The versatility of SpAM: A fast, efficient, spatial method of data collection for multidimensional scaling

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 142, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 256-281

  Hout, Michael C ^a   Goldinger, Stephen D ^a   Ferguson, Ryan W ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Multidimensional scaling; Similarity; Spatial cognition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION;

ADULT; DATA COLLECTION; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPACE PERCEPTION;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84880930983     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0028860     Document Type: Article

References (143)

1. Abdi, H., Dunlop, J. P., & Williams, L. J. (2009). How to compute reliability estimates and display confidence and tolerance intervals for pattern classifiers using the bootstrap and 3-way multidimensional scaling (DISTATIS). NeuroImage, 45, 89-95. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage .2008.11.008
2. Abdi, H., Valentin, D., Chollet, S., & Chrea, C. (2007). Analyzing assessors and products in sorting tasks: DISTATIS, theory and applications. Food Quality and Preference, 18, 627-640. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2006.09.003
3. Ahn, W.-K., & Medin, D. L. (1992). A two-stage model of category construction. Cognitive Science, 16, 81-121. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1601_3
4. Ashby, F. G., Maddox, W. T., & Lee, W. W. (1994). On the dangers of averaging across subjects when using multidimensional scaling or the similarity-choice model. Psychological Science, 5, 144-151. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00651.x
5. Attneave, F. (1950). Dimensions of similarity. American Journal of Psychology, 63, 516-556. doi:10.2307/1418869
6. Bassok, M., Chase, V. M., & Martin, S. A. (1998). Adding apples and oranges: Alignment of semantic and formal knowledge. Cognitive Psychology, 35, 99-134. doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0675
7. Bergmann Tiest, W. M., & Kappers, A. M. L. (2006). Analysis of haptic perception of materials by multidimensional scaling and physical measurements of roughness and compressibility. Acta Psychologica, 121, 1-20. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.04.005
8. Bijmolt, T. H. A., & Wedel, M. (1995). The effects of alternative methods of collecting similarity data for multidimensional scaling. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12, 363-371. doi:10.1016/0167-8116(95)00012-7
9. Bimler, D., Kirkland, J., & Pichler, S. (2004). Escher in color space: Individual-differences multidimensional scaling of color dissimilarities collected with a gestalt formation task. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 69-76. doi:10.3758/BF03195550
10. Borg, I., & Groenen, P. (1997). Modern multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
11. Busey, T. A., & Tunnicliff, J. L. (1999). Accounts of blending, distinc-tiveness, and typicality in the false recognition of faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1210-1235. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.25.5.1210
12. Busing, F. M. T. A., Commandeur, J. J. F., & Heiser, W. J. (1997). PROXSCAL: A multidimensional scaling program for individual differences scaling with constraints. In W. Bandilla & F. Faulbaum (Eds.), Softstat '97: Advances in statistical software (Vol. 6, pp. 67-74). Stuttgart, Germany: Lucius & Lucius.
