Perspectives from the avian phylogenomics project: Questions that can be answered with sequencing all genomes of a vertebrate class

Annual Review of Animal Biosciences

Volumn 4, Issue , 2016, Pages 45-59

  Jarvis, Erich D ^a,b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Algorithms; Avian genomes; B10K; Comparative genomics; Extinction; Species tree; Trait evolution

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ART; BIRD; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; GENOME; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; GENOMICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; TRENDS; VERTEBRATE;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BIRDS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENOME; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; GENOMICS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; PHYLOGENY; VERTEBRATES;

EID: 84959058509     PISSN: 21658102     EISSN: 21658110     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-animal-021815-111216     Document Type: Review

References (79)

1. Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B, Nusbaum C, Zody MC, et al. 2001. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409(6822):860-921
2. Venter JC, Adams MD, Myers EW, Li PW, Mural RJ, et al. 2001. The sequence of the human genome. Science 291(5507):1304-51
3. Okazaki Y, Furuno M, Kasukawa T, Adachi J, Bono H, et al. 2002. Analysis of the mouse transcriptome based on functional annotation of 60,770 full-length cDNAs. Nature 420(6915):563-73
4. Waterston RH, Lindblad-Toh K, Birney E, Rogers J, Abril JF, et al. 2002. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature 420(6915):520-62
5. Int. Chick. Genome Seq. Consort. 2004. Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 432(7018):695-716
6. Warren WC, Clayton DF, Ellegren H, Arnold AP, Hillier LW, et al. 2010. The genome of a songbird. Nature 464(7289):757-62
7. van Dijk EL, Auger H, Jaszczyszyn Y, Thermes C. 2014. Ten years of next-generation sequencing technology. Trends Genet. 30(9):418-26
8. Genome 10K Community Sci. 2009. Genome 10K: a proposal to obtain whole-genome sequence for 10,000 vertebrate species. J. Hered. 100(6):659-74
9. Koepfli KP, Paten B, Genome 10K Community Sci., O'Brien SJ. 2014. The Genome 10K Project: a way forward. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 3:57-111
10. Li R, FanW, Tian G, Zhu H, He L, et al. 2010. The sequence and de novo assembly of the giant panda genome. Nature 463(7279):311-17
11. Zhang GJ, Jarvis ED, Gilbert MTP. 2014. A flock of genomes. Science 346(6215):1308-9
12. Zhang GJ, Li C, Li Q, Li B, Larkin DM, et al. 2014. Comparative genomics reveals insights into avian genome evolution and adaptation. Science 346(6215):1311-20
13. Jarvis ED, Mirarab S, Aberer AJ, Li B, Houde P, et al. 2014. Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds. Science 346(6215):1320-31
14. Meredith RW, Zhang G, Gilbert MT, Jarvis ED, Springer MS. 2014. Evidence for a single loss of mineralized teeth in the common avian ancestor. Science 346(6215):1254390
15. Opazo JC, Hoffmann FG, Natarajan C,Witt CW, Berenbrink M, Storz JF. 2015. Gene turnover in the avian globin gene families and evolutionary changes in hemoglobin isoform expression. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32(4):871-87
16. Ribeiro AM, Zepeda-MendozaML, BertelsenMF, Kristensen AT, Jarvis ED, et al. 2015. A refinedmodel of the genomic basis for phenotypic variation in vertebrate hemostasis. BMC Evol. Biol. 15:124
17. Zhou Q, Zhang J, Bachtrog D, An N, Huang Q, et al. 2014. Complex evolutionary trajectories of sex chromosomes across bird taxa. Science 346(6215):1246338
18. Pfenning AR, Hara E, Whitney O, Rivas MV, Wang R, et al. 2014. Convergent transcriptional specializations in the brains of humans and song-learning birds. Science 346(6215):1256846
19. Whitney O, Pfenning AR, Howard JT, Blatti CA, Liu F, et al. 2014. Core and region-enriched networks of behaviorally regulated genes and the singing genome. Science 346(6215):1256780
20. Wirthlin M, Lovell PV, Jarvis ED, Mello CV. 2014. Comparative genomics reveals molecular features unique to the songbird lineage. BMC Genom. 15(1):1082
21. Petkov CI, Jarvis ED. 2012. Birds, primates, and spoken language origins: behavioral phenotypes and neurobiological substrates. Front. Evol. Neurosci. 4:12
22. Zhang G. 2015. Genomics: Bird sequencing project takes off. Nature 522(7554):34
