What is special about face recognition? Nineteen experiments on a person with visual object agnosia and dyslexia but normal face recognition

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 555-604

  Moscovitch, Morris ^a   Winocur, Gordon ^a   Behrmann, Marlene ^b  

^a ROTMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGNOSIA; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSLEXIA; EYE; FACE; FACIES; HEAD INJURY; HUMAN; MALE; MOUTH; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NOSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0030659847     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.5.555     Document Type: Article

References (176)

1. Allison, T., Ginter, H., McCarthy, G., Nobre, A. A., Puce, A., Luby, M., & Spencer, D. D. (1994a). Face recognition in human extrastriate cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 71, 821-825.
2. Allison, T., McCarthy, G., Nobre, A., Puce, A., & Belger, A. (1994b). Human extrastriate visual cortex and the perception of faces, words, numbers, and colors. Cerebral Cortex, 5, 544-554.
3. Assal, G., Favre, C., & Anderes, J. P. (1984). Non-reconnaisance d'animaux familiers chez un payson: Zoo-agnosie ou prosopagnosie pour les animaux. Revue Neurologique, 140, 580-584.
4. Bartlett, J. C., Hurry, S., & Thorley, W. (1984). Typicality and familiarity of faces. Memory and Cognition, 12, 219-228.
5. Bartlett J. C., & Searcy, J. (1993). Inversion and configuration of faces. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 281-316.
6. Bauer, R. M. (1984). Autonomic recognition of names and faces in prosopagnosia: A neuropsychological application of the guilty knowledge test. Neuropsychologia, 23, 457- 469.
7. Behrmann, M., Moscovitch, M., & Winocur, G. (1994). Intact visual imagery and impaired visual perception in a patient with visual agnosia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(5), 1068-1087.
8. Behrmann, M., Winocur, G., & Moscovitch, M. (1992). Dissociations between mental imagery and object recognition in a brain-damaged patient. Nature, 359, 636-637.
9. Benson, P. J., & Perrett, D. I. (1991). Perception and recognition of photographic quality caricatures: Implications for the recognition of natural images. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 3, 105-135.
10. Benson, P. J., & Perrett, D. I. (1994). Visual processing of facial distinctiveness. Perception, 23, 75-93.
11. Bentin, S., Allison, T., Puce, A., & McCarthy, G. (1996). Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 551-565.
12. Benton, A. L. (1980). The neuropsychology of facial recognition. American Psychologist, 35, 176-186.
13. Benton, A. L., Hamsher, K. des, Varney, N. R., & Spreen, O. (1978). Facial recognition: Stimulus and multiple choice pictures. New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Benton, A. L., & van Allen, M. W. (1973). Test of facial recognition. Neurosensory Center Publication No. 287. Iowa City, LA: University Hospitals, Department of Neurology.
15. Beymer, D., & Poggio, T. (1996). Image representation for visual learning. Science, 272, 1905-1909.
16. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
17. Bodamer, J. (1947). Die Prosop-agnosie. Archiv für Psychiatric und Nervenkrankheiten, 179, 6-53.
18. Bobes, M. A., Valdes-Sosa, M., & Olivares, E. (1994). An ERP study of expectancy violation in face perception. Brain and Cognition, 26, 1-22.
19. Bradshaw, J. L., & Nettleton, N. C. (1981). The nature of hemispheric specialization in man. The Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 4, 51-92.
20. Bradshaw, J. L., & Wallace, G. (1971). Models for the processing and identification of faces. Perception and Psychophysics, 9, 443-448.
21. Brennan, S. E. (1985). The caricature generator. Leonardo, 18, 170-178.
22. Bruce, C. J., Desimone, R., & Gross, C. G. (1981). Visual properties of neurons in a polysensory area in superior temporal sulcus of macaque. Journal of Neurophysiology, 46, 369-384.
23. Bruce, V. (1988). Recognizing faces. London: Erlbaum.
24. Bruce, V., & Humphreys, G. (1994). Recognizing objects and faces. Visual Cognition, 1, 141-180.
25. Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305-327.
