Multi-tiered system of supports for effective inclusion in elementary schools

Handbook of Effective Inclusive Schools: Research and Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 197-209

  Cusumano, Dale L ^a   Algozzine, Kate ^a   Algozzine, Bob ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84955759347     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203102930     Document Type: Chapter

References (98)

1. Aaron, P. G. (1997). The impending demise of the discrepancy formula. Review of Educational Research, 67, 461 - 502.
2. Abbott, M., Walton, C., Tapia, Y., & Greenwood, C. R. (1999). Research to practice: A "blueprint" for closing the gap in local schools. Exceptional Children, 65, 339 - 352.
3. Algozzine, B., Wang, C., & Violette, A. S. (2011). Reexamining the relationship between academic achievement and social behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 13, 3 - 16.
4. Baker, S. K., & Baker, D. L. (2008). English learners and response to intervention: Improving quality of instruction in general and special education. In E. L. Grigorenko (Ed.), Educating individuals with disabilities: IDEA 2004 and beyond. New York: Springer.
5. Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6. Barlow, D. H., Hayes, S. C., & Nelson, R. O. (1984). The scientist practitioner: Research and accountability in clinical and educational settings. New York: Pergamon.
7. Batsche, G. M., Curtis, M. J., Dorman, C., Castillo, J. M., & Porter, L. J. (2007). The Florida problem solving/response to intervention model: Implementing a statewide initiative. In S. R. Jimerson, M. K. Burns, & A. M. VanDerHeyden, (Eds.). Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention (pp. 378 - 395). New York, NY: Springer Science.
8. Beghetto, R. (2003, April). Scientifically- based research. ERIC Digest, 167. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED475107
9. Bernfeld, G. A. (2001). The struggle for treatment integrity in a "dis- integrated" service delivery system. In G. A Bernfeld, D. P. Farrington & A. W. Leschied (Eds.), Offender rehabilitation in practice: Implementing and evaluating effective programs (pp. 167 - 188). London: Wiley.
10. Bierman, K. L., Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., Greenberg, M. T., Lochman, J. E., McMahon, R., J., et al. (2002). The implementation of the Fast Track Program: An example of a large- scale prevention science efficacy trial. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 1 - 17.
11. Blase, K. A., Fixsen, D. L., & Phillips, E. L. (1984). Residential treatment for troubled children: Developing service delivery systems. In S. C. Paine, G. T. Bellamy, & B. Wilcox (Eds.), Human services that work: From innovation to standard practice (pp. 149 - 165). Baltimore, MD: Paul H.
12. Bolt, S. E. (2005). Reflections on practice within the Heartland problem- solving model: The perceived value of direct assessment of students. The California School Psychologist, 10, 65 - 79.
13. Bransford, J. D., & Stein, B. S. (1984). The IDEAL problem solver. New York: W. H. Freeman.
14. Castillo, J. M., Batsche G. M., Curtis, M. J., Stockslager, K., March, A., & Minch, D. (2010). Problem- Solving/Response to Intervention: Evaluation tool technical assistance manual. Retrieved from http://floridarti.usf.edu/resources/program_evaluation/ta_manual/index.html
15. Castillo, J. M., Hines, C. M., Batsche, G. M., & Curtis, M. J. (2011). The Florida Problem Solving/Response to Intervention Project: Year 3 evaluation report. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Florida Problem Solving/Response to Intervention Project.
16. Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Bryant, J. D. (2006). Selecting at- risk readers in first grade for early intervention: A two- year longitudinal study of decision rules and procedures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 394 - 409.
17. Crawford, E., & Torgesen, J. (2007, November). Teaching all students to read: practices from schools with strong reading intervention outcomes, Summary Document. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Center for Reading Research.
18. Curtis, M. J., Castillo, J. M., & Cohen, R. M. (2008). Best practices in system- level change. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 887 - 901). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
19. Deno, S. L. (1985). School psychologist as problem solver. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (pp. 471 - 484). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
20. Deno, S. L. (2002). Problem solving as "best practice." In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (pp. 37 - 55). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
21. Division for Learning Disabilities. (2007). Thinking about response to intervention and learning disabilities: A teacher's guide. Arlington, VA: Author.