23. Prum RO, Berv JS, Dornburg A, Field DJ, Townsend JP, et al. 2015. A comprehensive phylogeny of birds (Aves) using targeted next-generation DNA sequencing. Nature 526:569-73
24. Ganapathy G, Howard JT, Ward JM, Li J, Li B, et al. 2014. High-coverage sequencing and annotated assemblies of the budgerigar genome. GigaScience 3:11
25. Zhang J, Li C, Zhou Q, Zhang G. 2015. Improving the ostrich genome assembly using optical mapping data. GigaScience 4:24
26. Borges R, Khan I, Johnson WE, Gilbert MTP, Zhang G, et al. 2015. Gene loss, adaptive evolution and the co-evolution of plumage coloration genes with opsins in birds. BMC Genom. 16(1):751
27. Haug-Baltzell A, Jarvis ED, McCarthy FM, LyonsE. 2015. Identification of dopamine receptors across the extant avian family tree and analysis with other clades uncovers a polyploid expansion among vertebrates. Front. Neurosci. 9:361
28. RomanovMN, FarréM, Lithgow PE, Fowler KE, Skinner BM, et al. 2014. Reconstruction of gross avian genome structure, organization and evolution suggests that the chicken lineage most closely resembles the dinosaur avian ancestor. BMC Genom. 15(1):1060
29. Nguyen N, Hickey G, Zerbino DR, Raney B, Earl D, et al. 2015. Building a pan-genome reference for a population. J. Comput. Biol. 22(5):387-401
30. Bradnam KR, Fass JN, Alexandrov A, Baranay P, Bechner M, et al. 2013. Assemblathon 2: evaluating de novo methods of genome assembly in three vertebrate species. GigaScience 2(1):10
31. Rahbek C, Graves GR. 2001. Multiscale assessment of patterns of avian species richness.PNAS98(8):4534-39
32. ArriagaG, Jarvis ED. 2013. Mouse vocal communication system: Are ultrasounds learned or innate? Brain Lang. 124(1):96-116
33. Rokas A, Williams BL, King N, Carroll SB. 2003. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425(6960):798-804
34. Mirarab S, Bayzid MS, Boussau B, Warnow T. 2014. Statistical binning enables an accurate coalescentbased estimation of the avian tree. Science 346(6215):1250463
35. Kozlov AM, Aberer AJ, Stamatakis A. 2015. ExaML version 3: a tool for phylogenomic analyses on supercomputers. Bioinformatics 31:2577-79
36. Vachaspati P, Warnow T. 2015. ASTRID: Accurate Species TRees from Internode Distances. BMC Genom. 16(Suppl. 10):S3
37. Zepeda Mendoza ML, Nygaard S, da Fonseca RR. 2014. DivA: detection of non-homologous and very divergent regions in protein sequence alignments. BMC Res. Notes 7:806
38. Nguyen NP, Mirarab S, Kumar K, Warnow T. 2015. Ultra-large alignments using phylogeny-aware profiles. Genome Biol. 16:124
39. Suh A, Smeds L, Ellegren H. 2015. The dynamics of incomplete lineage sorting across the ancient adaptive radiation of neoavian birds. PLOS Biol. 13(8):e1002224
40. Ksepka DT, Ware JL, Lamm KS. 2014. Flying rocks and flying clocks: disparity in fossil and molecular dates for birds. Proc. Biol. Sci. 281(1788):20140677
41. Donoghue PC,BentonMJ. 2007. Rocks and clocks: calibrating theTree ofLife using fossils andmolecules. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22(8):424-31
42. Mitchell KJ, Cooper A, PhillipsMJ. 2015. Comment on "Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds." Science 349(6255):1460
43. Cracraft J, Houde P, Ho SYW, Mindell DP, Fjeldså J, et al. 2015. Response to Comment on "Wholegenome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds." Science 349(6255):1460
44. Schulte P, Alegret L, Arenillas I, Arz JA, Barton PJ, et al. 2010. The Chicxulub asteroid impact and mass extinction at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary. Science 327(5970):1214-18
45. Benton MJ. 2010. The origins of modern biodiversity on land. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 365(1558):3667-79
46. Cooper A, Penny D. 1997. Mass survival of birds across the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary: molecular evidence. Science 275(5303):1109-13
47. Green RE, Braun EL, Armstrong J, Earl D, Nguyen N, et al. 2014. Three crocodilian genomes reveal ancestral patterns of evolution among archosaurs. Science 346(6215):1254449
48. de Queiroz K. 2005. Ernst Mayr and the modern concept of species. PNAS 102:6600-7
49. Silcox MT. 2014. A pragmatic approach to the species problem from a paleontological perspective. Evol. Anthropol. 23(1):24-26
50. Isomura N, Iwao K, Fukami H. 2013. Possible natural hybridization of two morphologically distinct species of Acropora (Cnidaria, Scleractinia) in the Pacific: fertilization and larval survival rates. PLOS ONE 8(2):e56701
51. Green RE, Kraus J, Briggs AW, Maricic T, Stenzel U, et al. 2010. A draft sequence of the Neandertal genome. Science 328(5979):710-22
