A clinical protocol for intraoral digital impression of screw-retained CAD/CAM framework on multiple implants based on wavefront sampling technology

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 320-325

  Moreno, Angel ^a   Giménez, Beatriz ^b   Özcan, Mutlu ^c   Pradíes, Guillermo ^b  

^a Bista Eder Private Practice   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

implant framework; intraoral scanner; passive fitdigital dentistry; SLA model; stereolithography

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; DENTAL MATERIAL; TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPLETE LOWER DENTURE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DENTAL ABUTMENT; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTURE; ENDODONTICS; EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; VIDEORECORDING;

ACRYLIC RESINS; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPLANT-ABUTMENT DESIGN; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE DESIGN; DENTURE RETENTION; DENTURE, COMPLETE, LOWER; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; SOFTWARE; TITANIUM; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 84881026847     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3182980fe9     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Chung WE, Rubenstein JE, Phillips KM, et al. Outcomes assessment of patients treated with osseointegrated dental implants at the University of Washington Graduate Prosthodontic Program, 1988 to 2000. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24:927-935
2. Zarb G, Schmitt A. Implant prosthodontic treatment options for edentulous patients. J Oral Rehabil. 1995;22:661-671
3. Zurdo J, Romão C, Wennström JL. Survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed partial dentures with cantilevers: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(suppl 4):59-66
4. Gomes EA, AssunÇão WG, Tabata LF, et al. Effect of passive fit absence in the prosthesis/implant/retaining screw system: A two-dimensional finite element analysis. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20: 2000-2005
5. Jo SH, Kim KI, Seo JM, et al. Effect of impression coping and implant angulation on the accuracy of implant impressions: An in vitro study. J Adv Prosthodont. 2010;2:128-133
6. Lee H, So JS, Hochstedler JL, et al. The accuracy of implant impressions: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;100:285-291
7. Yamamoto E, Marotti J, de Campos TT, et al. Accuracy of four transfer impression techniques for dental implants: A scanning electron microscopic analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25:1115-1124
8. Roos-Janaker AM, Lindahl C, Renvert H, et al. Nine-To-fourteen year follow up of implant treatment. Part II: Presence of peri-implant lesions. J Clin Periodontol. 2006;33:290-292
9. Fransson C, Lekholm U, Jemt T, et al. Prevalence of subjects with progressive bone loss at implants. A 5-20 year retrospective study. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2005;16:440-446
10. Taylor TD, Agar JR, Vogiatzi T. Implant prosthodontics: Current perspective and future directions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:66-75
11. Lee HJ, Lim YJ, Kim CW, et al. Accuracy of a proposed implant impression technique using abutments and metal framework. J Adv Prosthodont. 2010;2:25-31
12. Taylor TD. Prosthodontic problems and limitations associated with osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;79:74-78
13. Karl M, Graef F, Heckmann S, et al. A methodology to study the effects of prosthesis misfit over time: An in vivo model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:689-694
14. Jager K, Wilrz J. Mandibular hybrid dentures with 4 implants. An in vitro stress analysis. Schweiz Monastsschr Zahnmed. 1994;104:1489-1494
15. Tan KB. The clinical significance of distortion in implant prosthodontics: Is there such a thing as passive fit? Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1995;24:138-157
16. Eliasson A, Ortorp A. The accuracy of an implant impression technique using digitally coded healing abutments. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14:30-38
17. Del'Acqua MA, Arioli-Filho JN, Compagnoni MA, et al. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:226-236
18. De la Cruz JE, Funkenbusch PD, Ercoli C, et al. Verification jig for implantsupported prosthesis: A comparison of standard impressions with verification jigs made of different materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88:329-336
19. Ortorp A, Jemt T. Clinical experiences of CNC-milled titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous jaw: 1-year prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2000;2:2-9
