Perspectives on the use of the problem-solving model from the viewpoint of a school psychologist, administrator, and teacher from a large midwest urban school district

Psychology in the Schools

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 117-127

  Lau, Matthew Y ^a,b   Sieler, Jay D ^b   Muyskens, Paul ^b   Canter, Andrea ^b   Vankeuren, Barbara ^b   Marston, Doug ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b Minneapolis Public Schools   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645283362     PISSN: 00333085     EISSN: 15206807     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pits.20135     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Adams, M.J., Foorman, B.R., Lundberg, I., & Beeler, T. (1998). Phonemic awareness in young children: A classroom curriculum. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
2. Bracken, B.A., & McCallum, R.S. (1998). Universal nonverbal intelligence test. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
3. Deno, S.L. (2002). Problem solving as "best practice." In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (pp. 37-55). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
4. Doyle, M.E., & Rice, D.M. (2002). A model for instructional leadership. Principal Leadership (High School Ed.), 3, 49-52.
5. Fletcher, J.M. (1992). The validity of distinguishing children with language and learning disabilities according to discrepancies with IQ: Introduction to the special series. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 546-548.
6. Fletcher, J.M., Francis, D.J., Shaywitz, S.E., Lyon, G.R., Foorman, B.R., Stuebing, K.K., & Shaywitz, B.A. (1998). Intelligent testing and the discrepancy model for children with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 186-203.
7. Gresham, F. (2001, August). Response to intervention: An alternative approach to the identification of learning disabilities. Paper presented at the Learning Disabilities Summit: Building a Foundation for the Future, Washington, DC.
8. Ikeda, M., Tilly, W.D., III, Stumme, J., Volmer, L., & Allison, R. (1996). Agency-wide implementation of problem-solving consultation. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 228-243.
9. Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA 2004), Pub. L. No. 108-446, 118 Stat. 2647 (2004) (amending 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq.).
10. Marston, D., Canter, A., Lau, M., & Muyskens, P. (2002). Problem solving: Implement and evaluation in Minneapolis Schools. Communiqué, 30, 15-16, 18-19.
11. Marston, D., Muyskens, P., Lau, M., & Canter, A. (2003). Problem-solving model for decision making with high-incidence disabilities: The Minneapolis experience. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 187-200.
12. National Association of School Psychologists. (2002). Learning disabilities criteria: Recommendations for change in IDEA reauthorization. Communiqué, 39, insert.
13. National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (2002). Specific learning disabilities: Finding common ground. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Learning Disability Roundtable.
14. Pasternack, R. (2002). The demise of IQ testing for children with learning disabilities. Distinguished lecture for National Association of School Psychologists, Chicago.
15. Prifitera, A., Weiss, L.G., & Saklofske, D.H. (1998). The WISC-III in context. In A. Prifitera & D. Daklofske (Eds.), WISC-III clinical use and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives (pp. 1-38). New York: Academic Press.
16. Reschly, D.J. (1988). Special education reform: School psychology revolution. School Psychology Review, 17, 459-475.
17. Reschly, D.J., & Tilly, W.D., III. (1999). Reform trends and system design alternatives. In D.J. Reschly, W.D. Tilly, III, & J.P. Grimes (Eds.), Special education in transition (pp. 19-48). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
18. Reschly, D.J., & Ysseldyke, J.E. (2002). Paradigm shift: The past is not the future. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes, (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
19. Richards, J. (2002). Why teachers resist change (and what principals can do about it). Principal (Reston, VA), 81, 75-77.
20. Silva, A. (2003, Summer). What is a school psychologist? Retrieved October 12, 2004, from http://www.nasponline.org/ about_nasp/whatisa.html
21. Stage, S.A., Abbott, R.D., Jenkins, J.R., Berninger, V.W. (2003). Predicting response to early reading intervention from verbal IQ, reading-related language abilities, attention ratings, and verbal IQ-word reading discrepancy: Failure to validate discrepancy method. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 24-33
22. Suzuki, L.A., & Valencia, R.R. (1997). Race-ethnicity and measured intelligence: Educational implications. American Psychologist, 52, 1103-1114.
23. Thornton, B., & Perreault, G. (2002). Becoming a data-based leader: An introduction. NASSP Bulletin, 86, 86-96.
24. Tilly, W.D., III. (2002). Best practices in school psychology as a problem-solving enterprise. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (pp. 21-36). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
25. Tilly, W.D., III, Grimes, J., & Reschly, D. (1993, September-December). Special education system reform: The Iowa story. Communiqué, 22(1).
26. Vellutino, F.R., Scanion, D.M., & Lyon, G.R. (2000). Differentiating between difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: More evidence against the IQ-achievement discrepancy definition of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 223-238.
27. Ysseldyke, J.E., Dawson, P., Lehr, C., Reschly, D., Reynolds, M., & Telzrow, C. (1997). School psychology: A blueprint for training and practice II. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
28. Ysseldyke, J.E., & Marston, D. (1999). Origins of categorical special education services in schools and a rationale for changing them. In D.J. Reschly, W.D. Tilly, III, & J.P. Grimes (Eds.), Special education in transition (pp. 1-18). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
29. Zimmerman, J.A., & May, J.J. (2003). Providing effective professional development: What's holding us back? American Secondary Education, 31, 37-48.