22. Donovan, S., & Cross, C. (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
23. Eisenhart, M. & Towne, L. (2003). Contestation and change in national policy on "scientifically based" educational research. Educational Researcher, 32, 31 - 38.
24. Engelmann, S. & Carnine, D. (1991). Theory of instruction: Principles and applications. Eugene, OR: ADI Press.
25. Faggin, F. (1985). The challenge of bringing new ideas to market. High Technology, 14 - 16.
26. Felner, R. D., Favazza, A., Shim, M., Brand, S., Gu, K., & Noonan, N. (2001). Whole school improvement and restructuring as prevention and promotion: Lessons from STEP and the Project on High Performance Learning Communities. Journal of School Psychology, 39, 177 - 202.
27. Fien, H., Smith, J., Baker, S. K., Chaparro, E., Preciado, J. & Baker, D. L. (2011). Including English Learners in a multi- tiered approach of early reading instruction and intervention. Assessment for Effective Intervention. 36, 143 - 157.
28. Fixsen, D., & Blase, K. A. (1993). Creating new realities: Program development and dissemination. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 597 - 615.
29. Fixsen, D., Naoom, S. F., Blase, D. A., Friedman, R. M., Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature. University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte
30. Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231). Florida's MTSS (n.d.). MTSS implementation components: Ensuring common language and understanding. Retrieved from http://www.florida- rti.org/educatorResources/documents.htm
31. Florida' Positive Behavior Support Project (2011). Implementing a multi- tiered system of support for behavior: Recommended practices for school and district leaders. University of South Florida: Florida's Positive Behavior Support Project.
32. Flugum, K. R., & Reschly, D. J. (1994). Prereferral interventions: Quality indices and outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 32, 1 - 14.
33. Fuchs, L. S., Compton D. L, Fuchs L. S., Bryant, J., Davis, N. (2008). Making "secondary intervention" work in a three- tier responsiveness- to-intervention model: Finding from the first- grade longitudinal reading study of the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 413 - 436.
34. Fuchs, D., & Deshler, D. D. (2007). What we need to know about responsiveness to intervention (and shouldn't be afraid to ask). Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 129 - 136.
35. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta- analysis. Exceptional Children, 53, 199 - 208.
36. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2008). Progress monitoring in a multi- tiered prevention system: Best practices . In J. Grimes & A. Thomas (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 2147 - 2164). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychology.
37. Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P. L., & Young, C. L. (2003). Responsiveness- to-intervention for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 157 - 171.
38. Fullan, M. (2010). All systems go: The change imperative for whole system reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
39. Gersten, R., Compton, D., Connor, C. M., Dimino, J., Santoro, L., Linan-Thompson, S., & Tilly, W. D. (2009). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to Intervention and multi- tier intervention for reading in the primary grades. A practice guide (NCEE 2009-4045). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/practiceguides/rti_reading_pg_021809.pdf
40. Gilliam, W. S., Ripple, C. H., Zigler, E. F., & Leiter, V. (2000). Evaluating child and family demonstration initiatives: Lessons from the comprehensive Child Development Program. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15, 41 - 59.
41. Glass, G. (1983). Effectiveness of special education. Policy Studies Review, 2, 65 - 78.
42. Gresham, F. M. (1989). Assessment of treatment integrity in school consultation and prereferral intervention . School Psychology Review, 17, 211 - 226.
43. Griffiths, A. J., Parson, L. B., Burns, M. K., VanDerHeyden, A., & Tilly, W. D. (2007). Response to intervention: Research for practice. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education.
44. Gunn, B., Smolkowski, K., Biglan, A., & Black, C. (2002). Supplemental instruction in decoding skills for Hispanic and non-Hispanic students in early elementary school: A follow- up. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 69 - 79.
45. Gutkin, T. B., & Curtis, M. J. (2008). School-based consultation: The science and practice of indirect service delivery. In T. B. Gutkin & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (4th ed., pp. 591 - 635). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
46. Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2006). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
47. Hollenbeck, A. F. (2007). From IDEA to implementation: A discussion of foundational and future responsiveness- to-intervention. Research Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 137 - 146.