26. Bruyer, R. (Ed.) (1986). The neuropsychology of face perception and facial expression. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Bruyer, R. (1991). Covert face recognition in prosopagnosia: A review. Brain and Cognition, 15, 223-235.
28. Bruyer, R., & Crispeels, G. (1992). Expertise in person recognition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 501-504.
29. Bruyer, R., Laterre, C., Seron, X., Feyereisen, P., Strypstien, E., Pierrard, E., & Rectem, D. (1983). A case of prosopagnosia with some preserved covert remembrance of familiar faces. Brain and Cognition, 2, 257-284.
30. Bryden, M. P. (1982). Laterality: Functional asymmetry in the intact brain. New York: Academic Press.
31. Carey, S., & Diamond, R. (1994). Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children? Visual Cognition, 1(2/3), 253-274.
32. Carey, S. Rhodes, G., Diamond, R., & Hamilton, J. (submitted). Norm-based coding of faces: Evidence from studies of caricature recognition.
33. Cohen, M. E., & Cam W. J. (1975). Facial recognition and the von Restorff effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 6, 383-384.
34. Corballis, M. C. (1991). The lopsided ape: The evolution of the generative mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Damasio, A. R. (1990). Category-related recognition defects as a clue to the neural substrates of knowledge. Trends in Neuroscience, 13, 95-98.
36. Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Van Hoesen, G. W. (1982). Prosopagnosia. Anatomic basis and behavioral mechanisms. Neurology, 32, 331-341.
37. Damasio, A. R., Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. (1990). Face agnosia and the neural substrates of memory. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 89-109.
38. de Haan, E. H. F., & Hay, D. C. (1986). The matching of famous and unknown faces given either the internal or the external features: A study on patients with unilateral brain lesions. In H. D. Ellis, M. A. Jeeves, F. Newcombe, & A. W. Young (Eds.), Aspects of face processing (pp. 302-309). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
39. de Haan, E. H. F., Young, A. W., & Newcombe, F. (1987). Face recognition without awareness. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 4, 389-419.
40. De Renzi, E. (1986a). Prosopagnosia in two patients with CT scan evidence of damage confined to the right hemisphere. Neuropsychologia, 24, 385-389.
41. De Renzi, E. (1986b). Current issues in prosopagnosia. In H. D. Ellis, M. A. Jeeves, F. Newcombe, & A. W. Young (Eds.), Aspects of face processing (pp. 243-252). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
42. De Renzi, E., Faglioni, P., Grossi, D., & Nichelli, P. (1991). Apperceptive and associative forms of prosopagnosia. Cortex, 27, 213-221.
43. De Renzi, E., Perani, D., Cartesimo, G. A., Silveri, M. C., & Fazio, F. (1994). Prosopagnosia can be associated with damage confined to the right hemisphere - An MRI and PET study and a review of the literature. Neuropsychologia, 32, 893-902.
44. Desimone, R. (1991). Face-selective cells in the temporal cortex of monkeys. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 1- 8.
45. Desimone, R., Albright, T. D., Gross, C. G., & Bruce, C. (1984). Stimulus selective properties of inferior temporal neurons in the macaque. Journal of Neuroscience, 4, 2051-2062.
46. Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 107-117.
47. Ellis, H. D., Jeeves, M. A., Newcombe, F., & Young, A. W. (Eds.) (1986). Aspects of face processing. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
48. Ellis, H. D., Shepherd, J. W., & Davies, G. M. (1979). Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: Source implication for theories of face recognition. Perception, 8, 431-439.
49. Farah, M. J. (1990). Visual agnosia: Disorders of object recognition and what they tell us about normal vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50. Farah, M. J. (1991). Patterns of co-occurrence among the associative agnosias: Implications for visual object representation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 1-19.
