What is special about expertise? Visual expertise reveals the interactive nature of real-world object recognition

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 83, Issue , 2016, Pages 88-99

  Harel, Assaf ^a  

^a WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; FFA; Object recognition; Perceptual expertise; Review; Top down control; Vision

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; ATTENTIONAL CONTROL; BRAIN REGION; FACIAL RECOGNITION; FUSIFORM FACE AREA; HUMAN; NERVE CELL NETWORK; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; RECOGNITION; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SEMANTIC MEMORY; TEMPORAL CORTEX; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL EXPERTISE; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL SYSTEM; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION; VISUAL WORD FORM AREA; BRAIN MAPPING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; VISION;

BRAIN MAPPING; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84958850414     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (157)

1. Ahissar M., Hochstein S. The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2004, 8(10):457-464.
2. Amir O., Xu X., Biederman I. The spontaneous appeal by naive subjects to nonaccidental properties when distinguishing among highly similar members of subspecies of birds closely resembles descriptions produced by experts. J. Vis. 2011, 11(11):842.
3. Anaki D., Nica E.I., Moscovitch M. Automatic aspects in face perception. Exp. Psychol. (formerly Zeitschrift Für Experimentelle Psychologie) 2011, 58(1):4-18.
4. Ashburner J., Friston K.J. Voxel-based morphometry-the methods. Neuroimage 2000, 11(6):805-821.
5. Avidan G., Hasson U., Malach R., Behrmann M. Detailed exploration of face-related processing in congenital prosopagnosia: 2. Functional neuroimaging findings. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2005, 17(7):1150-1167.
6. Baker C.I., Behrmann M., Olson C.R. Impact of learning on representation of parts and wholes in monkey inferotemporal cortex. Nat Neurosci 2002, 5(11):1210-1216.
7. Baker C.I., Liu J., Wald L.L., Kwong K.K., Benner T., Kanwisher N. Visual word processing and experiential origins of functional selectivity in human extrastriate cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104(21):9087-9092.
8. Bar M. A cortical mechanism for triggering top-down facilitation in visual object recognition. J. Cogn. Neurosc. 2003, 15(4):600-609.
9. Bartlett J.C., Boggan A.L., Krawczyk D.C. Expertise and processing distorted structure in chess. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2013, 7:825.
10. Barton J.J.S., Hanif H., Ashraf S. Relating visual to verbal semantic knowledge: the evaluation of object recognition in prosopagnosia. Brain 2009, 132(12):3456-3466.
11. Behrmann M., Marotta J., Gauthier I., Tarr M.J., McKeeff T.J. Behavioral change and its neural correlates in visual agnosia after expertise training. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2005, 17(4):554-568.
12. Behrmann M., Plaut D.C. Distributed circuits, not circumscribed centers, mediate visual recognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2013, 17:210-219.
13. Bell A.H., Hadj-Bouziane F., Frihauf J.B., Tootell R.B.H., Ungerleider L.G. Object representations in the temporal cortex of monkeys and humans as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Neurophysiol. 2009, 101(2):688-700.
14. Ben-Shachar M., Dougherty R.F., Deutsch G.K., Wandell B.A. The Development of Cortical Sensitivity to Visual Word Forms. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23(9):2387-2399.
15. Bentin S., Allison T., Puce A., Perez E., McCarthy G. Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1996, 8(6):551-565.
16. Biederman I., Shiffrar M.M. Sexing day-old chicks-a case-study and expert systems-analysis of a difficult perceptual-learning task. J. Exp. Psychol.-Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1987, 13(4):640-645.
17. Bilalic M., Grottenthaler T., Nagele T. and Lindig T., The faces in radiological images: fusiform face area supports radiological expertise, Cereb. Cortex in press, . http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu272.
18. Bilalić M., Langner R., Erb M., Grodd W. Mechanisms and neural basis of object and pattern recognition: A study with chess experts. J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen. 2010, 139(4):728-742.
19. Bilalić M., Langner R., Ulrich R., Grodd W. Many faces of expertise: fusiform face area in chess experts and novices. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31(28):10206-10214.
20. Bilalić M., Turella L., Campitelli G., Erb M., Grodd W. Expertise modulates the neural basis of context dependent recognition of objects and their relations. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2012, 33(11):2728-2740.
21. Binder J.R., Desai R.H., Graves W.W., Conant L.L. Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cereb. Cortex 2009, 19(12):2767-2796.
