An In Vitro Study of Factors Influencing the Performance of Digital Intraoral Impressions Operating on Active Wavefront Sampling Technology with Multiple Implants in the Edentulous Maxilla

Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 2017, Pages 650-655

  Gimenez Gonzalez, Beatriz ^a   Hassan, Bassam ^a   Özcan, Mutlu ^b   Pradíes, Guillermo ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

accuracy; CAD CAM; dental implants; digital impression; Intraoral scanner

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION; EDENTULOUSNESS; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IN VITRO STUDY; MAXILLA; MOUTH; TOOTH IMPLANT;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IN VITRO TECHNIQUES; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MAXILLA; MOUTH;

EID: 84959299390     PISSN: 1059941X     EISSN: 1532849X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12457     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Sorrentino R, Gherlone EF, Calesini G, et al: Effect of implant angulation, connection lenght and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro comparative study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010;12:63-71
2. Baig MR: Accuracy of impressions of multiple implants in the edentulous arch: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:869-880
3. Papaspyridakos P, Chen CJ, Gallucci GO, et al: Accuracy of implant impressions for partially and completely edentulous patients: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:836-845
4. Wenneberg A, Albrektsson T: Current challenges in successful rehabilitation with oral implants. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38:286-294
5. Burns J, Palmer R, Howe L, et al: Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:250-255
6. Lee H, Ercoli C, Funkenbusch PD, et al: Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:107-113
7. Patzelt SB, Lamprinos C, Stampf S, et al: The time efficiency of intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparative study. J Am Dent Assoc 2014;145:542-551
8. Van Noort R: The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 2012;28:3-12
9. Pradíes G, Ferreiroa A, Özcan M, et al: Using stereophotogrammetric technology for obtaining intraoral digital impressions of implants. J Am Dent Assoc 2014;145:338-344
10. Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Agustín-Panadero R, Bagán L, et al: Impression of multiple implants using photogrammetry: description of technique and case presentation. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2014;9:366-371
11. Ender A, Mehl A: Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. Int J Comput Dent 2013;16:11-21
12. Patzelt SB, Vonau S, Stampf S, et al: Assessing the feasibility and accuracy of digitizing edentulous jaws. J Am Dent Assoc 2013;144:914-920
13. Patzelt SB, Emmanouilidi A, Stampf S, et al: Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:1687-1694
14. Giménez B, Özcan M, Martínez-Rus F, et al: Accuracy of a digital impression system based on parallel confocal laser technology for implants with consideration of operator experience and implant angulation and depth. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:853-862
15. Giménez B, Özcan M, Martínez-Rus F, et al: Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active wavefront sampling technology for implants considering operator experience, implant angulation and depth. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;30: 56-64
16. Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, et al: Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 2010;38:553-559
17. Henkel GL: A comparison of fixed prostheses generated from conventional vs 0digitally scanned dental impressions. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2007;28:422-431
18. Brawek PK, Wolfart S, Endres L, et al: The clinical accuracy of single crowns exclusively fabricated by digital workflow— the comparison of two systems. Clin Oral Invest 2013;17:2119-2125
19. Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wöstmann B: Accuracy of digital and conventional impression technique and workflow. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:1759-1764
20. Boeddinghaus M, Breloer ES, Rehmann P, et al: Accuracy of single-tooth restorations based on intraoral digital and conventional impressions in patients. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:2027-2034
21. Pradíes G, Zarauz C, Valverde A, et al: Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions based on wavefront sampling technology. J Dent 2015;43:201-208
22. Luthardt RG, Loos R, Quaas S, et al: Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression. Int J Comput Dent 2005;8:283-294
23. Güth J-F, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, et al: Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig 2012;17:1202-1208
24. Ender A, Mehl A: Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:121-128
25. Van der Meer WJ, Andriessen FS, Wismeijer D, et al: Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PLoS One 2012;7:e43312
26. Giménez B, Pradíes G, Martínez-Rus F, et al: Accuracy of two digital implant impression systems based on confocal microscopy with variations in customized software and clinical parameters. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015;30: 56-64
27. Papaspyridakos P, Gallucci GO, Chen CJ, et al: Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015 Feb 13. doi: 10.1111/clr.12567. [Epub ahead of print]
28. Moreno A, Giménez B, Ozcan M, et al: A clinical protocol for intraoral digital impression of screw-retained CAD/CAM framework on multiple implants base don wavefront sampling technology. Implant Dent 2013;22:320-325
29. Almeida E Silva JS, Erdelt K, Edelhoff D, et al: Marginal and internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques. Clin Oral Investig 2013;18:515-523
30. Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D, et al: Implant impression techniques for the edentulous jaw: a summary of three studies. J Prosthodont 2015 Jun 1. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12305. [Epub ahead of print]