48. Hosp, J. L., & Reschly, D. J. (2004). Disproportionate representation of minority students in special education. Exceptional Children, 70, 185 - 199.
49. Hunley, S. & McNamara, K. M. (2010). Tier Three of the Response to Intervention Model: Problem Solving Through a Case Study Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
50. Ikeda, M. J., Rahn-Blakeslee, A., Niebling, B. C., Allison, R., & Stumme, A. (2006). Evaluating evidence- based practice in response- to-intervention systems, Retrieved October 2007, from http://www. nasponline.org/publications/cq/cq348evaloutcomes.aspx.
51. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (2004). H.R. 1350, 108th Congress.
52. Institute of Medicine - Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
53. Jenkins, J. R., Hudson, R. F., & Johnson, E. S. (2007). Screening for at- risk readers in a response to intervention framework. School Psychology Review, 36, 582 - 600.
54. Joyce B., & Showers, B. (1995). Student achievement through staff dvelopment: fundamentals of school renewal (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
55. Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (2002). Student achievement through staff development (3rd Ed). Association for Staff and Curriculum Development.
56. Kealey, K. A., Peterson, A. V., Jr., Gaul, M. A., & Dinh, K. T. (2000). Teacher training as a behavior change process: Principles and results from a longitudinal study. Health Education & Behavior, 27 (1), 64 - 81.
57. Kemp, L., & Hall, A. H. (1992). Impact of effective teaching research on student achievement and teacher performance: Equity and access implications for quality education. Jackson, MS: Jackson State University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 348 360)
58. Klingner, J. K., Ahwee, S., Pilonieta, P., & Menendez, R. (2003). Barriers and facilitators in scaling up research- based practices. Exceptional Children, 69, 411 - 429.
59. Kratochwill, T. R., & Bergan, J. R. (1990). Behavioral consultation: An individual guide. New York: Plenum Press.
60. Lau, M. Y., Sieler, J. D., Muyskens, P., Canter, A., Vankeuren, B., & Marston, D. (2006). Perspectives on the use of the Problem-Solving Model from the viewpoint of a school psychologist, administrator, and teacher from a large Midwest urban school district. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 117 - 127.
61. Leithwood, K., & Beatty, B. (2008). Leading with teacher emotions in mind. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
62. Macallair, D., & Males, M. (2004). A Failure of good intentions: An analysis of juvenile justice reform in San Francisco during the 1990s. Review of Policy Research, 21, 63 - 78.
63. Marzano, R., & Marzano, J. (2003). The key to classroom management. Educational Leadership, 61, 6 - 13.
64. McCook, J. E. (2006). The RTI guide: Developing and implementing a model in your schools. Palm Beach Gardens, FL: LRP.
65. McNamara, K. (1998, April). Ohio's implementation of intervention- based assessment: Reactions of key stakeholders. In C. Telzrow (Chair), Ohio's implementation of intervention- based assessment. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the National Association of School Psychologists, Orlando, FL.
66. National Association of State Directors of Special Education. (2006). Response to Intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Alexandria, VA: NASDSE, Inc.
67. National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (2005). Responsiveness to intervention and learning disabilities. Available from www.ldonline.org/njcld.
68. National Reading Panel (2000). Report to the national reading panel: Teaching children to read: An evidencebased assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No 00-4769). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
69. No Child Left Behind Act (2001). Public Law No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425, 2002 U.S.C.
70. Noell, G. H., Witt, J. C., Slider, N. J., Connell, J. E., Gatti, S. L., Williams, K. L., Koenig, J. L., & Resetar, J. L. (2005). Treatment implementation following behavioral consultation in schools: A comparison of three follow- up strategies. School Psychology Review, 34, 87 - 106.
71. Peterson, L., Horner, A., & Wonderlich, S. (1982). The integrity of independent variables in behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 477 - 492.