22. Boggan A.L., Bartlett J.C., Krawczyk D.C. Chess masters show a hallmark of face processing with chess. J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen. 2012, 141(1):37.
23. Brants M., Wagemans J., Op de Beeck H.P. Activation of fusiform face area by Greebles is related to face similarity but not expertise. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23(12):3949-3958.
24. Bukach C.M., Gauthier I., Tarr M.J. Beyond faces and modularity: the power of an expertise framework. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2006, 10(4):159-166.
25. Bukach C.M., Gauthier I., Tarr M.J., Kadlec H., Barth S., Ryan E., Bub D.N. Does acquisition of Greeble expertise in prosopagnosia rule out a domain-general deficit?. Neuropsychologia 2012, 50(2):289-304.
26. Bukach C.M., Phillips W.S., Gauthier I. Limits of generalization between categories and implications for theories of category specificity. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2010, 72(7):1865-1874.
27. Busey T.A., Vanderkolk J.R. Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for configural processing in fingerprint experts. Vis. Res. 2005, 45(4):431-448.
28. Calder A., Rhodes G., Johnson M., Haxby J. Oxford Handbook of Face Perception 2011, Oxford University Press, UK.
29. Carmel D., Bentin S. Domain specificity versus expertise: factors influencing distinct processing of faces. Cognition 2002, 83(1):1-29.
30. Chao L.L., Haxby J.V., Martin A. Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects. Nat. Neurosci. 1999, 2(10):913-919.
31. Cohen L., Dehaene S., Naccache L., Lehéricy S., Dehaene-Lambertz G., Hénaff M.-A., Michel F. The visual word form area Spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. Brain 2000, 123(2):291-307.
32. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002, 3(3):201-215.
33. Cukur T., Nishimoto S., Huth A.G., Gallant J.L. Attention during natural vision warps semantic representation across the human brain. Nat. Neurosci. 2013, 16(6):763-770.
34. De Renzi E., Faglioni P., Grossi D., Nichelli P. Apperceptive and associative forms of prosopagnosia. Cortex 1991, 27(2):213-221.
35. Dehaene S., Cohen L. Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron 2007, 56(2):384-398.
36. Dehaene S., Cohen L. The unique role of the visual word form area in reading. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2011, 15(6):254-262.
37. Dehaene S., Pegado F., Braga L.W., Ventura P., Nunes Filho G., Jobert A., Cohen L. How learning to read changes the cortical networks for vision and language. Science 2010, 330(6009):1359-1364.
38. Dennett H.W., McKone E., Tavashmi R., Hall A., Pidcock M., Edwards M., Duchaine B. The Cambridge car memory test: a task matched in format to the cambridge face memory test, with norms, reliability, sex differences, dissociations from face memory, and expertise effects. Behav. Res. Methods 2012, 44(2):587-605.
39. Der Mark S., Bucher K., Maurer U., Schulz E., Brem S., Buckelmüller J., et al. Children with dyslexia lack multiple specializations along the visual word-form (VWF) system. Neuroimage 2009, 47(4):1940-1949.
40. Diamond R., Carey S. Why faces are and are not special. An effect of expertise. J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen. 1986, 115(2):107-117.
41. Dinkelacker V., Grüter M., Klaver P., Grüter T., Specht K., Weis S., Fernandez G. Congenital prosopagnosia: multistage anatomical and functional deficits in face processing circuitry. J. Neurol. 2011, 258(5):770-782.
42. Downar J., Crawley A.P., Mikulis D.J., Davis K.D. The effect of task relevance on the cortical response to changes in visual and auditory stimuli: An event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage 2001, 14(6):1256-1267.
43. Duchaine B.C., Dingle K., Butterworth E., Nakayama K. Normal greeble learning in a severe case of developmental prosopagnosia. Neuron 2004, 43(4):469-473.
44. Farah M.J. Cognitive neuropsychology: patterns of co-occurrence among the associative agnosias: implications for visual object representation. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 1991, 8(1):1-19.
45. Freedman D.J., Riesenhuber M., Poggio T., Miller E.K. A comparison of primate prefrontal and inferior temporal cortices during visual categorization. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23(12):5235-5246.
46. Gainotti G. What the locus of brain lesion tells us about the nature of the cognitive defect underlying category-specific disorders: a review. Cortex 2000, 36(4):539-559.
47. Gauthier I. What constrains the organization of the ventral temporal cortex?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2000, 4(1):1-2. doi:S1364-6613(99)01416-3
48. Gauthier I., Curby K.M., Skudlarski P., Epstein R.A. Individual differences in FFA activity suggest independent processing at different spatial scales. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2005, 5(2):222-234.
