Evaluation of pulse pressure variation validity criteria in critically ill patients: A prospective observational multicentre point-prevalence study

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 112, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 681-685

  Mahjoub, Y ^a   Lejeune, V ^a   Muller, L ^c   Perbet, S ^d   Zieleskiewicz, L ^e   Bart, F ^f   Veber, B ^g   Paugam Burtz, C ^h   Jaber, S ⁱ   Ayham, A ^j   Zogheib, E ^b   Lasocki, S ^k   Vieillard Baron, A ^l   Quintard, H ^m   Joannes Boyau, O ⁿ   Plantefeve G ^o   Montravers, P ^p   Duperret, S ^q   Lakhdari, M ^r   Ammenouche, N ^a   Lorne, E ^a   Slama, M ^b   Dupont, H ^a   more..

^a Intensive Care Unit Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine   (France)

^b AMIENS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^c NÎMES UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF CLERMONT FERRAND   (France)

^e AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^f HÔPITAL LARIBOISIÈRE   (France)

^g ROUEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^h BEAUJON HOSPITAL   (France)

ⁱ HÔPITAL SAINT ELOI   (France)

^j Saint Quentin General Hospital   (France)

^k ANGERS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^l HÔPITAL AMBROISE PARÉ   (France)

^m UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NICE   (France)

ⁿ BORDEAUX UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^o CENTRE HOSPITALIER VICTOR DUPOUY   (France)

^p BICHAT HOSPITAL   (France)

^q UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^r HÔTEL DIEU   (France)

more..

Author keywords

fluid responsiveness; haemodynamic monitoring; pulse pressure variation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTERIAL LINE; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; BREATHING; BREATHING RATE; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HEART RHYTHM; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; POINT PREVALENCE STUDY; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PULSE PRESSURE; RESPIRATORY SYSTEM; SIMPLIFIED ACUTE PHYSIOLOGY SCORE; TIDAL VOLUME; VALIDITY;

FLUID RESPONSIVENESS; HAEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; PULSE PRESSURE VARIATION;

BLOOD PRESSURE; CRITICAL ILLNESS; FLUID THERAPY; HEART RATE; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; PREVALENCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; RESPIRATORY RATE; TIDAL VOLUME; TRICUSPID VALVE;

EID: 84896993231     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: 14716771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aet442     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Task Force of the American College of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Critical Care Medicine. Practice parameters for hemodynamic support of sepsis in adult patients in sepsis. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 639-60
2. Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: A critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2001; 121: 2000-8
3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network, Wiedemann HP, WheelerAP, BernardGR, et al.Comparisonof twofluid-management strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl JMed 2006; 354: 2564-75
4. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, et al. Relation between respiratory changesin arterial pulse pressure andfluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 134-8
5. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: A systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 2642-7
6. Cannesson M, DesebbeO, PiriouV, Lehot JJ.Automatic andcontinuous monitoring of preload dependence in the perioperative period: Interests and limits. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2010; 29: 452-63
7. De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, Koch M, Vincent JL. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: Influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 517-23
8. De Backer D, Taccone FS, Holsten R, Ibrahimi F, Vincent JL. Influence of respiratory rate on stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesthesiology 2009; 110: 1092-7
9. Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D, et al. Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 2006; 34: 1402-7
10. Monnet X, Bleibtreu A, Derre A, et al. Passive leg-raising and end-expiratory occlusion test perform better than pulse pressure variation in patients with low respiratory system compliance. Crit Care Med 2012; 40: 152-7
11. Mahjoub Y, Pila C, Friggeri A, et al. Assessing fluid responsiveness in critically patients: Positive pulse pressure variation is detected by Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of the right ventricle. Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 2570-5
12. Soubrier S, Saulnier F, Hubert H, et al. Can dynamic indicators help the prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing critically ill patients? Intensive Care Med 2009; 33: 1117-24
13. Micharf F, Teboul J-L. Using heart-lung interactions to assess fluid responsiveness during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care 2000; 4: 282-9
14. Lansdorp B, Lemson J, van Putten MJ, et al. Dynamic indices do not predict volume responsiveness in routine clinical practice. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108: 395-401
15. Charron C, Fessenmeyer C, Cosson C, et al. The influence of tidal volumeonthedynamicvariables of fluid responsivenessin critically ill patients. Anesth Analg 2006; 102: 1511-7
16. [No author listed.] Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1301-8
17. Gajic O, Dara SI, Mendez JL, et al. Ventilator associated lung injury in patients without acute lung injury at the onset of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 2004; 32: 1817-24
18. Gajic O, Frutos-Vivar F, Esteban A, Hubmatr RD, Anzueto A. Ventilator settings as a risk factor for acute respiratory distress syndrome in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 922-6
19. Schultz MJ, Haitsma JJ, Slutsky AS, Gajic O. What tidal volume should be used in patients without acute lung injury? Anesthesiology 2007; 106: 1226-31
20. The Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeNetwork.Ventilation with lower tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1301-8
21. Mayo PH, Beaulieu Y, Doelken P, et al. American College of Chest Physician/Lasociété dereánimationdelangue franc'aise statement on competence in critical care ultrasonography. Chest 2009; 135: 1050-60
22. Maguire S, Rinehart J, Vakharia S, Cannesson M. Technical communication: Respiratory variation in pulse pressure and plethysmographic waveforms: Intraoperative applicability in a North American academic center. Anesth Analg 2011; 112: 94-6
23. Vieillard-Baron A, Charron C. Preload responsiveness or right ventricular dysfunction? Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 2662-3
24. McGee S, AbernethyWB III, Simel DL. The rational clinical examination. Is this patient hypovolemic? J Am Med Assoc 1999; 281: 1022-9
25. Stéphan F, Flahault A, Dieudonné N, Hollande J, Paillard F, Bonnet F. Clinical evaluation of circulating blood volume in critically ill patients-contribution of a clinical scoring system. Br J Anaesth 2001; 86: 754-62
26. Lakhal K, Ehrmann S, Benzekri-Lefèvre D, et al. Respiratory pulse pressure variation fails to predict fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care 2011; 15: R85
27. Huang CC, Fu JY, Hu HC, et al. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure. Crit Care Med 2008; 36: 2810-6
28. Muller L, Louart G, Bousquet PJ, et al. The influence of the airway driving pressure on pulsed pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36: 496-503
29. Wiklund CU, Morel DR, Orbring-Wiklund H, et al. Influence of tidal volume on pulse pressure variations in hypovolemic ventilated pigs with acute respiratory distress-like syndrome. Anesthesiology 2010; 11: 630-8
30. Nouira S, Elatrous S, Dimassi S, et al. Effects of norepinephrine on static and dynamic preload indicators in experimental hemorrhagic shock. Crit Care Med 2005; 33: 2339-44
31. Duperret S, Lhuillier F, Piriou V, et al. Increased intra-Abdominal pressure affects respiratory variations in arterial pressure innormovolaemic and hypovolemic mechanically ventilated healthy pigs. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33: 163-71
32. Cannesson M, LeManach Y, Hofer CK, et al. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: A 'gray zone' approach. Anesthesiology 2011; 115: 231-41.