Coupled binding and folding of intrinsically disordered proteins: What can we learn from kinetics?

Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Volumn 36, Issue , 2016, Pages 18-24

  Gianni, Stefano ^a,b   Dogan, Jakob ^c   Jemth, Per ^d  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^d UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTRINSICALLY DISORDERED PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING;

ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; BASAL ASSOCIATION RATE CONSTANT; BINDING AFFINITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REACTION RATE CONSTANT; REVIEW; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; HUMAN; KINETICS; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

ANIMALS; HUMANS; INTRINSICALLY DISORDERED PROTEINS; KINETICS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING;

EID: 84959288285     PISSN: 0959440X     EISSN: 1879033X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2015.11.012     Document Type: Review

References (68)

1. Kriwacki R.W., Hengst L., Tennant L., Reed S.I., Wright P.E. Structural studies of p21Waf1/Cip1/Sdi1 in the free and Cdk2-bound state: conformational disorder mediates binding diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996, 93:11504-11509.
2. Daughdrill G.W., Chadsey M.S., Karlinsey J.E., Hughes K.T., Dahlquist F.W. The C-terminal half of the anti-sigma factor, FlgM, becomes structured when bound to its target, sigma 28. Nat Struct Biol 1997, 4:285-291.
3. Wright P.E., Dyson H.J. Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm. J Mol Biol 1999, 293:321-331.
4. Uversky V.N., Gillespie J.R., Fink A.L. Why are 'natively unfolded' proteins unstructured under physiologic conditions?. Proteins 2000, 41:415-427.
5. Dunker A.K., Lawson J.D., Brown C.J., Williams R.M., Romero P., Oh J.S., Oldfield C.J., Campen A.M., Ratliff C.M., Hipps K.W., et al. Intrinsically disordered protein. J Mol Graph Model 2001, 19:26-59.
6. Uversky V.N. Natively unfolded proteins: a point where biology waits for physics. Protein Sci 2002, 11:739-756.
7. Tompa P. Intrinsically unstructured proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 2002, 27:527-533.
8. Uversky V.N., Dunker A.K. Multiparametric analysis of intrinsically disordered proteins: looking at intrinsic disorder through compound eyes. Anal Chem 2012, 84:2096-2104.
9. Forman-Kay J.D., Mittag T. From sequence and forces to structure, function, and evolution of intrinsically disordered proteins. Structure 2013, 21:1492-1499.
10. Habchi J., Tompa P., Longhi S., Uversky V.N. Introducing protein intrinsic disorder. Chem Rev 2014, 114:6561-6588.
11. Wright P.E., Dyson H.J. Intrinsically disordered proteins in cellular signalling and regulation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2015, 16:18-29.
12. Fisher C.K., Stultz C.M. Constructing ensembles for intrinsically disordered proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2011, 21:426-431.
13. Onitsuka M., Kamikubo H., Yamazaki Y., Kataoka M. Mechanism of induced folding: both folding before binding and binding before folding can be realized in staphylococcal nuclease mutants. Proteins 2008, 72:837-847.
14. Bachmann A., Wildemann D., Praetorius F., Fischer G., Kiefhaber T. Mapping backbone and side-chain interactions in the transition state of a coupled protein folding and binding reaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108:3952-3957.
15. Papadakos G., Sharma A., Lancaster L.E., Bowen R., Kaminska R., Leech A.P., Walker D., Redfield C., Kleanthous C. Consequences of inducing intrinsic disorder in a high-affinity protein-protein interaction. J Am Chem Soc 2015, 137:5252-5255.
16. Janin J., Sternberg M.J.E. Protein flexibility, not disorder, is intrinsic to molecular recognition. F1000 Biol Rep 2013, 5.
17. Uversky V.N., Dunker A.K. The case for intrinsically disordered proteins playing contributory roles in molecular recognition without a stable 3D structure. F1000 Biol Rep 2013, 5.
18. Eigen M., Hammes G.G. Elementary steps in enzyme reactions (as studied by relaxation spectrometry). Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol 1963, 25:1-38.
19. Dumont C., Emilsson T., Gruebele M. Reaching the protein folding speed limit with large, sub-microsecond pressure jumps. Nat Methods 2009, 6:515-519.
20. Shastry M.C., Luck S.D., Roder H. A continuous-flow capillary mixing method to monitor reactions on the microsecond time scale. Biophys J 1998, 74:2714-2721.