49. Gauthier I., Curran T., Curby K.M., Collins D. Perceptual interference supports a non-modular account of face processing. Nat. Neurosci. 2003, 6(4):428-432.
50. Gauthier I., Nelson C.A. The development of face expertise. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2001, 11(2):219-224.
51. Gauthier I., Skudlarski P., Gore J.C., Anderson A.W. Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nat. Neurosci. 2000, 3(2):191-197.
52. Gauthier I., Tarr M.J. Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: bridging brain activity and behavior. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 2002, 28(2):431-446.
53. Gauthier I., Tarr M.J., Anderson A.W., Skudlarski P., Gore J.C. Activation of the middle fusiform "face area" increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects. Nat. Neurosci. 1999, 2(6):568-573.
54. Gilaie-Dotan S., Harel A., Bentin S., Kanai R., Rees G. Neuroanatomical correlates of visual car expertise. NeuroImage 2012, 62(1):147-153.
55. Gobbini M.I., Haxby J.V. Neural systems for recognition of familiar faces. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45(1):32-41.
56. Gobet F., Charness N. Expertise in chess. Cambridge Handbook on Expertise and Expert Performance 2006, 523-538. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA. K. Ericsson, N. Charness, P.J. Feltovich, R.R. Hoffman (Eds.).
57. Golan T., Bentin S., DeGutis J.M., Robertson L.C., Harel A. Association and dissociation between detection and discrimination of objects of expertise: Evidence from visual search. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2013, 76(2):1-16.
58. Grill-Spector K. The neural basis of object perception. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2003, 13(2):159-166.
59. Grill-Spector K., Kanwisher N. Visual recognition: as soon as you know it is there, you know what it is. Psychol. Sci. 2005, 16(2):152-160.
60. Grill-Spector K., Knouf N., Kanwisher N. The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification. Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7(5):555-562.
61. Grill-Spector K., Malach R. The human visual cortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2004, 27:649-677.
62. Harel A., Bentin S. Stimulus type, level of categorization, and spatial-frequencies utilization: implications for perceptual categorization hierarchies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2009, 35(4).
63. Harel A., Bentin S. Are all types of expertise created equal? Car experts use different spatial frequency scales for subordinate categorization of cars and faces. PLoS ONE 2013, 8(6):e67024.
64. Harel A., Gilaie-Dotan S., Malach R., Bentin S. Top-down engagement modulates the neural expressions of visual expertise. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20(10):2304-2318.
65. Harel A., Kravitz D., Baker C.I. Beyond perceptual expertise: revisiting the neural substrates of expert object recognition. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2013, 7:885.
66. Harel A., Ullman S., Epshtein B., Bentin S. Mutual information of image fragments predicts categorization in humans: electrophysiological and behavioral evidence. Vis. Res. 2007, 47(15):2010-2020.
67. Harel A., Ullman S., Harari D., Bentin S. Basic-level categorization of intermediate complexity fragments reveals top-down effects of expertise in visual perception. J. Vis. 2011, 11(8):18.
68. Harley E.M., Pope W.B., Villablanca J.P., Mumford J., Suh R., Mazziotta J.C., Engel S.A. Engagement of fusiform cortex and disengagement of lateral occipital cortex in the acquisition of radiological expertise. Cereb. Cortex 2009, 19(11):2746-2754.
69. Haxby J.V., Hoffman E.A., Gobbini M.I. The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2000, 4(6):223-233.
70. Hecaen H., Angelergues R. Agnosia for faces (prosopagnosia). Arch. Neurol. 1962, 7(2):92-100.
71. Hershler O., Golan T., Bentin S., Hochstein S. The wide window of face detection. J. Vis. 2010, 10(10):21.
72. Hershler O., Hochstein S. At first sight: a high-level pop out effect for faces. Vis. Res. 2005, 45(13):1707-1724.
73. Hershler O., Hochstein S. The importance of being expert: top-down attentional control in visual search with photographs. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2009, 71(7):1478-1486.
74. Huth A.G., Nishimoto S., Vu A.T., Gallant J.L. A continuous semantic space describes the representation of thousands of object and action categories across the human brain. Neuron 2012, 76(6):1210-1224.
75. Ishai A., Schmidt C.F., Boesiger P. Face perception is mediated by a distributed cortical network. Brain Res. Bull. 2005, 67(1):87-93.
