Preference invites categorization

Psychological Science

Volumn 19, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 1228-1232

  Smallman, Rachel ^a   Roese, Neal J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFFECT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONDITIONING; HUMAN; LEARNING; METHODOLOGY; MOTIVATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; STUDENT; TASK PERFORMANCE;

AFFECT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; COGNITION; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); GOALS; HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; STUDENTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 57649200210     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02229.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Albarracín, D. Kumkale, G.T. (2003). Affect as information in persuasion: A model of affect identification and discounting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 453 469.
2. Belk, R.W., Ger, G. Askegaard, S. (2003). The fire of desire: A multisided inquiry into consumer passion. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 326 351.
3. Bodenhausen, G.V. (1993). Emotions, arousal, and stereotypic judgments: A heuristic model of affect and stereotyping. In D.M. Mackie D.L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 13 38). San Diego, CA : Academic Press.
4. Bornstein, R.F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265 289.
5. Carver, C.S. (2003). Pleasure as a sign you can attend to something else: Placing positive feelings within a general model of affect. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 241 261.
6. Chi, M.T.H., Feltovich, P. Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121 152.
7. Cowley, E. Mitchell, A.A. (2003). The moderating effect of product knowledge on the learning and organization of product information. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 443 454.
8. Duckworth, K.L., Bargh, J.A., Garcia, M. Chaiken, S. (2002). The automatic evaluation of novel stimuli. Psychological Science, 13, 513 519.
9. Ferguson, M.J. Bargh, J.A. (2004). Liking is for doing: The effects of goal pursuit on automatic evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 557 572.
10. Gable, P.A. Harmon-Jones, E. (2008). Approach-motivated positive affect reduces breadth of attention. Psychological Science, 19, 476 482.
11. Gasper, K. Clore, G.L. (2002). Attending to the big picture: Mood and global versus local processing of visual information. Psychological Science, 13, 33 39.
12. Goukens, C., Dewitte, S., Pandelaere, M. Warlop, L. (2007). Wanting a bit(e) of everything: Extending the valuation effect to variety seeking. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 386 394.
13. Hirt, E.R., Melton, R.J., McDonald, H.E. Harackiewicz, J.M. (1996). Processing goals, task interest, and the mood-performance relationship: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 245 261.
14. Hoch, S.J. Deighton, J. (1989). Managing what consumers learn from experience. Journal of Marketing, 52, 1 20.
15. Isen, A.M. Daubman, K.A. (1984). The influence of affect on categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1206 1217.
16. Ito, T.A., Cacioppo, J.T. Lang, P.J. (1998). Eliciting affect using the International Affective Picture System: Bivariate evaluation and ambivalence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 856 879.
17. Kahn, B.E. Isen, A.M. (1993). The influence of positive affect on variety-seeking among safe, enjoyable products. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 257 270.
18. Lang, P.J., Bradley, M.M. Cuthbert, B.N. (1997). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Technical manual and affective ratings. Gainesville : University of Florida, NIMH Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention.
19. Medin, D.L., Lynch, E.B., Coley, J.D. Atran, S. (1997). Categorization and reasoning among tree experts: Do all roads lead to Rome? Cognitive Psychology, 32, 49 96.
20. Mullen, B. Hu, L. (1989). Perceptions of ingroup and outgroup variability: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 233 252.
21. Mummendey, A. Wenzel, M. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 158 174.
22. Redden, J.P. (2008). Satiation: The role of categorization. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 624 634.
23. Rota, L.M. Zellner, D.A. (2007). The categorization effect in hedonic contrast: Experts differ from novices. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 179 183.
24. Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In R.M. Sorrentino E.T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 527 561). San Diego, CA : Academic Press.
25. Schwarz, N., Bless, H. Bohner, G. (1991). Mood and persuasion: Affective states influence processing of persuasive communications. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 161 199). San Diego, CA : Academic Press.
26. Schwarz, N. Clore, G.L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513 523.
27. Sinclair, R.C. Mark, M.M. (1992). The influence of mood state on judgment and action: Effects on persuasion, categorization, social justice, person perception, and judgmental accuracy. In L.L. Martin A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgments (pp. 165 193). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
28. Thorndike, E.L. (1898). Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals. Psychological Review Monograph Supplement, 2, 1 109.
29. Watson, D., Clark, L.A. Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063 1070.
30. Zajonc, R.B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preference needs no inference. American Psychologist, 35, 151 175.