An Account of Object Identification Confusions

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 21-41

  O'Kane, Barbara L ^a   Cooper, Eric E ^d   Biederman, Irving ^c   Nystrom, Beth ^b  

^a NIGHT VISION AND ELECTRONIC SENSORS DIRECTORATE   (United States)

^b E OIR Measurements Inc   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d NVESD ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001818889     PISSN: 1076898X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1076-898X.3.1.21     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Biederman, I. (1972). Human performance in contingent information processing tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 219-238.
2. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
3. Biederman, I. (1995). Visual object recognition. In D. N. Osherson & S. F. Kosslyn (Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science (2nd ed., pp. 121-165). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Biederman, I., & Bar, M. (1995, November). One-shot viewpoint invariance with nonsense objects. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles, CA.
5. Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. (1991). Priming contour-deleted images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 393-419.
6. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P. (1993). Récognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1162-1182.
7. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P. C. (1995). Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: Reply to Tarr and Bülthoff (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1506-1514.
8. Biederman, I., & Ju, G. (1988). Surface vs. edge-based determinants of visual recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 38-64.
9. Biederman, I., & Shiffrar, M.M. (1987). Sexing day-old chicks: A case study and expert systems analysis of a difficult perceptual learning task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 640-645.
10. Blake, B. (Ed.) (1987). Jane's weapon systems 1987-88 (18th ed.). New York: Jane's Publishing.
11. Edelman, S., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1992). Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects. Vision Research, 32, 2385-2400.
12. Fiser, J., Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. (in press). To what extent can matching algorithms based on direct outputs of spatial filters account for human shape recognition? Spatial Vision.
13. Fitts, P. M., & Seeger, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199-210.
14. Gibson, J. J. (1947). Motion picture testing and research (U.S. Army Air Force Aviation Psychology Program Research Report No. 7). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
15. Herdman, R. C. (1993). Who goes there: Friend or foe? (Tech. Rep. No. OTA-ISC-537). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
16. Horger, J. D. (1990). Image generation for perception testing using computer FLIR simulation. Proceedings of the SPIE International Symposium on Optical Engineering and Photonics in Aerospace Engineering, 1309, 181-189.
17. Hummel, J., & Biederman, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99, 480-517.
18. Kalocsai, P., Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. (1994). To what extent can the recognition of unfamiliar faces be accounted for by a representation of the direct output of simple cells. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 35, 1626.
19. Kottas, B. L., & Bessemer, D. W. (1980). Comparison of potential critical feature sets for simulator-based target identification training (Final Report). Ft. Knox, KY: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
20. Lades, M., Vortbrüggen, J. C., Buhmann, J., Lange, J., von der Malsburg, C., Würtz, R. P., & Konen, W. (1993). Distortion invariant object recognition in the dynamic link architecture. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 42, 300-311.
21. LaFollette, R., Horger, J. D., & O'Kane, B. L. (1991). PC-based system for thermal identification training. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, 2, 1512-1516.
22. Lambert, M. (Ed.). (1994). Jane's all the world's aircraft 1994-95. Alexandria, VA: Jane's Information Group.
23. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
24. O'Kane, B. (1995). Validation of range prediction models for target acquisition with infrared imaging sensors. In E. Peli (Ed.), Vision models for target detection and recognition (pp. 192-218). London: World Scientific.
25. Poggio, T., & Edelman, S. (1990). A network that learns to recognize 3D objects. Nature, 343, 263-266.
26. Prados, J. (1995). Combined fleet decoded: The secret history of American intelligence and the Japanese Navy in World War II. New York: Random House.
27. Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W., Johnson, D., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382-439.
28. Shepard, R. N. (1987). Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science, 237, 1317-1323.
29. Spector, R. H. (1995, August 6). The code war. Review of J. Prados' "Combined fleet decoded." The New York Times Book Review, p. 27.
30. Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 225-245.
31. Tversky, B., & Hemenway, K. (1984). Objects, parts, and categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 169-193.
32. Zerroug, M., & Nevatia, R. (1996). Volumetric descriptions from a single intensity image. International Journal of Computer Vision, 20, 11-42.