH;

ARTICLE; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FLUID RESUSCITATION; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HEART OUTPUT; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; PREDICTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETER; PULSE PRESSURE VARIATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; THORAX PRESSURE; TIDAL VOLUME; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; TREATMENT RESPONSE; VENTILATED PATIENT; BLOOD PRESSURE; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); CRITICAL ILLNESS; FLUID THERAPY; HEMODYNAMICS; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TRENDS;

BLOOD PRESSURE; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; CRITICAL ILLNESS; FLUID THERAPY; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; TIDAL VOLUME;

EID: 84925378129     PISSN: 13648535     EISSN: 1466609X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-014-0650-6     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Marik PE, Monnet X, Teboul JL. Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy. Ann Intensive Care 2011, 1:1. 10.1186/2110-5820-1-1, 21906322.
2. Sakr Y, Vincent JL, Reinhart K, Groeneveld J, Michalopoulos A, Sprung CL, Artigas A, Ranieri VM. High tidal volume and positive fluid balance are associated with worse outcome in acute lung injury. Chest 2005, 128:3098-3108. 10.1378/chest.128.5.3098, 16304249.
3. Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 2006, 354:2564-2575. 10.1056/NEJMoa062200.
4. Murphy CV, Schramm GE, Doherty JA, Reichley RM, Gajic O, Afessa B, Micek ST, Kollef MH. The importance of fluid management in acute lung injury secondary to septic shock. Chest 2009, 136:102-109. 10.1378/chest.08-2706, 19318675.
5. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, Ressler J, Muzzin A, Knoblich B, Peterson E, Tomlanovich M. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001, 345:1368-1377. 10.1056/NEJMoa010307, 11794169.
6. Pearse RM, Harrison DA, MacDonald N, Gillies MA, Blunt M, Ackland G, Grocott MP, Ahern A, Griggs K, Scott R, Hinds C, Rowan K, Group OS. Effect of a perioperative, cardiac output-guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm on outcomes following major gastrointestinal surgery: a randomized clinical trial and systematic review. JAMA 2014, 311:2181-2190. 10.1001/jama.2014.5305, 24842135.
7. Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002, 121:2000-2008. 10.1378/chest.121.6.2000, 12065368.
8. Vincent JL, Weil MH. Fluid challenge revisited. Crit Care Med 2006, 34:1333-1337. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000214677.76535.A5, 16557164.
9. Marik PE. Techniques for assessment of intravascular volume in critically ill patients. J Intensive Care Med 2009, 24:329-337. 10.1177/0885066609340640, 19648183.
10. Umbrello M, Formenti P, Galimberti A, Curti M, Zaniboni M, Iapichino G. On-line measurement of systolic pressure variation and pulse pressure variation on a multiparametric monitor. Intensive Care Med 2008, 34:386-387. 10.1007/s00134-007-0913-7, 17960363.
11. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 2009, 37:2642-2647. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a590da, 19602972.
12. EMBASE []., http://www.embase.com/
13. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, Leeflang MM, Sterne JA, Bossuyt PM. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 2011, 155:529-536. 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009, 22007046.
14. Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003, 3:25-28. 10.1186/1471-2288-3-25, 14606960.
15. Whiting P, Harbord R, Kleijnen J. No role for quality scores in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005, 5:19. 10.1186/1471-2288-5-19, 15918898.
16. Riley RD, Abrams KR, Lambert PC, Sutton AJ, Thompson JR. An evaluation of bivariate random-effects meta-analysis for the joint synthesis of two correlated outcomes. Stat Med 2007, 26:78-97. 10.1002/sim.2524, 16526010.
17. Riley RD, Abrams KR, Sutton AJ, Lambert PC, Thompson JR. Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis and the estimation of between-study correlation. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007, 7:3. 10.1186/1471-2288-7-3, 17222330.
18. Riley RD, Thompson JR, Abrams KR. An alternative model for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis when the within-study correlations are unknown. Biostatistics 2008, 9:172-186. 10.1093/biostatistics/kxm023, 17626226.
19. Dahabreh IJ, Trikalinos TA, Lau J, Schmid C: An Empirical Assessment of Bivariate Methods for Meta-analysis of Test Accuracy. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012. []., http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK115736/
20. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysis. BMJ 2003, 327:557-560. 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557, 12958120.
21. Moses LE, Shapiro D, Littenberg B. Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: data-analytic approaches and some additional considerations. Stat Med 1993, 12:1293-1316. 10.1002/sim.4780121403, 8210827.