20. Ortorp A, Jemt T, Bäck T, et al. Comparisons of precision of fit between cast and CNC-milled titanium implant frameworks for the edentulous mandible. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16:194-200
21. Birnbaum NS, Aaronson HB. Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners: Virtual becomes reality. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2008;29:494-505
22. Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, et al. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent. 2010;38: 553-559
23. Henkel GL. A comparison of fixed prostheses generated from conventional vs digitally scanned dental impressions. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2007;28: 422-424,426-428,430-431
24. Brawek PK, Wolfart S, Endres L, et al. The clinical accuracy of single crowns exclusively fabricated by digital workflowthe comparison of two systems. Clin Oral Investig. In Press
25. Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wöstmann B. Accuracy of digital and conventional impression technique and workflow. Clin Oral investig. In Press
26. Luthardt RG, Loos R, Quaas S. Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression. Int J Comput Dent. 2005;8:283-294
27. Güth J-F, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, et al. Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17:1201-1208
28. Karl M, Shubinski P, Taylor T. Effect of intraoral scanning on the passivity of fit of implant-supported fixed partial prostheses. Quintessence Int. 2012:43: 555-563
29. Mehl A, EnderW, Mörmann W, et al. Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. Int J Comput Dent. 2009;12:11-28
30. Ender A, Melh A. Full arch scans: Conventional versus digital impressionsdAn in-vitro study. Int J Comput Dent. 2011;14: 11-21
31. Van der Meer WJ, Andriessen FS, Wismeijer D, et al. Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PLoS One. 2012;7:e43312
32. Abduo J, Bennani V, Waddell N, et al. Assessing the fit of implant fixed prostheses: A critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25:506-515
33. Yanase R, Binon P, Jemt T, et al. How do you test a cast framework fit for a full-Arch fixed implant-supported prosthesis? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994;9:469-474
34. Howell KJ, McGlumphy EA, Drago C, et al. Comparison of the accuracy of Biomet 3i Encode Robocast Technology and conventional implant impression techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28:228-240
35. Lee SJ, Gallucci GO. Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: Efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2012;22:111-115
36. Karl M, Graef F, Schubinski P, et al. Effect of intraoral scanning on the passivity of fit of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. Quintessence Int. 2012;43: 555-562
37. Lee H, Ercoli C, Finkenbusch PD, et al. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;99:107-113
38. Stimmelmayr M, Erdelt K, Güth JF, et al. Evaluation of impression accuracy for a four-implant mandibular modeldA digital approach. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16: 1137-1142
39. Stimmelmayr M, Güth JF, Erdelt K, et al. Clinical study evaluating the discrepancy of two different impression techniques of four implants in an edentulous jaw. Clin Oral Investig. In Press
40. Filho HG, Mazaro JV, Vedovatoo E, et al. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2dComparison of splinting techniques. J Prosthodont. 2009;18: 172-176
41. Kim S, Nicholls JI, Han CH, et al. Displacement of implant components from impressions to definitive casts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21:747-755
42. Cheng WW, Ju CP, Lin JH. Structure, castability and mechanical properties of commercially pure and alloyed titanium cast in graphite mould. J Oral Rehabil. 2007;34:528-540
43. Oyagüe RC, Turrión AS, Toledano M, et al. In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prosthesis. J Dent. 2009;37:52-58
44. Parel SM. The single-piece milled titanium implant bridge. Dent Today. 2003;22:96-99
45. Mitrani R, Vasilic M, Bruguera A. Fabrication of an implant-supported reconstruction utilizing CAD/CAM technology. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2005;17:71-78
46. Takahashi T, Gunne J. Fit of implant frameworks: An in vitro comparison between two fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:256-260
47. Karl M, Taylor TD. Effect of material selection on the passivity of fit of implant supported restorations created with computer-Aided design/computer-Assisted manufacture. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26:739-745
48. Stimmelmayr M, Güth JF, Erdelt K, et al. Digital evaluation of the reproducibility of implant scanbody fitdAn in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16:851-856