A general valence asymmetry in similarity: Good is more alike than bad

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 42, Issue 8, 2016, Pages 1171-1192

  Koch, Alex ^a   Alves, Hans ^a   Krüger, Tobias ^b   Unkelbach, Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Processing asymmetry; Representative design; Sampling; Similarity; Valence

Indexed keywords

AFFECT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COGNITION; EMOTION; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; READING; RECOGNITION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEMANTICS; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY;

AFFECT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COGNITION; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEMANTICS; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES; VOCABULARY;

EID: 84957714358     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000243     Document Type: Article

References (115)

1. Alves, H., Koch, A., & Unkelbach, C. (2016a). My friends are all alike-On the relation between liking, knowledge and perceived similarity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 62, 103-117.
2. Alves, H., Koch, A., & Unkelbach, C. (2016b). The "Common Good" in Person Perception: An amplification/attenuation model of social comparison. Manuscript in preparation.
3. Alves, H., Unkelbach, C., Burghardt, J., Koch, A. S., Krüger, T., & Becker, V. D. (2015). A density explanation of valence asymmetries in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 43, 896-909. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3758/s13421-015-0515-5
4. Ames, D. R. (2004). Strategies for social inference: A similarity contingency model of projection and stereotyping in attribute prevalence estimates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 573-585. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.573
5. Augustine, A. A., Mehl, M. R., & Larsen, R. J. (2011). A positivity bias in written and spoken English and its moderation by personality and gender. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 2, 508-515. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1177/1948550611399154
6. Balliet, D., Mulder, L. B., & Van Lange, P. A. (2011). Reward, punishment, and cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 594-615.
7. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
8. Berman, M. G., Hout, M. C., Kardan, O., Hunter, M., Yourganov, G., Henderson, J. M. Jonides, J. (2014). The perception of naturalness converges with objective measures of naturalness. PLoS One, 9, e114572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114572
9. Bernard, C. (1974). Lectures on the phenomena of life common to animals and plants (E. Hebbel, R. Hoff, & L. Guillermin, Trans.). (Vol. 1, p. 84). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas. (Original work published 1865)
10. Billig, M., & Tajfel, H. (1973). Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 339-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420030312
11. Bless, H., & Fiedler, K. (2006). Mood and the regulation of information processing and behavior. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Hearts and minds: Affective influences on social cognition and behaviour (pp. 65-84). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
12. Borg, I., & Groenen, P. (2005). Modern multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
13. Bruckmüller, S., & Abele, A. E. (2013). The density of the Big Two: How are agency and communion structurally represented? Social Psychology, 44, 63-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000145
14. Brunswik, E. (1955). Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychological Review, 62, 193-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0047470
15. Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
16. Cannon, W. B. (1926). Physiological regulation of normal states. Some tentative postulates concerning biological homeostasis. In W. B. Cannon & A. Pettit (Eds.), à Charles Richet, ses amis, ses collègues, ses élèves [To Charles Richet and his friends, colleagues, and scholars]. (pp. 91-93). Paris, France: Les Editions Médicales.
17. Cilibrasi, R. L., & Vitanyi, P. M. B. (2007). The Google similarity distance. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 19, 370-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2007.48
18. Davies, M. (2011). Word frequency data from the Corpus of Contemporary American English. Provo, UT: COCA.
19. De Deyne, S., Peirsman, Y., & Storms, G. (2009). Sources of semantic similarity. In N. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1834-1839). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
20. De Houwer, J., Gawronski, B., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2013). A functionalcognitive framework for attitude research. European Review of Social Psychology, 24, 252-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2014.892320
21. Denrell, J. (2005). Why most people disapprove of me: Experience sampling in impression formation. Psychological Review, 112, 951-978. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.951
22. DeSoto, K. A., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2014). Positive and negative correlations between confidence and accuracy for the same events in recognition of categorized lists. Psychological Science, 25, 781-788. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797613516149
23. Dhami, M. K., Hertwig, R., & Hoffrage, U. (2004). The role of representative design in an ecological approach to cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 959-988.
24. Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0033731
25. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1971). Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 124-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0030377
26. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149-1160. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
27. Fazio, R. H., Eiser, J. R., & Shook, N. J. (2004). Attitude formation through exploration: Valence asymmetries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 293-311.
28. Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229
29. Feinberg, M., Willer, R., & Schultz, M. (2014). Gossip and ostracism promote cooperation in groups. Psychological Science, 25, 656-664.
30. Fiedler, K. (2011). Voodoo correlations are everywhere-Not only in social neurosciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 163-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691611400237
31. Fiedler, K., Kutzner, F., & Vogel, T. (2013). Pseudocontingencies: Logically unwarranted but smart inferences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 324-329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 0963721413480171
32. Fiedler, K., & Wänke, M. (2009). The cognitive-ecological approach to rationality in social psychology. Social Cognition, 27, 699-732. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.5.699
33. Forgas, J. P. (1976). The perception of social episodes: Categorical and dimensional representations in two different social milieus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 199-209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.34.2.199
34. Forgas, J. P. (2013). Don't worry, be sad! On the cognitive, motivational, and interpersonal benefits of negative mood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 225-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 0963721412474458