22. Deeks JJ, Macaskill P, Irwig L. The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. J Clin Epidemiol 2005, 58:882-893. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.016, 16085191.
23. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, Anguel N, Mercat A, Lecarpentier Y, Richard C, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000, 162:134-138. 10.1164/ajrccm.162.1.9903035, 10903232.
24. Kramer A, Zygun D, Hawes H, Easton P, Ferland A. Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness following coronary artery bypass surgery. Chest 2004, 126:1563-1568. 10.1378/chest.126.5.1563, 15539728.
25. Feissel M, Badie J, Merlani PG, Faller JP, Bendjelid K. Pre-ejection period variations predict the fluid responsiveness of septic ventilated patients. Crit Care Med 2005, 33:2534-2539. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000186415.43713.2F, 16276164.
26. Charron C, Fessenmeyer C, Cosson C, Mazoit JX, Hebert JL, Benhamou D, Edouard AR. The influence of tidal volume on the dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients. Anesth Analg 2006, 102:1511-1517. 10.1213/01.ane.0000209015.21418.f4, 16632835.
27. Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D, Anguel N, Richard C, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL. Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 2006, 34:1402-1407. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000215453.11735.06, 16540963.
28. Feissel M, Teboul JL, Merlani P, Badie J, Faller JP, Bendjelid K. Plethysmographic dynamic indices predict fluid responsiveness in septic ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 2007, 33:993-999. 10.1007/s00134-007-0602-6, 17393139.
29. Wyffels PAH, Durnez PJ, Helderweirt J, Stockman WM, De Kegel D. Ventilation-induced plethysmographic variations predict fluid responsiveness in ventilated postoperative cardiac surgery patients. Anesth Analg 2007, 105:448-452. 10.1213/01.ane.0000267520.16003.17, 17646504.
30. Auler JO, Galas F, Hajjar L, Santos L, Carvalho T, Michard F. Online monitoring of pulse pressure variation to guide fluid therapy after cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 2008, 106:1201-1206. 10.1213/01.ane.0000287664.03547.c6, 18349193.
31. Monge Garcia MI, Gil Cano A, Diaz Monrové JC. Brachial artery peak velocity variation to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care 2009, 13:R142. 10.1186/cc8027, 19728876.
32. Vistisen ST, Struijk JJ, Larsson A. Automated pre-ejection period variation indexed to tidal volume predicts fluid responsiveness after cardiac surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009, 53:534-542. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01893.x, 19239409.
33. Loupec T, Nanadoumgar H, Frasca D, Petitpas F, Laksiri L, Baudouin D, Debaene B, Dahyot-Fizelier C, Mimoz O. Pleth variability index predicts fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2011, 39:294-299. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181ffde1c, 21057311.
34. Biais M, Cottenceau V, Stecken L, Jean M, Ottolenghi L, Roullet S, Quinart A, Sztark F. Evaluation of stroke volume variations obtained with the pressure recording analytic method. Crit Care Med 2012, 40:1186-1191. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31823bc632, 22425817.
35. Cecconi M, Monti G, Hamilton MA, Puntis M, Dawson D, Tuccillo ML, Della Rocca G, Grounds RM, Rhodes A. Efficacy of functional hemodynamic parameters in predicting fluid responsiveness with pulse power analysis in surgical patients. Minerva Anestesiol 2012, 78:527-533. 22534733.
36. Fellahi JL, Fischer MO, Rebet O, Massetti M, Gérard JL, Hanouz JL. A comparison of endotracheal bioimpedance cardiography and transpulmonary thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2012, 26:217-222. 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.06.023, 21880510.
37. Khwannimit B, Bhurayanontachai R. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: comparing stroke volume variation by FloTrac/Vigileo and automated pulse pressure variation. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2012, 29:64-69. 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834b7d82, 21946822.
38. Monnet X, Bleibtreu A, Ferre A, Dres M, Gharbi R, Richard C, Teboul JL. Passive leg-raising and end-expiratory occlusion tests perform better than pulse pressure variation in patients with low respiratory system compliance. Crit Care Med 2012, 40:152-157. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31822f08d7, 21926581.