76. James K.H., Gauthier I. Letter processing automatically recruits a sensory-motor brain network. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44(14):2937-2949.
77. James T.W., Cree G.S. Perceptual Expertise: Bridging Brain and Behavior. Perceptual and conceptual interactions in object recognition and expertise 2010, 333-352.
78. James T.W., James K.H. Expert individuation of objects increases activation in the fusiform face area of children. NeuroImage 2013, 67:182-192.
79. Johnson K.E., Mervis C.B. Effects of varying levels of expertise on the basic level of categorization. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 1997, 126(3):248-277.
80. Kanwisher N. Domain specificity in face perception. Nat. Neurosci. 2000, 3(8):759-763.
81. Kanwisher N. Functional specificity in the human brain: a window into the functional architecture of the mind. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107(25):11163-11170.
82. Kiefer M. Perceptual and semantic sources of category-specific effects: event-related potentials during picture and word categorization. Mem. Cogn. 2001, 29(1):100-116.
83. Konkle T., Caramazza A. Tripartite organization of the ventral stream by animacy and object size. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33(25):10235-10242.
84. Konkle T., Oliva A. A real-world size organization of object responses in occipitotemporal cortex. Neuron 2012, 74:1114-1124. 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.04.036.
85. Kravitz D.J., Behrmann M. Space-, object-, and feature-based attention interact to organize visual scenes. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2011, 73:2434-2447.
86. Krawczyk D.C., Boggan A.L., McClelland M.M., Bartlett J.C. The neural organization of perception in chess experts. Neurosci. Lett. 2011, 499(2):64-69.
87. Levy I., Hasson U., Avidan G., Hendler T., Malach R. Center--periphery organization of human object areas. Nat. Neurosci. 2001, 4(5):533-539.
88. Liu H., Agam Y., Madsen J.R., Kreiman G. Timing, timing, timing: fast decoding of object information from intracranial field potentials in human visual cortex. Neuron 2009, 62(2):281-290.
89. Mahon B.Z., Caramazza A. Concepts and categories: a cognitive neuropsychological perspective. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2009, 60:27.
90. Malach R., Levy I., Hasson U. The topography of high-order human object areas. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2002, 6(4):176-184.
91. Malach R., Reppas J.B., Benson R.R., Kwong K.K., Jiang H., Kennedy W.A., Tootell R.B. Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92(18):8135-8139.
92. Martelli M., Majaj N.J., Pelli D.G. Are faces processed like words? A diagnostic test for recognition by parts. J. Vis. 2005, 5(1):6.
93. Martin A. The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2007, 58:25-45.
94. Maurer D., Grand R.L., Mondloch C.J. The many faces of configural processing. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2002, 6(6):255-260.
95. McCandliss B.D., Cohen L., Dehaene S. The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2003, 7(7):293-299.
96. McGugin R.W., Newton A.T., Gore J.C., Gauthier I. Robust expertise effects in right FFA. Neuropsychologia 2014, 63:135-144.
97. McGugin R.W., Gatenby J.C., Gore J.C., Gauthier I. High-resolution imaging of expertise reveals reliable object selectivity in the fusiform face area related to perceptual performance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109(42):17063-17068.
98. McGugin R.W., Richler J.J., Herzmann G., Speegle M., Gauthier I. The Vanderbilt Expertise Test reveals domain-general and domain-specific sex effects in object recognition. Vis. Res. 2012, 69:10-22.
99. McGugin R.W., Van Gulick A.E., Tamber-Rosenau B.J., Ross D.A. and Gauthier I.,Expertise effects in face-selective areas are robust to clutter and diverted attention, but not to competition, Cereb. Cortex in press, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu060.
100. McKone E., Kanwisher N., Duchaine B.C. Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2007, 11(1):8-15.
101. Mondloch C.J., Le Grand R., Maurer D. Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing. Perception 2002, 31(5):553-566.
102. Mondloch C.J., Maurer D., Ahola S. Becoming a face expert. Psychol. Sci. 2006, 17(11):930-934.
103. Moscovitch M., Winocur G., Behrmann M. What is special about face recognition? Nineteen experiments on a person with visual object agnosia and dyslexia but normal face recognition. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1997, 9(5):555-604.
104. Natu V., O'Toole A.J. The neural processing of familiar and unfamiliar faces: A review and synopsis. Br. J. Psychol. 2011, 102(4):726-747.
105. Nederhouser M., Yue X., Mangini M.C., Biederman I. The deleterious effect of contrast reversal on recognition is unique to faces, not objects. Vis. Res. 2007, 47(16):2134-2142.