72. Repp, A. C., & Horner, R. H. (Eds.). (1999). Functional analysis of problem behavior. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
73. Reschly, D. J. & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1995). School psychology paradigm shift. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best Practices in School Psychology (pp. 17 - 31). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
74. Reschly, D. J., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (2002). Paradigm shift: The past is not the future. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 3 - 20). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
75. Rogers, C. G. (2002). Teacher expectations: Implications for school improvement. In C. Desforges & R. Fox (Eds.), Teaching and Learning: The essential readings (pp. 152 - 170). Oxford: Blackwell.
76. Santoro, L. E., Jitendra, A. K., Starosta, K., & Sacks, S. (2006). Reading well with "Read Well:" Enhancing the reading performance of English language learners. Remedial and Special Education, 27 (2), 105 - 115.
77. Schofeld, J. (2004). A model of learned implementation. Public Administration, 82, 283 - 308.
78. Scruggs, T., & Mastropieri, M. (1996). Teacher perceptions of mainstreaming/inclusion. Exceptional Children, 63 (1), 59 - 72.
79. Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline. New York, NY: Doubleday/Currency.
80. Small, M., & Yasin, M. (2000). Human factors in the adoption and performance of advanced manufacturing technology in unionized firms. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 100, 389 - 401.
81. Snow, C. S., Burns, S. M., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
82. Taylor, B. M., Pearson, P. D., Clark, K. E., & Walpole, S. (1999). Beating the odds in teaching all children to read. (CIERA Rep. No. 2-006). Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Improvement of Early Reading Achievement.
83. Telzrow, C. F., McNamara, K., & Hollinger, C. L. (2000). Fidelity of problem solving implementation and relationship to student performance. School Psychology Review, 29, 443 - 461.
84. Tilly, W. D. (2002). Best practices in school psychology as a problem solving enterprise. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best Practices in School Psychology (pp. 21 - 36). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
85. Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., & Alexander, A. (2001). Principles of fluency instruction in reading: Relationships with established empirical outcomes. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, Fluency, and the Brain. (pp. 333 - 355).
86. Parkton, MD: York Press. United States Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development. (2010). A blueprint for reform: The reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
87. Vadasy, P. F., Sanders, E. A., & Peyton, J. A. (2005). Relative effectiveness of reading practice or wordlevel instruction in supplemental tutoring: How text matters. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 364 - 380.
88. Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 137 - 146.
89. Vaughn, S., Gersten, R., & Chard, D. J. (2000). The underlying message in LD intervention research: Findings from research syntheses. Exceptional Children, 67, 99 - 114.
90. Vaughn, S., Mathes, P., Linan-Thompson, S., Cirino, P., Carlson, C., Pollard-Durodola, S., and Francis, D. (2006). Effectiveness of an English intervention for first- grade English language learners at risk for reading problems. Elementary School Journal, 107, 153 - 180.
91. Vaughn, S., & Linan-Thompson, S. (2003). What is special about special education for students with learning disabilities? The Journal of Special Education, 37, 140 - 205.
92. Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., Woodruff, A. L., & Linan-Thompson, S. (2007). Prevention and early identification of students with reading disabilities. In D. Haager, J. Klinger, & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Evidence- based reading practices for response to intervention (pp. 11 - 27). Baltimore: Brookes.
93. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Small, S. G., Fanuele, D. P., & Sweeney, J. (2007). Preventing early reading difficulties through kindergarten and first grade intervention: A variant of the three- tier model. In D. Haager, S. Vaughn, & J. K. Klinger (Eds.), Validated practices for three tiers of reading intervention (pp. 186).
94. Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2008). Response to varying amounts of time in reading intervention for students demonstrating insufficient response to intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 126 - 142.
95. Washington State Institute for Public Policy (2002). Washington State's Implementation of Functional Family Therapy for Juvenile Offenders. Preliminary Findings (No. 02-08-1201). Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
96. Williams, C. A. (1975). A study of cognitive preferences. The Journal of Experimental Education, 43, 61 - 77.
97. Windram, H., & Gibbons, K. (2011, February). Implementation integrity within an RtI framework: Critical roles and tools for school psychologists. National Associate of School Psychologists workshop, San Francisco, CA.
98. Winter, S. G., & Szulanski, G. (2001). Replication as strategy. Organization Science, 12, 730 - 743.