39. Monnet X, Dres M, Ferre A, Le Teuff G, Jozwiak M, Bleibtreu A, Le Deley MC, Chemla D, Richard C, Teboul JL. Prediction of fluid responsiveness by a continuous non-invasive assessment of arterial pressure in critically ill patients: comparison with four other dynamic indices. Br J Anaesth 2012, 109:330-338. 10.1093/bja/aes182, 22735299.
40. Yazigi A, Khoury E, Hlais S, Madi-Jebara S, Haddad F, Hayek G, Jabbour K. Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness in elderly patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2012, 26:387-390. 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.09.014, 22100211.
41. Fischer MO, Coucoravas J, Truong J, Zhu L, Gérard JL, Hanouz JL, Fellahi JL. Assessment of changes in cardiac index and fluid responsiveness: a comparison of Nexfin and transpulmonary thermodilution. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2013, 57:704-712. 10.1111/aas.12108, 23521161.
42. Fischer MO, Pelissier A, Bohadana D, Gérard JL, Hanouz JL, Fellahi JL. Prediction of responsiveness to an intravenous fluid challenge in patients after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a comparison between arterial pulse pressure variation and digital plethysmographic variability index. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2013, 27:1087-1093. 10.1053/j.jvca.2013.02.024, 23992654.
43. Ishihara H, Hashiba E, Okawa H, Saito J, Kasai T, Tsubo T. Neither dynamic, static, nor volumetric variables can accurately predict fluid responsiveness early after abdominothoracic esophagectomy. Perioper Med (Lond) 2013, 2:3. 10.1186/2047-0525-2-3.
44. Monnet X, Guérin L, Jozwiak M, Bataille A, Julien F, Richard C, Teboul JL. Pleth variability index in a weak predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients receiving norepinephrine. Br J Anaesth 2013, 110:207-213. 10.1093/bja/aes373, 23103777.
45. Hong JQ, He HF, Chen ZY, Du ZS, Liu WF, Weng PQ, Huang HB. Comparison of stroke volume variation with pulse pressure variation as a diagnostic indicator of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. Saudi Med J 2014, 35:261-268. 24623206.
46. Rex S, Schälte G, Schroth S, de Waal EE, Metzelder S, Overbeck Y, Rossaint R, Buhre W. Limitations of arterial pulse pressure variation and left ventricular stroke volume variation in estimating cardiac pre-load during open heart surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007, 51:1258-1267. 17714575.
47. Wiesenack C, Fiegl C, Keyser A, Prasser C, Keyl C. Assessment of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated cardiac surgical patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2005, 22:658-665. 10.1017/S0265021505001092, 16163911.
48. Nordstrom J, Hallsjo-Sander C, Shore R, Bjorne H. Stroke volume optimization in elective bowel surgery: a comparison between pulse power wave analysis (LiDCOrapid) and oesophageal Doppler (CardioQ). Br J Anaesth 2013, 110:374-380. 10.1093/bja/aes399, 23171725.
49. Michard F, Chemla D, Richard C, Wysocki M, Pinsky MR, Lecarpentier Y, Teboul JL. Clinical use of respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure to monitor the hemodynamic effects of PEEP. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999, 159:935-939. 10.1164/ajrccm.159.3.9805077, 10051276.
50. Bendjelid K, Suter PM, Romand JA. The respiratory change in preejection period: a new method to predict fluid responsiveness. J Appl Physiol 2004, 96:37-342.
51. De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, Koch M, Vincent JL. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 2005, 31:517-523. 10.1007/s00134-005-2586-4, 15754196.
52. Vallee F, Richard JCM, Mari A, Gallas T, Arsac E, Verlaan PS, Chousterman B, Samii K, Genestal M, Fourcade O. Pulse pressure variations adjusted by alveolar driving pressure to assess fluid responsiveness. Intensive Care Med 2009, 35:1004-1010. 10.1007/s00134-009-1478-4, 19347330.
53. Wyler von Ballmoos M, Takala J, Roeck M, Porta F, Tueller D, Ganter CC, Schroder R, Bracht H, Baenziger B, Jakob SM: Pulse-pressure variation and hemodynamic response in patients with elevated pulmonary artery pressure: a clinical study. Crit Care 2010, 14:R111.
54. Pestana D, Espinosa E, Eden A, Najera D, Collar L, Aldecoa C, Higuera E, Escribano S, Bystritski D, Pascual J, Fernandez-Garijo P, de Prada B, Muriel A, Pizov R. Perioperative goal-directed hemodynamic optimization using noninvasive cardiac output monitoring in major abdominal surgery: a prospective, randomized, multicenter, pragmatic trial: POEMAS Study (PeriOperative goal-directed thErapy in Major Abdominal Surgery). Anesth Analg 2014, 119:579-587. 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000295, 25010820.