51. Farah, M. J. (1995). A dissociable system for visual recognition: A cognitive neuropsychology approach (pp. 101- 119). In S. M. Kosslyn & D. N. Osherson (Eds.), Invitation to cognitive science: Visual cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. Farah, M. J., Levinson, K. L., & Klein, K. L. (1995). Face perception and within-category discrimination in prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 33, 661-674.
53. Farah, M. J., Tanaka, J. W., & Drain, H. M. (1995). What causes the face inversion effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1-7.
54. Farah, M. J., Wilson, K. D., Drain, H. M., & Tanaka, J. R. (1995). The inverted face inversion effect in prosopagnosia: Evidence for mandatory, face-specific perceptual mechanisms. Vision Research. 35, 2089-2093.
55. Farah, M. J., Wilson, K. D., Drain, H. M., Tanaka, J. R. (submitted). What is "special" about face perception?
56. Feinberg, T. E., Schindler, R. J., Ochoa, E., Kwan, P. C., & Farah, M. J. (1994). Associative visual agnosia and alexia without prosopagnosia. Cortex, 30, 395-412.
57. Fodor J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
58. Fodor, J. (1985). Précis of The modularity of mind. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 8, 1-42.
59. Garner, W. R. (1974). The processing of information and structure. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
60. Gauthier, I., & Tarr, M. (1997). Becoming a "greeble" expert: Exploring the face recognition mechanism. Vision Research, 37, 1673-1682.
61. Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Anderson, A., & Gore, J. (1997) Expertise training with novel objects can recruit the fusiform face area. Society for Neuroscience Abstract. New Orleans, LA.
62. Gazzaniga, M. S. (1997). Pieces of Mind. Scientific American Frontier, Connecticut Public Television/Scientific American Magazine (narrator, Alan Alda).
63. Going, M., & Read, J. E. (1974). Effects of uniqueness, sex of subject, and sex of photograph on facial recognition. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 39, 109-110.
64. Grady, C. L., McIntosh, A. R., Horwitz, B., Maisog, J. M., Ungerleider, L. G., Mentis, M. J., Pietrini, P., Schapiro, M. B., & Haxby, J. V. (1995). Age-related reductions in human recognition memory due to impaired encoding. Science, 269, 218-221.
65. Gross, C.G. (1973). Visual functions of inferotemporal cortex. In V.Jung (Ed.), Handbook of sensory physiology, VII/3. Berlin: Springer.
66. Gross, C. G. (1992). Representation of visual stimuli in inferior temporal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, series B, 335, 3-10.
67. Gross, C. G., Rocha-Miranda, C. E., & Bender, D. B. (1972). Visual properties of neurons in inferotemporal cortex of the macaque. Journal of Neurophysiology, 35, 96-111.
68. Gross, C. G., Rodman, H. R., Gochin, P. M., & Colombo, M. W. (1993). Inferior temporal cortex as a pattern recognition device. In E. Baum (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third NEC Conference Research Symposium, Computational Learning and Cognition (pp. 44-73). Philadelphia: SLAM.
69. Gross, C. G., & Sergent, J. (1992). Face recognition. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 2, 156-161.
70. Hamm, J. P., & McMullen, A. (1996). Effects of orientation on the identification of rotation objects depend on the level of identity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. In press.
71. Hancock, P. J. B., Burton, A. M., & Bruce, V. (1996). Face processing: Human perception and principal component analysis. Memory & Cognition, 24, 26-40.
72. Harman, K., & Moscovitch, M. (1996). The inversion effect for faces and objects: Part-based/holistic encoding and the effects of format congruence. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Society for Brain Behavior and Cognitive Science. Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
73. Harmon, L. D. (1973). The recognition of faces. Scientific American, 227, 71-82.
74. Haxby, J. V., Grady, C. L., Horwitz, B., Ungerleider, L. G., Mishkin, M., Carson, R. E., Herscovitch, P., Schapiro, M. B., & Rapaport, S. I. (1991). Dissociations of spatial and object visual processing pathways in human extrastriate cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 88, 1621-1625.