21. Schuck P., Zhao H. The role of mass transport limitation and surface heterogeneity in the biophysical characterization of macromolecular binding processes by SPR biosensing. Surface Plasmon Resonance 2010, 15-54. Humana Press. N.J. Mol, M.J.E. Fischer (Eds.).
22. Sugase K., Dyson H.J., Wright P.E. Mechanism of coupled folding and binding of an intrinsically disordered protein. Nature 2007, 447:1021-1025.
23. Dogan J., Gianni S., Jemth P. The binding mechanisms of intrinsically disordered proteins. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2013, 10.1039/c3cp54226b.
24. Demarest S.J., Martinez-Yamout M., Chung J., Chen H., Xu W., Dyson H.J., Evans R.M., Wright P.E. Mutual synergistic folding in recruitment of CBP/p300 by p160 nuclear receptor coactivators. Nature 2002, 415:549-553.
25. Dogan J., Schmidt T., Mu X., Engström Å, Jemth P. Fast association and slow transitions in the interaction between two intrinsically disordered protein domains. J Biol Chem 2012, 287:34316-34324.
26. Dogan J., Mu X., Engström Å., Jemth P. The transition state structure for coupled binding and folding of disordered protein domains. Sci Rep 2013, 3:2076.
27. Gianni S., Morrone A., Giri R., Brunori M. A folding-after-binding mechanism describes the recognition between the transactivation domain of c-Myb and the KIX domain of the CREB-binding protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2012, 428:205-209.
28. Giri R., Morrone A., Toto A., Brunori M., Gianni S. Structure of the transition state for the binding of c-Myb and KIX highlights an unexpected order for a disordered system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013, 110:14942-14947.
29. Shammas S.L., Travis A.J., Clarke J. Remarkably fast coupled folding and binding of the intrinsically disordered transactivation domain of cMyb to CBP KIX. J Phys Chem B 2013, 117:13346-13356.
30. Rogers J.M., Steward A., Clarke J. Folding and binding of an intrinsically disordered protein: fast, but not 'diffusion-limited'. J Am Chem Soc 2013, 135:1415-1422.
31. Rogers J.M., Wong C.T., Clarke J. Coupled folding and binding of the disordered protein PUMA does not require particular residual structure. J Am Chem Soc 2014, 136:5197-5200.
32. Rogers J.M., Oleinikovas V., Shammas S.L., Wong C.T., De Sancho D., Baker C.M., Clarke J. Interplay between partner and ligand facilitates the folding and binding of an intrinsically disordered protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014, 111:15420-15425.
33. Chemes L.B., Sánchez I.E., de Prat-Gay G. Kinetic recognition of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor by a specific protein target. J Mol Biol 2011, 412:267-284.
34. TAIL and X Domains. ACS Chem Biol 2015, 10:795-802.
35. Olson S.T., Srinivasan K.R., Björk I., Shore J.D. Binding of high affinity heparin to antithrombin. III. Stopped flow kinetic studies of the binding interaction. J Biol Chem 1981, 256:11073-11079.
36. Gianni S., Dogan J., Jemth P. Distinguishing induced fit from conformational selection. Biophys Chem 2014, 189C:33-39.
37. Davis C.M., Cooper A.K., Dyer R.B. Fast helix formation in the B domain of protein A revealed by site-specific infrared probes. Biochemistry 2015, 54:1758-1766.
38. Fuxreiter M., Simon I., Friedrich P., Tompa P. Preformed structural elements feature in partner recognition by intrinsically unstructured proteins. J Mol Biol 2004, 338:1015-1026.
39. Iešmantavičius V., Dogan J., Jemth P., Teilum K., Kjaergaard M. Helical propensity in an intrinsically disordered protein accelerates ligand binding. Angew Chem Int Ed 2014, 53:1548-1551.
40. Borcherds W., Theillet F.-X., Katzer A., Finzel A., Mishall K.M., Powell A.T., Wu H., Manieri W., Dieterich C., Selenko P., et al. Disorder and residual helicity alter p53-Mdm2 binding affinity and signaling in cells. Nat Chem Biol 2014, 10:1000-1002.
41. Dogan J., Jemth P. Only kinetics can prove conformational selection. Biophys J 2014, 107:1997-1998.
42. Gibbs E.B., Showalter S.A. Quantitative biophysical characterization of intrinsically disordered proteins. Biochemistry 2015, 54:1314-1326.
43. Schneider R., Maurin D., Communie G., Kragelj J., Hansen D.F., Ruigrok R.W.H., Jensen M.R., Blackledge M. Visualizing the molecular recognition trajectory of an intrinsically disordered protein using multinuclear relaxation dispersion NMR. J Am Chem Soc 2015, 137:1220-1229.
44. Arai M., Sugase K., Dyson H.J., Wright P.E. Conformational propensities of intrinsically disordered proteins influence the mechanism of binding and folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015, 112:9614-9619.
45. Kragelj J., Palencia A., Nanao M.H., Maurin D., Bouvignies G., Blackledge M., Jensen M.R. Structure and dynamics of the MKK7-JNK signaling complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015, 112:3409-3414.