55. Antonelli M, Levy M, Andrews PJ, Chastre J, Hudson LD, Manthous C, Meduri GU, Moreno RP, Putensen C, Stewart T, Torres A. Hemodynamic monitoring in shock and implications for management. International Consensus Conference, Paris, France, 27-28 April 2006. Intensive Care Med 2007, 33:575-590. 10.1007/s00134-007-0531-4, 17285286.
56. Parker MM. Goals for fluid resuscitation: a real challenge. Crit Care Med 2007, 35:295-296. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000251846.58645.5A, 17197770.
57. Deville WL, Buntinx F, Bouter LM, Montori VM, de Vet HC, van der Windt DA, Bezemer PD. Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines. BMC Med Res Methodol 2002, 2:9. 10.1186/1471-2288-2-9, 12097142.
58. Oliveira-Costa CD, Friedman G, Vieira SR, Fialkow L. Pulse pressure variation and prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients ventilated with low tidal volumes. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2012, 67:773-778. 10.6061/clinics/2012(07)12.
59. Lakhal K, Ehrmann S, Benzekri-Lefevre D, Runge I, Legras A, Dequin P, Mercier E, Wolff M, Regnier B, Boulain T. Respiratory pulse pressure variation fails to predict fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care 2011, 15:R85. 10.1186/cc10083, 21385348.
60. Muller L, Louart G, Bousquet PJ, Candela D, Zoric L, de La Coussaye JE, Jaber S, Lefrant JY. The influence of the airway driving pressure on pulsed pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness. Intensive Care Med 2010, 36:496-503. 10.1007/s00134-009-1686-y, 19847400.
61. Muller L, Toumi M, Bousquet PJ, Riu-Poulenc B, Louart G, Candela D, Zoric L, Suehs C, De La Coussaye JE, Molinari N, Lefrant JY. An increase in aortic blood flow after an infusion of 100 ml colloid over 1 minute can predict fluid responsiveness: the mini-fluid challenge study. Anesthesiology 2011, 115:541-547. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318229a500, 21792056.
62. Lansdorp B, Lemson J, Van Putten MJAM, De Keijzer A, Van Der Hoeven JG, Pickkers P. Dynamic indices do not predict volume responsiveness in routine clinical practice. Br J Anaesth 2012, 108:395-401. 10.1093/bja/aer411, 22185905.
63. Guinot PG, Zogheib E, Detave M, Moubarak M, Hubert V, Badoux L, Bernard E, Besserve P, Caus T, Dupont H. Passive leg raising can predict fluid responsiveness in patients placed on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care 2011, 15:R216. 10.1186/cc10451, 21923944.
64. Friedman GF, Costa CD, Vieira SR, Fialkow L. The value of pulse pressure variation to predict volume response in patients ventilated with low VT. Crit Care 2010, 14:S41. 10.1186/cc8348.
65. Huang CC, Fu JY, Hu HC, Kao KC, Chen NH, Hsieh MJ, Tsai YH. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure. Crit Care Med 2008, 36:2810-2816. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318186b74e, 18766099.
66. Freitas FGR, Bafi AT, Nascente APM, Assuncao M, Mazza B, Azevedo LCP, Machado FR, Mahajan RP. Predictive value of pulse pressure variation for fluid responsiveness in septic patients using lung-protective ventilation strategies. Br J Anaesth 2012, 110:402-408. 10.1093/bja/aes398, 23161359.
67. Mahjoub Y, Lejeune V, Muller L, Perbet S, Zieleskiewicz L, Bart F, Veber B, Paugam-Burtz C, Jaber S, Ayham A, Zogheib E, Lasocki S, Vieillard-Baron A, Quintard H, Joannes-Boyau O, Plantefeve G, Montravers P, Duperret S, Lakhdari M, Ammenouche N, Lorne E, Slama M, Dupont H. Evaluation of pulse pressure variation validity criteria in critically ill patients: a prospective observational multicentre point-prevalence study. Br J Anaesth 2014, 112:681-685. 10.1093/bja/aet442, 24374504.
68. Teboul JL, Monnet X. Pulse pressure variation and ARDS. Minerva Anestesiol 2013, 79:398-407. 23370121.