75. Haxby, J. V., Horwitz, B., Ungerleider, L. G., Maisog, J. M., Pietrini, P., & Grady, C. L. (1994). The functional organization of human extrastriate cortex: A PET rCBF study of selective attention to faces and locations. Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 6336-6353.
76. Hécaen, H., & Angelergues, R. (1962). Agnosia for faces (prosopagnosia). Archives of Neurology, 7, 24-32.
77. Hécaen, H., Goldblum, M. C., Masure, M. C., & Ramier, A. M. (1974). Une nouvelle observation d'agnosie d'objet: Deficit de l'association ou de la categorisation, specifique de la modalité visuelle. Neuropsychologia, 12, 447- 464.
78. Heywood, C. A., & Cowey, A. (1992). The role of the "face- cell" area in the discrimination and recognition of faces by monkeys. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (B), 335, 31-38.
79. Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, M. J., Donnelly, N., Freeman, T., Boucart, M., & Muller, H. M. (1994). Intermediate visual processing and visual agnosia. In M. J. Farah & G. Ratcliff (Eds.), The neuropsychology of high-level vision (pp. 63- 101). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
80. Jackson, J. H. (1874, 1915). On the nature of the duality of the brain. Medical Press and Circular, 1, 19, and Brain, 38, 80-103 (1915).
81. Jacobs, R. A., & Jordan, M. I. (1992). Computational consequences of a bias toward short connections. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 323-336.
82. Jeffreys, D. A. (1993). The influence of stimulus orientation on the vertex positive scalp potential evoked by faces. Experimental Brain Research, 91, 340-350.
83. Jeffreys, D. A., & Tukmachi, E. S. A. (1992). The vertex-positive scalp potential evoked by faces and objects. Experimental Brain Research, 96, 163-172.
84. Johnston, R. A., Milne, A. B., Williams, C., & Hosie, J. (1997). Do distinctive faces come from outer space? An investigation of the status of multidimensional face-space. Visual Cognition, 4, 59-67.
85. Jolicoeur, P. (1985). The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory and Cognition, 13, 289-303.
86. Kanwisher, N., Chun, M. M., McDermott, J., & Ledden, P. J. (1996a). Functional imaging of human visual recognition. Cognitive Brain Research, 5, 55-67.
87. Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (in press). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience.
88. Kanwisher, N., Woods, R. P., Iacoboni, M., & Mazziota, J. C. (1996b). A locus in human extrastriate cortex for visual shape analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 133- 142.
89. Köhler, S., Kapur, S., Moscovitch, M., Winocur, G., & Houle, S. (1995). Dissociation of pathways for object and spatial vision: A PET study in humans. Neuroreport, 6, 1865-1868.
90. Landis, T., Cummings, J. L., Christen, L., Bogen, J. E., & Imhof, H. G. (1986). Are unilateral right posterior cerebral lesions sufficient to cause prosopagnosia? Clinical and radiological findings in six additional patients. Cortex, 22, 243- 252.
91. Levy-Agresti, J., & Sperry, R. W. (1968). Differential perceptual capacities in major and minor hemispheres. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 61, 1151.
92. Light, L. L., Kayra-Stuart, F., & Hollander, S. (1979). Recognition memory for typical and unusual faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 212-219.
93. Lissauer, H. (1890). Ein fall von seelenblindheit nebst einem beitrag zur theorie derselben. Archiv fur Psychiatrie, 21, 222-270. [ Edited and reprinted in translation by Jackson, M. (1988). Lissauer on agnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 155-192.]
94. Lissauer, H. (1890). Ein fall von seelenblindheit nebst einem beitrag zur theorie derselben. Archiv fur Psychiatrie, 21, 222-270. [ Edited and reprinted in translation by Jackson, M. (1988). Lissauer on agnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 155-192.]
95. Logothetis, N., & Sheinberg, D. L. (1996). Visual object recognition. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 19, 577-621.
96. Malach, R., Reppas, J. B., Benson, R. R., Kwong, K. K., Jiang, H., Kennedy, W. A., Ledden, P. J., Brady, T. J., Rosen, B. R., & Tootell, R. B. H. (1995). Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 92, 8135-8139.