13. Busing, F. M. T. A., Groenen, P. J. K., & Heiser, W. J. (2005). Avoiding degeneracy in multidimensional unfolding by penalizing on the coefficient of variation. Psychometrika, 70, 71-98. doi:10.1007/s11336-001-0908-1
14. Byatt, G., & Rhodes, G. (2004). Identification of own-race and other-race faces: Implications for the representation of race in face space. Psycho-nomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 735-741. doi:10.3758/BF03196628
15. Campbell, J. I. D. (1994). Architectures for numerical cognition. Cognition, 53, 1-44. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)90075-2
16. Carlton, E., & Shepard, R. N. (1990a). Psychologically simple motions as geodesic paths I. Asymmetric objects. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 34, 127-188. doi:10.1016/0022-2496(90)90001-P
17. Carlton, E., & Shepard, R. N. (1990b). Psychologically simple motions as geodesic paths II. Symmetric objects. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 34, 189-228. doi:10.1016/0022-2496(90)90002-Q
18. Carroll, J. D., & Chang, J.-J. (1970). Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an N-way generalization of "Eckart-Young" decomposition. Psychometrika, 35, 283-319. doi:10.1007/BF02310791
19. Casasanto, D. (2008). Similarity and proximity: When does close in space mean close in mind? Memory & Cognition, 36, 1047-1056. doi:10.3758/MC.36.6.1047
20. Chan, A. S., Butters, N., & Salmon, D. P. (1997). The deterioration of semantic networks in patients with Alzheimer's disease: A cross-sectional study. Neuropsychologia, 35, 241-248. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(96)00067-X
21. Clark, W. C., Carroll, J. D., Yang, J. C., & Janal, M. N. (1986). Multidimensional scaling reveals two dimensions of thermal pain. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 103-107. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.12.1.103
22. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Cooper, L. A. (1976). Demonstration of a mental analog of an external rotation. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 296-302. doi:10.3758/BF03204234
24. Davidson, M. L. (1983). Multidimensional scaling. New York, NY: Wiley.
25. Dawis, R. V. (1992). The individual differences tradition in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 7-19. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.39.1.7
26. Ding, C. S. (2006). Multidimensional scaling modelling approach to latent profile analyses in psychological research. International Journal of Psychology, 41, 226-238. doi:10.1080/00207590500412219
27. Ekman, G. (1954). Dimensions of color vision. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 38, 467-474. doi:10.1080/00223980.1954.9712953
28. Estes, W. K. (1956). The problem of inference from curves based on group data. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 134-140. doi:10.1037/h0045156
29. Faye, P., Brémaud, D., Durand Daubin, M., Courcoux, P., Giboreau, A., & Nicod, H. (2004). Perceptive free sorting and verbalization tasks with naive subjects: An alternative to descriptive mappings. Food Quality and Preference, 15, 781-791. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.04.009
30. Faye, P., Brémaud, D., Teillet, E., Courcoux, P., Giboreau, A., & Nicod, H. (2006). An alternative to external preference mapping based on consumer perceptive mapping. Food Quality and Preference, 17, 604-614. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2006.05.006
31. Garner, W. R. (1974). The processing of information and structure. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
32. Gati, I., & Tversky, A. (1982). Representations of qualitative and quantitative dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 325-340. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.8.2.325
33. Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52, 45-56. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.1.45
34. Giguére, G. (2006). Collecting and analyzing data in multidimensional scaling experiments: A guide for psychologists using SPSS. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 2, 26-37.
35. Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1-67. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.91.1.1
36. Gilmore, G. C., Hersh, H., Caramazza, A., & Griffin, J. (1979). Multidimensional letter similarity derived from recognition errors. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 425-431. doi:10.3758/BF03199852
37. Goldinger, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105, 251-279. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.105.2.251
38. Goldinger, S. D., & Azuma, T. (2004). Episodic memory reflected in printed word naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 716-722. doi:10.3758/BF03196625
39. Goldinger, S. D., He, Y., & Papesh, M. H. (2009). Deficits in cross-race face learning: Insights from eye movements and pupillometry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1105-1122. doi:10.1037/a0016548
40. Goldstone, R. (1994a). An efficient method for obtaining similarity data. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 26, 381-386. doi:10.3758/BF03204653
41. Goldstone, R. L. (1994b). The role of similarity in categorization: Providing a groundwork. Cognition, 52, 125-157. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)90065-5
42. Goldstone, R. L. (1994c). Similarity, interactive activation, and mapping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 3-28. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.1.3
43. Goldstone, R. L. (1996). Alignment-based nonmonotonicities in similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 988-1001. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.4.988
44. Goldstone, R. L., & Medin, D. L. (1994). Time course of comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 29-50. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.1.29
45. Goldstone, R. L., Medin, D. L., & Gentner, D. (1991). Relational similarity and the nonindependence of features in similarity judgments. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 222-262. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(91)90010-L
46. Goldstone, R. L., Medin, D. L., & Halberstadt, J. (1997). Similarity in context. Memory & Cognition, 25, 237-255. doi:10.3758/BF03201115
47. Goldstone, R. L., & Steyvers, M. (2001). The sensitization and differentiation of dimensions during category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 116-139. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.1.116
48. Green, P. E., Camone, F. J., Jr., & Smith, S. M. (1989). Multidimensional scaling: Concepts and applications. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
49. Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation-level theory: An experimental and systematic approach to behavior. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
50. Helson, H., Michels, W. C., & Sturgeon, A. (1954). The use of comparative rating scales for the evaluation of psychophysical data. American Journal of Psychology, 67, 321-326. doi:10.2307/1418634
51. Henley, N. M. (1969). A psychological study of the semantics of animal terms. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 176-184. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(69)80058-7
52. Henmon, V. A. C. (1906). The time of perception as a measure of differences in sensations. New York, NY: Science Press.