106. Nestor A., Plaut D.C., Behrmann M. Unraveling the distributed neural code of facial identity through spatiotemporal pattern analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108(24):9998-10003.
107. O'Craven K.M., Downing P.E., Kanwisher N. fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection. Nature 1999, 401(6753):584-587.
108. O'Kane B.L., Biederman I., Cooper E.E., Nystrom B. An account of object identification confusions. J. Exp. Psychol.: Appl. 1997, 3(1):21-41.
109. Op de Beeck H.P., Baker C.I. The neural basis of visual object learning. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2010, 14(1):22-30.
110. Op de Beeck H.P., Baker C.I., DiCarlo J.J., Kanwisher N.G. Discrimination training alters object representations in human extrastriate cortex. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26(50):13025-13036.
111. Op de Beeck H.P., Torfs K., Wagemans J. Perceived shape similarity among unfamiliar objects and the organization of the human object vision pathway. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28(40):10111-10123.
112. Orban G.A., Van Essen D., Vanduffel W. Comparative mapping of higher visual areas in monkeys and humans. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2004, 8(7):315-324.
113. Palermo R., Rhodes G. Are you always on my mind? A review of how face perception and attention interact. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45(1):75-92.
114. Palmeri T.J., Wong A.C.N., Gauthier I. Computational approaches to the development of perceptual expertise. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2004, 8(8):378-386.
115. Pitcher D., Charles L., Devlin J.T., Walsh V., Duchaine B. Triple dissociation of faces, bodies, and objects in extrastriate cortex. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19(4):319-324.
116. Privman E., Nir Y., Kramer U., Kipervasser S., Andelman F., Neufeld M.Y., Malach R. Enhanced category tuning revealed by intracranial electroencephalograms in high-order human visual areas. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27(23):6234-6242.
117. Ptak R. The frontoparietal attention network of the human brain action, saliency, and a priority map of the environment. Neurosci. 2012, 18(5):502-515.
118. Pylyshyn Z. Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. Behav. Brain Sci. 1999, 22(3):341-365.
119. Reddy L., Kanwisher N. Coding of visual objects in the ventral stream. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2006, 16(4):408-414.
120. Reddy L., Moradi F., Koch C. Top-down biases win against focal attention in the fusiform face area. NeuroImage 2007, 38(4):730-739.
121. Rezlescu C., Barton J.J.S., Pitcher D., Duchaine B. Normal acquisition of expertise with greebles in two cases of acquired prosopagnosia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111(14):5123-5128.
122. Rhodes G., Byatt G., Michie P.T., Puce A. Is the fusiform face area specialized for faces, individuation, or expert individuation?. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2004, 16(2):189-203.
123. Righi G., Tarr M.J., Kingon A. Category-selective recruitment of the fusiform gyrus with chess expertise. Expertise and Skill Acquisition: The Impact of William G. Chase 2013, Taylor & Francis, New York, NY. J.J. Staszewski (Ed.).
124. Ro T., Russell C., Lavie N. Changing faces: a detection advantage in the flicker paradigm. Psychol. Sci. 2001, 12(1):94-99.
125. Robbins R., McKone E. No face-like processing for objects-of-expertise in three behavioural tasks. Cognition 2007, 103(1):34-79.
126. Rossion B., Curran T. Visual expertise with pictures of cars correlates with RT magnitude of the car inversion effect. Perception 2010, 39(2):173-183.
127. Rossion B., Joyce C.A., Cottrell G.W., Tarr M.J. Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex. NeuroImage 2003, 20(3):1609-1624.
128. Rousselet G.A., Husk J.S., Bennett P.J., Sekuler A.B. Time course and robustness of ERP object and face differences. J. Vis. 2008, 8(12):3.
129. Schyns P.G. Diagnostic recognition: task constraints, object information, and their interactions. Cognition 1998, 67(1-2):147-179.
130. Schyns P.G., Goldstone R.L., Thibaut J.P. The development of features in object concepts. Behav. Brain Sci. 1998, 21(1):1-54.
131. Scott L.S., Tanaka J.W., Sheinberg D.L., Curran T. A reevaluation of the electrophysiological correlates of expert object processing. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2006, 18(9):1453-1465.
132. Sheinberg D.L., Tarr M.J. Objects of expertise. Perceptual Expertise: Bridging Brain and Behavior 2010, Oxford University Press, New York. I. Gauthier, D.N. Bub (Eds.).