97. McCarthy, G., Puce, A., Gore, J. C., & Allison, T. (in press). Face- specific processing in the human fusiform gyrus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 605-610.
98. McCarthy, R. A., & Warrington, E. K. (1990). Cognitive neuropsychology: A clinical introduction. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
99. McMullen, P. A., Fisk, J. D., & Phillips, S. J. (submitted). Spared visual face processing in a severely appreciative visual object agnosic.
100. McNeil, J., & Warrington, E. K. (1991). Prosopagnosia: A reclassification. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 267-287.
101. McNeil, J., & Warrington, E. K. (1993). Prosopagnosia: A face- specific disorder. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 1-10.
102. Meadows, J. C. (1974). The anatomical basis of prosopagnosia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 37, 489-501.
103. Michel, F., Poncet, M., & Signoret, J.-L. (1989). Les lesions responsables de la prosopagnosie sont-elles toujours bilatérales? Revue Neurologique, 146, 764-770.
104. Milner, B. (1980). Complementary functional specialization of the human cerebral hemispheres. In R. Levy-Montealeini (Ed.), Neurons, transmitters and behavior. Vatican City: Pontificiae Academiae Scientiarum Scripta Varia.
105. Mooney, C. M. (1956). Closure with negative after images under filtering light. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 10, 191-199.
106. Moran, L.J., Kimble, J. P., Jr., & Mefferd, R. B., Jr. (1960). Repetitive psychometric measures: Memory for faces. Psychological Reports, 7, 407-413. (Repetitive psychodiagnostic measures: Social memory. Hogg Foundation for Mental Health. University of Texas).
107. Moscovitch, M. (1979). Information processing and cerebral hemispheres. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), Handbook of behavioral neurobiology, Vol. 2 (pp. 379-446). New York: Plenum Press.
108. Moscovitch, M., Kapur, S., Köhler, S., & Houle, S. (1995). Distinct neural correlates of visual long-term memory for spatial location and object identity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 92, 3721-3725.
109. Moscovitch, M., & Radzins, M. (1987). Backward masking of lateralized faces by noise, pattern, and spatial frequency. Brain and Cognition, 6, 72-90.
110. Moscovitch, M., Scullion, D., & Christie, D. (1976). Early vs. late stages of processing and their relation to functional hemispheric asymmetries in face recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 401-416.
111. Moscovitch, M., & Umiltà, C., (1990). Modularity and neuropsychology: Modules and central processes in attention and memory. In M. Schwartz (Ed.), Modular deficits in Alzheimer's disease (pp. 1-59). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford.
112. Nachson, I. (1995). On the modularity of face recognition: The riddle of domain specificity. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 17, 256-275.
113. Nachson, I., Moscovitch, M., & Umiltà, C. (1995). The contribution of external and internal features to the matching of unfamiliar faces. Psychological Research, 58, 31-37.
114. Nakayama, K., Shimojo, S., & Silverman, G. H. (1989). Stereoscopic depth: Its relation to image segmentation, grouping, and the recognition of occluded objects. Perception, 18, 55-68.
115. Navon, D. C. (1977). Forest before the trees: The precedence of global features in visual processing. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
116. Newcombe, F., Mehta, Z., & de Haan, E. H. F. (1994). Category specificity in visual recognition. In M. J. Farah & G. Ratcliff (Eds.), The neuropsychology of high-level vision (pp. 103- 132). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
117. Nobre, A. C., Allison, T., & McCarthy, G. (1994). Word recognition in the human inferior temporal lobe. Nature, 372, 260-263.
118. Norris, D. (1995). Signal detection theory and modularity: On being sensitive to the power of bias models of semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 935-939.
119. Palmer, S., & Rock, I. (1994a). Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 29-55.
120. Palmer, S., & Rock, I. (1994b). On the nature and order of organizational processing: A reply to Peterson. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 515-519.