53. Hintzman, D. L. (1986). "Schema abstraction" in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411-428. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.4.411
54. Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95, 528-551. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.528
55. Hintzman, D. L., & Ludlam, G. (1980). Differential forgetting of prototypes and old instances: Simulation by an exemplar-based classification model. Memory & Cognition, 8, 378-382. doi:10.3758/BF03198278
56. Hollins, M., Bensmäia, S., Karlof, K., & Young, F. (2000). Individual differences in perceptual space for tactile textures: Evidence from multidimensional scaling. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1534-1544. doi:10.3758/BF03212154
57. Hornberger, M., Bell, B., Graham, K. S., & Rogers, T. T. (2009). Are judgments of semantic relatedness systematically impaired in Alzheimer's disease? Neuropsychologia, 47, 3084-3094. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.07.006
58. Hout, M. C., & Goldinger, S. D. (2011). Multiple-target search increases workload but enhances incidental learning: A computational modelling approach to a memory paradox [In Object Perception, Attention, and Memory (OPAM) 2011 conference report], Visual Cognition, 19, 1315-1318. doi:10.1080/13506285.2011.618773
59. Howard, D. V., & Howard, J. H., Jr. (1977). A multidimensional scaling analysis of the development of animal names. Developmental Psychology, 13, 108-113. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.13.2.108
60. Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
61. Hutchinson, J. W., & Lockhead, G. R. (1977). Similarity as distance: A structural principle for semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 660-678. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.3.6.660
62. Izmailov, C. A., & Sokolov, E. N. (1991). Spherical model of color and brightness discrimination. Psychological Science, 2, 249-259. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00143.x
63. Jaworska, N., & Chupetlovska-Anastasova, A. (2009). A review of multidimensional scaling (MDS) and its utility in various psychological domains. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 5, 1-10.
64. Johnson, M. D., Lehmann, D. R., & Horne, D. R. (1990). The effects of fatigue on judgments of interproduct similarity. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 7, 35-43. doi:10.1016/0167-8116(90)90030-Q
65. Kessler, E. J., Hansen, C., & Shepard, R. N. (1984). Tonal schemata in the perception of music in Bali and the West. Music Perception, 2, 131-165.
66. King, M. C., Cliff, M. A., & Hall, J. W. (1998). Comparison of projective mapping and sorting data collection and multivariate methodologies for identification of similarity-of-use of snack bars. Journal of Sensory Studies, 13, 347-358. doi:10.1111/j.1745-459X.1998.tb00094.x
67. Krantz, D. H., & Tversky, A. (1975). Similarity of rectangles: An analysis of subjective dimensions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 12, 4-34. doi:10.1016/0022-2496(75)90047-4
68. Kroskaand, A., & Goldstone, R. L. (1996). Dissociations in the similarity and categorization of emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 10, 27-45. doi:10.1080/026999396380376
69. Krumhansl, C. L., & Shepard, R. N. (1979). Quantification of the hierarchy of tonal functions with a diatonic context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 579-594. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.5.4.579
70. Kruskal, J. B. (1964a). Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika, 29, 1-27. doi:10.1007/BF02289565
71. Kruskal, J. B. (1964b). Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method. Psychometrika, 29, 115-129. doi:10.1007/BF02289694
72. Kruskal, J. B., & Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional scaling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
