Erratum to manuscript YJESP 3135, "Preferences for expressing preferences: People prefer finer evaluative distinctions for liked than disliked objects" [J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 52, (May 2014), 25-31], 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.12.004;Preferences for expressing preferences: People prefer finer evaluative distinctions for liked than disliked objects

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Volumn 52, Issue , 2014, Pages 25-31

  Smallman, Rachel ^a   Becker, Brittney ^a   Roese, Neal J ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attitude; Categorization; Evaluation; Preference; Rating

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892460247     PISSN: 00221031     EISSN: 10960465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.01.007     Document Type: Erratum

References (34)

1. Aiken L.S., West S.G. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions 1991, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
2. Amabile T.M., Hill K.G., Hennessey B.A., Tighe E.M. The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1994, 66:950-967.
3. Anderson N.H. Averaging versus adding as a stimulus-combination rule in impression formation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1965, 70:394-400.
4. Asch S.E. Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1946, 41(259):290.
5. Baumeister R.F., Bratslavsky E., Finkenauer C., Vohs K.D. Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology 2001, 5:323-370.
6. Bohner G., Nickel N. Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology 2011, 62:391-417.
7. Cacioppo J.T., Gardner W.L., Berntson G.G. Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review 1997, 1:3-25.
8. Cacioppo J.T., Petty R.E. The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1982, 42:116-131.
9. Cacioppo J.T., Petty R.E., Feinstein J.A., Jarvis B.G. Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin 1996, 119:197-253.
10. Cacioppo J.T., Petty R.E., Kao C.E. The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment 1984, 48:306-307.
11. Carver C.S. Pleasure as a sign you can attend to something else: Placing positive feelings within a general model of affect. Cognition and Emotion 2003, 17:241-261.
12. Cohen J., Cohen P. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences 1983, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. 2nd ed.
13. Eagly A.H., Chaiken S. The psychology of attitudes 1993, Harcourt Brace, Fort Worth, TX.
14. Fazio R.H., Eiser J.R., Shook N.J. Attitude formation through exploration: Valence asymmetries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2004, 87:293-311.
15. Gable P.A., Harmon-Jones E. Approach-motivated positive affect reduces breadth of attention. Psychological Science 2008, 19:476-482.
16. Garner W.R. Rating scales, discriminability, and information transmission. Psychological Review 1960, 67:343-352.
17. Himmelfarb S. The measurement of attitudes. The psychology of attitudes 1993, 23-87. Harcourt Brace, Fort Worth, TX. A.H. Eagly, S. Chaiken (Eds.).
18. Hoch S.J., Deighton J. Managing what consumers learn from experience. Journal of Marketing 1989, 52:1-20.
19. Hofmann W., De Houwer J., Perugini M., Baeyens F., Crombez G. Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 2010, 136:390-421.
20. Komorita S.S., Graham W.K. Number of scale points and the reliability of scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1965, 25:987-995.
21. Krosnick J.A., Judd C.M., Wittenbrink B. The measurement of attitudes. The handbook of attitudes 2005, 21-76. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. D. Albarracin, B.T. Johnson, M.P. Zanna (Eds.).
22. Medin D.L., Lynch E.B., Coley J.D., Atran S. Categorization and reasoning among tree experts: Do all roads lead to Rome?. Cognitive Psychology 1997, 32:49-96.
23. Petty R.E., Cacioppo J.T. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in experimental social psychology 1986, Vol. 19:123-205. Academic Press, New York.
24. Raudenbush S.W., Bryk A.S. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods 2002, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
25. Roese N.J., Morris M.W. Impression valence constrains social explanations: The case of discounting versus conjunction effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999, 77:437-448.
26. Rosch E., Mervis C.B., Gray W.D., Johnson D.M., Boyes-Braem P. Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 1976, 8:382-439.
27. Rozin P., Royzman E.B. Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2001, 5:296-320.
28. Skowronski J.J., Carlston D.E. Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin 1989, 105:131-142.
29. Smallman R., Roese N.J. Preference invites categorization. Psychological Science 2008, 19:1228-1232.
30. Smallman R., Roese N.J. Valence-dependent self-scrutiny in judgments of event impact. Social Cognition 2009, 27:834-846.
31. Taylor S.E. The interface of cognitive and social psychology. Cognition, social behavior, and the environment 1981, 189-211. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N J. J. Harvey (Ed.).
32. Thompson E.P., Chaiken S., Hazlewood J.D. Need for cognition and desire for control as moderators of extrinsic reward effects: A Person×Situation approach to the study of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1993, 64:987-999.
33. Thorndike E.L. Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals. Psychological Review Monograph Supplement 1898, 2:1-109.
34. Weng L. Impact of the number of response categories and anchor labels on coefficient alpha and test-retest reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement 2004, 64:956-972.