121. Perrett, D. I., Hietanen, J. K., Oram, M. W., & Benson, P. J. (1992). Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 335, 23-30.
122. Perrett, D. I., Rolls, E. T., & Caan, W. (1982). Visual neurones responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex. Experimental Brain Research, 47, 329-342.
123. Peterson, M. A. (1994a). Shape recognition can and does occur before figure-ground organization. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 105-111.
124. Peterson, M. A. (1994b). The proper placement of uniform connectedness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 509-514.
125. Peterson, M. A., & Gibson, B. S. (1994a). Must shape recognition follow figure-ground organization: An assumption in peril. Psychological Science, 9, 253-259.
126. Peterson, M. A., & Gibson, B. S. (1994b). Object recognition contributions to figure-ground organization: Operations on outlines and subjective contours. Perception and Psychophysics, 56, 551-554.
127. Puce, A., Allison, T., Asgari, M., Gore, J. C., & McCarthy, G. (1996). Differential sensitivity of human visual cortex to faces, letterstrings and textures: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 5205- 5215.
128. Puce, A., Allison, T., Gore, J. C., & McCarthy, G. (1995). Face- sensitive regions in human extrastriate cortex studied by functional MRI. Journal of Neurophysiology, 74, 1192-1199.
129. Renault, B., Signoret, J.-L., Debruille, B., Breton, F., & Bolger, F. (1989). Brain potentials reveal covert facial recognition in prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 27, 905-912.
130. Rhodes, G. (1988). Looking at faces: First-order and second-order features as determinants of facial appearance. Perception, 17, 43-63.
131. Rhodes, G. (1993). Configural coding, expertise and the right hemisphere advantage for face recognition. Brain and Cognition, 22, 19-41.
132. Rhodes, G., Brake, S., & Atkinson, A. P. (1993). What's lost in inverted faces? Cognition, 47, 25-57.
133. Rhodes, G., Brennan, S., & Carey, S. (1987). Identification and ratings of caricatures: Implications for mental representation of faces. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 473-497.
134. Rhodes, G., & McLean, I. G. (1990). Distinctiveness and expertise effects with homogeneous stimuli: Towards a model of configural coding. Perception, 19, 773-794.
135. Rhodes, G., & Tremewan, T. (1993). The Simon then Garfunkel effect: Semantic priming, sensitivity and modularity of face recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 147-187.
136. Rhodes, G., & Tremewan, T. (1994). Understanding face recognition: Caricature effects, inversion and the homogeneity problem. Visual Cognition, 1(2/3), 275-311.
137. Riddoch, M. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1987). A case of integrative visual agnosia. Brain, 110, 1431-1462.
138. Robertson, L. C., & Delis, D. C. (1986). "Part-whole" processing in unilateral brain damaged patients: Dysfunction of hierarchical organization. Neuropsychologia, 24, 363-370.
139. Rolls, E. T. (1992). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying face processing within and beyond the temporal cortical visual areas. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (B), 335, 11-21.
140. Ross, P., & Turkewitz, G. (1981). Individual differences in cerebral asymmetries for facial recognition. Cortex, 17, 199- 214.
141. Ross, P., & Turkewitz, G. (1982). Changes in hemispheric advantage in processing facial information with increasing stimulus familiarization. Cortex, 18, 489-499.
142. Searcy, J. H., & Bartlett, J. C. (1996). Inversion and processing of component and spatial relational information in faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 904-915.
143. Sergent, J. (1984). An investigation into component and configurational processes underlying face perception. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 221-242.
144. Sergent, J., & Hellige, J. B. (1986). Role of input factors in visual-field asymmetries. Brain and Cognition, 5, 174- 179.
145. Sergent J., MacDonald, B., & Zuck, E. (1994). Structural and functional organization of knowledge about faces and proper names: A positron emission tomography study. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 203-228). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/ Bradford.