73. Lakoff, G. (1989). A figure of thought. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 1, 215-225.
74. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Science, 4, 195-208. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0402_4
75. Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259-284. doi:10.1080/01638539809545028
76. Landauer, T., & Kintsch, W. (2003). Latent semantic analysis. Retrieved from http://lsa.colorado.edu
77. Landy, D., & Goldstone, R. L. (2007a). Formal notations are diagrams: Evidence from a production task. Memory & Cognition, 35, 2033-2040. doi:10.3758/BF03192935
78. Landy, D., & Goldstone, R. L. (2007b). How abstract is symbolic thought? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 720-733. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.720
79. Landy, D., & Goldstone, R. L. (2010). Proximity and precedence in arithmetic. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1953-1968. doi:10.1080/17470211003787619
80. Lawless, H. T. (1989). Exploration of fragrance categories and ambiguous odors using multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis. Chemical Senses, 14, 349-360. doi:10.1093/chemse/14.3.349
81. Lee, M. D. (2001). Determining the dimensionality of multidimensional scaling representations for cognitive modeling. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 45, 149-166. doi:10.1006/jmps.1999.1300
82. Lee, M. D., & Pope, K. J. (2003). Avoiding the dangers of averaging across subjects when using multidimensional scaling. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 47, 32-46. doi:10.1016/S0022-2496(02)00019-6
83. Lee, M. D., & Webb, M. R. (2005). Modeling individual differences in cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 605-621. doi:10.3758/BF03196751
84. Levin, D. T. (1996). Classifying faces by race: The structure of face categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1364-1382. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1364
85. Levine, G. M., Halberstadt, J. B., & Goldstone, R. L. (1996). Reasoning and the weighting of attributes in attitude judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 230-240. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.2.230
86. MacKay, D. B. (1989). Probabilistic multidimensional scaling: An aniso-tropic model for distance judgments. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 33, 187-205. doi:10.1016/0022-2496(89)90030-8
87. McBeath, M. K., & Shepard, R. N. (1989). Apparent motion between shapes differing in location and orientation: A window technique for estimating path curvature. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 333-337. doi:10.3758/BF03204986
88. Medin, D. L., Goldstone, R. L., & Gentner, D. (1993). Respects for similarity. Psychological Review, 100, 254-278. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.254
89. Mugavin, M. E. (2008). Multidimensional scaling: A brief overview. Nursing Research, 57, 64-68. doi:10.1097/01.NNR.0000280659 .88760.7c
90. Napier, D. (1972). Nonmetric multidimensional techniques for summated ratings. In R. N. Shepard, A. K. Romney, & S. B. Nerlove (Eds.), Multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications in the behavioral sciences: Vol. 1. Theory (pp. 157-178), New York, NY: Seminar Press.
91. Nestrud, M. A., & Lawless, H. T. (2011). Recovery of subsampled dimensions and configurations from napping data by MFA and MDS. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 1266-1278. doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0091-0