35. Goldstone, R. (1994). An efficient method for obtaining similarity data. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 26, 381-386. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03204653
36. Goldstone, R. L., & Son, J. Y. (2005). Similarity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
37. Goodman, N. (1972). Seven strictures on similarity. In N. Goodman (Ed.), Problems and Projects (pp. 22-32). New York, NY: Bobbs-Merrill.
38. Gräf, M., & Unkelbach, C. (2015). Halo effects in trait assessment depend on information valence: Why being honest makes you industrious, but lying does not make you lazy. Manuscript under review.
39. Griffiths, T. L., Steyvers, M., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007). Topics in semantic representation. Psychological Review, 114, 211-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.211
40. Hahn, U., Chater, N., & Richardson, L. B. (2003). Similarity as transformation. Cognition, 87, 1-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00184-1
41. Hair, J. F., Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate Data Analysis (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
42. Henley, N. M. (1969). A psychological study of the semantics of animal terms. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 176-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(69)80058-7
43. Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95, 528-551. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.528
44. Hornberger, M., Bell, B., Graham, K. S., & Rogers, T. T. (2009). Are judgments of semantic relatedness systematically impaired in Alzheimer's disease? Neuropsychologia, 47, 3084-3094. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.07.006
45. Hout, M. C., & Goldinger, S. D. (2015). Target templates: The precision of mental representations affects attentional guidance and decision-making in visual search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 128-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0764-6
46. Hout, M. C., Goldinger, S. D., & Brady, K. J. (2014). MM-MDS: A multidimensional scaling database with similarity ratings for 240 object categories from the Massive Memory picture database. PLoS One, 9, e112644. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112644
47. Hout, M. C., Goldinger, S. D., & Ferguson, R. W. (2013). The versatility of SpAM: A fast, efficient, spatial method of data collection for multidimensional scaling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 256-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0028860
48. Izard, C. E. (1971). The face of emotion. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
49. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/11059-000
50. Jaworska, N., & Chupetlovska-Anastasova, A. (2009). A review of multidimensional scaling (MDS) and its utility in various psychological domains. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 5, 1-10.
51. Jones, M. N., & Mewhort, D. J. (2007). Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon. Psychological Review, 114, 1-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.1
52. Kensinger, E. A., Garoff-Eaton, R. J., & Schacter, D. L. (2006). Memory for specific visual details can be enhanced by negative arousing content. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 99-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.05.005
53. Klauer, K. C., & Musch, J. (1999). Eine Normierung unterschiedlicher Aspekte der evaluativen Bewertung von 92 Substantiven [Norms for different aspects of the evaluation of 92 nouns]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 30, 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1024//0044-3514.30.1.1
54. Knobe, J. (2003). Intentional action and side effects in ordinary language. Analysis, 63, 190-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/analys/63.3.190
55. Koch, A., Alves, H., & Unkelbach, C. (2016). Why good is more alike than bad: An ecological explanation of similarity asymmetries in evaluative information. Manuscript submitted for publication.
56. Koch, A., Imhoff, R., Dotsch, R., Unkelbach, C., & Alves, H. (in press). The ABC of stereotypes about groups: Agency/socio-economic success, conservative-progressive Beliefs, and Communion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
57. Kriegeskorte, N., & Mur, M. (2012). Inverse MDS: Inferring dissimilarity structure from multiple item arrangements. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 245. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00245
58. Krumhansl, C. L. (1978). Concerning the applicability of geometric models to similarity data: The interrelationship between similarity and spatial density. Psychological Review, 85, 445-463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ 0033-295X.85.5.445
59. Kruskal, J. B., & Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional scaling. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
60. Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211
61. Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2005). International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Gainesville, FL: Center for the Study of Emotion & Attention.
62. Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390-423.
63. Langlois, J. H., & Roggman, L. A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, 1, 115-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00079.x
64. Langston, C. A. (1994). Capitalizing on and coping with daily life events: Expressive responses to positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1112-1125.
65. Leising, D., Ostrovski, O., & Borkenau, P. (2012). Vocabulary for describing disliked persons is more differentiated than vocabulary for describing liked persons. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 393-396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.03.006
66. Lyubomirsky, S., Sousa, L., & Dickerhoof, R. (2006). The costs and benefits of writing, talking, and thinking about life's triumphs and defeats. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 692-708.
67. Mason, R. L., Gunst, R. F., & Hess, J. L. (1989). statistical design and analysis of experiments: Applications to engineering and science. New York, NY: Wiley.
68. Matlin, M. W., & Stang, D. J. (1978). The Pollyanna principle: Selectivity in language, memory, and thought. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Pub. Co.
69. McRae, K., & Boisvert, S. (1998). Automatic semantic similarity priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 558-572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.24.3.558
70. Medin, D. L., Goldstone, R. L., & Gentner, D. (1993). Respects for similarity. Psychological Review, 100, 254-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.254
71. Menard, S. (1995). Applied Logistic Regression Analysis: Sage University Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
72. Noordewier, M. K., & Breugelmans, S. M. (2013). On the valence of surprise. Cognition and Emotion, 27, 1326-1334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2013.777660
73. Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identificationcategorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.115.1.39
74. Nosofsky, R. M. (1988). Similarity, frequency, and category representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 54-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.14.1.54
75. Ortony, A., & Turner, T. J. (1990). What's basic about basic emotions? Psychological Review, 97, 315-331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.315
76. Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
77. Peeters, G., & Czapinski, J. (1990). Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects. European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 33-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14792779108401856
78. Perea, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2008). R34d1ng w0rd5 w1th numb3r5. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 237-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.237
79. Plutchik, R. (2001). The nature of emotions. American Scientist, 89, 344-350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1511/2001.4.344
80. Potter, T., Corneille, O., Ruys, K. I., & Rhodes, G. (2007). "Just another pretty face:" A multidimensional scaling approach to face attractiveness and variability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 368-372. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03194079
81. Pratto, F., & John, O. P. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attentiongrabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 380-391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.380
82. Quine, W. V. (1969). Ontological relativity and other essays. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
83. Reis, H. T., Gable, S. L., & Maniaci, M. R. (2014). Methods for studying everyday experience in its natural context. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 373-402). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
84. Reis, H. T., Smith, S. M., Carmichael, C. L., Caprariello, P. A., Tsai, F. F., Rodrigues, A., & Maniaci, M. R. (2010). Are you happy for me? How sharing positive events with others provides personal and interpersonal benefits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 311-329.
85. Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208
86. Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803-814. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.803
87. Rom, S., & Hofmann, W. (2015). Labour-leisure tradeoffs in everyday life. Manuscript in preparation.
88. Rosenberg, S., Nelson, C., & Vivekananthan, P. S. (1968). A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 283-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0026086
89. Rozin, P., Berman, L., & Royzman, E. (2010). Biases in use of positive and negative words across twenty natural languages. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 536-548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699930902793462
90. Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 296-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2
91. Sauter, D. (2010). More than happy: The need for disentangling positive emotions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 36-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963721409359290
92. Schrauf, R. W., & Sanchez, J. (2004). The preponderance of negative emotion words in the emotion lexicon: A cross-generational and crosslinguistic study. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 25, 266-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01434630408666532
93. Schwartz, R. M., & Humphreys, M. S. (1973). Similarity judgments and free recall of unrelated words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 101, 10-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0035511
94. Semin, G. R., & Fiedler, K. (1992). Language, interaction and social cognition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
95. Shaver, P., Schwartz, J., Kirson, D., & O'Connor, C. (1987). Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1061-1086. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1061
96. Shepard, R. N. (1987). Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science, 237, 1317-1323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.3629243
97. Skowronski, J., & Carlston, D. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 131-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.131
98. Smallman, R., Becker, B., & Roese, N. J. (2014). Preferences for expressing preferences: People prefer finer evaluative distinctions for liked than disliked objects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 25-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.12.004
99. Smallman, R., & Roese, N. J. (2008). Preference invites categorization. Psychological Science, 19, 1228-1232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02229.x
100. Smith, E. E., & Sloman, S. A. (1994). Similarity-versus rule-based categorization. Memory & Cognition, 22, 377-386. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03200864
101. Taylor, S. E. (1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 67-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.67
102. Tenenbaum, J. B., & Griffiths, T. L. (2001). Generalization, similarity, and Bayesian inference. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 629-640. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01000061
103. Topolinski, S., & Deutsch, R. (2012). Phasic affective modulation of creativity. Experimental Psychology, 59, 302-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000159
104. Topolinski, S., & Deutsch, R. (2013). Phasic affective modulation of semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 414-436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0028879
105. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.4.327
106. Unkelbach, C. (2012). Positivity advantages in social information processing. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 83-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00407.x
107. Unkelbach, C., Fiedler, K., Bayer, M., Stegmüller, M., & Danner, D. (2008). Why positive information is processed faster: The density hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 36-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.36
108. Unkelbach, C., von Hippel, W., Forgas, J. P., Robinson, M. D., Shakarchi, R. J., & Hawkins, C. (2010). Good things come easy: Subjective exposure frequency and the faster processing of positive information. Social Cognition, 28, 538-555.
109. Verhaeghen, P., Aikman, S. N., & Van Gulick, A. E. (2011). Prime and prejudice: Co-occurrence in the culture as a source of automatic stereotype priming. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 501-518. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1348/014466610X524254
110. Warriner, A. B., Kuperman, V., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 1191-1207. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0314-x
111. Wells, G. L., & Windschitl, P. D. (1999). Stimulus sampling and social psychological experimentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1115-1125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01461672992512005
112. Westfall, J., Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (2015). Replicating studies in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 390-399.
113. Westfall, J., Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (2014). Statistical power and optimal design in experiments in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 2020-2045. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000014
114. Williams, K. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425-452.
115. Young, F. W., Takane, Y., & Lewyckyj, R. (1978). ALSCAL: A nonmetric multidimensional scaling program with several individual-differences options. Behavior Research Methods, 10, 451-453.