52. Hawks J. 2013. Significance of Neandertal and Denisovan genomes in human evolution. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 42:433-49
53. Qin P, Stoneking M. 2015. Denisovan ancestry in East Eurasian and Native American populations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32(10):2665-74
54. Antrosio J. 2012. Denisovans, Neandertals, archaics as human races. Living Anthropologically, Aug. 7
55. Bickford D, Lohman DJ, Sodhi NS, Ng PKL, Meier R, et al. 2007. Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22(3):148-55
56. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. 2013. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinform. 14:60
57. Baker RJ, Bradley RD. 2006. Speciation in mammals and the genetic species concept. J. Mammal. 87(4):643-62
58. Palumbi SR. 1989. Rates of molecular evolution and the fraction of nucleotide positions free to vary. J. Mol. Evol. 29(2):180-87
59. Sangster G. 2014. The application of species criteria in avian taxonomy and its implications for the debate over species concepts. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 89(1):199-214
60. Cui J, Zhao W, Huang Z, Jarvis ED, Gilbert MTP, et al. 2014. Low frequency of paleoviral infiltration across the avian phylogeny. Genome Biol. 15(12):539
61. Weber CC, Boussau B, Romiguier J, Jarvis ED, Ellegren H. 2014. Evidence for GC-biased gene conversion as a driver of between-lineage differences in avian base composition. Genome Biol. 15(12):549
62. Suh A, Churakov G, Ramakodi MP, Platt RN II, Jurka J, et al. 2015. Multiple lineages of ancient CR1 retroposons shaped the early genome evolution of amniotes. Genome Biol. Evol. 7(1):205-17
63. Catchpole CK, Slater PJB. 1995. Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
64. Li S, Li B, Cheng C, Xiong Z, Liu Q, et al. 2014. Genomic signatures of near-extinction and rebirth of the crested ibis and other endangered bird species. Genome Biol. 15(12):557
65. Blanchette M, Green ED, Miller W, Haussler D. 2004. Reconstructing large regions of an ancestral mammalian genome in silico. Genome Res. 14(12):2412-23
66. Pollard DA, Iyer VN, Moses AM, Eisen MB. 2006. Widespread discordance of gene trees with species tree in Drosophila: evidence for incomplete lineage sorting. PLOS Genet. 2(10):e173
67. Dekker J, Misteli T. 2015. Long-range chromatin interactions. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. In press
68. Deakin JE, Ezaz T. 2014. Tracing the evolution of amniote chromosomes. Chromosoma 123:201-16
69. RomanovMN, FarréM, Lithgow PE, Fowler KE, Skinner BM, et al. 2014. Reconstruction of gross avian genome structure, organization and evolution suggests that the chicken lineage most closely resembles the dinosaur avian ancestor. BMC Genom. 15:1060
70. Orlando L, GilbertMT, Willerslev E. 2015. Reconstructing ancient genomes and epigenomes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16(7):395-408
71. Der Sarkissian C, Allentoft ME, Ávila-Arcos MC, Barnett R, Campos PF, et al. 2015. Ancient genomics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 370(1660):20130387
72. Murphy WJ, Larkin DM, Everts-van der Wind A, Bourque G, Tesler G, et al. 2005. Dynamics of mammalian chromosome evolution inferred from multispecies comparative maps. Science 309:613-17
73. Ma J, Zhang L, Suh BB, Raney BJ, Burhans RC, et al. 2006. Reconstructing contiguous regions of an ancestral genome. Genome Res. 16:1557-65
74. Lynch VJ, Bedoya-Reina OC, Ratan A, Sulak M, Drautz-Moses DI, et al. 2015. Elephantid genomes reveal the molecular bases of woolly mammoth adaptations to the Arctic. Cell Rep. 12(2):217-28
75. Whiteley AR, Fitzpatrick SW, FunkWC, Tallmon DA. 2015. Genetic rescue to the rescue. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30(1):42-49
76. Loi P, Saragusty J, Ptak G. 2014. Cloning the mammoth: A complicated task or just a dream? Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 753:489-502
77. Cardona CJ, Xing Z, Sandrock CE, Davis CE. 2009. Avian influenza in birds and mammals. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 32(4):255-73
78. Carroll SP, Jørgensen PS, KinnisonMT, Bergstrom CT, Denison RF, et al. 2014. Applying evolutionary biology to address global challenges. Science 346(6207):1245993
79. Cheng A, Mayes S, Dalle G, Demissew S, Massawe F. 2015. Diversifying crops for food and nutrition security-a case of teff. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. In press