92. Newton, I. (1704). Opticks. London, England: Smith and Walford.
93. Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39-57. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.115.1.39
94. Nosofsky, R. M. (1992). Similarity scaling and cognitive process models. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 25-53. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps .43.020192.000325
95. Nosofsky, R. M., & Palmeri, T. J. (1997). An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. Psychological Review, 104, 266-300. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.266
96. Pagés, J. (2005). Collection and analysis of perceived product inter-distances using multiple factor analysis: Application to the study of 10 white wines from the Loire Valley. Food Quality and Preference, 16, 642-649. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.01.006
97. Papesh, M. H., & Goldinger, S. D. (2010). A multidimensional scaling analysis of own- and cross-race face spaces. Cognition, 116, 283-288. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.001
98. Parducci, A. (1965). Category judgment: A range-frequency model. Psychological Review, 72, 407-418. doi:10.1037/h0022602
99. Perrin, L., Symoneaux, R., Mâitre, I., Asselin, C., Jourjon, F., & Pagés, J. (2008). Comparison of three sensory methods for use with the napping procedure: Case of ten wines from Loire Valley. Food Quality and Preference, 19, 1-11. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.06.005
100. Perry, L. K., Samuelson, L. K., Malloy, L. M., & Shiffer, R. N. (2010). Learn locally, think globally: Exemplar variability supports higher-order generalization and word learning. Psychological Science, 21, 1894-1902. doi:10.1177/0956797610389189
101. Podgorny, P., & Garner, W. R. (1979). Reaction time as a measure of inter-and intraobject visual similarity: Letters of the alphabet. Perception & Psychophysics, 26, 37-52. doi:10.3758/BF03199860
102. Qannari, E. M., Wakeling, I., & MacFie, H. J. H. (1995). A hierarchy of models for analysing sensory data. Food Quality and Preference, 6, 309-314. doi:10.1016/0950-3293(95)00033-X
103. Rabinowitz, G. B. (1975). An introduction to nonmetric multidimensional scaling. American Journal of Political Science, 19, 343-390. doi: 10.2307/2110441
104. Richardson, M. W. (1938). Multidimensional psychophysics. Psychological Bulletin, 35, 659-660.
105. Risvik, E., McEwan, J. A., Colwill, J. S., Rogers, R., & Lyon, D. H. (1994). Projective mapping: A tool for sensory analysis and consumer research. Food Quality and Preference, 5, 263-269. doi:10.1016/0950-3293(94)90051-5
106. Risvik, E., McEwan, J. A., & Rødbotten, M. (1997). Evaluation of sensory profiling and projective mapping data. Food Quality and Preference, 8, 63-71. doi:10.1016/S0950-3293(96)00016-X
107. Rosenberg, S., Nelson, C, & Vivekananthan, P. S. (1968). A multidimensional scaling approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 283-294. doi:10.1037/h0026086
108. Rumov, B. T. (2001). Steiner system. In M. Hazewinkel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer. Retrieved from http://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Steiner_system&oldid=17791http://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title = Steiner_system&oldid=17791
109. Russell, S. (1988). Analogy by similarity. In D. H. Helman (Ed.), Analogical reasoning: Perspectives of artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and philosophy (pp. 251-269). Boston, MA: Reidel.
110. Schiffman, S. S., Reilly, D. A., & Clark, T. B., III (1979). Qualitative differences among sweeteners. Physiology & Behavior, 23, 1-9. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(79)90113-6
111. Schiffman, S. S., Reynolds, M. L., & Young, F. W. (1981). Introduction to multidimensional scaling: Theory, methods, and applications. New York, NY: Academic Press.
112. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user's guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
113. Shepard, R. N. (1957). Stimulus and response generalization: A stochastic model relating generalization to distance in psychological space. Psy-chometrika, 22, 325-345. doi:10.1007/BF02288967
114. Shepard, R. N. (1958). Stimulus and response generalization: Tests of a model relating generalization to distance in psychological space. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 509-523. doi:10.1037/h0042354
115. Shepard, R. N. (1962a). The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. I. Psychometrika, 27, 125-140. doi:10.1007/BF02289630
116. Shepard, R. N. (1962b). The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. II. Psychometrika, 27, 219-246. doi:10.1007/BF02289621
117. Shepard, R. N. (1963). Analysis of proximities as a technique for the study of information processing in man. Human Factors, 5, 33-48. doi: 10.1177/001872086300500104
118. Shepard, R. N. (1964). Attention and the metric structure of the stimulus space. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 54-87. doi:10.1016/0022-2496(64)90017-3
119. Shepard, R. N. (1966). Learning and recall as organization and search. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 201-204. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(66)80018-X
120. Shepard, R. N. (1980). Multidimensional scaling, tree-fitting, and clustering. Science, 210, 390-398. doi:10.1126/science.210.4468.390
121. Shepard, R. N. (1984). Ecological constraints on internal representation: Resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. Psychological Review, 91, 417-447. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.91.4.417
122. Shepard, R. N. (1987). Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science, 237, 1317-1323. doi:10.1126/science.3629243
123. Shepard, R. N. (1991). Integrality versus separability of stimulus dimensions: From an early convergence of evidence to a proposed theoretical basis. In G. R. Lockhead & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), The perception of structure: Essays in honor of Wendell R. Garner (pp. 53-71). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10101-003
124. Shepard, R. N. (2004). How a cognitive psychologist came to seek universal laws. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1-23. doi:10.3758/BF03206455
125. Shepard, R. N., & Chang, J.-J. (1963). Stimulus generalization in the learning of classifications. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 94-102. doi:10.1037/h0043732
126. Shepard, R. N., & Cooper, L. A. (1982). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
127. Singular Inversions. (2004). FaceGen Modeller (Version 3.1.4) [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.facegen.com
128. Spence, I., & Domoney, D. W. (1974). Single subject incomplete designs for nonmetric multidimensional scaling. Psychometrika, 39, 469-490. doi:10.1007/BF02291669
129. Spencer-Smith, J., & Goldstone, R. L. (1997). The dynamics of similarity. Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, 4, 38-56.
130. SPSS. (2006). SPSS Base 15.0 user's guide. Chicago, IL: Author.
131. Stevens, S. S. (1971). Issues in psychophysical measurement. Psychological Review, 78, 426-450. doi:10.1037/h0031324
132. Torgerson, W. S. (1958). Theory and methods of scaling. New York, NY: Wiley.
133. Torgerson, W. S. (1965). Multidimensional scaling of similarity. Psy-chometrika, 30, 379-393. doi:10.1007/BF02289530
134. Townsend, J. T. (1971). Theoretical analysis of an alphabetic confusion matrix. Perception & Psychophysics, 9, 40-50. doi:10.3758/BF03213026
135. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.4.327
136. Tversky, A., & Gati, I. (1982). Similarity, separability, and the triangle inequality. Psychological Review, 89, 123-154. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.89.2.123
137. Tversky, A., & Krantz, D. H. (1970). The dimensional representation and the metric structure of similarity data. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 7, 572-596. doi:10.1016/0022-2496(70)90041-6
138. Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 43A, 161-204. doi: 10.1080/14640749108400966
139. Watson, D. C., & Sinha, B. K. (1995). Dimensional structure of personality disorder inventories: A comparison of normal and clinical populations. Personality Individual Differences, 6, 817-826. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(95)00130-1
140. Wedell, D. H. (1995). Contrast effects in paired comparisons: Evidence for both stimulus-based and response-based processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1158-1173. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.21.5.1158
141. Wish, M., & Carroll, J. D. (1974). Applications of individual differences scaling to studies of human perception and judgment. In E. C. Carterville & M. P. Friedman (Eds.), Handbook of perception: Vol. 2. Psychophysical judgment and measurement (pp. 449-491). New York, NY: Academic Press.
142. Wolfe, M. B. W., & Goldman, S. R. (2003). Use of latent semantic analysis for predicting psychological phenomena: Two issues and proposed solutions. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments,& Computers, 35, 22-31. doi:10.3758/BF03195494
143. Young, F. W., Takane, Y., & Lewyckyj, R. (1978). ALSCAL: A nonmetric multidimensional scaling program with several individual-differences options. Behavior Research Methods, 10, 451-453. doi:10.3758/BF03205177