46. Zhou H.-X., Pang X., Lu C. Rate constants and mechanisms of intrinsically disordered proteins binding to structured targets. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2012, 14:10466-10476.
47. Tompa P., Fuxreiter M. Fuzzy complexes: polymorphism and structural disorder in protein-protein interactions. Trends Biochem Sci 2008, 33:2-8.
48. Jemth P., Mu X., EngströmF Å., Dogan J. A frustrated binding interface for intrinsically disordered proteins. J Biol Chem 2014, 289:5528-5533.
49. Bryngelson J.D., Onuchic J.N., Socci N.D., Wolynes P.G. Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: a synthesis. Proteins 1995, 21:167-195.
50. Zhou H.-X. Intrinsic disorder: signaling via highly specific but short-lived association. Trends Biochem Sci 2012, 37:43-48.
51. Dogan J., Jonasson J., Andersson E., Jemth P. Binding rate constants reveal distinct features of disordered protein domains. Biochemistry 2015, 54:4741-4750.
52. Teufel D.P., Freund S.M., Bycroft M., Fersht A.R. Four domains of p300 each bind tightly to a sequence spanning both transactivation subdomains of p53. Proc. Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104:7009-7014.
53. Ferreon J.C., Lee C.W., Arai M., Martinez-Yamout M.A., Dyson H.J., Wright P.E. Cooperative regulation of p53 by modulation of ternary complex formation with CBP/p300 and HDM2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:6591-6596.
54. Haq S.R., Chi C.N., Bach A., Dogan J., Engström Å., Hultqvist G., Karlsson O.A., Lundström P., Montemiglio L.C., Strømgaard K., et al. Side-chain interactions form late and cooperatively in the binding reaction between disordered peptides and PDZ domains. J Am Chem Soc 2012, 134:599-605.
55. Karlsson O.A., Chi C.N., Engström A., Jemth P. The transition state of coupled folding and binding for a flexible β-finger. J Mol Biol 2012, 417:253-261.
56. Hill S.A., Kwa L.G., Shammas S.L., Lee J.C., Clarke J. Mechanism of assembly of the non-covalent spectrin tetramerization domain from intrinsically disordered partners. J Mol Biol 2014, 426:21-35.
57. Hemsath L., Dvorsky R., Fiegen D., Carlier M.-F., Ahmadian M.R. An electrostatic steering mechanism of Cdc42 recognition by Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome proteins. Mol Cell 2005, 20:313-324.
58. Ganguly D., Otieno S., Waddell B., Iconaru L., Kriwacki R.W., Chen J. Electrostatically accelerated coupled binding and folding of intrinsically disordered proteins. J Mol Biol 2012, 422:674-684.
59. Schreiber G., Haran G., Zhou H.-X. Fundamental aspects of protein-protein association kinetics. Chem Rev 2009, 109:839-860.
60. Shammas S.L., Travis A.J., Clarke J. Allostery within a transcription coactivator is predominantly mediated through dissociation rate constants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014, 111:12055-12060.
61. Shoemaker B.A., Portman J.J., Wolynes P.G. Speeding molecular recognition by using the folding funnel: the fly-casting mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000, 97:8868-8873.
62. Ganguly D., Zhang W., Chen J. Electrostatically accelerated encounter and folding for facile recognition of intrinsically disordered proteins. PLoS Comput Biol 2013, 9:e1003363.
63. Wang Y., Chu X., Longhi S., Roche P., Han W., Wang E., Wang J. Multiscaled exploration of coupled folding and binding of an intrinsically disordered molecular recognition element in measles virus nucleoprotein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013, 110:E3743-E3752.
64. Knott M., Best R.B. Discriminating binding mechanisms of an intrinsically disordered protein via a multi-state coarse-grained model. J Chem Phys 2014, 140:175102.
65. Gambin Y., VanDelinder V., Ferreon A.C.M., Lemke E.A., Groisman A., Deniz A.A. Visualizing a one-way protein encounter complex by ultrafast single-molecule mixing. Nat Methods 2011, 8:239-241.
66. König I., Zarrine-Afsar A., Aznauryan M., Soranno A., Wunderlich B., Dingfelder F., Stüber J.C., Plückthun A., Nettels D., Schuler B. Single-molecule spectroscopy of protein conformational dynamics in live eukaryotic cells. Nat Methods 2015, 12:773-779.
67. Demarest S.J., Deechongkit S., Dyson H.J., Evans R.M., Wright P.E. Packing, specificity, and mutability at the binding interface between the p160 coactivator and CREB-binding protein. Protein Sci 2004, 13:203-210.
68. Kjaergaard M., Teilum K., Poulsen F.M. Conformational selection in the molten globule state of the nuclear coactivator binding domain of CBP. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:12535-12540.