146. Sergent, J., Ohta, S., MacDonald, B. (1992). Neuroanatomy of face and object processing. Brain, 115, 15-36.
147. Sergent, J., & Signoret, J. L. (1992a). Varieties of functional deficits in prosopagnosia. Cerebral Cortex, 2, 375-388.
148. Sergent, J., & Signoret, J. L. (1992b). Implicit access to knowledge from unrecognized faces in prosopagnosia. Cerebral Cortex, 2, 389-400.
149. Suzuki, S., & Cavanagh, P. (1995). Facial organization blocks access to low-level features: An object inferiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 901-913.
150. Suzuki, S., Peterson, M. A., & Moscovitch, M., & Behrmann, M. (1997). Viewpoint specificity in the identification of single objects is evident in control participants and very exaggerated in visual object agnosia. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Cognitive Neuroscience. Boston, March 1997.
151. Takane, Y., & Sergent, J. (1983). Multidimensional scaling models for reaction times and same-different judgements. Psychometrika, 48, 393-423.
152. Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 225-245.
153. Tanaka, J. W., & Sengco, J. A. (in press). Parts and their configuration in face recognition. Memory and Cognition.
154. Thompson, P. (1980). Margaret Thatcher: A new illusion. Perception, 9, 483-484.
155. Tovee, M. J., & Cohen-Tovee, E. M. (1993). The neural substrates of face processing models: A review. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 505-528.
156. Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1985). Knowledge without awareness: An autonomic index of facial recognition by prosopagnosics. Science, 228, 1453-1454.
157. Turk, M., & Pentland, A. (1991). Eigen faces for recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 71-68.
158. Tversky, B. T., & Baratz, D. (1985). Memory for faces: Are caricatures better than photographs? Memory & Cognition, 13, 45-49.
159. Ungerleider, L. G. (1995). Functional brain imaging studies of cortical mechanisms for memory. Science, 270, 769-775.
160. Valentine, T. (1988). Upside-down faces: A review of the effects of inversion upon face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 471-491.
161. Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 161- 204.
162. Valentine, T., & Bruce, V. (1986a). Recognizing familiar faces. The role of distinctiveness and familiarity. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40, 300-305.
163. Valentine, T., & Bruce, V. (1986b). The effect of race, inversion, and encoding activity upon face recognition. Acta Psychologies 61, 259-273.
164. Van Essen, D. C., Anderson, C. H., & Felleman, D. J. (1992). Information processing in the primate visual system: An integrated systems perspective. Science, 225, 419-423.
165. Warrington, E. K., & James, M. (1967). An experimental study of facial recognition in patients with unilateral cerebral lesions. Cortex, 3, 317-326.
166. Warrington, E. K., & Rabin, P. (1970). Perceptual matching in patients with cerebral lesions. Neuropsychologia, 8, 475- 487.
167. Whiteley, A. M., & Warrington, E. K. (1977). Prosopagnosia: A clinical psychological and anatomical study of three pa tients. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 40, 395-403.
168. Wright, A. A., & Roberts, W. A. (1996). Monkey and human face perception: Inversion effects for human faces but not for monkey faces or scenes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 278-290.
169. Yamane, S., Kaji, S., & Kawano, K. (1988). What facial features activate face neurons in the inferotemporal cortex of the monkey? Experimental Brain Research, 73, 209-214.
170. Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141-145.
171. Yin, R. K. (1970). Face recognition by brain-injured patients: A dissociable ability? Neuropsychologia, 8, 395-402.
172. Young, A. W. (1994). Conscious and nonconscious recognition of familiar faces. In C. Umiltà & M. Moseovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 153-178). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford.
173. Young, A. W., Hay, D. C., McWeeney, K. H., Flude, B. M., & Ellis, A. W. (1985). Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features. Perception, 14, 737-746.
174. Young, A. W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D. C. (1987). Conngurational information in face perception. Perception, 16, 747- 759.
175. Young, M. P., & Yamane, S. (1992). Sparse population coding of faces in the inferotemporal cortex. Science, 256, 1327- 1331.
176. Yuille, A. L. (1991). Deformable templates for face recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 59-70.