133. Shen J., Mack M.L., Palmeri T.J. Studying real-world perceptual expertise. Front. Psychol. 2014, 5(857).
134. Suzuki W., Matsumoto K., Tanaka K. Neuronal responses to object images in the macaque inferotemporal cortex at different stimulus discrimination levels. Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26(41):10524-10535.
135. Tanaka J.W. The entry point of face recognition: evidence for face expertise. J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen. 2001, 130(3):534-543.
136. Tanaka J.W., Curran T. A neural basis for expert object recognition. Psychol. Sci. 2001, 12(1):43-47.
137. Tanaka J.W., Taylor M. Object categories and expertise - is the basic level in the eye of the beholder. Cogn. Psychol. 1991, 23(3):457-482.
138. Tarr M.J., Gauthier I. FFA: a flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise. Nat. Neurosci. 2000, 3(8):764-769.
139. Tsao D.Y., Freiwald W.A., Knutsen T.A., Mandeville J.B., Tootell R.B.H. Faces and objects in macaque cerebral cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2003, 6(9):989-995.
140. Tsunoda K., Yamane Y., Nishizaki M., Tanifuji M. Complex objects are represented in macaque inferotemporal cortex by the combination of feature columns. Nat. Neurosci. 2001, 4:832-838.
141. Ullman S. Object recognition and segmentation by a fragment-based hierarchy. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2007, 11(2):58-64.
142. Ullman S., Vidal-Naquet M., Sali E. Visual features of intermediate complexity and their use in classification. Nat. Neurosci. 2002, 5(7):682-687.
143. Urgesi C., Berlucchi G., Aglioti S.M. Magnetic stimulation of extrastriate body area impairs visual processing of nonfacial body parts. Curr. Biol. 2004, 14(23):2130-2134.
144. Van der Linden M., Wegman J., Fernández G. Task- and experience-dependent cortical selectivity to features informative for categorization. J. Cogn. Neurosc. 2014, 26(2):319-333.
145. Vidal J.R., Ossandón T., Jerbi K., Dalal S.S., Minotti L., Ryvlin P., Lachaux J.-P. Category-specific visual responses: an intracranial study comparing gamma, beta, alpha, and ERP response selectivity. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2010, 4:195.
146. Vinckier F., Dehaene S., Jobert A., Dubus J.P., Sigman M., Cohen L. Hierarchical coding of letter strings in the ventral stream: dissecting the inner organization of the visual word-form system. Neuron 2007, 55(1):143-156.
147. Wagner A.D., Bunge S.A., Badre D. Cognitive control, semantic memory, and priming: contributions from prefrontal cortex. The cognitive neurosciences III 2004, 709-726.
148. Wilmer J.B., Germine L., Chabris C.F., Chatterjee G., Williams M., Loken E., Duchaine B., et al. Human face recognition ability is specific and highly heritable. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107(11):5238-5241. 10.1073/pnas.0913053107.
149. Wojciulik E., Kanwisher N., Driver J. Covert visual attention modulates face-specific activity in the human fusiform gyrus: fMRI study. J. Neurophys. 1998, 79(3):1574-1578.
150. Wong A.C.N., Wong Y.K. Interaction between perceptual and cognitive processing well acknowledged in perceptual expertise research. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2014, 8:308.
151. Wong A.C.N., Palmeri T.J., Gauthier I. Conditions for facelike expertise with objects: becoming a ziggerin expert-but which type?. Psychol. Sci. 2009, 20(9):1108-1117.
152. Wong Y.K., Folstein J.R., Gauthier I. The nature of experience determines object representations in the visual system. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2012, 141(4):682-698.
153. Wong Y.K., Gauthier I. A multimodal neural network recruited by expertise with musical notation. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2010, 22(4):695-713.
154. Wong Y.K., Peng C., Fratus K.N., Woodman G.F., Gauthier I. Perceptual expertise and top-down expectation of musical notation engages the primary visual cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosc. 2014, 26(8):1629-1643.
155. Xu Y. Revisiting the role of the fusiform face area in visual expertise. Cereb. Cortex 2005, 15(8):1234-1242.
156. Xue G., Chen C., Jin Z., Dong Q. Language experience shapes fusiform activation when processing a logographic artificial language: an fMRI training study. Neuroimage 2006, 31(3):1315-1326.
157. Yue X., Tjan B.S., Biederman I. What makes faces special?. Vis. Res. 2006, 46(22):3802-3811.